The goal Democrat amnesty supporters is not to bring 11 million illegal immigrants humanely “out of the shadows,” but to turn them into voters.

rubio gang og 8

breitbart.com

A Politico cover story perfectly encapsulates the bizarre, insular world of the D.C. political establishment. The article purports to take readers behind the scenes of the strategic machinations of the Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) campaign

It is a fairly basic rule of thumb that campaign staffs should always make political stories about the candidate, not themselves. Barely 100 words into the story, however, the reader introduced to no fewer than three top aides to Rubio. Worse, the story is devoted to chronicling an allegedly brilliant trap the three had set for one of Rubio’s rivals.

Obviously, staff have a large role in developing and executing a campaign, but publicly this should always be subordinate to the candidate. Did the staff who leaked this story want to profile Marco Rubio or themselves?

Read the article, you’ll learn that was a rhetorical question.

Most political campaigns are surrounded by people who seek the limelight for themselves. On its own, this Politico story is part of a sad legacy of campaign advisors who try to use an election to raise their own personal profile.

This article, though, creates an entirely new chapter of the genre because it chooses to highlight a strategy that can only be described as inane. The “trap” supposedly hatched by the Rubio staff was to pick an arcane fight over technicalities of a bill that itself represents an existential threat to Rubio’s candidacy.

One of the biggest obstacles to Marco Rubio winning the Republican nomination was his decision to co-sponsor the infamous “Gang of 8” immigration reform bill. Written primarily by Sens. Dick Durbin and Chuck Schumer, the legislation provided a quick path to amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants with the barest fig-leaf of border protections far into the future.

Rubio took the lead on the effort just months after President Obama won reelection, at a time that the D.C. Republican party establishment was desperate to enact some kind of immigration reform. It represented a complete misreading of the public and, especially, the Republican base.

Just over a year later, Republicans would thunder into a Senate Majority, largely by campaigning against the very amnesty provisions contained in Rubio’s bill.

Recognizing that the amnesty legislation currently represents a challenge to Rubio’s ambitions, the Rubio campaign staff, according to Politico, has chosen to actually use this legislation against one of his chief rivals, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)

. Their “smoking gun” was an amendment to the Gang of 8 bill proposed by Cruz that would have allowed legalizing illegal immigrants but permanently blocked them from becoming citizens.

Politico sets the scene in Rubio’s headquarters when Cruz said during the most recent debate that he didn’t support legalization:

In that moment, Rubio campaign manager Terry Sullivan, top adviser Todd Harris and communications director Alex Conant recognized what they’d accomplished because they’d been planning this exchange all along. Not only had Cruz just contradicted his own statements from 2013, he’d used words that gave them the opening they had been wanting to turn their rival’s anti-establishment narrative on its head.

So, Rubio’s “trap” for Cruz was to compare his stated position to a hostile legislative amendment filed to a proposal he was opposing.

“This was an attempt by Cruz to kill the  Amnesty bill,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, co-author of the Gang of Eight bill said of Cruz’s amendment. “And there was no doubt at the time that Senator Cruz knew it would do exactly that.”

What Cruz understands is that the goal of Sens. Schumer, Durbin and other Democrat amnesty supporters is not to bring 11 million illegal immigrants humanely “out of the shadows,” but to turn them into voters.

Cruz’s amendment exposed that truth.

The particularly inane part of the Rubio staff’s strategy is that they are choosing to focus on complicated, inside-baseball legislative machinations around legislation that was sponsored by Rubio and hated by an overwhelming majority of Republicans.

Rubio’s campaign ought to focus on foreign policy and try to forget the Senator ever embraced amnesty in the first place. When the chief opponent of Rubio’s amnesty legislation, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) 80% publicly lists Cruz as an ally against amnesty, no one, other than a Politico reporter, is going to take seriously Rubios campaign’s spin.

If anything, the entire episode simply reminds Republican voters that Marco

Rubio did team up with Sens. Schumer and Durbin to push amnesty legislation.

In the 1980 primary, Ronald Reagan’s primary challenges tried to argue that he had supported tax hikes in the past or had been pro-choice on abortion. These weren’t really true, but rather based on creative reading of past legislative debates. Voters didn’t buy it, no matter how clever the challengers, or their staffs, tried.

Rubio’s weird attempt to blunt his own record on amnesty by claiming that Cruz at one time supported something like it seems equally doomed to fail.

Pollster Frank Luntz reported that Ted Cruz scored the highest positive ratings during the Las Vegas debate. Cruz didn’t really have any of the memorable zingers or one-liners that political pundits dissect. What he did have was composure and confidence, at a time that much of the public is filled with anxiety.

ted cruz bst flag

That anxiety is fueled in no small part by a feeling that the political class in Washington is out of touch and almost inhabits an alternate universe. A universe where a campaign to be the leader of the free world leaks its internal strategy deliberations to Politico.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/18/marco-rubio-staff-leak-inane-strategy-politico/

 

 

 

Ted Cruz Bio

ted cruz bst flag “There are some who believe that the path to Republican victory is to run to the mushy middle, is to blur distinctions,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said in January in response to a question about Romney. “I think that recent history has shown us that’s not a path to success. It doesn’t work. It’s failed electoral strategy.”

BIO

After graduating from Princeton, Cruz attended Harvard Law School, graduating magna cum laude in 1995 Referring to Cruz’s time as a student at Harvard Law, Professor Alan Dershowitz said, “Cruz was off-the-charts brilliant”

Cruz served as a law clerk to J. Michael Luttig of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and William Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United States in 1996.Cruz was the first Hispanic ever to clerk for a Chief Justice of the United States.1999 and 2003,

Cruz served as the director of the Office of Policy Planning at the Federal Trade Commission, an Associate Deputy Attorney General at the United States Department of Justice, , Cruz was an Adjunct Professor of Law at the University of Texas School of Law in Austin, where he taught U.S. Supreme Court litigation, from 2004 to 2009. Cruz has tried cases before the Supreme Court

cruz constitution We can trust Ted Cruz to follow our constitution. He is the most qualified to be President Left or Right. Cruz is someone that the left is going to try and dig up garbage on, because he doesn’t claim a strong alliance with any side, he plots the course he believes in.

James Carville:  Ted Cruz “the most talented and fearless Republican.He has no fear,Ted Cruz will eat their lunch”

Ted Cruz Vowed to Put strong Conservatives on the Supreme Court.       As examples, he cited Chief Justice John Roberts, an appointee of President George W. Bush, who rejected a challenge to President Barack Obama’s health care law in 2012, and Justice Anthony Kennedy, a Ronald Reagan appointee, who voted in 2015 to make same-sex marriage a constitutional right. Both cases were decided 5 to 4.

His goal? To match Democrats’ “nearly perfect record” of picking justices who vote reliably with their movement. “The Republicans have an abysmal record. We bat about .500,” he said  “About half of the nominees Republicans have put on the court have not just occasionally disappointed but have turned into absolute disasters.” His ideal contender would be someone who has refused to bow to pressure, rather than a “stealth candidate” without a demonstrable conservative record.

cruz a great service

The land-related provisions in the defense authorization. In his statement, Cruz criticized “self-serving politicians” for trying to “exploit” the annual defense authorization and called on colleagues to reject the current draft:  At a time where jobs are scarce and the federal government has removed billions of acres of land from productive use, Congress should not be restricting more than a half-million new acres. Four federal agencies — the Bureau of Land Management, the Forest Service, the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Park Service — oversee the acres owned by the government. The land-related provisions in the defense authorization angered national security experts and conservative groups alike.

Sen. Ted Cruz Blasts Obama’s Plan to Arm Syrian Rebels:  speaking on the Senate Floor where he blasted President Obama’s plan to arm Syrian rebels, many of whom are aligned with Al-Qaeda. Cruz said plainly: (2013)

“Number one, don’t arm al Qaida. Don’t arm those who hate us. Don’t arm those who want to kill us.”

Sen. Cruz indicated as many as “seven of nine” primary rebel groups in Syria are tied to Al-Qaeda, and he quoted from reports that the Al-Qaeda leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri had said one of the main rebel groups in Syria acts on his orders.

future must not belong to

 

     
     

 

 

 

Five Globalist Presidents have brought us to their hateful New World Order. All refused to close our southern border.

america the beautiful

Kit Daniels | Infowars.com

It’s time YOU take a step back, re-examine history, and STOP listening to the Mainstream Media it is Obama who has been accused of Treason by the highest levels in government, not you.

“America has switched sides in the war on terror under President Obama. Clare Lopez was willing to say what a few members of Congress have said in private, but declined to say on-the-record.”

It’s time people decide if they want their country back, or not. If they do, it’s time to stop headline reading and sound bite seeking. The time has come to get INFORMED, spread this to everyone you know, and tell everyone you see. If we wait, this country is lost. Congress are the only ones who can stop Obama, because even though Obama seems to think he has power over who gets in the country, Congress and ONLY Congress has plenary power over immigration.

NWO Presidents

Five Globalist Presidents have brought us to their hateful New World Order. Spreading the middle class wealth our forefathers fought and died for to nations that hate us. All refused to close our southern border.

Several of the same are running for the office of POTUS right now. In my opinion 3 are Bush, Rubio, and Graham

NO MORE TALK, TIME FOR ACTION!

The time to make a stand against Barack Obama has finally come. For seven years we’ve repeatedly heard, “Oh, Obama will never be able to do that, the people will stop him,” and no one has even lifted a finger much less stop him, but here and now, unless we want what happened in Paris happening on our doorsteps, killing our children, then the rubber has finally met the road, and the time to act has come.

morsi-gets-tanks1

Much of what I am about to write, you can see and hear you will find in the video at the end of this post. It is one of the most powerful I’ve ever seen. It is your DUTY as an American to enlighten yourselves on the FACTS.

If you, or anyone else around you suggests the words I speak in this post, or those that you hear in the video at the end sound treasonous, then perhaps it’s time YOU take a step back, re-examine history, and STOP listening to the Mainstream Media. Chief Justice William Douglass, the LONGEST sitting Supreme Court justice in this nation’s history said, “The RIGHT to revolt has sources DEEP within out nations history.” Besides, it is Obama who has been accused of Treason by the highest levels in government, not you.

damn-you-obama

The former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, General Michael Flynn, accused Obama of “knowingly and willingly arming ISIS.” Keep in mind that is an appointed position by the President, so that was one of his own turning on him. Then there’s 4 Star Admiral Lyons, Lieutenant General Thomas McInnerney, The former CIA Director, Former Assistant Director of the FBI, Former CIA agent Clare M. Lopez, who is now the Vice President for Research and Analysis at the Center for Security Policy and a Senior Fellow at The Clarion Project, the London Center for Policy Research, and the Canadian Meighen Institute, and if I’m not mistake General Valley has also, but don’t quote me on the last one. The point is, the list of people accusing President Obama of outright treason is long, and distinguished. Clare M. Lopez bluntly told the newspaper, World Net Daily, that:

America has switched sides in the war on terror under President Obama

cartoon your all good people rightClare Lopez was willing to say what a few members of Congress have said in private, but declined to say on-the-record.”

It’s time people decide if they want their country back, or not. If they do, it’s time to stop headline reading and sound bite seeking.

The time has come to get INFORMED, spread this to everyone you know and tell everyone you see. If we wait, this country is lost. Congress are the only ones who can stop Obama, because even though Obama seems to think he has power over who gets in the country, Congress and ONLY Congress has plenary power over immigration.

Again 5 POTUS Democrat and GOP all Globalist’s puppets. none closed the border none stopped illegal immigration or slowed legal uneducated of over a million a year. Nor did they do anything productive to stop the job run to oversea”. (jc)

NWO presidents.jpg 2

smiley-sign0085

James Madison, the Father of the Constitution, said:

“The ultimate authority resides within the people, and if the federal government ever got too powerful and overstepped its authority, then the people were to develop plans of resistance and resort to arms.”

Thomas Jefferson wrote:

“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was, and what never will be.”

jeb-bush-immigration New World Order Progressive ?

Rubio puppetRubio Globalist NWO  Puppet ?

 

Trump’s Tax Plan

untitled.png3

Trump’s code, which he calls the “1-5-10-15 income tax plan,” is a simplistic way to fix our nation’s broken taxation system, without putting the strain on any particular group of people.

Under Trump’s tax plan, those making up to…

$30,000 per year will pay 1 percent in federal income taxes

$30,000 to $100,000 will pay 5 percent

$100,000 to $1 million will pay 10 percent

$1 million or above will pay 15 percent

“It’s clear and fair,” wrote Trump on his tax plan. “Best of all, it can be filled out on the back of a postcard and will save Americans big bucks on accountants and massive amounts of time wasted attempting to decipher the tax code.”

Trump also wrote, “Imagine your paycheck was 40 percent higher than it currently is. What could you do with 40 percent more wealth? How many jobs and opportunities for others could you create?”

“The longer you really think about it the madder you will get,” he wrote, “especially when you consider the waste, fraud, and abuse the federal government traffics in as it inflicts its self-defeating policies on hard-working Americans.”

Trump’s rhetoric on taxes continues to this day. On CBS’ “Face the Nation,” Trump stated that he tries to pay as little tax as possible.

“I fight like hell to pay as little as possible, for two reasons. Number one, I am a businessman, and that’s the way you are supposed to do it. And you put the money back in your company and employees and all of that.”

He also added, “But the other reason is that I hate the way our government spends our taxes. I hate the way they waste our money, trillions and trillions of dollars of waste and abuse. And I hate it.”

Trump’s proposed tax plan is fair and shows real promise at fixing what has arguably become America’s biggest headache. It doesn’t tax the poor to the point of bankruptcy, and it doesn’t punish the rich for being successful.

Donald Trump Message makes sense for our country

untitled.png3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls3m7NUOqxs&feature=youtu.be

Urgent Message from Donald J. Trump

Dear Friend,

Are you ready to Make America Great Again?

Since I announced my candidacy for the Republican nomination for president I have soared to first place in the polls, defying the mainstream media and the GOP establishment.

I am rising in the polls because of you – and the fact that I am offering the American people an alternative to the inept career politicians who talk big but never produce results.

I have a long track record of producing big results. Very big results.

Frankly, I am running for president because I hate seeing what is happening to America – the country I love so much.

I am sick and tired of China and Mexico and all other countries beating us at the negotiating table – getting one-sided trade deals from Washington officials.

They have been letting these countries rip off our jobs, killing our potential for economic growth.

Let’s face it, America is in deep trouble.

We are a laughingstock around the globe as our incompetent leaders like Obama and Hillary Clinton get outmaneuvered.

Our economy is a disaster.

I think the American people are ready for some hard truths.You know I call it the way I see it. Thanks to Obama, the American dream is dead.

But I can bring it back – bigger and better and stronger than ever before.

A few weeks ago the political establishment went crazy when I pointed out the fact that some illegal aliens from Mexico, being pushed into our country by the Mexican government, are bringing crime, drugs and murder to the United States.

The media tried to smear me, claiming I was “racist” and that I attacked the Mexican people.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

I forced the media to focus on a number of horrific crimes in which U.S. citizens were killed by illegal immigrants who got into the country because our borders are so porous practically anyone can walk into the United States.

In the face of this media onslaught, my poll numbers actually went up.

I even pulled well ahead of Jeb Bush, the supposed “front-runner.”

Bush is a weak and ineffective leader who would merely preside over the continued decline of this country. If he gets the nomination, we lose in 2016.

I am very critical of John McCain’s record in the U.S. Senate. He has done little to help veterans.

McCain with Svaboda Nazi's (McCain with Nazi Svaboda leaders McCain certainly has a penchant for bolstering shadowy forces, usually labeling them with risible euphemisms like “freedom fighters”) (added by jj)

John McCain has been in the Senate for 30 years and worked closely with Senator Bernie Sanders to pass legislation to ensure that no one was held responsible for the scandal at Obama’s Veterans Administration, in which over 1,000 of our veterans died waiting for medical care.

Ironically many of these veterans died in the VA hospital in Phoenix, Arizona – McCain’s home state!

It’s just like Benghazi – incompetent and pathetic officials screw up, then Americans die . . . and no one in Washington is held responsible.

In charge of everything responsible for nothing

My concern is for all those men and women who served this country.

As president, I would build the finest Veterans Hospital system in the world where our veterans would have universal access – and I will do it for far less in tax dollars than we are spending now on our disgraceful broken Veterans Administration health care system.

soldiers 2.jpg 3

The political establishment is in shock over the way I have taken the lead in the presidential race – and they are scared to death.

I am not afraid – I know Americans like you are with me.

Because my campaign will be funded mostly with my own money, the Washington insiders know that the lobbyists and special interests will have no influence in a Trump administration.

The special interests know you can’t “buy” me.

As I have traveled across the country I have met thousands of Americans who want to join our crusade. Actually, some people are calling it a movement.

The media, however, wants to claim that I have no grass-roots support.

I want to prove them wrong. I am asking you to stand with me and join with me today.

I believe so much in this campaign and that we can Make America Great Again, that I will match dollar-for-dollar every dollar donated by people like you.

If you will send a contribution of $25, $50, $100, $250 or more I will personally match whatever gift you give.

If you can send $500, $1,000 or more, I will also match that.

Show your support – Go Here Now

I want to show the liberal media that not since the days of Ronald Reagan has there been such a grass-roots movement of people ready to transform our party and our country.

My #1 goal is to create the greatest economic boom in American history, to unleash the incredible spirit of free enterprise in this country – get America moving again!

I have been tremendously blessed in this country.

I want all American families to share in the great economic opportunities this country offers.

I am very rich and I created something very special.I want to make you and the American people rich.

I have no doubt the liberal media and the GOP establishment will continue to attack me.

But, make no mistake, I will never back down or apologize in the fight to make America great again.     obama crimes

Stand with me today and send a powerful message to the establishment by supporting my campaign

Please rush me your answer today – Go Here Now.

Sincerely,

DickMorris.com

picture’s added by jj

Obama’s FCC Internet Takeover Will Radically Change America

obama and vallery“Net Neutrality” is the first major step of federal control over the Internet.

With the FCC’s decision Thursday to give the federal government massive control over the regulation of the Internet, this has now happened.

As Dick Morris explains in “Power Grab,” this is truly a pivotal move.

Major Internet companies are now subservient to an FCC controlled by Obama and his most liberal minions.

Even after decisive victories for the GOP in the midterm elections, the radical agenda of Obama is being advanced daily.

Morris predicted all of this in “Power Grab.”

Morris’ powerful exposé of Barack Obama — Power Grab: Obama’s Dangerous Plan for a One-Party Nation — rips the lid off of Obama’s scary plan to re-create our nation with a “ruling” single party: the Democratic Party and its most liberal wing!

Obama was not concerned about the congressional elections. He is concerned about the levers of Democratic power, such as getting illegal aliens to vote, increasing entitlements and dependency, intimidating political enemies, and controlling the very circuits of a free society. . . such as the Internet!

This is why Dr. Ben Carson is joining with Dick Morris and warning Americans about this new threat.

Ben Carson said: “I read ‘Power Grab’ and couldn’t put it down. It thoroughly reveals President Obama’s hidden agenda.”

Many believe that Barack Obama is a lame duck in his last two years.

As Dick Morris reveals, these last two years are absolute critical for Obama’s master plan. . . which is to lock out the Republicans permanently from the White House!

“Power Grab” has become a #1 best-seller and was instantly sold out at Barnes & Noble and other booksellers its first week out.

Get your copy of this best-seller with this offer.

Keep reading below or Go Here Now!

In this blockbuster book, Morris exposes Obama’s ultimate agenda — to turn America into a banana republic ruled by one party.

Ben Carson says it bluntly: “‘Power Grab’ is a must-read for all Americans.”

Dire Warning: Obama Close to Goal

Dick Morris and his co-author, Eileen McGann, say their book is a dire warning to the nation about Obama’s real intentions.

“Power Grab” makes a convincing case that Obama has an overarching strategy in pushing his liberal agenda — one that grabs power from our traditional and bipartisan institutions in favor of a single party: his Democratic Party.

According to Morris and McGann, Obama has promulgated his plan by:

Implementing the biggest power grab of all, Obamacare — one that creates a new, permanent dependency class

Pushing for “immigration reform” that will quickly tip the delicate balance of power in favor of Democrats, giving them a permanent lock on the White House

Pushing “red” states aside by gaining federal control over state-run education systems using the Common Core curriculum

Asserting more control over private business by granting the EPA global governance in the name of climate change, affecting every aspect of our lives

Obama vetoed the Keystone XL bill, effectively blocking energy independence — thereby slowing economic growth and breeding more dependency. And it was predicted in “Power Grab.”

Gutting welfare reform and keeping millions on the dole

Silencing critics by turning over regulation of the Internet to the FCC and eventually the United Nations

The authors write: “Obama is a left-wing president who is desperately determined to impose his radical agenda to transform our democratic government and free market economy into his socialist-style ideal before leaving office in 2016.”

“He’s a president who is obsessively fixated on keeping the left in permanent power by turning our two-party system into a one-party monopoly.”

Obama is close to achieving his goal, Morris and McGann warn. Only you can stop him.

by: Dick Morris and Ben Carson

when your country is telling you no

Obama Helps OPEC Keep It’s Oil Economy And The U.S loses Hers ?

There are ties worthy of a Bourne film, if the media connected the dots

kerry bomb syria

The story goes that Secretary of State Kerry went to Oman for another round of talks on the Iranian nuclear question. The other half of the visit had to do with Washington’s unabated desire to ruin the Russian economy. To do this, Kerry by some unknown means required the Saudis (1) To raise production and( 2) Cut its crude price. keep in mind The Saudis produce a barrel of oil for less than $30 the Russians need apx $105 Shortly after Kerry’s visit, in November the Saudis began increasing production, — by more than 100,000 barrels daily Other OPEC members were screaming for relief, and the Saudis make back-to-back moves certain to push falling prices still lower? Now OPEC has decided in a meeting last month against reducing production. The Relentless Production of Shale Oil Is Breaking OPEC’s Neck and Infuriating Obama , his economy killing Ideology, and Greenie pals. In many opinions it sure looks like a U.S Obama Whitehouse Conspiracy?

obama FLAG Obama replaces our flags stars with an O”

The price of oil is giving the narcissistic Obama new foreign economic power that gives him leverage in most areas of policy at, the cost of American oil independence, jobs, Senior savings ,Pension funds already taking a toll due to Obama’s higher taxes on their dividends and ,he gets to cripple the new U.S oil producers. He has loathed.

This is demolition on many fronts led by a desperate administration in danger of losing its ideological schemes for a New World Order. The Obama administrations unabated desire to ruin the Russian economy and break Americas new oil independence . Is also bringing down economies in several other countries.

Do not think Gas prices will stay low . As soon as The Whitehouse gets the results they schemed for ,Gas will go to Obama’s goal of $8.00 or more a gallon.

When will the Whitehouse schemes stop?  Certainly not if a sixth Globalist President is elected such as Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton.

NWO presidents.jpg 2 5 Globalist President’s Have Ruined Our Magnificent Country. Don’t be sold on another. Some are likable and the Old Boys and Big Progressive money will be selling their virtues . This time around that should not get our votes. No Jeb, No Hillary, No Grahams, No McCain’s, No more NWO Presidents and their unrestrained immigration.

The more integrated the world becomes, the more likely it becomes that we will see nightmarish global tyranny someday.  It is very frightening to think of what Persons very evil might do if they had the chance to run the entire planet.

Once our national sovereignty is gone, it will be incredibly difficult to get back. If the American people don’t take a stand while they still can, their children may wake up someday as citizens of a very oppressive “global regime”.

obama_contemptliveWhen it comes to Barack Obama, one of the most important things to understand is that he is a committed globalist. He firmly believes in more “global governance” (the elite don’t like to use the term “global government”) Throughout his time in the White House, Obama has consistently sought to strengthen international institutions such as the UN, the IMF, the World Bank, NATO, and the WTO. At every turn, Obama has endeavored to more fully integrate America into the “global community”. Since he was elected, Obama has signed a whole host of new international economic agreements.

Hillary more of the same

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Congress can in fact block funding for President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty order

 

immigrants crossing borderThe Congressional Research Service (CRS) has concluded that House Appropriations Committee chairman Rep. Hal Rogers (R-KY) is wrong, and that Congress can in fact block funding for President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty order.

In light of Congress’s constitutional power over the purse, the Supreme Court has recognized that ‘Congress may always circumscribe agency discretion to allocate resources by putting restrictions in the operative statutes,’” the CRS, a legislative authority on Capitol Hill, wrote in a report sent to incoming Senate Budget Committee chairman Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL). “Where Congress has done so, ‘an agency is not free simply to disregard statutory responsibilities.’ Therefore, if a statute were enacted which prohibited appropriated funds from being used for some specified purposes, then the relevant funds would be unavailable to be obligated or expended for those purposes.”

Sessions’ team provided the CRS report—which is not made public unless members of Congress who request such reports decide to make them so—exclusively to Breitbart News.

Rogers, last week, argued that Congress could not block funding for Obama’s executive amnesty because the agency that will be printing the work authorization and other documents for illegal aliens—U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)—operates primarily on fees it collects rather than from tax revenue collected by the federal government.

(Caving Planned by Speaker John Boehner to Obama on executive amnesty smiley-angry019 )

The House Appropriations Committee, which Rogers chairs, said in a statement last week:

The primary agency for implementing the President’s new immigration executive order is the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). This agency is entirely self-funded through the fees it collects on various immigration applications. Congress does not appropriate funds for any of its operations, including the issuance of immigration status or work permits, with the exception of the ‘E-Verify’ program. Therefore, the Appropriations process cannot be used to ‘de-fund’ the agency. The agency has the ability to continue to collect and use fees to continue current operations, and to expand operations as under a new Executive Order, without needing legislative approval by the Appropriations Committee or the Congress, even under a continuing resolution or a government shutdown.

But the CRS report that Sessions requested shows that is untrue. Even if an agency like USCIS operates on fees rather than tax revenues appropriated by Congress, the Congress can still block funding for the implementation of such matters as Obama’s executive amnesty. CRS wrote:

A fee-funded agency or activity typically refers to one in which the amounts appropriated by Congress for that agency or activity are derived from fees collected from some external source. Importantly, amounts received as fees by federal agencies must still be appropriated by Congress to that agency in order to be available for obligation or expenditure by the agency. In some cases, this appropriation is provided through the annual appropriations process. In other instances, it is an appropriation that has been enacted independently of the annual appropriations process (such as a permanent appropriation in an authorizing act). In either case, the funds available to the agency through fee collections would be subject to the same potential restrictions imposed by Congress on the use of its appropriations as any other type of appropriated funds.

Cutting the legalese language here, basically this means that, no matter how USCIS gets it money—even if it’s from a prior authorization appropriation that is permanent and based on fee collection—Congress can still restrict the use of that money for some purposes.

On the night Obama announced the amnesty—last Thursday—Sessions said that the House of Representatives must lead by passing a government funding bill that blocks any money being spent on Obama’s amnesty.

The House should send the Senate a government funding bill which ensures no funds can be spent for this unlawful purpose,” Sessions said. “If [Outgoing Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid’s Senate Democrats vote to surrender their own institution to an imperial dictate and block the measure, then the House should send a short-term funding measure so the new GOP majority can be sworn in and pass a funding bill with the needed language.”

The Conservative Review’s Daniel Horowitz laid out on Tuesday how one of the things “lost amidst the hullabaloo of mob rule in Ferguson” is that the GOP is planning to “capitulate” to Obama’s amnesty. Part of that caving by Speaker John Boehner to Obama on executive amnesty, Horowitz notes, is that Republicans will promise to fight later—but won’t block the funding of it now.

boehner and obama 1borhner and obama 2boener obama reid pelosi “This strategy allows GOP leaders to promise a fight three months from now, after Obama’s executive action becomes more entrenched, without having to fight on defund immediately,” Horowitz wrote. “It will also buy them time to work on the second step: negotiating with Obama to pass amnesty legislatively.”  

“No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong.” – Winston Churchill

Steven Coburn asked Pelosi “Do you have naked photos of John Boehner doing something?”  He should have asked  Valerie Jarrett instead “Do you have naked photos of John Boehner doing something?”

If Rogers—or other top allies of Speaker Boehner like 2012 GOP vice presidential candidate Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI)—don’t block the funding of Obama’s executive amnesty, they could face dire consequences.

“Some Kentucky activists are already talking about a primary challenge to Representative Harold Rogers, chairman of the Appropriations Committee, who has been in office since 1981,” the New York Times’ Jeremy Peters wrote on Tuesday. “Breitbart News, a conservative website, reported on the possible primary challenger this week. Mr. Rogers’ office has said Congress could not simply defund the president’s directive, because the agency that carries it out, Citizenship and Immigration Services, is not financed by appropriations but by the fees it generates.”

Later in the story, Peters noted that Ryan and even Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) could face primary challenges in 2016.

“Other potential primary targets, Tea Party groups say, are Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, the 2012 Republican vice-presidential nominee, and even Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida, who was elected initially with the help of Tea Party energy,” Peters wrote.

boehner ryan scam gopCondemn all Politicians who only work for Lobbyist’s. Who lost their faith and forgot their own citizens future.

 

Obama,Clinton Selling Out U.S. Sovereignty in Secret ?

Obama, Clinton Selling Out U.S. Sovereignty in SecretObama, Clinton work in secret to surrender U.S. sovereignty?

By Victor Thorn: Victor Thorn is a hard-hitting researcher, journalist and author of over 40 books.

Is the Obama administration secretly negotiating treaties with globalist bodies, in violation of the Unites States Constitution? That’s the question on the minds of a number of political watchdogs, who argue that the White House is doing an end run around Congress and the American people in order to lock the country into agreements on the environment, fishing rights and even gun ownership with the United Nations (UN).

On February 7, former Bill Clinton campaign manager Dick Morris dissected a host of international “sneaky treaties” that, he says, “Once signed and ratified, have the same status as constitutional law and cannot be altered or eclipsed by Congress or state legislatures. And their provisions must be enforced by U.S. courts.”

The most egregious of these would be U.S. membership in the International Criminal Court (ICC). This tribunal that has jurisdiction across the globe could prosecute elected U.S. leaders for entering into a war without UN approval. These “crimes of aggression”—even if approved by Congress under an official declaration of war—could still land the president or cabinet members in prison. The ICC’s reach supersedes the rulings of any U.S. court, thereby posing a serious threat to constitutionally-guaranteed trials by a jury of our peers.

A lesser-known aspect of this treaty involves, ironically, the use of America’s military to wage aggressions against those deemed war criminals by the ICC.

Already, Barack Obama has buckled to this ruling body by sending armed forces into Africa to execute an arrest warrant for alleged war criminal Joseph Kony, leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army in Uganda.

Yet rather than having Congress authorize sending U.S. men and women into action overseas, Obama bypassed them and opted to exert his “executive power.” He justified this decision as an “international obligation.” Who is our president obligated to: American citizens or the New World Order?

Another treaty, one advocating children’s rights, would—at least superficially—protect youths from kidnapping, prostitution and human trafficking. However, if a 14-member panel determines that certain countries like the U.S. aren’t providing enough funding for food, education or clothing to underdeveloped nations, the UN could levy a tax on American citizens and then redistribute this money to Third World countries.

Not surprisingly, a leading proponent for the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) is Hillary Clinton. In her book It Takes a Village, she wrote: “The village must act in the place of parents. It accepts these responsibilities in all our names through the authority we vest in the government.”  

These 14-member overlords could also weigh in on what religious teachings, educational material and social attitudes are acceptable.

27421988-sad-children-hugging-his-motherInterestingly, Hillary’s views on child-rearing dovetail with those of the UNCRC. “They parents have to be shown how to do it,” wrote Hillary. “They have to be, in a sense, re-parented to be able to be a good parent.” Hillary is so distrustful of traditional families that she further elaborated.: “Decisions about motherhood and abortion, schooling, cosmetic surgery, treatment of venereal diseases or employment and others where the decision—or lack of one—will significantly reflect the child’s future should not be made unilaterally by the parent.”

If these social-engineering thoughts aren’t horrifying enough, Hillary remarked at the University of Texas in 1993, “Let us be willing to remold society by redefining what it means to be a human being in the 20th century, moving into the new millennium.”

 

A third troublesome treaty is known as the Law of the Sea Treaty, or LOST. Over 162 nations have signed or ratified it. Many other nations, such as Turkey and Israel, have stayed out of it. Today, America is not on board, but this situation may change if Obama sidesteps the Constitution yet again via executive order.

LOST is being promoted by another Clinton crony, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who seeks to surrender seas off the coasts of the United States to UN overseers.

Although the complexities of this treaty are far too vast to elaborate on here, in a nutshell LOST will acquiesce to a UN council where U.S. companies can drill for oil or fish and which technologies must become global property via a form of intellectual eminent domain. The UN could tax up to 50% of royalties from offshore drilling and redistribute these proceeds to poorer nations.      

male-crying-100100961In another example, the Outer Space Code of Conduct could seriously interfere with the U.S. implementing any type of anti-missile shield to protect itself. Using the feel-good premise of decreasing space debris, in actuality this treaty would jeopardize the U.S. military’s ability to deploy platform-based weapons in space. When it comes to China and India’s rapid development of their space programs and offensive weaponry, are Americans willing to forfeit their safety to the edicts of UN bureaucrats that already view us with such outright enmity?

Obama and Hillary are also targeting Americans’ firearms ownership. In early April, Sen. Rand Paul issued a statement on this: “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently announced the Obama administration will be working hand in glove with the United Nations to pass a new ‘UN Small Arms Treaty.’ ”

The UN Small Arms Treaty is designed to “register, ban and confiscate firearms owned by private citizens like you,” wrote Paul. If Washington signs onto this, added Paul, the U.S. would be forced to “enact tougher licensing requirements . . . confiscate and destroy all ‘unauthorized’ civilian firearms . . . ban the trade, sale and private ownership of semiautomatic weapons . . .and create an international gun registry.”

Globalist Treaties Terrible for America

During a May 10 interview with AMERICAN FREE PRESS,

Becky Fenger, A political columnist for Arizona’s Sonoran News, voiced her concerns to this writer in regard to a rash of globalist treaties being negotiated by the current administration

Hillary is the war on women says kathleen wiley “What are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama thinking?” asked Mrs. Fenger. “I can’t understand why they would willingly hand over power to the UN. How can you reason with these people when it seems like they’ve lost their minds?”    smiley-shocked028

When questioned about the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) and the International Criminal Court (ICC), Mrs. Fenger replied: “Do you know how detrimental they are to our nation? We used to worry about communism and those who wanted to take over the U.S. But now we’re surrendering our sovereignty to the UN, which is filled with petty dictators. America should get out of the UN, since we pay the bulk of dues and always get voted against anyway.”

According to Mrs. Fenger, the dangers facing us are monumental. “These treaties become the equivalent of law,” she said, “and it’ll take 161 countries to release us from them.

Worse, I’m not sure if Congress is even aware of what’s going on, or if they understand how binding these treaties are.”

She continued: “Look at the ICC. Aggression is described as going to war without UN approval, which includes Russia and China. What kind of mind thinks that succumbing to this is a good idea?”

Mrs. Fenger next addressed one of Mrs. Clinton’s favorite pet projects.

“Hillary said it takes a village, not a parent, to raise children,” she said. “Their goal is really to get these little minds and teach them from infancy to love global government dictatorship. But why should we relinquish parental control when it’s been a guiding light throughout history?

They want to disintegrate the family unit and replace it with government. It’s unconscionable. Our personal liberties have always frightened them, so their goal is to take freedom out of the hands of every individual.” AFP broached the subject of Obama’s increasing use of executive orders.

“I used to think that a law couldn’t pass if it was unconstitutional, but what about eminent domain and the Kelo decision?” she asked. “I’ve lost all faith in what used to be known as common sense and following the Constitution.

Obama has proved he doesn’t give a damn about the Constitution.” The Kelo case refers to a 2002 Supreme Court ruling which found that private entities can take property for a price from private individuals who do not want to give it up if the private company can argue that the property will be used for the common good.

Specifically, the case involved a house owned by Susette Kelo in New London, Conn. As it turns out, a developer bought Mrs. Kelo’s house, even though she didn’t want to move. After all the homes in the area had been bulldozed, however, funding for the developer’s project fell through, and the town was forced to take it over. It is now a landfill.

AFP also spoke with author Brandon Pierce, author of a novel about the Bilderberg group entitled Crisis Point. He agreed, telling this writer on May 11,

“Americans could be tried in a world court even after they’ve been acquitted in the U.S. It has a direct effect on all of us when an international body can decide what happens to our leaders and citizens.”

Is Hillary or Barack Wearing the Pants in the White House? Is Secretary of State and one-time Bilderberg attendee Hillary Clinton the shadow president of the United States, just as it was claimed she was de facto governor and president during her husband’s tenure in Arkansas and Washington, D.C.?

Doubters should be reminded of a Febrary 24, 2008 quote delivered by Barack Obama during a campaign stop in Loraine, Ohio. “She Hillary has essentially presented herself as co-president during the Clinton years.” Obama knew full well of what he spoke. Journalist Scott Creighton’s March 19, 2011 article, “President Hillary Clinton’s Shock and Awe,” began with this stark contrast.

While Hillary Clinton met with 22 world leaders to decide the fate of Libya, they kept Barack Obama in the back of the bus and let the real president take the lead.”

Creighton also pointed out that while Obama golfed and vacationed, Hillary conferred with practically every world leader and dignitary imaginable. A quick glance at the State Dept.’s travel itinerary reveals nearly 75 trips to foreign countries by Clinton where the real groundwork for a New World Order super-structure was being laid.

While some commentators call Hillary a “Globalist Grand Wizard,” her influence spread to the formation of Obama’s Cabinet after his 2008 election. In a March 18 article, Edward Ulrich wrote, “31 of the 47 people Barack Obama has named for appointments have ties to the Clinton administration, including Eric Holder, Larry Summers, Rahm Emanuel and Timothy Geithner.”

To get a better idea of Hillary’s modus operandi, in a 2006 film entitled Inside Man, Hollywood actress Jodie Foster analyzed her character’s role in remedying delicate situations.

“She’s a fixer, a rich Madison Avenue lawyer who fixes things when they go wrong. Say you were a mayor and you got caught in bed with three dead hookers, I would be brought in to fix the situation.” When asked how her character did it, Foster replied, “Call in lots of favors. You use people and kind of puppet behind the scenes, manipulate them. She’s a dubious bad guy.” The above words perfectly describe Hillary Clinton’s entire political career.

In fact, HILLARY (AND BILL) THE MURDER VOLUME contains the following passage. “Hillary acted as an enabler and fixer to cover-up for her husband’s serial philandering and sexual reign of terror.”

But being a handler for Bill’s raging libido was minor compared to Hillary’s role in trafficking drugs through Mena Airport, the cover-up of Vince Foster and Ron Brown’s murders, Chinagate, and laundering money through the Arkansas Development Finance Authority to finance their campaigns. Learning the ropes from Washington, D.C.’s former fixer extraordinaire—longtime Bilderberg luminary Vernon Jordan—Hillary has always nurtured a comfortable relationship with Wall Street bankers and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

Indeed, during a July 17, 2009 CFR (Council Of Foreign Relations )address, Hillary revealed, “We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future.” With the Obama administration pursuing a number of globalist treaties that undermine American sovereignty, it’s clear that Hillary Clinton is the driving force behind these moves as she traveled from country to country.

According to the elitist’s worldview, individuals should be subordinate and powerless to collectivists, while nationalists are viewed as a distraction to be folded into the globalist whole.

During a July 17, 2009 CFR address, Hillary revealed: “We get a lot of advice from the council, so this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future.” –

Hillary more of the same

See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=4207#sthash.MXWW4xnr.dpuf

Victor Thorn is a hard-hitting researcher, journalist and author of over 40 books.

 

 

Our Betters In Washington Shall Simply Order Us To Live As They Want Us To Live

Hillary is the war on women says kathleen wiley “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”

The cesspool get’s deeper on a daily basis with the present crew residing in office

valerie jarretThe ones who helped us will be rewarded, the ones who opposed us will get what they deserve.”

—————————————————————————

October 14, 2014 12:00 AM Local Elections with Lasting National Import
What’s at stake this November is the president’s vision for remaking America.

By Thomas Sowell

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. His website is http://www.tsowell.com   thomas sowell

What is the overriding national issue that makes this year’s elections so crucial?

That issue is whether, despite all the lawless edicts of President Obama, threatening one-man rule, we can still salvage enough of the Constitution to remain a free, democratic nation.

Barack Obama will be on his way out in two years, but if he can appoint enough federal judges who share his contempt for the Constitution’s limits on federal government power in general and presidential powers in particular, then the United States of America can continue on the path to becoming another banana republic, even after Obama has left the White House.

President Obama understands how high the stakes are, which is why he is out fundraising all across the country — seemingly all the time — even though he has no more elections to face himself. Obama came to power saying that he was going to fundamentally change the United States of America — and he intends to do it, even after he is gone, by giving lifetime appointments as federal judges to people who share his view that this country’s institutions and values are fundamentally wrong, and need to be scrapped and replaced by his far-left vision.

If only Obama’s critics and opponents understood this momentous issue as clearly as he does.

The issue is whether “we the people,” as designated by the Constitution, continue free to live our own lives as we see fit and to determine what laws and policies we want to live under.

President Obama’s vision is very different. In his vision, our betters in Washington shall simply order us to live as they want us to live — telling us what medical insurance we can have, what doctors we can go to, what political groups shall be favored by the Internal Revenue Service, with more of the same coming in the years ahead, long after Obama has left the White House.

Critics who deplore President Obama’s foreign policies in general – and his weak response to the Islamic State threat in particular – as showing incompetence and who see his incessant fundraising as just a weird distraction fail to understand how different his priorities are from theirs.

Barack Obama understands clearly that his ability to fundamentally remake what he has long seen as a deeply defective and corrupt America in the image of his far-left vision depends crucially on having control of the Senate that has the power to confirm his appointments of federal judges with lifetime tenure. His fundraising is key to maintaining the Democrats’ Senate majority.

Foreign policy is subordinated to Obama’s overriding ideological vision. The president will not risk losing this year’s congressional elections by taking military actions that will alienate his political base. Token military actions can minimize the political losses from other voters.

That people will die while he stalls on military action is a price he is willing to pay. His ordering thousands of American troops into Ebola-infested Liberia shows the same ideologically driven callousness.

ebola-dead-body-guinea-liberia_si

The big question is whether those who wish to preserve a free America see the issue and the stakes as clearly as Barack Obama does — and see that this is the overriding national issue of our time, with our votes for senators not to be confused by local issues.

Hillary more of the same