Patient’s Merely “product” to be Manipulated by Law to Produce Profits for all of the Special Interests.

 

large group we wont take it any more

Eblen Carol · Commented on the Center for the Public Integrity

Unfortunately, the elderly/disabled on Medicare/Medicaid have no idea that their social safety net is managed to provide profit for all of the special interests involved —and we, the patients, are on the bottom of the pile and merely “product” to be manipulated by law to produce profits for all of the special interests.

Unless some of the responsible reporters in Big Media and Big Newspapers tell the American people what is going on, we aren’t going to have this discussion about the constitutionality of unilaterally hastening the dealth of the elderly/disabled on Medicare/Medicaid for the fiscal expediency of the special interests, are we?

When both political parties are complicit, the Executive becomes complicit, and nobody wants to rock the boat If we stopped the unsuccessful spending of our Tax dollars. would the under-the-radar involuntary euthanasia of American elderly/disabled citizens on Medicare/Medicaid be necessary?

The Forgotten Ones

The Forgotten Ones

Because The Congress never clarified the provisions of the 1991 Patient Self Determination Act and the States interpreted it in many different ways, the old folks were left hanging out there on a limb.
Within the past few years, several states have passed legislation to prevent unilateral DNR policies but we see Massachusetts General has had a unilateral DNR Code Policy since 2006 that has, of course, never been tested in the courts. Apparently the concept of “managed medical care” and “managed death” for profit is the new vision of the for-profit sector of our health care industry

DNR “Do Not Resuscitate”, Advance Directives, Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment & End-Of-Life Decision-Making Process, Clin 08.01 Effective Date: March 05, 2009

on of the for-profit sector of our health care industry.

If unilateral DNRs are legal under our Medicare Contract, and this is a contract we can’t refuse, shouldn’t we, the patients be informed when life-saving and life-extending treatments will not be paid for by Medicare and their partner, Big Insurance so that we can pay privately to live as long as is medically possible if this is our desire?

The shame is that there are NO Whistle Blowers who will blow the whistle for the people. We need to get Big Insurance out of our social safety net —-but how?

 

Hillary more of the same

The same framework for the federal regulation that now requires hospitals and other medical care facilities to pressure patients—particularly elderly patients—to sign Living Wills (i.e., euthanasia provisions).That was in Hillary Care ,Today is in ObamaCare .

In violation of the Hippocratic Oath, doctors regularly euthannize patients deemed to be terminally-ill. Among the list of terminal illnesses that can trigger the Living Will death-with-dignity provision is old-age.

Threats, deals got drug companies on board with Obama

By Paige Winfield Cunningham – The Washington Times – Thursday, May 31, 2012

Top administration officials cut backroom deals with the nation’s top drug companies to win support for President Obama’s health care overhaul, threatening them with steeper taxes if they resisted and promising a better financialHYPERLINK \l “” deal for the industry if they acquiesced, according to internal documents released by The House.In some of the key deals, Mr. Obama agreed to drop his long-standing support for letting Americans buy cheaper foreign prescription drugs — something the pharmaceutical industry vehemently opposed — and the drugmakers promised to mount a public campaign to sell the public on the healthHYPERLINK \l “” care legislation.

The material released by House members provides a rare insider look at the wheeling and dealing on Capitol Hill as Mr. Obama tried to shepherd his bill through Congress, in the face of near-unanimous GOP opposition.

The details emerged as House Republicans released emailsHYPERLINK \l “” it obtained during a yearlong investigation into the closed-door negotiations between the White House and lobbyists for drug companies. House Republicans said those negotiations violated the promises of transparency Mr. Obama made during his 2008 campaign.

“We really have now been able to build a case that there was a sequential, planned, organized strategyHYPERLINK \l “” for the White House to trade policy for politics, if you will,” said Rep. Michael C. Burgess, Texas Republican. “They were willing to give up on things they thought were sound principles.”

The documents show that former White House Chief of Staff Jim Messina and health care reform point woman Nancy-Ann DeParle told drug company representatives in June 2009 that if they didn’t cooperate on the initiative, Mr. Obama would demand a 15 percent rebate on Medicare drugs and push to remove the tax deduction for direct consumer advertising — items that could cost the industry $100 billion over the next decade.

The threats appeared to work, and the parties met the next month to hammer out a final deal. The drug companiesHYPERLINK \l “” agreed to pay higher Medicaid rebates and a new health care reform fee to raise $80 billion for the legislation, and promised to run positive television ads about it.

In exchange, the White House gave them direct input into the new policies and promised to let them continue to set their own drug prices.

Ms. DeParle threw in an extra prize HYPERLINK \l “” to reward pharmaceutical companies for their cooperation, saying she and other officials decided to reverse the administration’s position on drug importation, which Mr. Obama supported while running for president.

“I made the decision, based on how constructive you guys have been, to oppose importation on this bill,” she wrote to Bryant Hall, chief lobbyist for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA).

 

 

 

 

If the Internet becomes a public utility, you’ll pay more. Here’s why.

 

when your country is telling you no

Obama –  instead of banning are freedom, rights and taking our money,why don’t you just try leaving us the hell alone & see how that works out?

Obama’s Federal Communications Commission is in the middle of a high-stakes decision that could raise taxes for close to 90 percent of Americans. The commission is considering whether to reclassify broadband as a telecommunications service and, in doing so, Washington would trigger new taxes and fees at the state and local level.

The agency would like to make Internet service a public utility, placing broadband under Title II regulation of the Communications Act of 1934. This move would make broadband subject to New Deal-era regulation, and have significant consequences for U.S. taxpayers.

Under this decision to reclassify broadband, Americans would face a host of new state and local taxes and fees that apply to public utilities. These new levies, according to the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI), would total $15 billion annually. On average, consumers would pay an additional $67 for landline broadband, and $72 for mobile broadband each year, according to PPI’s calculations, with charges varying from state to state.

Proponents of broadband reclassification, including the left-of-center organization Free Press, claim that it would not result in higher taxes or fees. The recently extended Internet Tax Freedom Act, they assert, prohibits state and local taxation of Internet service. This is incorrect, however. The act does not apply to telecom-related fees.

Free Press and other broadband reclassification proponents also say the new taxes and fees can be prevented if the FCC designates broadband as an interstate service. A Progressive Policy Institute report explains why this also is incorrect:

“When the Commission previously considered the jurisdiction of Internet traffic, it determined that such traffic was ‘largely interstate,’ but ‘jurisdictionally mixed.’ States routinely tax jurisdictionally mixed services that are classified as ‘interstate’ for purposes of regulation. For example, wireless services may not be regulated by state public utility commissions, but they are subject to a host of state and local taxes and fees. In several states, interstate wireless revenues are subject to taxation.”

Late last year, President Barack Obama waded into this contentious debate. He called for the Internet to be treated like a public utility. Critics of Obama’s position point out this would reduce investment in infrastructure and lead to inferior service for consumers. Reclassifying broadband as a telecommunications service would also stifle innovation and restrict the openness of the Internet.

obama silly Change???

The telecommunications industry has invested more than $1.2 trillion on broadband infrastructure since 1996. As a result, roughly 87 percent of Americans have access to broadband. It would be foolish for government to discourage the significant investment required to maintain, expand and improve this infrastructure by subjecting broadband to circa 1930s regulation. Subjecting Internet service providers to such onerous rules would depress innovation and penalize Web users.

Not only would higher taxes and fees leave individuals, families, and employers with less disposable income, a wealth of research indicates it would be bad for the economy.

John Hood, former president of the John Locke Foundation, found that keeping state and local tax and regulatory burdens as low as possible fosters economic growth, when he analyzed 681 peer-reviewed academic journal articles going back to 1990.

“Most studies find,” Hood stated, “that lower levels of taxes and spending, less-intrusive regulation…correlate with stronger economic performance.”

Tax Foundation economist William McBride reviewed academic literature going back three decades and found, “While there are a variety of methods and data sources, the results consistently point to significant negative effects of taxes on economic growth even after controlling for various other factors such as government spending, business cycle conditions and monetary policy.”

In McBride’s survey of 26 studies, dating to 1983, he found “all but three of those studies, and every study in the last 15 years, find a negative effect of taxes on growth.”

The Federal Communications Commission is expected to make its decision early this year. After the more than 20 tax increases signed into law during Obama’s six years in office, the last thing American taxpayers need is a gusher of new taxes and fees triggered by bureaucrats in Washington.

really you still trust the government

 

The slow, deadly destruction of American freedom has carried us to this day of Obama,

 

NWO presidents.jpg 2These 5 New World Order Presidents never asked Americans if they wanted A global Government, A New World Order or Agenda 2.  They just sent our jobs over seas, Increased immigration by millions and stole our Social Security. (jc) We must have a President that will roll back Barak Obama’s 7,000 new regulations.  My pick Ted Cruz, a fighter for our Constitution (jc)      ———————————————————————-

By Ron Ewart  March 9, 2010 | Comments| Print friendly |

 “The world is a dangerous place to live ….. not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.”  Albert Einstein

That’s right.  It’s over.  Their guns are bigger.  They control all the money.  They control the energy.  They control the land.  They control the food and they control the water.  Soon they will control our health care, down to the last detail on our electronic health care records being stored in a giant computer in Washington DC, from which they can determine if we are worthy of receiving health care.  The older we get, the less worthy we become.

large group we wont take it any more

Just like the guy standing on the beach witnessing in horror, the onrushing tsunami wave and has no place to run, we might just as well bend over and kiss our behinds goodbye.  Freedom and liberty are gone.  The constitution and bill of rights are just so much toilet paper and American sovereignty is but a fading memory of a bunch of dead guys who thought they could create individual liberty and have it last.   This didn’t happen overnight, you know.  It’s been coming on for about a hundred to a hundred and twenty years.  First, the civil war gave us the 14th Amendment,

immigrants crossing border  we now let illegal aliens become U. S. Citizens, thus creating a magnet for millions more to come.

Then a cadre of real smart guys from Harvard around the 1880s (the Dean and Supreme Court Justice, Oliver Wendell Holmes) decided that we shouldn’t be bothered by the strict interpretation of the U. S. Constitution, we need to use court precedence’s to guide our adjudication of laws and legislation, court precedence’s that reflect the changing social nature of our society.  (Socialism by any other name)  They called this new paradigm of legal jurisprudence, Positivism.  A collective shudder must have rattled the souls of the Founding Fathers and a deep groan could be heard emanating from their graves.  Cracks started forming in our Constitution.smiley-angry019

Then came the first dictator of America and Constitution hater, President Woodrow Wilson, who did everything in his power to open the cracks in the Constitution even wider, by forming the League of Corrupt Nations, presiding over the 16th Amendment and the creation of the Federal Reserve and the Internal Revenue Service, which legalized taxes on Americans that were never authorized by the Constitution.  The government, with this new found source of revenue, began to grow and grow and gain immense power.

Second dictator of America, FDR,

Constitutional  Corruption didn’t stop with President Wilson. The second dictator of America, FDR, used a crow bar to pry the cracks in our Constitution so far that it became literally unrecognizable.  He did it by using the emergency of the Great Depression as his rationale to fundamentally transform America.  The opposition to FDR was fierce, but the great savior and orator convinced the weak among us (voters), that the only answer to this unprecedented and worsening crisis had to come at the expense of their freedom and liberty.  In the fog of our pending destruction of the 1930s, unions, socialists, Nazis, communists and the Technocrats all rose in prominence to “feed” the hungry souls of the weak and troubled within our ranks.  Many were forever converted, and the cracks in the Constitution got wider still.

The slow, deadly destruction of American freedom has carried us to this day of Obama, who is trying to repeat, in spades, what FDR did,

 Fundamentally transforming America into a utopian socialist society, once again exploiting the weak among us and using the strategy of class warfare to dupe the naive into supporting this constitutional treason.

Johnson and Carter took us deeper into the abyss of socialism and the weakening of American power in the world.  Obama, Pelosi and Reid are attempting to tip America over the edge from which there will be no return and they are on the verge of completing the job …… if they get their way.

The fact is, the American people, the so-called Consent of the Governed, went to sleep for a hundred years and have allowed what we face today to happen.  If there is anyone to blame, we can only blame ourselves.  We had the mechanisms to stop these traitors from tearing the fabric of freedom asunder, but we abandoned our roots of freedom, obtained at great sacrifice, in favor of comfort and security.  We couldn’t be bothered.

Still, there are indications that the Obamas in America have awakened a sleeping giant and have run headlong into a center-right brick wall.  Some have said that the progressives are beginning to unravel.  As evidence of their unraveling, attacks on conservatives grow by the day.  They fear us, and they worry we might be successful in ruining their diabolical plans for America.  They just might be right, but that depends entirely on the level of conservative commitment to defend freedom.

We are in a war for the very survival of individual liberty and for the last 100 years, we have been losing that war. History is on the ragged edge of repeating itself, once again. It is evident that serfs they want us to be and serfs we will become …… unless tens of millions of Americans have the b…..lls to stop them, with whatever it takes. If we are divided and fragmented in our prosecution of this war, we most surely will lose. But losing is not an option if freedom and liberty are to be preserved for present and future generations.

Hillary more of the same

 

 

 

Obama Helps OPEC Keep It’s Oil Economy And The U.S loses Hers ?

There are ties worthy of a Bourne film, if the media connected the dots

kerry bomb syria

The story goes that Secretary of State Kerry went to Oman for another round of talks on the Iranian nuclear question. The other half of the visit had to do with Washington’s unabated desire to ruin the Russian economy. To do this, Kerry by some unknown means required the Saudis (1) To raise production and( 2) Cut its crude price. keep in mind The Saudis produce a barrel of oil for less than $30 the Russians need apx $105 Shortly after Kerry’s visit, in November the Saudis began increasing production, — by more than 100,000 barrels daily Other OPEC members were screaming for relief, and the Saudis make back-to-back moves certain to push falling prices still lower? Now OPEC has decided in a meeting last month against reducing production. The Relentless Production of Shale Oil Is Breaking OPEC’s Neck and Infuriating Obama , his economy killing Ideology, and Greenie pals. In many opinions it sure looks like a U.S Obama Whitehouse Conspiracy?

obama FLAG Obama replaces our flags stars with an O”

The price of oil is giving the narcissistic Obama new foreign economic power that gives him leverage in most areas of policy at, the cost of American oil independence, jobs, Senior savings ,Pension funds already taking a toll due to Obama’s higher taxes on their dividends and ,he gets to cripple the new U.S oil producers. He has loathed.

This is demolition on many fronts led by a desperate administration in danger of losing its ideological schemes for a New World Order. The Obama administrations unabated desire to ruin the Russian economy and break Americas new oil independence . Is also bringing down economies in several other countries.

Do not think Gas prices will stay low . As soon as The Whitehouse gets the results they schemed for ,Gas will go to Obama’s goal of $8.00 or more a gallon.

When will the Whitehouse schemes stop?  Certainly not if a sixth Globalist President is elected such as Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton.

NWO presidents.jpg 2 5 Globalist President’s Have Ruined Our Magnificent Country. Don’t be sold on another. Some are likable and the Old Boys and Big Progressive money will be selling their virtues . This time around that should not get our votes. No Jeb, No Hillary, No Grahams, No McCain’s, No more NWO Presidents and their unrestrained immigration.

The more integrated the world becomes, the more likely it becomes that we will see nightmarish global tyranny someday.  It is very frightening to think of what Persons very evil might do if they had the chance to run the entire planet.

Once our national sovereignty is gone, it will be incredibly difficult to get back. If the American people don’t take a stand while they still can, their children may wake up someday as citizens of a very oppressive “global regime”.

obama_contemptliveWhen it comes to Barack Obama, one of the most important things to understand is that he is a committed globalist. He firmly believes in more “global governance” (the elite don’t like to use the term “global government”) Throughout his time in the White House, Obama has consistently sought to strengthen international institutions such as the UN, the IMF, the World Bank, NATO, and the WTO. At every turn, Obama has endeavored to more fully integrate America into the “global community”. Since he was elected, Obama has signed a whole host of new international economic agreements.

Hillary more of the same

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OBAMA TO ALLOW 100,000 HAITIANS INTO AMERICA WITHOUT A VISA

when your country is telling you noCalling it “an irresponsible overreach of the executive branch’s authority,” Senator Charles Grassley, ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, is criticizing an executive order issued by the president that would allow at least 100,000 Haitian nationals into the United States to be “reunited with their families.”

Washington Times:

“Which countries are next on President Obama’s list?” Mr. Grassley said. “Will there by medical screenings before entry? Will work permits be granted automatically? How will this affect American workers?”

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the branch of the Department of Homeland Security that handles immigration benefits cases, announced Friday the program to unite Haitians already living in the U.S. with family members abroad will ramp up in 2015.

At that time the State Department’s National Visa Center will begin notifying families who may be eligible to take part in the program. Those immigrants will allowed to apply for work permits while waiting for issuance of their permanent visas.

The agency said the program will expedite “safe, legal and orderly migration.”

A similar program that reunited Central American children with their parents had a fraud rate of about 70%.

Read the rest of the story at American Thinker.

obama-communism.jpg rothchildsObama will do whatever it takes to be the POTUS that turned America over to the New World Order

 

Mark Udall can’t run from his official voting record

85px-UdallUdall206165_453413278032501_108773658_n Udall one of the nation’s top donation recipients from Goldman Sachs and votes for bank bailouts

Six secrets Mark Udall doesn’t want you to
know … and the media refuses to publicize!

  • Mark Udall is married to Maggie Fox. Who? Maggie Fox. If you wonder why she uses a different name than her husband, She is a radical environmentalist that equates use of carbon based fuel to terrorism.
  •  Mark Udall is a member of the “bankster party” … he is one of the nation’s top donation recipients from Goldman Sachs and then votes for bank bailouts and against stricter banking regulations!
  • Mark Udall accepts dirty money from Jon Corzine, convicted Wall Street swindler, and refuses to give it back when confronted!
  • soros picMark Udall parties with billionaire environmentalist super liberal George Soros clone, Tom Steyart, takes his money, then votes the way he is told … “no” on Keystone XL Pipeline, “yes” on more EPA regulations, “yes” on cap and trade, “no” on fossil fuels … this in Colorado where energy production is the backbone of our economy!
  • Votes for the United Nations’ Arms Trade Treaty which would prohibit private gun ownership in the United States!  (Thanks Hillary)
  • Mark Udall votes to give free college scholarships to illegal aliens in the U.S., votes to give free medical care to illegals in the U.S. and votes to allow illegal parents of children born in the U.S. to become citizens based on the “anchor baby” concept. You see, a child born in this country automatically becomes a U.S. citizen, even if born to “illegal” parents. The parents of this child then apply for citizenship based on the anchor baby provision, whereby citizenship is given to the parents!
  • Votes for the United Nations’ Arms Trade Treaty which would prohibit private gun ownership in the United States!

    While Rome burns, Udall fiddles.Udall has voted against earmarks four times in the last two years, true to his big spending ways. He has put over a half billion dollars of “earmark pork” into the budget and now during the election year he rushes to add his name on Tom Coburn’s anti-earmark bill. What a hypocrite. Udall tells us he likes to judge people based on their actions not words. Well, that makes Mark either a hypocrite or a liar.

    As a Congressional big spender, Mark Udall voted for increase of entitlement programs and welfare programs, increased defense spending that explode the National Debt from $5 trillion to $17 trillion in the last seven years.

    Wants the United Nations to dictate what weapons, if any, would be available in the United States.As a Congressman, Mark Udall votes to raise the debt ceiling every time yet boasts he is for fiscal responsibility.

    obamacare thousands of pagesVoted for ObamaCare that caused 380,000 insurance policies in Colorado to be cancelled, and premiums to skyrocket. In spite of overwhelming public opposition to this 10 trillion dollar boondoggle, he said he would vote for it again,

    As a Congressman, continues to support outsourcing of American jobs and make it more expensive for American companies to stay in the U.S. and hire U.S. workers. Also kept taxes high to discourage domestic investment by corporate America.

    With all the pressing problems facing our country the best piece of legislation Udall can come up with is HR 5639: Physical activity guidelines for Americans Act of 2008.

    Udall has passed legislation that favors big banks over small banks thus reducing credit lines for local business in their communities.

    As a Congressman, votes to prop up failed American companies (General Motors, Solyndra) that didn’t make products people wanted to buy.

    Voted “Yes” to $1 trillion worth of stimulus spending.

    Mark Udall accepted more money from banking interests than 92 other senators (read here) … and then voted to repeal S. 1282  Glass-Steagall Act of 2013 (read here). Repeal of this act allowed banks to engage in risky “business” ventures that caused the trillion dollar bank bailouts and depression of 2008, that continues to this day.

    Udall supports Federal Reserve policies that transfers money to banks, the stock market, big corporations, and Wall Street, and decimates main street.

    Rubber stamp yes vote on Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernache, Janet Yellen (all disciples of loose money policies that prop up the banks, the stock market, financial institutions, and allows U.S. government its spending binges).

    Rated 15% by the Christian Coalition indicating an anti-family voting record.

    Udall weak on addressing ways to cut down on gun control violence such as stricter laws and sentencing for those involved in crimes, breaking up gangs and criminal organizations, providing more mental health counseling, providing more gun safety and training for gun owners.

    Ethanol Destroys the Environment (read here). Mark Udall supports ethanol. Does that make him anti-environment?

    Votes “No” on reporting illegal aliens who receive medical treatment in U.S. Votes for Pathway to Citizenship for illegal entrants into U.S. Udall refuses to address anchor baby law that lets anyone born in the U.S. become a U.S. citizen regardless of their parents citizenship.

    Voted for DREAM Act to give college scholarships to sons and daughters of illegal immigrants and grant them citizenship.

    Refuses to lower corporate tax rates so American companies can come back to the U.S., open factories and stores, and hire American workers. The corporate tax rate for business in the United States is highest in the world. American business are saddled to pay healthcare, workers compensation, social security taxes and other payroll taxes that make them less competitive in a world economy.

    male-crying-100100961Udall watches from the sidelines as the middle class has taken a hosing by government policies that help the super rich  and taxes the middle class through higher cost for gasoline, food, utilities, and housing.

    Voted for Dodd Frank that doesn’t regulate big banks or Wall Street but encourages big banks to get bigger by buying out little banks. Under Udall’s tenure the justice dept still hasn’t prosecuted a single criminal suit against the banksters who brought the U.S. na king system down in 2008, and hasn’t done anything about the two government backed mortgage companies (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) that made bad loans and started the debacle of 2008.Talk the talk on the middle class, but doesn’t walk the walk.

    Voted again (May 2014) against GMO labeling…on the side of corporate monopolies that are only after profits.  Genetically modified organisms (GMO’s) when fed to animals in labs cause sterility and death.  Oh well, I guess Mark knows best, we should not have the right to know how our food is being altered, irradiated and poisoned with God Knows what.

    Udall’s votes decimates the American family by devaluing the currency, increasing the cost of good and services, and taxing all income that would be better left in the wallets of those who earn the money.

    Udall went to a college that has spawned numerous notorious ecoterrorists and he couldn’t care less about the ranchers or their land that feeds families, or the ranching heritage .

    He is a two-bit liberal elitist who has no regard whatsoever for Farmers and Ranchers.or their property rights. He is a career politician who has not only never created a job but done nothing but sign the back of government checks for most of his career

    Mark Udall is a career politician and Washington insider who is running for office, but can’t run from his official voting record. Make an educated vote, not an emotional vote.

Hillary more of the same

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) released his annual Wastebook this past week

 obama_yourpayingforit.jpg 2222222222   Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) released his annual Waste Book  this past week It contains a laundry list of doozies. The U.S. government’s gold-plating operations included $190,000 to study compost digested by worms, $297 million for the purchase of an unused mega blimp, and $1 million on a Virginia bus stop where only 15 people can huddle under a half-baked roof. These questionable (read: absurd) expenditures only represent the tip of the iceberg.

Just consider the following:

The Speaker of the House currently receives an annual salary of $223,500, and will receive a payment of roughly that amount, depending on the years of service, for life. An annual payment of this magnitude amounts to about five times the average annual wage in the United States. But that’s not all.

 

For those who have had different positions in Congress, their retirements can be augmented. For example, Nancy Pelosi will not receive $223,500 for life, but roughly double that. Why? Because she is a member of Congress, currently the House of Representatives’ Minority Leader, and a retired Speaker of the House. For purposes of computing retirement pay, Congress adds and accumulates. They do not net.

In addition to supporting members of Congress and civil servants, U.S. taxpayers support welfare recipients. And they support them lavishly, too. Hawaii, Massachusetts, and D.C. residents receive sizeable welfare payments (read: salaries). Indeed,

The magnitude of these Welfare Payments exceeds the average salary of an American teacher, As well as a soldier deployed in Afghanistan, by at least $10,000 per year.

soldierssoldiers 2The public can forget all the clap-trap they are hearing about austerity. Indeed, a fairly dull knife could cut billions of dollars from the U.S. government’s largess.

The president and his queen are the epitome of corruption and greed. They talk about “caring for the poor” while spending piles of other people’s money on their celebrity parties.This, coming from an administration whose most recent political platform focuses on income inequalitySome Americans are more equal than others, I guess.

:

 

 

We know whose earnings you got your “withholding” eye on and it isn’t just “the rich”

large group we wont take it any moreHere is another tip for Republican politicians:                                                                                                                           For how many years have you been stumping the words; “I believe, like you do, in smaller government, less taxes and less government intrusion into our lives.”? We see where DECADES of your words and rhetoric has gotten us: The National Debt and the loss of our rights, liberty, earnings, economy, employment, property and, soon to come, hyperinflation. Who, may I ask, is going to pay for all of that debt? Hmmm?

(We know whose earnings you got your “withholding” eye on and it isn’t just “the rich”!)

Many of us have learned and more are every single day, what the cure to all of these problems is. The cure is the Freedom Principles encompassed in The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution for The United (but constitutionally independent and sovereign) States of America

durbin_mccain_schumer laughing at 80% of America Schummer is laughing at him not with him.  Schummer pure evil pushing compromise. Making fools of the Republicans.

The Rick Perry Indictment is Reminiscent of “What Happens in Totalitarian Societies.”

meet-rick-perry Texans for Public Justice, the so-called public interest group that has been pushing for the indictment of Gov. Rick Perry by a grand jury at the urging of special prosecutor Michael McCrum.

The basis for the indictment is, in the words of liberal New York Magazine writer Jonathan Chait, “unbelievably ridiculous.” The first count says that Perry violated a vaguely worded statute by threatening to veto an appropriation. That, even though the Texas Constitution gives governors the veto power and the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment protects their right to free speech.

The second count states that it was illegal “coercion” to demand the resignation of Rosemary Lehmberg, head of the public integrity prosecution unit whose funding Perry vetoed, after she was arrested for drunk driving with a blood alcohol content three times the legal limit.

“To describe the indictment as ‘frivolous’ gives it far more credence than it deserves,” Chait said. Liberal Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz agreed. Perry’s actions, he said, are “not anything for a criminal indictment,” adding that the indictment is reminiscent of “what happens in totalitarian societies.”

252144_2193569715521_1135522739_32597499_1889525_n The editorial writers of the Washington Post and the New York Times agreed. A “tendentious prosecution,” the Post wrote, noting that it was not the first one launched in Austin. (An Agenda 21 City) The Texas town also produced the 2006 campaign finance indictment of former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay that was finally ruled invalid last year.

The Times, after making clear its distaste for Perry (“one of the least thoughtful and most damaging state leaders in America”), wrote that “the indictment appears to be the product of an overzealous prosecution.”

Many Texas liberals, perhaps shell shocked after losing every statewide race since 1994, are still chortling over Perry’s predicament. But the obvious injustice of the indictment may help more than hurt Perry. A decent lawyer would have told them to stop.

And a decent lawyer would also have told President Obama to stop before letting it be known that he was considering a proclamation that his administration would not prosecute some 5 million illegal immigrants. That’s apparently what he told Hispanic group leaders in a closed meeting earlier this year.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/decent-lawyer-tell-liberals-theyre-damned-fools-stop/#mwawPIvgj7DGSMfw.99

Obama Seizes Control Over All Food Production Under Executive Order:

obama anger

Mike Adams Reports

Published on Mar 20, 2012

NaturalNews “We told ya so” just doesn’t quite cut it anymore. As the American sheeple slept, selfishly refusing to take a stand against tyranny, the Obama administration has been plotting what can only be called a total government takeover of America.

On March 16, 2012, President Obama issued an executive order entitled, “NATIONAL DEFENSE RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS.” (http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-o……)

This executive order states that the President alone has the authority to take over all resources in the nation (labor, food, industry, etc.) as long as it is done “to promote the national defense” — a phrase so vague that it could mean practically anything.

The power to seize control and take over these resources is delegated to the following government authorities:

(1) the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer;

(2) the Secretary of Energy with respect to all forms of energy;

(3) the Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to health resources;

(4) the Secretary of Transportation with respect to all forms of civil transportation;

(5) the Secretary of Defense with respect to water resources; and

(6) the Secretary of Commerce with respect to all other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials.

This takeover is designed, in part, to “stockpile supplies” for the U.S. military. Authority for this total takeover of all national resources is granted with nothing more than the writing of a single statement that claims these actions are necessary to “promote the national defense.” As stated in the order:

the authority delegated by section 201 of this order may be used only to support programs that have been determined in writing as necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense:

(a) by the Secretary of Defense with respect to military production and construction, military assistance to foreign nations, military use of civil transportation, stockpiles managed by the Department of Defense, space, and directly related activities;

What all this means is that the U.S. government now claims the power to simply march onto your farm with guns drawn and demand all your crops, seeds, livestock and farm equipment.

Think I’m exaggerating? Read it yourself!

And for those living in denial who refuse to accept the reality of what’s happening in America, remember the following:

• When NaturalNews reported on the existence of the NDAA, we were told our reporting was misleading because Obama opposed it and wouldn’t sign it.

• When Obama betrayed America and signed the bill, we were told our reporting was misleading because “it didn’t apply to Americans.”

• When Obama admitted it did apply to Americans, he announced that he would choose “not to use it on Americans” but only by the grace of his restraint. Nobody who previously accused us of misleading the public had the integrity to offer us an apology and say, “Gee, you were right, it DOES apply to Americans!”

• Now Obama has seized control over all food, farms, livestock, water and transportation across America. How many brain-dead Americans will continue to live in denial and try to convince themselves this is not happening? Sticking your head in the sand does not make this go away…

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/035301_Oba…
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
https://twitter.com/#!/RealAlexJones
http://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEmer…