The goal Democrat amnesty supporters is not to bring 11 million illegal immigrants humanely “out of the shadows,” but to turn them into voters.

rubio gang og 8

breitbart.com

A Politico cover story perfectly encapsulates the bizarre, insular world of the D.C. political establishment. The article purports to take readers behind the scenes of the strategic machinations of the Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) campaign

It is a fairly basic rule of thumb that campaign staffs should always make political stories about the candidate, not themselves. Barely 100 words into the story, however, the reader introduced to no fewer than three top aides to Rubio. Worse, the story is devoted to chronicling an allegedly brilliant trap the three had set for one of Rubio’s rivals.

Obviously, staff have a large role in developing and executing a campaign, but publicly this should always be subordinate to the candidate. Did the staff who leaked this story want to profile Marco Rubio or themselves?

Read the article, you’ll learn that was a rhetorical question.

Most political campaigns are surrounded by people who seek the limelight for themselves. On its own, this Politico story is part of a sad legacy of campaign advisors who try to use an election to raise their own personal profile.

This article, though, creates an entirely new chapter of the genre because it chooses to highlight a strategy that can only be described as inane. The “trap” supposedly hatched by the Rubio staff was to pick an arcane fight over technicalities of a bill that itself represents an existential threat to Rubio’s candidacy.

One of the biggest obstacles to Marco Rubio winning the Republican nomination was his decision to co-sponsor the infamous “Gang of 8” immigration reform bill. Written primarily by Sens. Dick Durbin and Chuck Schumer, the legislation provided a quick path to amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants with the barest fig-leaf of border protections far into the future.

Rubio took the lead on the effort just months after President Obama won reelection, at a time that the D.C. Republican party establishment was desperate to enact some kind of immigration reform. It represented a complete misreading of the public and, especially, the Republican base.

Just over a year later, Republicans would thunder into a Senate Majority, largely by campaigning against the very amnesty provisions contained in Rubio’s bill.

Recognizing that the amnesty legislation currently represents a challenge to Rubio’s ambitions, the Rubio campaign staff, according to Politico, has chosen to actually use this legislation against one of his chief rivals, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)

. Their “smoking gun” was an amendment to the Gang of 8 bill proposed by Cruz that would have allowed legalizing illegal immigrants but permanently blocked them from becoming citizens.

Politico sets the scene in Rubio’s headquarters when Cruz said during the most recent debate that he didn’t support legalization:

In that moment, Rubio campaign manager Terry Sullivan, top adviser Todd Harris and communications director Alex Conant recognized what they’d accomplished because they’d been planning this exchange all along. Not only had Cruz just contradicted his own statements from 2013, he’d used words that gave them the opening they had been wanting to turn their rival’s anti-establishment narrative on its head.

So, Rubio’s “trap” for Cruz was to compare his stated position to a hostile legislative amendment filed to a proposal he was opposing.

“This was an attempt by Cruz to kill the  Amnesty bill,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, co-author of the Gang of Eight bill said of Cruz’s amendment. “And there was no doubt at the time that Senator Cruz knew it would do exactly that.”

What Cruz understands is that the goal of Sens. Schumer, Durbin and other Democrat amnesty supporters is not to bring 11 million illegal immigrants humanely “out of the shadows,” but to turn them into voters.

Cruz’s amendment exposed that truth.

The particularly inane part of the Rubio staff’s strategy is that they are choosing to focus on complicated, inside-baseball legislative machinations around legislation that was sponsored by Rubio and hated by an overwhelming majority of Republicans.

Rubio’s campaign ought to focus on foreign policy and try to forget the Senator ever embraced amnesty in the first place. When the chief opponent of Rubio’s amnesty legislation, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) 80% publicly lists Cruz as an ally against amnesty, no one, other than a Politico reporter, is going to take seriously Rubios campaign’s spin.

If anything, the entire episode simply reminds Republican voters that Marco

Rubio did team up with Sens. Schumer and Durbin to push amnesty legislation.

In the 1980 primary, Ronald Reagan’s primary challenges tried to argue that he had supported tax hikes in the past or had been pro-choice on abortion. These weren’t really true, but rather based on creative reading of past legislative debates. Voters didn’t buy it, no matter how clever the challengers, or their staffs, tried.

Rubio’s weird attempt to blunt his own record on amnesty by claiming that Cruz at one time supported something like it seems equally doomed to fail.

Pollster Frank Luntz reported that Ted Cruz scored the highest positive ratings during the Las Vegas debate. Cruz didn’t really have any of the memorable zingers or one-liners that political pundits dissect. What he did have was composure and confidence, at a time that much of the public is filled with anxiety.

ted cruz bst flag

That anxiety is fueled in no small part by a feeling that the political class in Washington is out of touch and almost inhabits an alternate universe. A universe where a campaign to be the leader of the free world leaks its internal strategy deliberations to Politico.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/18/marco-rubio-staff-leak-inane-strategy-politico/

 

 

 

Five Globalist Presidents have brought us to their hateful New World Order. All refused to close our southern border.

america the beautiful

Kit Daniels | Infowars.com

It’s time YOU take a step back, re-examine history, and STOP listening to the Mainstream Media it is Obama who has been accused of Treason by the highest levels in government, not you.

“America has switched sides in the war on terror under President Obama. Clare Lopez was willing to say what a few members of Congress have said in private, but declined to say on-the-record.”

It’s time people decide if they want their country back, or not. If they do, it’s time to stop headline reading and sound bite seeking. The time has come to get INFORMED, spread this to everyone you know, and tell everyone you see. If we wait, this country is lost. Congress are the only ones who can stop Obama, because even though Obama seems to think he has power over who gets in the country, Congress and ONLY Congress has plenary power over immigration.

NWO Presidents

Five Globalist Presidents have brought us to their hateful New World Order. Spreading the middle class wealth our forefathers fought and died for to nations that hate us. All refused to close our southern border.

Several of the same are running for the office of POTUS right now. In my opinion 3 are Bush, Rubio, and Graham

NO MORE TALK, TIME FOR ACTION!

The time to make a stand against Barack Obama has finally come. For seven years we’ve repeatedly heard, “Oh, Obama will never be able to do that, the people will stop him,” and no one has even lifted a finger much less stop him, but here and now, unless we want what happened in Paris happening on our doorsteps, killing our children, then the rubber has finally met the road, and the time to act has come.

morsi-gets-tanks1

Much of what I am about to write, you can see and hear you will find in the video at the end of this post. It is one of the most powerful I’ve ever seen. It is your DUTY as an American to enlighten yourselves on the FACTS.

If you, or anyone else around you suggests the words I speak in this post, or those that you hear in the video at the end sound treasonous, then perhaps it’s time YOU take a step back, re-examine history, and STOP listening to the Mainstream Media. Chief Justice William Douglass, the LONGEST sitting Supreme Court justice in this nation’s history said, “The RIGHT to revolt has sources DEEP within out nations history.” Besides, it is Obama who has been accused of Treason by the highest levels in government, not you.

damn-you-obama

The former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, General Michael Flynn, accused Obama of “knowingly and willingly arming ISIS.” Keep in mind that is an appointed position by the President, so that was one of his own turning on him. Then there’s 4 Star Admiral Lyons, Lieutenant General Thomas McInnerney, The former CIA Director, Former Assistant Director of the FBI, Former CIA agent Clare M. Lopez, who is now the Vice President for Research and Analysis at the Center for Security Policy and a Senior Fellow at The Clarion Project, the London Center for Policy Research, and the Canadian Meighen Institute, and if I’m not mistake General Valley has also, but don’t quote me on the last one. The point is, the list of people accusing President Obama of outright treason is long, and distinguished. Clare M. Lopez bluntly told the newspaper, World Net Daily, that:

America has switched sides in the war on terror under President Obama

cartoon your all good people rightClare Lopez was willing to say what a few members of Congress have said in private, but declined to say on-the-record.”

It’s time people decide if they want their country back, or not. If they do, it’s time to stop headline reading and sound bite seeking.

The time has come to get INFORMED, spread this to everyone you know and tell everyone you see. If we wait, this country is lost. Congress are the only ones who can stop Obama, because even though Obama seems to think he has power over who gets in the country, Congress and ONLY Congress has plenary power over immigration.

Again 5 POTUS Democrat and GOP all Globalist’s puppets. none closed the border none stopped illegal immigration or slowed legal uneducated of over a million a year. Nor did they do anything productive to stop the job run to oversea”. (jc)

NWO presidents.jpg 2

smiley-sign0085

James Madison, the Father of the Constitution, said:

“The ultimate authority resides within the people, and if the federal government ever got too powerful and overstepped its authority, then the people were to develop plans of resistance and resort to arms.”

Thomas Jefferson wrote:

“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was, and what never will be.”

jeb-bush-immigration New World Order Progressive ?

Rubio puppetRubio Globalist NWO  Puppet ?

 

Message from Egypt, Yes to The American People, No To Obama

Nothing was said when phony McCain invited Brzezinski to speak.

brezinskie and  pal. 6x6

Netanyahu. Remember when House Speaker John Boehner — without consulting or notifying 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue — invited Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address Congress. An Obama spokesman says the move is a “departure” from protocol, and neither the president nor vice president will meet with Netanyahu.

But privately, say inside sources, the administration was fuming over the Israeli leader’s plans to go before U.S. lawmakers in March regarding the possibility of stepping up sanctions against Iran. In fact,

One unnamed Obama official has reportedly threatened retaliation, saying Netanyahu will pay “a price” if he dares to appeal directly to the senators and representatives. (MY guess Valerie Jarrett jj )

these two 3.jpg 5 Valerie Jarrett is the most powerful figure in the White House, rivalling President Obama in the scope of her influence over the fate of the Republic. Her personal Secret Service detail attests to the importance of her role in our government – in a position that is unelected and unconfirmed by the Senate.

muslim brotherhood infiltrates obama adm  Reports on accounts in the Israeli media saying that the White House is outraged by the Israeli prime minister’s acceptance of Boehner’s speaking invitation, and that Obama intends to inflict payback.

“We thought we’ve seen everything,” a source identified as a senior American official was quoted as saying. “But Bibi [Netanyahu] managed to surprise even us. There are things you simply don’t do.

(I say: “What’s wrong with our Congress inviting an ally to speak.”)

“He spat in our face publicly and that’s no way to behave. Netanyahu ought to remember that President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.”    “How Presidential our little Dictator is.

obama and vallery In addition,a Fox News report says that President Obama has even gone so far as to directly warn Netanyahu not to get involved with the back-and-forth between the White House and the Congress.

misssile-e1421867594235-635x357  Iran has built a 27-meter-long missile, capable of delivering a warhead “far beyond Europe,” and placed it on a launch pad at a site close to Tehran, an Israeli television report said Wednesday, showing what it said were the first satellite images of the missile ever seen in the West. It stressed that the missile could be used to launch spacecraft or satellites, but also to carry warheads.

It showed one photograph of a site near Tehran, which it said the West had known about for two years, where Iran was working on engines for its long-range missiles.

It then showed a satellite photograph of a second site, nearby, which featured a launch pad, with the 27-meter missile on it — an Iranian missile “never seen before” by the West. The missile is capable of taking a manned spacecraft or satellite into space, the TV report said

extraordinary criticism of the president’s “crumbling” foreign policy — blunt criticism coming from the editorial board of the left-leaning Washington Post.

The Post’s editorial of January 22nd blasted Obama’s so-called “partnering” strategy with nations where anti-American terrorists have sought safe havens, especially in Middle East countries such as Yemen, which has fallen into chaos.

The Yemen mess reveals the weaknesses of Mr. Obama’s “partners” strategy….

Unfortunately, the president’s cursory and formulaic description of his counterterrorism policies this week, following a year in which jihadist forces and terrorist attacks expanded across the world, suggested that he remains uninterested in correcting his mistakes.

no-obama-egypt-flag 

“Yes to the American People-No Obama “

hillary clinton you are not welcome in Egypt

Citizens of Egypt Depose Installed Rothschild NWO Czar Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood. Citizens of Egypt Depose Obama’s, Rothchild NWO Czar Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood.

McCain and Graham in egypt on thr wrong side

McCain and Graham in Egypt on the wrong side

John McCain, center, stands with Neo-Nazi leader Oleh Tyahnybok

CFA Member John McCain,center stands with Neo-Nazi leader Oleh Tyahnybok in the troubled Ukraine.

isis with McCain.jpg lrg

McCain with Islamic state?  and  Syria Free Army General Salem Idriss             right of McCain.

—Council On Foreign Affair’s McCain ~ Fomenting War In Libya

McCain Formenting war in Libya ?

mcCain Soros5

McCain’s long standing association with George Soros

McCain hUGGING sOROS oH THANK YOU FOR SAVING ME

cartoon your all good people right

When they say Path-to-Citizenship. They mean- Blanket Amnesty

https://www.numbersusa.com/resource-article/position-and-vocabulary

The Government has long since run out of other peoples money including yours.and yet, it’s still giving it away.,

these two 3.jpg 5 immigrant children

Controlled Immigration: Vocabulary 

  https://www.numbersusa.com/resource-article/position-and-vocabulary

When they say Path-to-Citizenship. They mean- Blanket Amnesty

When they say Immigration Reform  They mean – Uncontrolled Immigration

When they say. Border Security First They mean – Amnesty and More Illegal Immigration

Uncontrolled immigration does not fix America’s immigration system. We need instead a policy of controlled immigration to preserve the value of American citizenship, consisting of three key components:

Serious immigration security & enforcement measures.

A system of controlled legal immigration.

No amnesty.

Amnesty – No Amnesty, No Work Permits ,No Path-to-Citizenship, No Blanket Amnesty, No Illegal Immigration, Yes ,Security & Enforcement Yes, Border Security

12006104-dejected-entrepreneur American Jobs First

Amnesty

Any right to live and work in the U.S. granted by the federal government to an illegal alien or illegal immigrant: Every so-called “pathway to citizenship,”; without exception, is an amnesty.

An amnesty occurs when an illegal alien or illegal immigrant receives a work permit.

There are two types of amnesty: restricted amnesty and blanket amnesty.

Amnesty Overload

The catastrophic immigration-processing dysfunction that will be caused by uncontrolled-immigration schemes resulting in millions of fraudulent amnesties, as well as fraudulent legal immigration requests, being granted:

The Senate-passed uncontrolled-immigration bill would quadruple applications immediately.

The United States Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) is the agency that processes immigration applications, including amnesties. USCIS is widely acknowledged to be at or over capacity now. Like all government bureaucracies, USCIS can only expand capacity at a slow rate.

The Senate-passed, uncontrolled-immigration bill shifts the burden-of-proof from the applicant to USCIS. As a practical matter, this makes it highly likely USCIS will simply issue amnesties upon the flimsiest of evidence, such as a relative’s unsupported attestation that the applicant has been in the U.S. for the requisite period of time.

Pools of fraudulent applications include the illegal immigration since the cut-off date, the 9 million Border Crossing Cards that allow Mexicans who hold them to cross at will, and tens of millions of other visitor visas issued each year.

Blanket Amnesty

An amnesty without significant amnesty qualification restrictions or amnesty process restrictions (see restricted amnesty for definitions):

Almost all pathway-to-citizenship proposals are blanket amnesties.

Proposals that grant amnesty to a majority of illegal immigrants are blanket amnesties.

The Senate-passed uncontrolled-immigration bill contains a blanket amnesty, as did the 1986 immigration law.

Controlled Immigration

Immigration to the U.S. (both legal and illegal) that serves the national interest. The three key components are:

Controlled legal immigration

Immigration security & enforcement

No amnesty

Controlled Legal Immigration

Legal immigration to the U.S. by foreign citizens only in numbers and categories justified by the national interest:

Includes visas for spouses and kids, some asylee visas, some number of employment-visas for the most skilled, potentially even at higher levels than today’s.

Reduces the overall numbers of legal immigrants from today’s levels: increases in any immigration category must be offset by decreases of at least as much immigration in others, principally through eliminating categories (such as that for adult siblings).

Illegal Alien

A foreign citizen unlawfully present in the U.S., whether by unlawful entry or overstaying a visa.

Illegal Immigrant

An illegal alien permanently settled in the U.S.

About half of illegal immigrants first arrived by illegal border crossings

About half of illegal immigrants arrived lawfully, but overstayed their visas. (Note that these visa overstays are not “undocumented.”)

Illegal Immigration

Foreign citizens entering the country unlawfully or overstaying their visas with the intent of long-term residency.

Immigration Security & Enforcement (ISE)

The full suite of measures to stop and reverse illegal immigration (i.e., the result being more illegal immigrants going out than coming in)

The most important immigration-security-&-enforcement measures are

An enforced employment-eligibility check system, more and better border fence, (also increased border manpower) check-in/check-out system for 100% of foreign citizens entering & exiting the U.S.A, and credible threat of deportation.

Immigration security & enforcement first, before any amnesties can occur:

To insure the political system actually implements immigration security & enforcement as part of any compromise, ISE must be implemented prior to any amnesty (such as work permits) being granted to illegal immigrants.

National Interest

Protecting the value of American citizenship; the long-term well-being of American citizens:

Not the interests of foreign citizens who want to immigrate to the U.S., or of businesses that seek low-wage labor, or of national-origin lobbies or of other special interests.

No Amnesty

The ideal position on amnesty: granting no illegal immigrants the right to live and work in the U.S.

Obamacare- like Immigration Policy

The uncontrolled-immigration bill passed by the U.S. Senate in the summer of 2013 is a prime example.

It made promises that won’t be kept.

It was such an enormous bill that no one knew what was in it.

It imposed tasks on the bureaucracy that are beyond its abilities.

It proposed a comprehensive approach to what are discrete problems.

It created an artificial crisis where there was none.

Specifically, the bill entailed:

Uncontrolled increases in legal immigration to double present levels.

Blanket amnesty for nearly all 11,000,000 illegal immigrants already settled in the U.S., as well as an amnesty opportunity for millions more fraudulent applicants who would take advantage of bureaucratic meltdown in the immigration system.

A lack of guaranteed immigration security & enforcement measures, to stop and reverse illegal immigration.

No real triggers.

The Obamacare-like uncontrolled-immigration bill would not fix America’s immigration system. It would break it.

immigrants crossing border

Restricted Amnesty

The granting of amnesty to some fraction of illegal immigrants (well under half) based on some number of restrictions, both qualification restrictions and process restrictions.

Qualification Restrictions: are mostly common-sense restrictions on the number of illegal immigrants granted amnesty. Two significant qualification restrictions would be:

Being able to pass an 8th-grade English test by a near-term date and

Having first arrived in the U.S. after a certain date significantly in the past (more than just the two years provided for in the Senate-passed uncontrolled-immigration bill)

Other restrictions might be things like never having previously been deported.

Process Restrictions: are restrictions on how fast, and by what processes, an amnesty can take place. These include a careful series of steps, so that a restricted amnesty in theory does not become a blanket amnesty in practice. But they also include triggers related to immigration security & enforcement (ISE) implementation to make sure the political system actually implements ISE.

Triggers

Process restrictions that lay out milestones of immigration security & enforcement before a given step toward a restricted amnesty occurs.

Uncontrolled Immigration

Any combination of blanket amnesty, uncontrolled legal immigration, and high levels of illegal immigration.

Uncontrolled Legal Immigration

Legal immigration at levels, and by type, far above historical norms and contrary to the national interest:

Includes adult-relative (other-than-spouse) visas, the visa lottery, unjustified refugee and asylee visas, and non-critical employment visas.

The Senate-passed uncontrolled-immigration bill would double legal immigration to over 2 million per year the first decade.

Hillary more of the same

https://seniorcitizenspublicsquare.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post-new.php

 

Obama Helps OPEC Keep It’s Oil Economy And The U.S loses Hers ?

There are ties worthy of a Bourne film, if the media connected the dots

kerry bomb syria

The story goes that Secretary of State Kerry went to Oman for another round of talks on the Iranian nuclear question. The other half of the visit had to do with Washington’s unabated desire to ruin the Russian economy. To do this, Kerry by some unknown means required the Saudis (1) To raise production and( 2) Cut its crude price. keep in mind The Saudis produce a barrel of oil for less than $30 the Russians need apx $105 Shortly after Kerry’s visit, in November the Saudis began increasing production, — by more than 100,000 barrels daily Other OPEC members were screaming for relief, and the Saudis make back-to-back moves certain to push falling prices still lower? Now OPEC has decided in a meeting last month against reducing production. The Relentless Production of Shale Oil Is Breaking OPEC’s Neck and Infuriating Obama , his economy killing Ideology, and Greenie pals. In many opinions it sure looks like a U.S Obama Whitehouse Conspiracy?

obama FLAG Obama replaces our flags stars with an O”

The price of oil is giving the narcissistic Obama new foreign economic power that gives him leverage in most areas of policy at, the cost of American oil independence, jobs, Senior savings ,Pension funds already taking a toll due to Obama’s higher taxes on their dividends and ,he gets to cripple the new U.S oil producers. He has loathed.

This is demolition on many fronts led by a desperate administration in danger of losing its ideological schemes for a New World Order. The Obama administrations unabated desire to ruin the Russian economy and break Americas new oil independence . Is also bringing down economies in several other countries.

Do not think Gas prices will stay low . As soon as The Whitehouse gets the results they schemed for ,Gas will go to Obama’s goal of $8.00 or more a gallon.

When will the Whitehouse schemes stop?  Certainly not if a sixth Globalist President is elected such as Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton.

NWO presidents.jpg 2 5 Globalist President’s Have Ruined Our Magnificent Country. Don’t be sold on another. Some are likable and the Old Boys and Big Progressive money will be selling their virtues . This time around that should not get our votes. No Jeb, No Hillary, No Grahams, No McCain’s, No more NWO Presidents and their unrestrained immigration.

The more integrated the world becomes, the more likely it becomes that we will see nightmarish global tyranny someday.  It is very frightening to think of what Persons very evil might do if they had the chance to run the entire planet.

Once our national sovereignty is gone, it will be incredibly difficult to get back. If the American people don’t take a stand while they still can, their children may wake up someday as citizens of a very oppressive “global regime”.

obama_contemptliveWhen it comes to Barack Obama, one of the most important things to understand is that he is a committed globalist. He firmly believes in more “global governance” (the elite don’t like to use the term “global government”) Throughout his time in the White House, Obama has consistently sought to strengthen international institutions such as the UN, the IMF, the World Bank, NATO, and the WTO. At every turn, Obama has endeavored to more fully integrate America into the “global community”. Since he was elected, Obama has signed a whole host of new international economic agreements.

Hillary more of the same

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is the Obama administration secretly negotiating treaties with globalist bodies?

Obama, Clinton Selling Out U.S. Sovereignty in Secret

By Victor Thorn

Is the Obama administration secretly negotiating treaties with globalist bodies, in violation of the Unites States Constitution? That’s the question on the minds of a number of political watchdogs, who argue that the White House is doing an end run around Congress and the American people in order to lock the country into agreements on the environment, fishing rights and even gun ownership with the United Nations (UN).

On February 7, former Bill Clinton campaign manager Dick Morris dissected a host of international “sneaky treaties” that, he says, “Once signed and ratified, have the same status as constitutional law and cannot be altered or eclipsed by Congress or state legislatures. And their provisions must be enforced by U.S. courts.”

The most egregious of these would be U.S. membership in the International Criminal Court (ICC). This tribunal that has jurisdiction across the globe could prosecute elected U.S. leaders for entering into a war without UN approval. These “crimes of aggression”—even if approved by Congress under an official declaration of war—could still land the president or cabinet members in prison.

The ICC’s reach supersedes the rulings of any U.S. court, thereby posing a serious threat to constitutionally-guaranteed trials by a jury of our peers. A lesser-known aspect of this treaty involves, ironically, the use of America’s military to wage aggressions against those deemed war criminals by the ICC. Already, Barack Obama has buckled to this ruling body by sending armed forces into Africa to execute an arrest warrant for alleged war criminal Joseph Kony, leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army in Uganda. Yet rather than having Congress authorize sending U.S. men and women into action overseas, Obama bypassed them and opted to exert his “executive power.” He justified this decision as an “international obligation.”

Who is our president obligated to: American citizens or the New World Order? Another treaty, one advocating children’s rights, would—at least superficially—protect youths from kidnapping, prostitution and human trafficking. However, if a 14-member panel determines that certain countries like the U.S. aren’t providing enough funding for food, education or clothing to underdeveloped nations, the UN could levy a tax on American citizens and then redistribute this money to Third World countries. Not surprisingly,

A leading proponent for the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) is Hillary Clinton. In her book It Takes a Village, she wrote: “The village must act in the place of parents. It accepts these responsibilities in all our names through the authority we vest in the government.These 14-member overlords could also weigh in on what religious teachings, educational material and social attitudes are acceptable.

Hillary is the war on women says kathleen wiley

Interestingly, Hillary’s views on child-rearing dovetail with those of the UNCRC. “They [parents] have to be shown how to do it,” wrote Hillary. “They have to be, in a sense, re-parented to be able to be a good parent.” Hillary is so distrustful of traditional families that she further elaborated.: “Decisions about motherhood and abortion, schooling, cosmetic surgery, treatment of venereal diseases or employment and others where the decision—or lack of one—will significantly reflect the child’s future should not be made unilaterally by the parent.”

If these social-engineering thoughts aren’t horrifying enough, Hillary remarked at the University of Texas in 1993, “Let us be willing to remold society by redefining what it means to be a human being in the 20th century, moving into the new millennium.”

A third troublesome treaty is known as the Law of the Sea Treaty, or LOST. Over 162 nations have signed or ratified it. Many other nations, such as Turkey and Israel, have stayed out of it. Obama sidesteps the Constitution yet again via executive order

. LOST is being promoted by another Clinton crony, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who seeks to surrender seas off the coasts of the United States to UN overseers. Although the complexities of this treaty are far too vast to elaborate on here, in a nutshell LOST will acquiesce to a UN council where U.S. companies can drill for oil or fish and which technologies must become global property via a form of intellectual eminent domain. The UN could tax up to 50% of royalties from offshore drilling and redistribute these proceeds to poorer nations.

panneta and UN

In another example, the Outer Space Code of Conduct could seriously interfere with the U.S. implementing any type of anti-missile shield to protect itself. Using the feel-good premise of decreasing space debris, in actuality this treaty would jeopardize the U.S. military’s ability to deploy platform-based weapons in space

When it comes to China and India’s rapid development of their space programs and offensive weaponry, are Americans willing to forfeit their safety to the edicts of UN bureaucrats that already view us with such outright enmity?

Obama and Hillary are also targeting Americans’ firearms ownership.

In early April, Sen. Rand Paul issued a statement on this: “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently announced the Obama administration will be working hand in glove with the United Nations to pass a new ‘UN Small Arms Treaty.’ ” The UN Small Arms Treaty is designed to “register, ban and confiscate firearms owned by private citizens like you,” wrote Paul.

If Washington signs onto this, added Paul, the U.S. would be forced to “enact tougher licensing requirements . . . confiscate and destroy all ‘unauthorized’ civilian firearms . . . ban the trade, sale and private ownership of semiautomatic weapons . . .[and] create an international gun registry.” – See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=4207#sthash.KWS4wdOi.dpuf

Hillary more of the same

Brzezinski Call’s The Shots; Obama’s job Is Simply To Sell Them To The People.

when your country is telling you noAnd a question: Does anyone really believe that someone, a ‘man of the people’, would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American history? He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very people that Obama says he wants to ‘set free’.

You only have to look at the cabal behind Obama, and those he has appointed to his administration team, to see what his ‘change’ is truly planned to be.

By: David Icke

His mentor, Svengali and main controller is Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor, and the co-founder, with David Rockefeller, of the Illuminati’s Trilateral Commission. Brzezinski has admitted publicly that he began to fund and train what he would call today ‘terrorists’ in Afghanistan to oppose the Soviet-controlled government in the capital, Kabul, in the late 1970s. The idea, he said, was to entice the Soviet Union to invade Afghanistan to protect the Kabul regime and thus give the rival superpower ‘their Vietnam’. The plan worked at the cost of a million Afghan lives during the Soviet occupation from 1979 to 1989, a consequence that troubles Brzezinski not at all.

Brzezinski’s ‘freedom fighters’ would become known as the ‘Mujahideen’ and later the Taliban and what is claimed to be ‘Al-Qaeda’. This is the man behind ‘anti-war’, Barack Obama. It was common knowledge that President Carter would do nothing involving foreign policy without the okay from Brzezinski, the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission which chose Carter for president. It is one of many great ironies of the Obama presidency that he was demanding massive troop reinforcements to be sent to Afghanistan to fight the Taliban terrorists who were initially armed, trained and organized by Brzezinski, the man behind Obama. As Morpheus says in The Matrix: ‘Fate, it seems, is not without its sense of irony’. if they are Brzezinski’s targets, they are Obama’s targets.

The Trilateral Commission and the wider Brzezinski network, including Illuminati fronts like the Ford Foundation, have chosen Obama and the situation will be the same. Brzezinski will call the shots; Obama’s job is simply to sell them to the people. This is rather alarming when you think that it had been said Brzezinski wants to trigger a war involving Russia and China.?????

‘Obama’s’ policies come straight from Brzezinski’s books. Here is one Brzezinski quote you might recognize and it was made before Obama ran for president: ‘Needed social reassessment … can be encouraged by deliberate civic education that stresses the notion of service to a higher cause than oneself. As some have occasionally urged, a major step in that direction would be the adoption of an obligatory period of national service for every young adult, perhaps involving a variety of congressionally approved domestic or foreign good works.’
Now where have I heard that before? As an Illuminati operative, Brzezinski’s aim is to create a world government, central bank, currency and army – a global dictatorship – underpinned by a micro chipped population connected to a global computer/satellite system. He wrote a book in 1970, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, in which he described the global society that he and the Illuminati seek to impose:

NATO International NWOFalse flag events are the new modus operandi of U.S New World Order Shadow Army– NATO and its allies, as we have witnessed in recent years, the most blatant example of which was provided in Libya before the FUKUS Axis (France-UK-US) again breached international law and slaughtered civilians. Another is planned in Ukraine to blame Russia

**The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.’ He also said in the same book nearly 40 years ago: ‘Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites … Whose ties cut across national boundaries … It is likely that before long the social elites of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook …** The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty … Further progress will require greater American sacrifices

More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position.’

And what does his puppet, Obama, now say that Americans have to do to bring about ‘change’? ‘Make sacrifices’. As Mrs. Demagogue, Michelle, said: ‘We need a different leadership because our souls are broken. We need to be inspired … to make the sacrifices that are needed to push us to a different place.’** You can bet that this will include sacrificing more sovereignty and freedom on the road to the global dictatorship described by Brzezinski for decades.

Brzezinski’s son, Mark, was an ‘advisor’ to the Obama campaign (doing what his father told him) and, in line with the American one-party-state, his other son, Ian, was *foreign policy advisor to the McCain campaign (doing what his father told him). His daughter, the Obama-supporting Mika Brzezinski, reported the campaign for MSNBC television.
Obama has been the chosen one for a long time, a fact known only to a few in the deep inner circle, and his relationship with Brzezinski almost certainly goes back to the start of the 1980s when he attended the Ivy League, and big-time Illuminati, Columbia University where Brzezinski was head of the Institute for Communist Affairs. Obama simply will not talk in any detail about this period. He has been covertly funded and supported ever since by the Trilateral Commission and its network of foundations connecting into the Ford Foundation, for whom Obama’s mother worked.

And a question: Does anyone really believe that someone, a ‘man of the people’, would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American history? He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very people that Obama says he wants to ‘set free’.

The sources of Obama funding read like a Wall Street Who’s Who – Goldman Sachs, UBS, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and so on. No wonder he went back on his pledge to accept the limitations of public funding for his campaign and instead took the no-limit option of ‘private’ funding.
And those people are going to support a candidate who does not represent their best interests?? Oh please.

Obama and his seasoned network of professional manipulators, sorry his ‘campaign team’, sold the lie that he had refused to take funding from ‘lobbyists’, those who are paid to ensure that politicians frame legislation, or block it, in the interests of their clients.

But like everything that surrounds Obama, past and present, it’s a sleight of hand and mouth. They funneled vast sums of money into the Obama accounts through law firms that represent lobbyists and lobby groups. It provided ‘plausible denial’ about funding from lobbyists while the money poured in from lobby interests via third parties.

Then there is the Jewish financier, George Soros, the multi-billionaire associate of Brzezinski and closely involved with the funding and marketing of Obama. Soros is a former board member of the Illuminati’s Council on Foreign Relations and funds the European Council on Foreign Relations. In short, he is a major insider.

You can certainly see the Soros/Brzezinski techniques in the Obama ‘revolution’ in the United States.
It was the complex and secretive network of Soros foundations and organizations, connected to the intelligence agencies of the US and Israel, that trained and funded students in the Ukraine, Georgia and elsewhere in the art of mass protest and overthrowing governments. These manufactured protests were sold to the world as ‘peoples’ revolutions’, but it just so happened that when they were over and the old regime was removed the new leaders were those waiting in the wings all along – the puppets of Soros, Brzezinski and their associated networks.

Obama is just more of the same, a big smile with strings attached, and controlled completely by the Illuminati networks that chose him, trained him, sold him and provided his record funding.** It was they who kept his many skeletons under wraps, like the gay sex and crack cocaine allegations of Larry Sinclair, and they will continue to do so as long as he jumps to their bidding.

Obama is just another Banksters’ moll prostituting himself for fame and power, and that’s why he supported the grotesque bail-out of the banking system and why he will always put their interests before the people.

110420obamamansionObama’s Chicago Home

His financial advisors are straight from the Wall Street ‘A’ list, including Paul Adolph Volker (Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group), the head of the Federal Reserve from 1979 to 1987 and Illuminati to his fingertips. Obama has made him head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board, which is dominated by insiders, including its staff director and chief economist, Austan Goolsbee, a close Obama associate from the University of Chicago. Goolsbee is an initiate of the infamous Illuminati Skull and Bones Society at Yale University, which also includes Boy and Father Bush.* It was Goolsbee who told the Canadian government not to worry about Obama’s attacks on the economic effects of ‘free trade’ agreements because his words were just to win votes in the election campaign.

Another Wall Street insider, the Zionist Timothy Geithner (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations), was appointed by Obama to be his Treasury Secretary. Geithner was the President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, the most powerful in the private ‘Federal’ Reserve cartel that masquerades as America’s ‘central bank’, and he is a former employee of both the Council on Foreign Relations and the appalling Kissinger Associates.

Obama’s Treasury team locks into the inner circle around the Zionist Robert Rubin, the Director and Senior Counselor of Citigroup, co-chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, and economic advisor to Obama. Rubin, a member of the Illuminati Bilderberg Group, was the man behind Citigroup’s strategy of expanding its risk in debt markets which forced it to be rescued by taxpayers’ money.

*The very people who caused the financial crisis appointed by Obama to decide how to respond to it (more taxpayers’ money for them and their friends).

Obama’s new “Executive Order 13524 — Amending Executive Order 12425″ grants the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) “rights” on American soil that place it beyond the reach of our own law enforcement agencies, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)!

This lays the ground work for INTERPOL do do what the President cannot legally justify doing. INTERPOL, on instructions from the Obama regime, will now be able to carry out actions prohibited to our own law enforcement!

Barack Obama is taking the U.S. down the path to MARTIAL LAW –

 

Legal battles against conservative state governors keep cropping up. Rick Perry, Scott Walker, and Bobby Jindal—all conservatives and all potential 2016 presidential candidates—have become the victims of vile smear campaigns from the left. What’s even more disturbing is that the trail of money financing these flimsy legal cases all seem to lead directly to George Soros.

George Soros has donated over $52 million to numerous liberal media outlets. He also has woven a web of influential left-wing operations, including Media Matters and Center for American Progress, that advance his socialist ideology.

Having funneled millions into journalism schools and more than 180 media outlets across the nation, it’s no wonder that the liberal media fail to report the connections between Soros and his attacks on elected officials he disagrees with. While ABC, CBS, and NBC were eagerly salivating to report on Scott Walker’s legal problems and Rick Perry’s indictment, not a single one mentioned the financial connection to George Soros.
 Media scoffed at the existence of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission and their goals for creating a one world government and economic system. Today prominent politicians, such as Hillary Clinton, make press statements with the CFR logo in the background as if to signal her allegiance to their globalist goals.

Hillary more of the sameHillary Clinton stands poised to inherit that activist indifference from the media (provided the even more thinly resumed Elizabeth Warren doesn’t decide to run). Her lack of accomplishment is being swept aside and replaced with “having been there” as some sort of resume enhancement. Her tenure as secretary of state is being portrayed as a relatively stable time, not the planting of currently sprouting seeds of problems because of her indifference and the president’s fecklessness.

Here’s some of the real Hillary as President.

Soros

whitewater

Benghazi gate

communism

it takes a village

redistribution

Billions vanished from the U.S. State Department mostly while Hillary Clinton ran it,according to alert issued by the agency’s inspector general.$6 billion are missing and it’s highly unlikely any of the money will ever be recovered. The cash was supposed to be used to pay contractors but it just disappeared and documents that could help track the dough cannot be located. How convenient! The paper trail, which federal law says must be maintained in the case of government contracts, has been destroyed or was never created to begin with.

soros picHillary’s Mentor Soros

 

scoffed at the existence of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission their goals for creating a one world government and economic system.

 

Hillary is the war on women says kathleen wileyCouncil on Foreign Relations (CFR)

@JoshDailySignal Dave Hodges

The trademarked tag line for my show, The Common Sense Show, Freeing America One Enslaved Mind At a Time, was consciously chosen to represent the brainwashing that Americans face with regard to the critical issues facing our country.

I grew up in an era where the media scoffed at the existence of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission and their goals for creating a one world government and economic system. Today, prominent politicians, such as Hillary Clinton, make press statements with the CFR logo in the background as if to signal her allegiance to their globalist goals .John McCain is a member

Agenda 21 is going through a similar transformation. The sellers of the new system don’t care if you know the truth because they believe that their plans are so far advanced that there is nothing you can do to stop the continued implementation. Continued implementation, you ask? Need I say more about our collective ignorance…?

What will these megacities look like? How will they function? Let me just say that if the average person understood what the final product is going to look like, the backlash from the populace would make the rioting in Ferguson, MO. look like a picnic by comparison.

Prominent scientists such as globalist servant, Michail Fragkias, who serves as the chief scientist for the UIN’s “Planet under Pressure” boldly states in his best Fabian Socialist voice that people should be required to reside in densely populated cities because “we certainly don’t want them strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by living closely together.”

Scientists, such as Fragkias, are developing technology which would seem quite unbelievable to the average person. Americans will be living in 300 square foot apartments, in buildings that contain furniture that folds into the wall and televisions that can become translucent or opaque upon command. The commoners will not own cars as did feudal serfs, from centuries ago, the average person will never stray more than a few miles from their home base.

 

A Snapshot of the Future

There are a number of prominent players emerging in this enslavement of America and one has taken center stage and it is called “America 2050“.

When Americans begin their morning as they depart their high rise “Stack and Pack” apartment building, they will be immediately scanned, identified and followed by the Intellistreet light poles. The light poles, already have been beta-tested in Farmington Hills, MI. and in Birmingham, UK., and will scan you for weapons after identifying you. It will have the capability to speak to you (i.e. “Don’t jaywalk Mr. Smith), issue summons to be mailed to your computer and notify the police of your location if you have a warrant for your arrest. In the last line of the following manufacturer video on Intellistreets, they admit to housing Department of Homeland Security features, but the video does not elaborate.

I have been made privy to the new technology which is being rolled out in cities like Las Vegas and various college campuses as I write these words.

Some of the DHS features would include what is loosely referred to as “mind-reading technology“. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is investing $70 million to develop a new implant that can track, and respond to, brain signals in real time. In the summer of 2013, I was contacted by an anonymous source who wanted to come on my show and expose a DARPA program of mind-reading being researched and implemented at Arizona State University. Less than two days before his scheduled appearance, he backed out sighting fears for his life. Confirmation for the involvement of Arizona State University in this project is confirmed here.

In short, Intellistreets is part of the overall Smartgrid system which will have the capacity to control 100% of your energy usage and, as we can now see, this system will monitor the population for dissident thinking and planning, presumably with the goals of eliminating any and all dissent.

Prominent scientists such as globalist servant, Michail Fragkias, who serves as the chief scientist for the UIN’s “Planet under Pressure” boldly states in his best Fabian Socialist voice that people should be required to reside in densely populated cities because “we certainly don’t want them strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by living closely together.”

Scientists, such as Fragkias, are developing technology which would seem quite unbelievable to the average person. Americans will be living in 300 square foot apartments, in buildings that contain furniture that folds into the wall and televisions that can become translucent or opaque upon command. The commoners will not own cars as did feudal serfs, from centuries ago, the average person will never stray more than a few miles from their home base.

How Will the People Be Moved Into the Stack and Packs?

As I have previously pointed out, in China they are moving rebellious rural area residents, from the outlying provinces, into the stack and pack cities, dubbed “Ghost Cities”, and they are doing so by force and at the rate of one million citizens per month.

In the United States, food will be the weapon of choice that will be used to be move people to the target areas. Today, people are being nudged by EPA and BLM policies to the inner city areas. In tomorrow’s world, food will be the enticer to move people to the inner city. With small farmers out of the way, only large corporate farms will exist.

A prominent player in the new megacities concept is Ecocity Builders. They espouse the four following beliefs:

• Human settlements modeled after sustainable development that functions with natural ecosystems and living organisms
• Reduce the inhabitants ecological impact on the environment
• Restoration of ecosystems after the recolonization of humans into dense cities
• Sustainable living under Agenda 21 supports regional, national and global economic systems

Please note the phrase “recolonization of humans into dense cities”. Does the term “recolonization” really need any further explanation?

End-Eminent-Domain-Abuse

NWO presidents.jpg 2 New world Order Presidents

The New Math

Thanks to Ted Turner for making it clear what the globalists truly want.

China presently has 65 million micro apartments that are vacant. Forgetting the Chinese one child policy, let’s assume that the Chinese have four occupants per unit.

65,000,000 x 4= 260 million Chinese residents with a home

Here is a second math problem that figures prominently into the future of the Chinese and their present 1.2 billion citizens:

1, 200, 000, 000 Chinese Citizens- 260, 000, 000 Chinese with homes..

940,000,000 missing Chinese

America has a similar math problem . Today, our estimated population is 310 million people. Yet, the 11 megacities are only expected to house six million people each.

310,000,000 million Americans – 66,000,000 megacity dwellers

244,000,000 missing Americans

About the Author

Dave Hodges is the host of the popular radio talk show, which airs from 9 PM to Midnight (Central). The show can be heard by clicking the following icon in the upper right hand corner of The Common Sense Show.

 

 

Obama,Clinton Selling Out U.S. Sovereignty in Secret ?

Obama, Clinton Selling Out U.S. Sovereignty in SecretObama, Clinton work in secret to surrender U.S. sovereignty?

By Victor Thorn: Victor Thorn is a hard-hitting researcher, journalist and author of over 40 books.

Is the Obama administration secretly negotiating treaties with globalist bodies, in violation of the Unites States Constitution? That’s the question on the minds of a number of political watchdogs, who argue that the White House is doing an end run around Congress and the American people in order to lock the country into agreements on the environment, fishing rights and even gun ownership with the United Nations (UN).

On February 7, former Bill Clinton campaign manager Dick Morris dissected a host of international “sneaky treaties” that, he says, “Once signed and ratified, have the same status as constitutional law and cannot be altered or eclipsed by Congress or state legislatures. And their provisions must be enforced by U.S. courts.”

The most egregious of these would be U.S. membership in the International Criminal Court (ICC). This tribunal that has jurisdiction across the globe could prosecute elected U.S. leaders for entering into a war without UN approval. These “crimes of aggression”—even if approved by Congress under an official declaration of war—could still land the president or cabinet members in prison. The ICC’s reach supersedes the rulings of any U.S. court, thereby posing a serious threat to constitutionally-guaranteed trials by a jury of our peers.

A lesser-known aspect of this treaty involves, ironically, the use of America’s military to wage aggressions against those deemed war criminals by the ICC.

Already, Barack Obama has buckled to this ruling body by sending armed forces into Africa to execute an arrest warrant for alleged war criminal Joseph Kony, leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army in Uganda.

Yet rather than having Congress authorize sending U.S. men and women into action overseas, Obama bypassed them and opted to exert his “executive power.” He justified this decision as an “international obligation.” Who is our president obligated to: American citizens or the New World Order?

Another treaty, one advocating children’s rights, would—at least superficially—protect youths from kidnapping, prostitution and human trafficking. However, if a 14-member panel determines that certain countries like the U.S. aren’t providing enough funding for food, education or clothing to underdeveloped nations, the UN could levy a tax on American citizens and then redistribute this money to Third World countries.

Not surprisingly, a leading proponent for the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) is Hillary Clinton. In her book It Takes a Village, she wrote: “The village must act in the place of parents. It accepts these responsibilities in all our names through the authority we vest in the government.”  

These 14-member overlords could also weigh in on what religious teachings, educational material and social attitudes are acceptable.

27421988-sad-children-hugging-his-motherInterestingly, Hillary’s views on child-rearing dovetail with those of the UNCRC. “They parents have to be shown how to do it,” wrote Hillary. “They have to be, in a sense, re-parented to be able to be a good parent.” Hillary is so distrustful of traditional families that she further elaborated.: “Decisions about motherhood and abortion, schooling, cosmetic surgery, treatment of venereal diseases or employment and others where the decision—or lack of one—will significantly reflect the child’s future should not be made unilaterally by the parent.”

If these social-engineering thoughts aren’t horrifying enough, Hillary remarked at the University of Texas in 1993, “Let us be willing to remold society by redefining what it means to be a human being in the 20th century, moving into the new millennium.”

 

A third troublesome treaty is known as the Law of the Sea Treaty, or LOST. Over 162 nations have signed or ratified it. Many other nations, such as Turkey and Israel, have stayed out of it. Today, America is not on board, but this situation may change if Obama sidesteps the Constitution yet again via executive order.

LOST is being promoted by another Clinton crony, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who seeks to surrender seas off the coasts of the United States to UN overseers.

Although the complexities of this treaty are far too vast to elaborate on here, in a nutshell LOST will acquiesce to a UN council where U.S. companies can drill for oil or fish and which technologies must become global property via a form of intellectual eminent domain. The UN could tax up to 50% of royalties from offshore drilling and redistribute these proceeds to poorer nations.      

male-crying-100100961In another example, the Outer Space Code of Conduct could seriously interfere with the U.S. implementing any type of anti-missile shield to protect itself. Using the feel-good premise of decreasing space debris, in actuality this treaty would jeopardize the U.S. military’s ability to deploy platform-based weapons in space. When it comes to China and India’s rapid development of their space programs and offensive weaponry, are Americans willing to forfeit their safety to the edicts of UN bureaucrats that already view us with such outright enmity?

Obama and Hillary are also targeting Americans’ firearms ownership. In early April, Sen. Rand Paul issued a statement on this: “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently announced the Obama administration will be working hand in glove with the United Nations to pass a new ‘UN Small Arms Treaty.’ ”

The UN Small Arms Treaty is designed to “register, ban and confiscate firearms owned by private citizens like you,” wrote Paul. If Washington signs onto this, added Paul, the U.S. would be forced to “enact tougher licensing requirements . . . confiscate and destroy all ‘unauthorized’ civilian firearms . . . ban the trade, sale and private ownership of semiautomatic weapons . . .and create an international gun registry.”

Globalist Treaties Terrible for America

During a May 10 interview with AMERICAN FREE PRESS,

Becky Fenger, A political columnist for Arizona’s Sonoran News, voiced her concerns to this writer in regard to a rash of globalist treaties being negotiated by the current administration

Hillary is the war on women says kathleen wiley “What are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama thinking?” asked Mrs. Fenger. “I can’t understand why they would willingly hand over power to the UN. How can you reason with these people when it seems like they’ve lost their minds?”    smiley-shocked028

When questioned about the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) and the International Criminal Court (ICC), Mrs. Fenger replied: “Do you know how detrimental they are to our nation? We used to worry about communism and those who wanted to take over the U.S. But now we’re surrendering our sovereignty to the UN, which is filled with petty dictators. America should get out of the UN, since we pay the bulk of dues and always get voted against anyway.”

According to Mrs. Fenger, the dangers facing us are monumental. “These treaties become the equivalent of law,” she said, “and it’ll take 161 countries to release us from them.

Worse, I’m not sure if Congress is even aware of what’s going on, or if they understand how binding these treaties are.”

She continued: “Look at the ICC. Aggression is described as going to war without UN approval, which includes Russia and China. What kind of mind thinks that succumbing to this is a good idea?”

Mrs. Fenger next addressed one of Mrs. Clinton’s favorite pet projects.

“Hillary said it takes a village, not a parent, to raise children,” she said. “Their goal is really to get these little minds and teach them from infancy to love global government dictatorship. But why should we relinquish parental control when it’s been a guiding light throughout history?

They want to disintegrate the family unit and replace it with government. It’s unconscionable. Our personal liberties have always frightened them, so their goal is to take freedom out of the hands of every individual.” AFP broached the subject of Obama’s increasing use of executive orders.

“I used to think that a law couldn’t pass if it was unconstitutional, but what about eminent domain and the Kelo decision?” she asked. “I’ve lost all faith in what used to be known as common sense and following the Constitution.

Obama has proved he doesn’t give a damn about the Constitution.” The Kelo case refers to a 2002 Supreme Court ruling which found that private entities can take property for a price from private individuals who do not want to give it up if the private company can argue that the property will be used for the common good.

Specifically, the case involved a house owned by Susette Kelo in New London, Conn. As it turns out, a developer bought Mrs. Kelo’s house, even though she didn’t want to move. After all the homes in the area had been bulldozed, however, funding for the developer’s project fell through, and the town was forced to take it over. It is now a landfill.

AFP also spoke with author Brandon Pierce, author of a novel about the Bilderberg group entitled Crisis Point. He agreed, telling this writer on May 11,

“Americans could be tried in a world court even after they’ve been acquitted in the U.S. It has a direct effect on all of us when an international body can decide what happens to our leaders and citizens.”

Is Hillary or Barack Wearing the Pants in the White House? Is Secretary of State and one-time Bilderberg attendee Hillary Clinton the shadow president of the United States, just as it was claimed she was de facto governor and president during her husband’s tenure in Arkansas and Washington, D.C.?

Doubters should be reminded of a Febrary 24, 2008 quote delivered by Barack Obama during a campaign stop in Loraine, Ohio. “She Hillary has essentially presented herself as co-president during the Clinton years.” Obama knew full well of what he spoke. Journalist Scott Creighton’s March 19, 2011 article, “President Hillary Clinton’s Shock and Awe,” began with this stark contrast.

While Hillary Clinton met with 22 world leaders to decide the fate of Libya, they kept Barack Obama in the back of the bus and let the real president take the lead.”

Creighton also pointed out that while Obama golfed and vacationed, Hillary conferred with practically every world leader and dignitary imaginable. A quick glance at the State Dept.’s travel itinerary reveals nearly 75 trips to foreign countries by Clinton where the real groundwork for a New World Order super-structure was being laid.

While some commentators call Hillary a “Globalist Grand Wizard,” her influence spread to the formation of Obama’s Cabinet after his 2008 election. In a March 18 article, Edward Ulrich wrote, “31 of the 47 people Barack Obama has named for appointments have ties to the Clinton administration, including Eric Holder, Larry Summers, Rahm Emanuel and Timothy Geithner.”

To get a better idea of Hillary’s modus operandi, in a 2006 film entitled Inside Man, Hollywood actress Jodie Foster analyzed her character’s role in remedying delicate situations.

“She’s a fixer, a rich Madison Avenue lawyer who fixes things when they go wrong. Say you were a mayor and you got caught in bed with three dead hookers, I would be brought in to fix the situation.” When asked how her character did it, Foster replied, “Call in lots of favors. You use people and kind of puppet behind the scenes, manipulate them. She’s a dubious bad guy.” The above words perfectly describe Hillary Clinton’s entire political career.

In fact, HILLARY (AND BILL) THE MURDER VOLUME contains the following passage. “Hillary acted as an enabler and fixer to cover-up for her husband’s serial philandering and sexual reign of terror.”

But being a handler for Bill’s raging libido was minor compared to Hillary’s role in trafficking drugs through Mena Airport, the cover-up of Vince Foster and Ron Brown’s murders, Chinagate, and laundering money through the Arkansas Development Finance Authority to finance their campaigns. Learning the ropes from Washington, D.C.’s former fixer extraordinaire—longtime Bilderberg luminary Vernon Jordan—Hillary has always nurtured a comfortable relationship with Wall Street bankers and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

Indeed, during a July 17, 2009 CFR (Council Of Foreign Relations )address, Hillary revealed, “We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future.” With the Obama administration pursuing a number of globalist treaties that undermine American sovereignty, it’s clear that Hillary Clinton is the driving force behind these moves as she traveled from country to country.

According to the elitist’s worldview, individuals should be subordinate and powerless to collectivists, while nationalists are viewed as a distraction to be folded into the globalist whole.

During a July 17, 2009 CFR address, Hillary revealed: “We get a lot of advice from the council, so this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future.” –

Hillary more of the same

See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=4207#sthash.MXWW4xnr.dpuf

Victor Thorn is a hard-hitting researcher, journalist and author of over 40 books.

 

 

Our Betters In Washington Shall Simply Order Us To Live As They Want Us To Live

Hillary is the war on women says kathleen wiley “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”

The cesspool get’s deeper on a daily basis with the present crew residing in office

valerie jarretThe ones who helped us will be rewarded, the ones who opposed us will get what they deserve.”

—————————————————————————

October 14, 2014 12:00 AM Local Elections with Lasting National Import
What’s at stake this November is the president’s vision for remaking America.

By Thomas Sowell

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. His website is http://www.tsowell.com   thomas sowell

What is the overriding national issue that makes this year’s elections so crucial?

That issue is whether, despite all the lawless edicts of President Obama, threatening one-man rule, we can still salvage enough of the Constitution to remain a free, democratic nation.

Barack Obama will be on his way out in two years, but if he can appoint enough federal judges who share his contempt for the Constitution’s limits on federal government power in general and presidential powers in particular, then the United States of America can continue on the path to becoming another banana republic, even after Obama has left the White House.

President Obama understands how high the stakes are, which is why he is out fundraising all across the country — seemingly all the time — even though he has no more elections to face himself. Obama came to power saying that he was going to fundamentally change the United States of America — and he intends to do it, even after he is gone, by giving lifetime appointments as federal judges to people who share his view that this country’s institutions and values are fundamentally wrong, and need to be scrapped and replaced by his far-left vision.

If only Obama’s critics and opponents understood this momentous issue as clearly as he does.

The issue is whether “we the people,” as designated by the Constitution, continue free to live our own lives as we see fit and to determine what laws and policies we want to live under.

President Obama’s vision is very different. In his vision, our betters in Washington shall simply order us to live as they want us to live — telling us what medical insurance we can have, what doctors we can go to, what political groups shall be favored by the Internal Revenue Service, with more of the same coming in the years ahead, long after Obama has left the White House.

Critics who deplore President Obama’s foreign policies in general – and his weak response to the Islamic State threat in particular – as showing incompetence and who see his incessant fundraising as just a weird distraction fail to understand how different his priorities are from theirs.

Barack Obama understands clearly that his ability to fundamentally remake what he has long seen as a deeply defective and corrupt America in the image of his far-left vision depends crucially on having control of the Senate that has the power to confirm his appointments of federal judges with lifetime tenure. His fundraising is key to maintaining the Democrats’ Senate majority.

Foreign policy is subordinated to Obama’s overriding ideological vision. The president will not risk losing this year’s congressional elections by taking military actions that will alienate his political base. Token military actions can minimize the political losses from other voters.

That people will die while he stalls on military action is a price he is willing to pay. His ordering thousands of American troops into Ebola-infested Liberia shows the same ideologically driven callousness.

ebola-dead-body-guinea-liberia_si

The big question is whether those who wish to preserve a free America see the issue and the stakes as clearly as Barack Obama does — and see that this is the overriding national issue of our time, with our votes for senators not to be confused by local issues.

Hillary more of the same