Under Obama Handlers the U.S. military presence on Russia’s Central Asian flank is proceeding at a ferocious pace
United Nations (United States) (AFP) – US President Barack Obama said Tuesday that Syrian counterpart Bashar al-Assad must go if the Islamic State group is to be defeated, as he rallied world leaders to revitalize the coalition campaign against the jihadists
This lie being peddled about the toppling of Middle Eastern leaders as being a good thing and in the name of democracy is an outright lie. This tragedy’s are a direct consequence of Obama’s interference by sending bombs in America’s name to topple Egypt and Libya. for his beloved Muslim Brotherhood.
President Mubarak Of Egypt (Our Ally) Befriended By Obama Before Ousting Him And Installing Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood As President Of Egypt.
In The Summer Of 2013 The Egyptian People With Their Military Overthrew Morsi And He Is Now In Prison For Inciting Murder Against Against The People.
Yes to the American people No to Obama and terrorism.
US Propaganda Enters Into Insane, Irrational Overdrive In Attempt to “Sell” War In Syria. Thanks to a dizzying barrage of lies, mainstream media fear-mongering and a couple of beheadings, the Obama Administration may finally achieved its long sought after war in Syria. The tactic that proved most effective FEAR.
It must be coupled with endless slogans and misdirection by the mainstream media and politicians. It must lead the public to subconsciously embrace a thought process that is completely irrational. Such tactics can be labeled propaganda, and it results in a public suddenly supporting a war it strongly opposed only a year ago. All it takes is a little repackaging. Propaganda allows those who profit from war to push the American public into a tizzy of trepidation based on a couple of beheadings from ISIS, while not batting an eye over the daily beheadings that were simultaneously occurring in Saudi Arabia.(by Tyler Durden on 09/24/2014 )
So the power structure and its impotent puppet, Barack Obama, intentionally pushed the American public into a frenzy of fear and may get their little war. Obama will say NATO not me ?
Obama’s Shadow Army NATO led by German four-star general, Domrose
NATO and the UN that has legitimized their global murder-spree must be recognized as entirely illegitimate — seen as the scam it is. their do-gooding They have created a problem to which their answer is military intervention, the destruction of sovereign nation-states, and the installation of client regimes demonstratively devoid of the promised “democracy” and “freedom” they were supposedly there to institute.
What has Vladimir Putin to say about NATO putting its missiles on Russia’s borders?
We have the right to ask, says Putin, against whom is the NATO expansion intended? And what happened to the assurances made after the dissolution of the Soviet Union?
Putin decried the continued “export” of democratic revolutions and when referring to the Middle East he asked: “how did that turn out?”
No sane person could seriously assert that NATO’s missile shield circling Russia is intended to protect the West from Iran. Yet, that is exactly what NATO – the imperial American occupation army in Europe – tells the world.
the chemical weapons attack by western-backed anti-Assad forces which committed the crime, using chemical weapons to serve as a causus belli against President Assad. (admitted even by the UN ) Only the swift action of President Putin avoided a bloodbath in Syria in which NATO would have become willingly involved.
Comments by the German four-star general, Domrose who is supreme commander of the Allied Joint Force Command, one of Europe’s three NATO units in the operations leadership, amounted to an open threat of war against Russia.
25 years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, NATO mass’s tens of thousands of troops near Russia’s borders.
Washington and Berlin orchestrated a fascist-led coup in Kiev last February to install a pro-Western, rabidly anti-Russian regime. Now the NATO powers are pursuing the military encirclement of Russia, a policy that carries with it the very real danger of military conflict with a nuclear-armed power. Even sections of the bourgeois press that have been propagandising against Russia for months describe the plan as a “provocative move against Moscow” ( Spiegel Online ).
We will establish a NATO rapid response force of between 5,000 and 7,000 men that can be deployed in two-to-five days to a region,” General Domröse said. “According to our plans, the rapid response force will participate in the major maneuver ‘Trident Juncture’ in September 2015 in Italy, Spain and Portugal. If everything goes according to plan, the rapid response force could be ready for deployment at the end of 2015.”
Only NATO states with the necessary high-tech military equipment and trained soldiers can participate in the NATO spearhead force, according to Domröse. Germany will assume a leading role.
“We are planning,” he said, “that each of the six-to-ten nations will form the spearhead for a year and then be changed. According to the current plans, each cycle will have a lead nation, which will certainly include Germany at some point. But this highly mobile force must have access to a large-scale air force in order to reach operational zones quickly.”
Domröse’s family history makes his statements all the more sinister. His father, Lothar Domröse, fought in the Second World War as commander of a Wehrmacht company on the Eastern Front. As part of the rearming of the German military, he was accepted back into the army in 1956 and pursued a successful military career.In 1973, he became major general and commander of the Northern Army Group. In 1975, he took over the post of head officer of the commanding officers of the armed forces.
Has his so now set himself the task of accomplishing what his father could not accomplish in the Second World War and Cold War—the military subordination of Russia?
Making available the required means of transportation was the greatest challenge for the NATO states, the general noted..
Domröse and the NATO leadership are planning a new form of Blitzkrieg. The NATO conference in Wales earlier this year approved a plan to increase readiness to deploy military forces.
One immediate flaw in NATO’s latest assertion is that, given its total dependence on creating military conflict, reliance on their version of anything should be subject to intense scrutiny. With an estimated 50,000 plus Ukrainian troops in action (not counting CIA and US mercenaries), the question is whether sending 1,000 Russian troops into Ukraine is worth the risk to Putin who has consistently followed a diplomatic path while US diplomacy has been dominated by threats and bullying.
by Tyler Durden on 09/24/2014