Terrorists are Here And We Are Told More Are Coming

obama arms alQada and the behead priest

I am 73 and owned a Home in the New Orleans French Quarter at the time of Katrina. Crime was occurring unchecked for weeks.   I was able to sleep at night with a 38 snub nosed police special (perfect Gun for women and Seniors)under my pillow, and a small dog who barked when my home was approached by anyone day or night.

Thankfully I have never had to use that firearm. I can remember the fear, the thoughts of the door being kicked in, and being trapped with no means of protection. (A woman alone)

This small but effective firearm allowed me to have the confidence that I would not be a victim. I could at the least try and fight for my life.

Remember New Orleans was on fire people were being robbed or killed and my neighbors were on their own. Police and troops not only went to the flooded areas of the town and confiscated guns, but they also went to the high and dry wealthy parts of town and confiscated all of their weapons as well.  It left many of them without any means of self-protection at a time when rioting and looting was taking place.

27421988-sad-children-hugging-his-mother There was no justifiable reason to confiscate the guns from the homes that were not affected by the hurricane.  If anything, these people needed their guns to help insure their own safety and that of their families.  They used the guise of a state of emergency to carry out their disarming of the people.  I believe the liberal Democrats violated the Second Amendment rights of the citizens of New Orleans when they did. By disarming the residents, the police and National Guard left them at the mercy of thugs, looters and rapists. We know from the news that the police then left their posts and abandoned the city. So the only ones left with guns were mostly the criminals. 

San Bernardino shooting: OK-  So today I hear a TV News Person say “Can you imagine what it felt like to be trapped in that room with no way out “Yes I Can”

Terrorist’s are here and more are coming. I don’t care what Barak Obama tells us. The threat is growing and any thinking person can see our homes will be invaded next. Perhaps not today or next month but Black suited gangs of Muslim Terror and even more Crime will come to our neighborhoods.

gun-control.jpg obama

The theory that becoming a victim is morally superior to defending your family

 When They Come For Your Guns, You Will Turn Them Over

By Jim Karger 

Jim Karger is a lawyer who has represented American businesses against incursions by government and labor unions for 30 years

“When they come for my gun, they will have to pry it out of my cold, dead hands,” is a common refrain I often hear when there is a threat, credible or otherwise, that the US government is going to take their firearms.

And, when I hear this crazy talk, I agree with them openly. “You are right. They will pry your gun from your cold dead hands,” which I often follow with the question, “And where will that leave you except face down in a pool of your own blood [in] the middle of the street, just another dead fool resisting the State?”

This is not a question they are comfortable with, if only because the intent of their saber-rattling was to imply they would fight to keep their weapons, and win.

Nice fantasy. It’s not happening.

…they will take your guns, and no, all your Second Amendment bluster aside, you are not going to do anything about it.

If the federal government decides to disarm the public, and when the increasingly-militarized police force rolls down your street after a not-so-subtle request that you kindly turn over your firearms and ammunition “for the common good,” it will be nothing less than suicide by cop to do anything other than what you are told.

The militarization of US police forces is ongoing and escalating. Many cities and towns now own tanks, armed personnel carriers, even attack helicopters, and almost all are outfitted with military weapons not available to the general public.

note jj: (So slick when this administration threatens now to take away police heavy military weapons that they gave them.  Don’t believe it the progressives are crafty, sly and Machiavellian.)

And, it is not just your hometown cops who are getting new boy-toys. The military itself is buying up weaponry not just for use in the current or next scheduled war, but to deal with the likes of you, citizens who don’t seem to understand that the Bill of Rights has been overruled, and that specifically includes, but is not limited to, the right to protest and engage in civil disobedience.

Also ignored (as if it didn’t even exist) is the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 which generally bars the military from law enforcement activities within the United States.

Did you know that when Hurricane Katrina took aim at the city of New Orleans in 2005, the Democrats in power at the time used the opportunity to disarm the people of the area?
gun-confiscation-during-hurricane-katrina-gives-us-picture-of-road-ahead

Article 15 of the UN Arms Trade Treaty, if ratified, provides for foreign “assistance to implement the Treaty,” and mandates that nations who can provide requested support must do so if requested by member nations.

United Nations Vehicles in the U.S

And, they are not just arming cops and weekend warriors for domestic purposes. Active duty Marines are now being trained for law enforcement operations all over the world (of which the US remains a part) specifically to deal with civil uprisings, and the US government knows that civil uprisings are coming to a town near you just as soon as the fantasy of a healing economy is shattered, the US dollar fails, and unemployment goes to 30%+ in real numbers.

And, to you tough-talk with your AR-15 rifles and a few thousand rounds of ammo, here is the reality: they will take your guns, and no, all your Second Amendment bluster aside, you are not going to do anything about it. You are not going to take on a platoon of Marines with state-of-the-art automatic weapons and the best body armor you cannot buy protected by armed personnel carriers and attack helicopters unless you choose to die that day — You will either be in the country or out, and if you are in, you will stay in and you will comply.

That is your choice… for the moment.

————————————————————-

Stewart Rhodes
Oath Keepers
May 17, 2010We know that wholesale gun confiscation happened during Hurricane Katrina. We watched the Chief of Police of New Orleans declare on national television that “no one [no private citizen] will be able to be armed, we’re going to take all the weapons.” We watched an old lady being tackled in her own kitchen and disarmed.
There WERE Troops Who Refused to Confiscate Guns in Katrina

“rumor of martial law”
“our group”…”Constitution loving”
“it’s wrong, we shouldn’t be doing this”
“don’t worry, we’ll never ask you to do that”
“whoa, why are they using active duty soldiers here”
“big army” “82nd Airbourne”

Note that bill clintoon called OathKeepers “hatriots”..those adhering to the Constitution, not beating and/or murdering civilians to confiscate their firearms..

Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b45_1274215853#6pusrBDuib7VQVco.99

Putin decried the continued “export” of democratic revolutions and when referring to the Middle East he asked: “how did that turn out?”

Under Obama Handlers the U.S. military presence on Russia’s Central Asian flank is proceeding at a ferocious pace

United Nations (United States) (AFP) – US President Barack Obama said Tuesday that Syrian counterpart Bashar al-Assad must go if the Islamic State group is to be defeated, as he rallied world leaders to revitalize the coalition campaign against the jihadists

weasel juice lrg Remember Egypt

This lie being peddled about the toppling of Middle Eastern leaders as being a good thing and in the name of democracy is an outright lie. This tragedy’s are a direct consequence of Obama’s interference by sending bombs in America’s name to topple Egypt and Libya. for his beloved Muslim Brotherhood.

morsi-gets-tanks1 Mohammed Morsi

President Mubarak Of Egypt (Our Ally) Befriended By Obama Before Ousting Him And Installing Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood As President Of Egypt.
In The Summer Of 2013 The Egyptian People With Their Military Overthrew Morsi And He Is Now In Prison For Inciting Murder Against Against The People.

no-obama-egypt-flagYes to the American people No to Obama and terrorism.

hillary clinton you are not welcome in Egypt

muslim brotherhood infiltrates obama adm

images Is this what Obama brings to  Syria

US Propaganda Enters Into Insane, Irrational Overdrive In Attempt to “Sell” War In Syria. Thanks to a dizzying barrage of lies, mainstream media fear-mongering and a couple of beheadings, the Obama Administration may finally achieved its long sought after war in Syria. The tactic that proved most effective FEAR.

It must be coupled with endless slogans and misdirection by the mainstream media and politicians. It must lead the public to subconsciously embrace a thought process that is completely irrational. Such tactics can be labeled propaganda, and it results in a public suddenly supporting a war it strongly opposed only a year ago. All it takes is a little repackaging. Propaganda allows those who profit from war to push the American public into a tizzy of trepidation based on a couple of beheadings from ISIS, while not batting an eye over the daily beheadings that were simultaneously occurring in Saudi Arabia.(by Tyler Durden on 09/24/2014 )

So the power structure and its impotent puppet, Barack Obama, intentionally pushed the American public into a frenzy of fear and may get their little war. Obama will say NATO not  me  ?

Obama’s Shadow Army  NATO led by German four-star general, Domrose

NATO and the UN that has legitimized their global murder-spree must be recognized as entirely illegitimate — seen as the scam it is. their do-gooding They have created a problem to which their answer is military intervention, the destruction of sovereign nation-states, and the installation of client regimes demonstratively devoid of the promised “democracy” and “freedom” they were supposedly there to institute.

What has Vladimir Putin to say about NATO putting its missiles on Russia’s borders?

Renee Parsons 03 September 2014. Posted in News

We have the right to ask, says Putin, against whom is the NATO expansion intended? And what happened to the assurances made after the dissolution of the Soviet Union?

apec-china-russia-obama Putin decried the continued “export” of democratic revolutions and when referring to the Middle East he asked: “how did that turn out?”

No sane person could seriously assert that NATO’s missile shield circling Russia is intended to protect the West from Iran. Yet, that is exactly what NATO – the imperial American occupation army in Europe – tells the world.

the chemical weapons attack by western-backed anti-Assad forces which committed the crime, using chemical weapons to serve as a causus belli against President Assad. (admitted even by the UN )  Only the swift action of President Putin avoided a bloodbath in Syria in which NATO would have become willingly involved.

Comments by the German four-star general, Domrose who is supreme commander of the Allied Joint Force Command, one of Europe’s three NATO units in the operations leadership, amounted to an open threat of war against Russia.  

 25 years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, NATO mass’s tens of thousands of troops near Russia’s borders.

1_official_photo_domroeseGeneral, Domrose

 Washington and Berlin orchestrated a fascist-led coup in Kiev last February to install a pro-Western, rabidly anti-Russian regime. Now the NATO powers are pursuing the military encirclement of Russia, a policy that carries with it the very real danger of military conflict with a nuclear-armed power. Even sections of the bourgeois press that have been propagandising against Russia for months describe the plan as a “provocative move against Moscow” ( Spiegel Online ).

We will establish a NATO rapid response force of between 5,000 and 7,000 men that can be deployed in two-to-five days to a region,” General Domröse said. “According to our plans, the rapid response force will participate in the major maneuver ‘Trident Juncture’ in September 2015 in Italy, Spain and Portugal. If everything goes according to plan, the rapid response force could be ready for deployment at the end of 2015.”

Only NATO states with the necessary high-tech military equipment and trained soldiers can participate in the NATO spearhead force, according to Domröse. Germany will assume a leading role.

“We are planning,” he said, “that each of the six-to-ten nations will form the spearhead for a year and then be changed. According to the current plans, each cycle will have a lead nation, which will certainly include Germany at some point. But this highly mobile force must have access to a large-scale air force in order to reach operational zones quickly.”

Obama tyranny Guess who ?

Domröse’s family history makes his statements all the more sinister. His father, Lothar Domröse, fought in the Second World War as commander of a Wehrmacht company on the Eastern Front. As part of the rearming of the German military, he was accepted back into the army in 1956 and pursued a successful military career.In 1973, he became major general and commander of the Northern Army Group. In 1975, he took over the post of head officer of the commanding officers of the armed forces.

surrender If  at first you don’t succeed try try again

Has his so now set himself the task of accomplishing what his father could not accomplish in the Second World War and Cold War—the military subordination of Russia?

Making available the required means of transportation was the greatest challenge for the NATO states, the general noted..

Domröse and the NATO leadership are planning a new form of Blitzkrieg. The NATO conference in Wales earlier this year approved a plan to increase readiness to deploy military forces.

One immediate flaw in NATO’s latest assertion is that, given its total dependence on creating military conflict, reliance on their version of anything should be subject to intense scrutiny. With an estimated 50,000 plus Ukrainian troops in action (not counting CIA and US mercenaries), the question is whether sending 1,000 Russian troops into Ukraine is worth the risk to Putin who has consistently followed a diplomatic path while US diplomacy has been dominated by threats and bullying.

by Tyler Durden on 09/24/2014