When they say Path-to-Citizenship. They mean- Blanket Amnesty

https://www.numbersusa.com/resource-article/position-and-vocabulary

The Government has long since run out of other peoples money including yours.and yet, it’s still giving it away.,

these two 3.jpg 5 immigrant children

Controlled Immigration: Vocabulary 

  https://www.numbersusa.com/resource-article/position-and-vocabulary

When they say Path-to-Citizenship. They mean- Blanket Amnesty

When they say Immigration Reform  They mean – Uncontrolled Immigration

When they say. Border Security First They mean – Amnesty and More Illegal Immigration

Uncontrolled immigration does not fix America’s immigration system. We need instead a policy of controlled immigration to preserve the value of American citizenship, consisting of three key components:

Serious immigration security & enforcement measures.

A system of controlled legal immigration.

No amnesty.

Amnesty – No Amnesty, No Work Permits ,No Path-to-Citizenship, No Blanket Amnesty, No Illegal Immigration, Yes ,Security & Enforcement Yes, Border Security

12006104-dejected-entrepreneur American Jobs First

Amnesty

Any right to live and work in the U.S. granted by the federal government to an illegal alien or illegal immigrant: Every so-called “pathway to citizenship,”; without exception, is an amnesty.

An amnesty occurs when an illegal alien or illegal immigrant receives a work permit.

There are two types of amnesty: restricted amnesty and blanket amnesty.

Amnesty Overload

The catastrophic immigration-processing dysfunction that will be caused by uncontrolled-immigration schemes resulting in millions of fraudulent amnesties, as well as fraudulent legal immigration requests, being granted:

The Senate-passed uncontrolled-immigration bill would quadruple applications immediately.

The United States Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) is the agency that processes immigration applications, including amnesties. USCIS is widely acknowledged to be at or over capacity now. Like all government bureaucracies, USCIS can only expand capacity at a slow rate.

The Senate-passed, uncontrolled-immigration bill shifts the burden-of-proof from the applicant to USCIS. As a practical matter, this makes it highly likely USCIS will simply issue amnesties upon the flimsiest of evidence, such as a relative’s unsupported attestation that the applicant has been in the U.S. for the requisite period of time.

Pools of fraudulent applications include the illegal immigration since the cut-off date, the 9 million Border Crossing Cards that allow Mexicans who hold them to cross at will, and tens of millions of other visitor visas issued each year.

Blanket Amnesty

An amnesty without significant amnesty qualification restrictions or amnesty process restrictions (see restricted amnesty for definitions):

Almost all pathway-to-citizenship proposals are blanket amnesties.

Proposals that grant amnesty to a majority of illegal immigrants are blanket amnesties.

The Senate-passed uncontrolled-immigration bill contains a blanket amnesty, as did the 1986 immigration law.

Controlled Immigration

Immigration to the U.S. (both legal and illegal) that serves the national interest. The three key components are:

Controlled legal immigration

Immigration security & enforcement

No amnesty

Controlled Legal Immigration

Legal immigration to the U.S. by foreign citizens only in numbers and categories justified by the national interest:

Includes visas for spouses and kids, some asylee visas, some number of employment-visas for the most skilled, potentially even at higher levels than today’s.

Reduces the overall numbers of legal immigrants from today’s levels: increases in any immigration category must be offset by decreases of at least as much immigration in others, principally through eliminating categories (such as that for adult siblings).

Illegal Alien

A foreign citizen unlawfully present in the U.S., whether by unlawful entry or overstaying a visa.

Illegal Immigrant

An illegal alien permanently settled in the U.S.

About half of illegal immigrants first arrived by illegal border crossings

About half of illegal immigrants arrived lawfully, but overstayed their visas. (Note that these visa overstays are not “undocumented.”)

Illegal Immigration

Foreign citizens entering the country unlawfully or overstaying their visas with the intent of long-term residency.

Immigration Security & Enforcement (ISE)

The full suite of measures to stop and reverse illegal immigration (i.e., the result being more illegal immigrants going out than coming in)

The most important immigration-security-&-enforcement measures are

An enforced employment-eligibility check system, more and better border fence, (also increased border manpower) check-in/check-out system for 100% of foreign citizens entering & exiting the U.S.A, and credible threat of deportation.

Immigration security & enforcement first, before any amnesties can occur:

To insure the political system actually implements immigration security & enforcement as part of any compromise, ISE must be implemented prior to any amnesty (such as work permits) being granted to illegal immigrants.

National Interest

Protecting the value of American citizenship; the long-term well-being of American citizens:

Not the interests of foreign citizens who want to immigrate to the U.S., or of businesses that seek low-wage labor, or of national-origin lobbies or of other special interests.

No Amnesty

The ideal position on amnesty: granting no illegal immigrants the right to live and work in the U.S.

Obamacare- like Immigration Policy

The uncontrolled-immigration bill passed by the U.S. Senate in the summer of 2013 is a prime example.

It made promises that won’t be kept.

It was such an enormous bill that no one knew what was in it.

It imposed tasks on the bureaucracy that are beyond its abilities.

It proposed a comprehensive approach to what are discrete problems.

It created an artificial crisis where there was none.

Specifically, the bill entailed:

Uncontrolled increases in legal immigration to double present levels.

Blanket amnesty for nearly all 11,000,000 illegal immigrants already settled in the U.S., as well as an amnesty opportunity for millions more fraudulent applicants who would take advantage of bureaucratic meltdown in the immigration system.

A lack of guaranteed immigration security & enforcement measures, to stop and reverse illegal immigration.

No real triggers.

The Obamacare-like uncontrolled-immigration bill would not fix America’s immigration system. It would break it.

immigrants crossing border

Restricted Amnesty

The granting of amnesty to some fraction of illegal immigrants (well under half) based on some number of restrictions, both qualification restrictions and process restrictions.

Qualification Restrictions: are mostly common-sense restrictions on the number of illegal immigrants granted amnesty. Two significant qualification restrictions would be:

Being able to pass an 8th-grade English test by a near-term date and

Having first arrived in the U.S. after a certain date significantly in the past (more than just the two years provided for in the Senate-passed uncontrolled-immigration bill)

Other restrictions might be things like never having previously been deported.

Process Restrictions: are restrictions on how fast, and by what processes, an amnesty can take place. These include a careful series of steps, so that a restricted amnesty in theory does not become a blanket amnesty in practice. But they also include triggers related to immigration security & enforcement (ISE) implementation to make sure the political system actually implements ISE.

Triggers

Process restrictions that lay out milestones of immigration security & enforcement before a given step toward a restricted amnesty occurs.

Uncontrolled Immigration

Any combination of blanket amnesty, uncontrolled legal immigration, and high levels of illegal immigration.

Uncontrolled Legal Immigration

Legal immigration at levels, and by type, far above historical norms and contrary to the national interest:

Includes adult-relative (other-than-spouse) visas, the visa lottery, unjustified refugee and asylee visas, and non-critical employment visas.

The Senate-passed uncontrolled-immigration bill would double legal immigration to over 2 million per year the first decade.

Hillary more of the same

https://seniorcitizenspublicsquare.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post-new.php

 

Is the Obama administration secretly negotiating treaties with globalist bodies?

Obama, Clinton Selling Out U.S. Sovereignty in Secret

By Victor Thorn

Is the Obama administration secretly negotiating treaties with globalist bodies, in violation of the Unites States Constitution? That’s the question on the minds of a number of political watchdogs, who argue that the White House is doing an end run around Congress and the American people in order to lock the country into agreements on the environment, fishing rights and even gun ownership with the United Nations (UN).

On February 7, former Bill Clinton campaign manager Dick Morris dissected a host of international “sneaky treaties” that, he says, “Once signed and ratified, have the same status as constitutional law and cannot be altered or eclipsed by Congress or state legislatures. And their provisions must be enforced by U.S. courts.”

The most egregious of these would be U.S. membership in the International Criminal Court (ICC). This tribunal that has jurisdiction across the globe could prosecute elected U.S. leaders for entering into a war without UN approval. These “crimes of aggression”—even if approved by Congress under an official declaration of war—could still land the president or cabinet members in prison.

The ICC’s reach supersedes the rulings of any U.S. court, thereby posing a serious threat to constitutionally-guaranteed trials by a jury of our peers. A lesser-known aspect of this treaty involves, ironically, the use of America’s military to wage aggressions against those deemed war criminals by the ICC. Already, Barack Obama has buckled to this ruling body by sending armed forces into Africa to execute an arrest warrant for alleged war criminal Joseph Kony, leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army in Uganda. Yet rather than having Congress authorize sending U.S. men and women into action overseas, Obama bypassed them and opted to exert his “executive power.” He justified this decision as an “international obligation.”

Who is our president obligated to: American citizens or the New World Order? Another treaty, one advocating children’s rights, would—at least superficially—protect youths from kidnapping, prostitution and human trafficking. However, if a 14-member panel determines that certain countries like the U.S. aren’t providing enough funding for food, education or clothing to underdeveloped nations, the UN could levy a tax on American citizens and then redistribute this money to Third World countries. Not surprisingly,

A leading proponent for the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) is Hillary Clinton. In her book It Takes a Village, she wrote: “The village must act in the place of parents. It accepts these responsibilities in all our names through the authority we vest in the government.These 14-member overlords could also weigh in on what religious teachings, educational material and social attitudes are acceptable.

Hillary is the war on women says kathleen wiley

Interestingly, Hillary’s views on child-rearing dovetail with those of the UNCRC. “They [parents] have to be shown how to do it,” wrote Hillary. “They have to be, in a sense, re-parented to be able to be a good parent.” Hillary is so distrustful of traditional families that she further elaborated.: “Decisions about motherhood and abortion, schooling, cosmetic surgery, treatment of venereal diseases or employment and others where the decision—or lack of one—will significantly reflect the child’s future should not be made unilaterally by the parent.”

If these social-engineering thoughts aren’t horrifying enough, Hillary remarked at the University of Texas in 1993, “Let us be willing to remold society by redefining what it means to be a human being in the 20th century, moving into the new millennium.”

A third troublesome treaty is known as the Law of the Sea Treaty, or LOST. Over 162 nations have signed or ratified it. Many other nations, such as Turkey and Israel, have stayed out of it. Obama sidesteps the Constitution yet again via executive order

. LOST is being promoted by another Clinton crony, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who seeks to surrender seas off the coasts of the United States to UN overseers. Although the complexities of this treaty are far too vast to elaborate on here, in a nutshell LOST will acquiesce to a UN council where U.S. companies can drill for oil or fish and which technologies must become global property via a form of intellectual eminent domain. The UN could tax up to 50% of royalties from offshore drilling and redistribute these proceeds to poorer nations.

panneta and UN

In another example, the Outer Space Code of Conduct could seriously interfere with the U.S. implementing any type of anti-missile shield to protect itself. Using the feel-good premise of decreasing space debris, in actuality this treaty would jeopardize the U.S. military’s ability to deploy platform-based weapons in space

When it comes to China and India’s rapid development of their space programs and offensive weaponry, are Americans willing to forfeit their safety to the edicts of UN bureaucrats that already view us with such outright enmity?

Obama and Hillary are also targeting Americans’ firearms ownership.

In early April, Sen. Rand Paul issued a statement on this: “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently announced the Obama administration will be working hand in glove with the United Nations to pass a new ‘UN Small Arms Treaty.’ ” The UN Small Arms Treaty is designed to “register, ban and confiscate firearms owned by private citizens like you,” wrote Paul.

If Washington signs onto this, added Paul, the U.S. would be forced to “enact tougher licensing requirements . . . confiscate and destroy all ‘unauthorized’ civilian firearms . . . ban the trade, sale and private ownership of semiautomatic weapons . . .[and] create an international gun registry.” – See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=4207#sthash.KWS4wdOi.dpuf

Hillary more of the same

Brzezinski Call’s The Shots; Obama’s job Is Simply To Sell Them To The People.

when your country is telling you noAnd a question: Does anyone really believe that someone, a ‘man of the people’, would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American history? He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very people that Obama says he wants to ‘set free’.

You only have to look at the cabal behind Obama, and those he has appointed to his administration team, to see what his ‘change’ is truly planned to be.

By: David Icke

His mentor, Svengali and main controller is Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor, and the co-founder, with David Rockefeller, of the Illuminati’s Trilateral Commission. Brzezinski has admitted publicly that he began to fund and train what he would call today ‘terrorists’ in Afghanistan to oppose the Soviet-controlled government in the capital, Kabul, in the late 1970s. The idea, he said, was to entice the Soviet Union to invade Afghanistan to protect the Kabul regime and thus give the rival superpower ‘their Vietnam’. The plan worked at the cost of a million Afghan lives during the Soviet occupation from 1979 to 1989, a consequence that troubles Brzezinski not at all.

Brzezinski’s ‘freedom fighters’ would become known as the ‘Mujahideen’ and later the Taliban and what is claimed to be ‘Al-Qaeda’. This is the man behind ‘anti-war’, Barack Obama. It was common knowledge that President Carter would do nothing involving foreign policy without the okay from Brzezinski, the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission which chose Carter for president. It is one of many great ironies of the Obama presidency that he was demanding massive troop reinforcements to be sent to Afghanistan to fight the Taliban terrorists who were initially armed, trained and organized by Brzezinski, the man behind Obama. As Morpheus says in The Matrix: ‘Fate, it seems, is not without its sense of irony’. if they are Brzezinski’s targets, they are Obama’s targets.

The Trilateral Commission and the wider Brzezinski network, including Illuminati fronts like the Ford Foundation, have chosen Obama and the situation will be the same. Brzezinski will call the shots; Obama’s job is simply to sell them to the people. This is rather alarming when you think that it had been said Brzezinski wants to trigger a war involving Russia and China.?????

‘Obama’s’ policies come straight from Brzezinski’s books. Here is one Brzezinski quote you might recognize and it was made before Obama ran for president: ‘Needed social reassessment … can be encouraged by deliberate civic education that stresses the notion of service to a higher cause than oneself. As some have occasionally urged, a major step in that direction would be the adoption of an obligatory period of national service for every young adult, perhaps involving a variety of congressionally approved domestic or foreign good works.’
Now where have I heard that before? As an Illuminati operative, Brzezinski’s aim is to create a world government, central bank, currency and army – a global dictatorship – underpinned by a micro chipped population connected to a global computer/satellite system. He wrote a book in 1970, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, in which he described the global society that he and the Illuminati seek to impose:

NATO International NWOFalse flag events are the new modus operandi of U.S New World Order Shadow Army– NATO and its allies, as we have witnessed in recent years, the most blatant example of which was provided in Libya before the FUKUS Axis (France-UK-US) again breached international law and slaughtered civilians. Another is planned in Ukraine to blame Russia

**The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.’ He also said in the same book nearly 40 years ago: ‘Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites … Whose ties cut across national boundaries … It is likely that before long the social elites of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook …** The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty … Further progress will require greater American sacrifices

More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position.’

And what does his puppet, Obama, now say that Americans have to do to bring about ‘change’? ‘Make sacrifices’. As Mrs. Demagogue, Michelle, said: ‘We need a different leadership because our souls are broken. We need to be inspired … to make the sacrifices that are needed to push us to a different place.’** You can bet that this will include sacrificing more sovereignty and freedom on the road to the global dictatorship described by Brzezinski for decades.

Brzezinski’s son, Mark, was an ‘advisor’ to the Obama campaign (doing what his father told him) and, in line with the American one-party-state, his other son, Ian, was *foreign policy advisor to the McCain campaign (doing what his father told him). His daughter, the Obama-supporting Mika Brzezinski, reported the campaign for MSNBC television.
Obama has been the chosen one for a long time, a fact known only to a few in the deep inner circle, and his relationship with Brzezinski almost certainly goes back to the start of the 1980s when he attended the Ivy League, and big-time Illuminati, Columbia University where Brzezinski was head of the Institute for Communist Affairs. Obama simply will not talk in any detail about this period. He has been covertly funded and supported ever since by the Trilateral Commission and its network of foundations connecting into the Ford Foundation, for whom Obama’s mother worked.

And a question: Does anyone really believe that someone, a ‘man of the people’, would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American history? He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very people that Obama says he wants to ‘set free’.

The sources of Obama funding read like a Wall Street Who’s Who – Goldman Sachs, UBS, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and so on. No wonder he went back on his pledge to accept the limitations of public funding for his campaign and instead took the no-limit option of ‘private’ funding.
And those people are going to support a candidate who does not represent their best interests?? Oh please.

Obama and his seasoned network of professional manipulators, sorry his ‘campaign team’, sold the lie that he had refused to take funding from ‘lobbyists’, those who are paid to ensure that politicians frame legislation, or block it, in the interests of their clients.

But like everything that surrounds Obama, past and present, it’s a sleight of hand and mouth. They funneled vast sums of money into the Obama accounts through law firms that represent lobbyists and lobby groups. It provided ‘plausible denial’ about funding from lobbyists while the money poured in from lobby interests via third parties.

Then there is the Jewish financier, George Soros, the multi-billionaire associate of Brzezinski and closely involved with the funding and marketing of Obama. Soros is a former board member of the Illuminati’s Council on Foreign Relations and funds the European Council on Foreign Relations. In short, he is a major insider.

You can certainly see the Soros/Brzezinski techniques in the Obama ‘revolution’ in the United States.
It was the complex and secretive network of Soros foundations and organizations, connected to the intelligence agencies of the US and Israel, that trained and funded students in the Ukraine, Georgia and elsewhere in the art of mass protest and overthrowing governments. These manufactured protests were sold to the world as ‘peoples’ revolutions’, but it just so happened that when they were over and the old regime was removed the new leaders were those waiting in the wings all along – the puppets of Soros, Brzezinski and their associated networks.

Obama is just more of the same, a big smile with strings attached, and controlled completely by the Illuminati networks that chose him, trained him, sold him and provided his record funding.** It was they who kept his many skeletons under wraps, like the gay sex and crack cocaine allegations of Larry Sinclair, and they will continue to do so as long as he jumps to their bidding.

Obama is just another Banksters’ moll prostituting himself for fame and power, and that’s why he supported the grotesque bail-out of the banking system and why he will always put their interests before the people.

110420obamamansionObama’s Chicago Home

His financial advisors are straight from the Wall Street ‘A’ list, including Paul Adolph Volker (Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group), the head of the Federal Reserve from 1979 to 1987 and Illuminati to his fingertips. Obama has made him head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board, which is dominated by insiders, including its staff director and chief economist, Austan Goolsbee, a close Obama associate from the University of Chicago. Goolsbee is an initiate of the infamous Illuminati Skull and Bones Society at Yale University, which also includes Boy and Father Bush.* It was Goolsbee who told the Canadian government not to worry about Obama’s attacks on the economic effects of ‘free trade’ agreements because his words were just to win votes in the election campaign.

Another Wall Street insider, the Zionist Timothy Geithner (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations), was appointed by Obama to be his Treasury Secretary. Geithner was the President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, the most powerful in the private ‘Federal’ Reserve cartel that masquerades as America’s ‘central bank’, and he is a former employee of both the Council on Foreign Relations and the appalling Kissinger Associates.

Obama’s Treasury team locks into the inner circle around the Zionist Robert Rubin, the Director and Senior Counselor of Citigroup, co-chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, and economic advisor to Obama. Rubin, a member of the Illuminati Bilderberg Group, was the man behind Citigroup’s strategy of expanding its risk in debt markets which forced it to be rescued by taxpayers’ money.

*The very people who caused the financial crisis appointed by Obama to decide how to respond to it (more taxpayers’ money for them and their friends).

Obama’s new “Executive Order 13524 — Amending Executive Order 12425″ grants the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) “rights” on American soil that place it beyond the reach of our own law enforcement agencies, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)!

This lays the ground work for INTERPOL do do what the President cannot legally justify doing. INTERPOL, on instructions from the Obama regime, will now be able to carry out actions prohibited to our own law enforcement!

Barack Obama is taking the U.S. down the path to MARTIAL LAW –

 

Legal battles against conservative state governors keep cropping up. Rick Perry, Scott Walker, and Bobby Jindal—all conservatives and all potential 2016 presidential candidates—have become the victims of vile smear campaigns from the left. What’s even more disturbing is that the trail of money financing these flimsy legal cases all seem to lead directly to George Soros.

George Soros has donated over $52 million to numerous liberal media outlets. He also has woven a web of influential left-wing operations, including Media Matters and Center for American Progress, that advance his socialist ideology.

Having funneled millions into journalism schools and more than 180 media outlets across the nation, it’s no wonder that the liberal media fail to report the connections between Soros and his attacks on elected officials he disagrees with. While ABC, CBS, and NBC were eagerly salivating to report on Scott Walker’s legal problems and Rick Perry’s indictment, not a single one mentioned the financial connection to George Soros.
 Media scoffed at the existence of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission and their goals for creating a one world government and economic system. Today prominent politicians, such as Hillary Clinton, make press statements with the CFR logo in the background as if to signal her allegiance to their globalist goals.

Hillary more of the sameHillary Clinton stands poised to inherit that activist indifference from the media (provided the even more thinly resumed Elizabeth Warren doesn’t decide to run). Her lack of accomplishment is being swept aside and replaced with “having been there” as some sort of resume enhancement. Her tenure as secretary of state is being portrayed as a relatively stable time, not the planting of currently sprouting seeds of problems because of her indifference and the president’s fecklessness.

Here’s some of the real Hillary as President.

Soros

whitewater

Benghazi gate

communism

it takes a village

redistribution

Billions vanished from the U.S. State Department mostly while Hillary Clinton ran it,according to alert issued by the agency’s inspector general.$6 billion are missing and it’s highly unlikely any of the money will ever be recovered. The cash was supposed to be used to pay contractors but it just disappeared and documents that could help track the dough cannot be located. How convenient! The paper trail, which federal law says must be maintained in the case of government contracts, has been destroyed or was never created to begin with.

soros picHillary’s Mentor Soros

 

scoffed at the existence of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission their goals for creating a one world government and economic system.

 

Hillary is the war on women says kathleen wileyCouncil on Foreign Relations (CFR)

@JoshDailySignal Dave Hodges

The trademarked tag line for my show, The Common Sense Show, Freeing America One Enslaved Mind At a Time, was consciously chosen to represent the brainwashing that Americans face with regard to the critical issues facing our country.

I grew up in an era where the media scoffed at the existence of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission and their goals for creating a one world government and economic system. Today, prominent politicians, such as Hillary Clinton, make press statements with the CFR logo in the background as if to signal her allegiance to their globalist goals .John McCain is a member

Agenda 21 is going through a similar transformation. The sellers of the new system don’t care if you know the truth because they believe that their plans are so far advanced that there is nothing you can do to stop the continued implementation. Continued implementation, you ask? Need I say more about our collective ignorance…?

What will these megacities look like? How will they function? Let me just say that if the average person understood what the final product is going to look like, the backlash from the populace would make the rioting in Ferguson, MO. look like a picnic by comparison.

Prominent scientists such as globalist servant, Michail Fragkias, who serves as the chief scientist for the UIN’s “Planet under Pressure” boldly states in his best Fabian Socialist voice that people should be required to reside in densely populated cities because “we certainly don’t want them strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by living closely together.”

Scientists, such as Fragkias, are developing technology which would seem quite unbelievable to the average person. Americans will be living in 300 square foot apartments, in buildings that contain furniture that folds into the wall and televisions that can become translucent or opaque upon command. The commoners will not own cars as did feudal serfs, from centuries ago, the average person will never stray more than a few miles from their home base.

 

A Snapshot of the Future

There are a number of prominent players emerging in this enslavement of America and one has taken center stage and it is called “America 2050“.

When Americans begin their morning as they depart their high rise “Stack and Pack” apartment building, they will be immediately scanned, identified and followed by the Intellistreet light poles. The light poles, already have been beta-tested in Farmington Hills, MI. and in Birmingham, UK., and will scan you for weapons after identifying you. It will have the capability to speak to you (i.e. “Don’t jaywalk Mr. Smith), issue summons to be mailed to your computer and notify the police of your location if you have a warrant for your arrest. In the last line of the following manufacturer video on Intellistreets, they admit to housing Department of Homeland Security features, but the video does not elaborate.

I have been made privy to the new technology which is being rolled out in cities like Las Vegas and various college campuses as I write these words.

Some of the DHS features would include what is loosely referred to as “mind-reading technology“. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is investing $70 million to develop a new implant that can track, and respond to, brain signals in real time. In the summer of 2013, I was contacted by an anonymous source who wanted to come on my show and expose a DARPA program of mind-reading being researched and implemented at Arizona State University. Less than two days before his scheduled appearance, he backed out sighting fears for his life. Confirmation for the involvement of Arizona State University in this project is confirmed here.

In short, Intellistreets is part of the overall Smartgrid system which will have the capacity to control 100% of your energy usage and, as we can now see, this system will monitor the population for dissident thinking and planning, presumably with the goals of eliminating any and all dissent.

Prominent scientists such as globalist servant, Michail Fragkias, who serves as the chief scientist for the UIN’s “Planet under Pressure” boldly states in his best Fabian Socialist voice that people should be required to reside in densely populated cities because “we certainly don’t want them strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by living closely together.”

Scientists, such as Fragkias, are developing technology which would seem quite unbelievable to the average person. Americans will be living in 300 square foot apartments, in buildings that contain furniture that folds into the wall and televisions that can become translucent or opaque upon command. The commoners will not own cars as did feudal serfs, from centuries ago, the average person will never stray more than a few miles from their home base.

How Will the People Be Moved Into the Stack and Packs?

As I have previously pointed out, in China they are moving rebellious rural area residents, from the outlying provinces, into the stack and pack cities, dubbed “Ghost Cities”, and they are doing so by force and at the rate of one million citizens per month.

In the United States, food will be the weapon of choice that will be used to be move people to the target areas. Today, people are being nudged by EPA and BLM policies to the inner city areas. In tomorrow’s world, food will be the enticer to move people to the inner city. With small farmers out of the way, only large corporate farms will exist.

A prominent player in the new megacities concept is Ecocity Builders. They espouse the four following beliefs:

• Human settlements modeled after sustainable development that functions with natural ecosystems and living organisms
• Reduce the inhabitants ecological impact on the environment
• Restoration of ecosystems after the recolonization of humans into dense cities
• Sustainable living under Agenda 21 supports regional, national and global economic systems

Please note the phrase “recolonization of humans into dense cities”. Does the term “recolonization” really need any further explanation?

End-Eminent-Domain-Abuse

NWO presidents.jpg 2 New world Order Presidents

The New Math

Thanks to Ted Turner for making it clear what the globalists truly want.

China presently has 65 million micro apartments that are vacant. Forgetting the Chinese one child policy, let’s assume that the Chinese have four occupants per unit.

65,000,000 x 4= 260 million Chinese residents with a home

Here is a second math problem that figures prominently into the future of the Chinese and their present 1.2 billion citizens:

1, 200, 000, 000 Chinese Citizens- 260, 000, 000 Chinese with homes..

940,000,000 missing Chinese

America has a similar math problem . Today, our estimated population is 310 million people. Yet, the 11 megacities are only expected to house six million people each.

310,000,000 million Americans – 66,000,000 megacity dwellers

244,000,000 missing Americans

About the Author

Dave Hodges is the host of the popular radio talk show, which airs from 9 PM to Midnight (Central). The show can be heard by clicking the following icon in the upper right hand corner of The Common Sense Show.

 

 

Obama the Corporatist

what happened to land of the free

By Ron Paul

Lately, many have characterized this administration as socialist, or having strong socialist leanings. I differ with this characterization. This is not to say Mr. Obama believes in free markets by any means. On the contrary, he has done and said much that demonstrates his fundamental misunderstanding of and hostility toward the truly free market.

But a closer, honest examination of his policies and actions in office reveals that, much like the previous administration, he is very much a corporatist. This in many ways can be more insidious and worse than being an outright socialist.

Socialism is a system where the government directly owns and manages businesses. Corporatism is a system where businesses are nominally in private hands, but are in fact controlled by the government. In a corporatist state, government officials often act in collusion with their favored business interests to design policies that give those interests a monopoly position, to the detriment of both competitors and consumers.

A careful examination of the policies pursued by the Obama administration and his allies in Congress shows that their agenda is corporatist. For example, the health care bill does not establish a Canadian-style government-run single-payer health care system. Instead, it relies on mandates forcing every American to purchase private health insurance or pay a fine. It also includes subsidies for low-income Americans and government-run health care “exchanges.”

Contrary to the claims of the proponents of the health care bill, large insurance and pharmaceutical companies were enthusiastic supporters of many provisions of this legislation because they knew in the end their bottom lines would be enriched by Obamacare.

To call the president a corporatist is not to soft-pedal criticism of his administration. It is merely a more accurate description of the president’s agenda

obama-communism.jpg rothchildsWhen he is called a socialist, the president and his defenders can easily deflect that charge by pointing out that the historical meaning of socialism is government ownership of industry; under the president’s policies, industry remains in nominally private hands. Using the more accurate term — corporatism — forces the president to defend his policies that increase government control of private industries and ignore  his  favorite Corps like GE and the Comcast Monopoly. as he expands de facto subsidies to big businesses.

This also promotes the understanding that though the current system may not be pure socialism, neither is it free market since government controls the private sector through taxes, regulations and subsidies, and has done so for decades.

Using precise terms can prevent future statists from successfully blaming the inevitable failure of their programs on the remnants of the free market that are still allowed to exist. We must not allow the disastrous results of corporatism to be ascribed incorrectly to free market capitalism or used as a justification for more government expansion. Most importantly, we must learn what freedom really is and educate others on how infringements on our economic liberties caused our economic woes in the first place.

Government is the Problem. It Cannot Be the Solution.

The fundamental problem with health care costs in America is that the doctor-patient relationship has been profoundly altered by third-party interference. Third parties, either government agencies themselves or nominally private insurance companies virtually forced upon us by government policies, have not only destroyed doctor-patient confidentiality. They also inescapably drive up costs because basic market disciplines — supply and demand, price sensitivity and profit signals — are destroyed. Obamacare, via its insurance mandate, is more of the same misdiagnosis.

Note added 11/28/14

Hungary Kills The Rothschild Banks: Ordered To Vacate Country.Hungary is making history of the first order along with Iceland & Russia.

Not since the 1930s in Germany has a major European country dared to escape from the clutches of the Rothschild-controlled international banking cartels. This is stupendous news that should encourage nationalist patriots worldwide to increase the fight for freedom from financial tyranny.

GLOBAL ELITES THROWN OUT OF ICELAND: Iceland Dismantles Corrupt Gov’t Then Arrests All Rothschild Bankers |

Since the 1900′s the vast majority of the American population has dreamed about saying “NO” to the Unconstitutional, corrupt, Rothschild/Rockefeller banking criminals, but no one has dared to do so. Why? If just half of our Nation, and the “1%”, who pay the majority of the taxes, just said NO MORE! Our Gov’t would literally change over night. Why is it so hard, for some people to understand, that by simply NOT giving your money, to large Corporations, who then send jobs, Intellectual Property, etc. offshore and promote anti-Constitutional rights…

Hillary more of the same

 

Hungary Kills The Rothschild Banks: Ordered To Vacate Country

end rothchild bankersHungary is making history of the first order along with Iceland & Russia.

Not since the 1930s in Germany has a major European country dared to escape from the clutches of the Rothschild-controlled international banking cartels. This is stupendous news that should encourage nationalist patriots worldwide to increase the fight for freedom from financial tyranny.

Already in 2011, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Orb%C3%A1n”Orbán promised to serve justice on his socialist predecessors, who sold the nation’s people into unending debt slavery under the lash of the International Monetary Fund (IMF)

The popular, nationalistic prime minister told the IMF that Hungary neither wants nor needs further “assistance” from that proxy of the Rothschild-owned Federal Reserve Bank.

No longer will Hungarians be forced to pay usurious interest to private, unaccountable central bankers

Instead, the Hungarian government has assumed sovereignty over its own currency and now issues money debt free, as it is needed. The results have been nothing short of remarkable.

The nation’s economy, formerly staggering under deep indebtedness, has recovered rapidly.

Orbán declared: “Hungary enjoys the trust of investors,” by which is not meant the IMF, the Fed or any other tentacle of the Rothschild financial empire. Rather, he was referring to investors who produce something in Hungary for Hungarians and cause true economic growth.

This is not the “paper prosperity” of plutocratic pirates, but the sort of production that actually employs people and improves their lives.

obama-communism.jpg rothchildsThe New World Order is “Communism”: Also Known As Rothschildism Or More Bluntly Robbery!

With Hungary now free from the shackles of servitude to debt slavers, it is no wonder that the president of the Hungarian central bank, operated by the government for the public welfare and not private enrichment, has demanded that the IMF close its offices in that ancient European land.

In addition, the state attorney general, echoing Iceland’s efforts, has brought charges against the last three previous prime ministers because of the criminal amount of debt into which they plunged the nation.

cia2.jpg graham and palsIf the United States would follow the lead of Hungary, Americans could be freed from the usurers’ tyranny and likewise hope for a return

   http://politicalvelcraft.org/2013/08/28/hungary-orders-rothschilds-imf-to-vacate-the-country-now-issuing-debt-free-money/

Rothschild Too Big To Jail? Russia, Iceland, Iran, China, & Hungary Say No!

Hillary more of the same

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Politicians Like the Clintons, Obama, McCain, Boehner, Lawyers and Bankers killed the American Dream.

Republican House Speaker John Boehner is facing a primary opponent in his District in Ohio – a local high school teacher named J.D. Winteregg. He is challenging Boehner’s conservative credentials and ability to lead the Republican Party.

Winteregg has stepped up to do what most Republicans won’t – confront Boehner.

Here’s his argument:

Boehner voted to fund Obamacare.
• Boehner voted to raise the debt ceiling.
• Boehner voted to fund Planned Parenthood.
• Boehner refused to investigate Benghazi.
• Boehner refused to investigate the IRS scandal.
• Boehner takes money from liberal PAC’s.
• Then, last week, Boehner told donors in a private meeting that he’s “hell-bent” on passing amnesty!

boehner and obamaBoehner takes money from liberal PAC’s.+ hell-bent” on passing amnesty for illegals.

We believe the case Winteregg makes against Boehner’s re-election is rock-solid.

The truth is, Boehner has been in Washington D.C. for 24 years. He’s a part of the establishment, and he’s bargaining away our Constitutional rights and our free enterprise system. In every instance where Boehner concedes to the liberals, in the name of cooperation, we lose.

A new poll shows Boehner is in trouble! Voters are finally waking-up to his shady deals with the liberals.

The era of go-along, get-along leadership must end. Over and over, people like Boehner forget why they were elected in the first place and abandon the very reason they were sent to Washington!

In 2010 we showed the world that conservative principles can prevail. It is time to demonstrate that strength again.

Politicians Like the Clintons, Obama, McCain, Boehner,Pelosi Lawyers, and Bankers killed the American Dream.
We ate our own young. More money if you can shoot a hoop rather than cure a disease. Entitlement for the lazy and ignorant. Voters who know more about the Kardashian’s then the Constitution, Elected Officials like Obama who are great talkers but totally worthless Leaders .

US-POLITICS-OBAMA-GOLF

pelosi laugh pic cuts out demonstrators They marched by thousands of our Citizen’s protesting Obamacare laughing at them. what 2

It sort of puts a new slant on how you view your friendly bank, doesn’t it?

kennedy was to expose plot

by John P. Curran

“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it”.
Louis T. McFadden Chairman of the House Banking Committee in the 1930s

With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. Two weeks later he was killed.

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree. Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superseded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.

in 1910 Senator Nelson Aldrich, then Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, in collusion with representatives of the European central banks, devised a plan to pressure and deceive Congress into enacting legislation that would covertly establish a private central bank.

This bank would assume control over the American economy by controlling the issuance of its money. After a huge public relations campaign, engineered by the foreign central banks, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was slipped through Congress during the Christmas recess, with many members of the Congress absent. President Woodrow Wilson, pressured by his political and financial backers, signed it on December 23, 1913.

The act created the Federal Reserve System, a name carefully selected and designed to deceive. “Federal” would lead one to believe that this is a government organization. “Reserve” would lead one to believe that the currency is being backed by gold and silver. “System” was used in lieu of the word “bank” so that one would not conclude that a new central bank had been created.

In reality, the act created a private, for profit, central banking corporation owned by a cartel of private banks. Who owns the FED? The Rothchilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg of Germany; and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman, Sachs and the Rockefeller families of New York

.Did you know that the FED is the only for-profit corporation in America that is exempt from both federal and state taxes? The FED takes in about one trillion dollars per year tax free! The banking families listed above get all that money.

Almost everyone thinks that the money they pay in taxes goes to the US Treasury to pay for the expenses of the government. Do you want to know where your tax dollars really go? If you look at the back of any check made payable to the IRS you will see that it has been endorsed as “Pay Any F.R.B. Branch or Gen. Depository for Credit U.S. Treas. This is in Payment of U.S. Oblig.” Yes, that’s right, every dime you pay in income taxes is given to those private banking families, commonly known as the FED, tax free.

**Like many of you, I had some difficulty with the concept of creating money from nothing

. You may have heard the term “monetizing the debt,” which is kind of the same thing. As an example, if the US Government wants to borrow $1 million $ the government does borrow every dollar it spends  they go to the FED to borrow the money. The FED calls the Treasury and says print 10,000 Federal Reserve Notes (FRN) in units of one hundred dollars.

The Treasury charges the FED 2.3 cents for each note, for a total of $230 for the 10,000 FRNs. The FED then lends the $1 million to the government at face value plus interest. To add insult to injury, the government has to create a bond for $1 million as security for the loan. And the rich get richer. The above was just an example, because in reality the FED does not even print the money; it’s just a computer entry in their accounting system. To put this on a more personal level, let’s use another example.

Today’s banks are members of the Federal Reserve Banking System. This membership makes it legal for them to create money from nothing and lend it to you. Today’s banks, like the goldsmiths of old, realize that only a small fraction of the money deposited in their banks is ever actually withdrawn in the form of cash. Only about 4 percent of all the money that exists is in the form of currency. The rest of it is simply a computer entry.

Let’s say you’re approved to borrow $10,000 to do some home improvements. You know that the bank didn’t actually take $10,000 from its pile of cash and put it into your pile? They simply went to their computer and input an entry of $10,000 into your account. They created, from thin air, a debt which you have to secure with an asset and repay with interest. The bank is allowed to create and lend as much debt as they want as long as they do not exceed the 10:1 ratio imposed by the FED.

 **It sort of puts a new slant on how you view your friendly bank, doesn’t it?

How about those loan committees that scrutinize you with a microscope before approving the loan they created from thin air. What a hoot! They make it complex for a reason. They don’t want you to understand what they are doing. People fear what they do not understand. You are easier to delude and control when you are ignorant and afraid.

Now to put the frosting on this cake. When was the income tax created? If you guessed 1913, the same year that the FED was created, you get a gold star. Coincidence? What are the odds? If you are going to use the FED to create debt, who is going to repay that debt? The income tax was created to complete the illusion that real money had been lent and therefore real money had to be repaid.

So, what can be done? My father taught me that you should always stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand up alone.

If “We the People” don’t take some action now, there may come a time when “We the People” are no more. You should write a letter or send an email to each of your elected representatives. Many of our elected representatives do not understand the FED. Once informed they will not be able to plead ignorance and remain silent.

Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can “coin money and regulate the value thereof.” The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency.

Ask your representative, in light of that information, how it is possible for the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the Federal Reserve Bank that it created, to be constitutional. Ask them why this private banking cartel is allowed to reap trillions of dollars in profits without paying taxes. Insist on an answer.

Thomas Jefferson said, “If the America people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currencies, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their prosperity until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt.”

John P. Curran  Source:http://www.roc-grp.org/jfk.html

Does anyone really believe that someone, a ‘man of the people’, would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American history? He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very people that Obama says he wants to ‘set free’.

You only have to look at the cabal behind Obama, and those he has already appointed to his administration team, to see what his ‘change’ is truly planned to be. 

a question : Does anyone really believe that someone, a ‘man of the people’, would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American history? He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very people that Obama says he wants to ‘set free’.

The sources of Obama funding read like a Wall Street Who’s Who – Goldman Sachs, UBS, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and so on. No wonder he went back on his pledge to accept the limitations of public funding for his campaign and instead took the no-limit option of ‘private’ funding.
And those people are going to support a candidate who does not represent their best interests?? “David Icke”

barack-obama-making-americans-slaves206165_453413278032501_108773658_n

The President Who Has Done the Most Damage

by Dennis Prager

I have been broadcasting for 31 years and writing for longer than that. I do not recall ever saying on radio or in print that a president is doing lasting damage to our country. I did not like the presidencies of Jimmy Carter (the last Democrat I voted for) or Bill Clinton. Nor did I care for the “compassionate conservatism” of George W. Bush. In modern political parlance “compassionate” is a euphemism for ever-expanding government.

But I have never written or broadcast that our country was being seriously damaged by a president. So it is with great sadness that I write that President Barack Obama has done and continues to do major damage to America. The only question is whether this can ever be undone.

This is equally true domestically and internationally.

Domestically, his policies have gravely impacted the American economy. He has overseen the weakest recovery from a recession in modern American history.

He has mired the country in unprecedented levels of debt: about $6.5 trillion dollars in five years (this after calling his predecessor “unpatriotic” for adding nearly $5 trillion in eight years).

He has fashioned a country in which more Americans now receive government aid — means-tested, let alone non-means tested — than work full-time.

He has no method of paying for this debt other than printing more money — thereby surreptitiously taxing everyone through inflation, including the poor he claims to be helping, and cheapening the dollar to the point that some countries are talking another reserve currency — and saddling the next generations with enormous debts.

With his 2,500-page Affordable Care Act, he has made it impossible for hundreds of thousands, soon millions, of Americans to keep their individual or employee-sponsored group health insurance; he has stymied American medical innovation with an utterly destructive tax on medical devices; and he has caused hundreds of thousands of workers to lose full-time jobs because of the health care costs imposed by Obamacare on employers.

His Internal Revenue Service used its unparalleled power to stymie political dissent. No one has been held accountable.

His ambassador to Libya and three other Americans were murdered by terrorists in Benghazi, Libya. No one has been blamed. The only blame the Obama administration has leveled was on a video maker in California who had nothing to do with the assault.

In this president’s White House, the buck stops nowhere.

Among presidents in modern American history, he has also been a uniquely divisive force. It began with his forcing Obamacare through Congress — the only major legislation in American history to be passed with no votes from the opposition party.

Though he has had a unique opportunity to do so, he has not only not helped heal racial tensions, he has exacerbated them. His intrusions into the Trayvon Martin affair (“If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon”) and into the confrontation between a white police officer and a black Harvard professor (the police “acted stupidly”) were unwarranted, irresponsible, demagogic and, most of all, divisive.

He should have been reassuring black Americans that America is in fact the least racist country in the world — something he should know as well anybody, having been raised only by whites and being the first black elected the leader of a white-majority nation. Instead, he echoed the inflammatory speech of professional race-baiters such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.

He has also divided the country by economic class, using classic Marxist language against “the rich” and “corporate profits.”

Regarding America in the world, he has been, if possible, even more damaging. The United States is at its weakest, has fewer allies, and has less military and diplomatic influence than at any time since before World War I.

One wonders if there is a remaining ally nation that trusts him. And worse, no American enemy fears him. If you are a free movement (the democratic Iranian and Syrian oppositions) or a free country (Israel), you have little or no reason to believe that you have a steadfast ally in the United States.

Even non-democratic allies no longer trust America. Barack Obama has alienated our most important and longest standing Arab allies, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Both the anti-Muslim Brotherhood and the anti-Iran Arab states have lost respect for him.And his complete withdrawal of American troops from Iraq has left that country with weekly bloodbaths.

Virtually nothing Barack Obama has done has left America or the world better since he became president. Nearly everything he has touched has been made worse.

He did, however, promise before the 2008 election that “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

That is the one promise he has kept.

 

 

The dollar is dead, or at the very least, the walking dead, and its days as the world’s reserve currency are numbered.

 

Ben Bernanke the dollar is dead lrg

by examinor.com

On April 17, former U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Roy Potter issued a statement that the recent drop in gold prices was due to a forced manipulation by the central bank as a message to the states that were either demanding their physical gold back from the Fed, or who were passing legislation allowing for the free use of gold and silver. Not coincidentally, the dumping of 500 tons of Paper gold onto the markets came one day after President Barack Obama‘s meeting with many high officials in the banking industry, to include Lloyd Blankfein and Jamie Dimon.

Lt. Col. Potter: You notice that gold took a big dip. The Federal Reserve did that by dropping a whole bunch of paper gold certificates, or however they do their trading… to lower the price to make it look like a bunch of gold had been dropped on the market when actually it hadn’t.

The Purpose of that was to make gold not as attractive as an investment. But there is more to it than that. I want to point this out to you…. remember, Texas and some other states (Texas being the first one), demanded their gold back from the Federal Reserve when it was at $1600 an ounce. And now that the price has dropped, they were trying to make people not as interested in keeping (holding) it.

 But the point is, this was done not just as an act against individuals, this was an act done against state governments. The Federal Reserve is a private entity backed by the power of the Federal government, telling the states no, you’re not going to get your gold back

. – Lt. Colonel Roy Potter, April 17  The coincidence of the massive gold short, nearly 25% of the entire global gold production for one year, being thrown into the markets one day after the bank meeting with President Obama cannot be ignored. Lloyd Blankfein and Jamie Dimon are the heads of two banks which are shareholders in the private Federal Reserve, and have the power to direct any market they see fit, using trillions of dollars of leverage at any given time.

Earlier this week, the state of Arizona joined the state of Utah in allowing its citizens to perform transactions within the state using gold and silver as recognized money. Couple this with The state of Texas demanding their gold holdings back from the Federal Reserve in late March, and you begin to see a growing disconnect between trust in the dollar, and the need to find alternatives to a devaluing currency.

People and sovereign nations around the world, mostly outside the Western economic sphere, are quickly moving away from the dollar, and into hard assets like gold and silver. Several economists, including Peter Schiff who called the bursting of the housing bubble well in advance back in 2006, have stated that the dollar is dead, or at the very least, the walking dead, and its days as the world’s reserve currency are numbered.

This week has been one of the most chaotic in America’s history, with events not seen since 9/11, the days of Watergate, or the assassination of President John Kennedy. Terror attacks, shootings, and other events like the explosion that occurred near Waco, Texas, are masking other events which deal with the financial and economic crisis now brewing in the U.S.. And as Lt. Colonel Roy Potter has pointed out, the use of a 500 ton shorting of gold by the Federal Reserve is an additional attack on the people, and on the states, in an attempt to consolidate power for a government and a currency that is experiencing a waning confidence by its populace.