Congress can in fact block funding for President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty order


immigrants crossing borderThe Congressional Research Service (CRS) has concluded that House Appropriations Committee chairman Rep. Hal Rogers (R-KY) is wrong, and that Congress can in fact block funding for President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty order.

In light of Congress’s constitutional power over the purse, the Supreme Court has recognized that ‘Congress may always circumscribe agency discretion to allocate resources by putting restrictions in the operative statutes,’” the CRS, a legislative authority on Capitol Hill, wrote in a report sent to incoming Senate Budget Committee chairman Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL). “Where Congress has done so, ‘an agency is not free simply to disregard statutory responsibilities.’ Therefore, if a statute were enacted which prohibited appropriated funds from being used for some specified purposes, then the relevant funds would be unavailable to be obligated or expended for those purposes.”

Sessions’ team provided the CRS report—which is not made public unless members of Congress who request such reports decide to make them so—exclusively to Breitbart News.

Rogers, last week, argued that Congress could not block funding for Obama’s executive amnesty because the agency that will be printing the work authorization and other documents for illegal aliens—U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)—operates primarily on fees it collects rather than from tax revenue collected by the federal government.

(Caving Planned by Speaker John Boehner to Obama on executive amnesty smiley-angry019 )

The House Appropriations Committee, which Rogers chairs, said in a statement last week:

The primary agency for implementing the President’s new immigration executive order is the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). This agency is entirely self-funded through the fees it collects on various immigration applications. Congress does not appropriate funds for any of its operations, including the issuance of immigration status or work permits, with the exception of the ‘E-Verify’ program. Therefore, the Appropriations process cannot be used to ‘de-fund’ the agency. The agency has the ability to continue to collect and use fees to continue current operations, and to expand operations as under a new Executive Order, without needing legislative approval by the Appropriations Committee or the Congress, even under a continuing resolution or a government shutdown.

But the CRS report that Sessions requested shows that is untrue. Even if an agency like USCIS operates on fees rather than tax revenues appropriated by Congress, the Congress can still block funding for the implementation of such matters as Obama’s executive amnesty. CRS wrote:

A fee-funded agency or activity typically refers to one in which the amounts appropriated by Congress for that agency or activity are derived from fees collected from some external source. Importantly, amounts received as fees by federal agencies must still be appropriated by Congress to that agency in order to be available for obligation or expenditure by the agency. In some cases, this appropriation is provided through the annual appropriations process. In other instances, it is an appropriation that has been enacted independently of the annual appropriations process (such as a permanent appropriation in an authorizing act). In either case, the funds available to the agency through fee collections would be subject to the same potential restrictions imposed by Congress on the use of its appropriations as any other type of appropriated funds.

Cutting the legalese language here, basically this means that, no matter how USCIS gets it money—even if it’s from a prior authorization appropriation that is permanent and based on fee collection—Congress can still restrict the use of that money for some purposes.

On the night Obama announced the amnesty—last Thursday—Sessions said that the House of Representatives must lead by passing a government funding bill that blocks any money being spent on Obama’s amnesty.

The House should send the Senate a government funding bill which ensures no funds can be spent for this unlawful purpose,” Sessions said. “If [Outgoing Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid’s Senate Democrats vote to surrender their own institution to an imperial dictate and block the measure, then the House should send a short-term funding measure so the new GOP majority can be sworn in and pass a funding bill with the needed language.”

The Conservative Review’s Daniel Horowitz laid out on Tuesday how one of the things “lost amidst the hullabaloo of mob rule in Ferguson” is that the GOP is planning to “capitulate” to Obama’s amnesty. Part of that caving by Speaker John Boehner to Obama on executive amnesty, Horowitz notes, is that Republicans will promise to fight later—but won’t block the funding of it now.

boehner and obama 1borhner and obama 2boener obama reid pelosi “This strategy allows GOP leaders to promise a fight three months from now, after Obama’s executive action becomes more entrenched, without having to fight on defund immediately,” Horowitz wrote. “It will also buy them time to work on the second step: negotiating with Obama to pass amnesty legislatively.”  

“No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong.” – Winston Churchill

Steven Coburn asked Pelosi “Do you have naked photos of John Boehner doing something?”  He should have asked  Valerie Jarrett instead “Do you have naked photos of John Boehner doing something?”

If Rogers—or other top allies of Speaker Boehner like 2012 GOP vice presidential candidate Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI)—don’t block the funding of Obama’s executive amnesty, they could face dire consequences.

“Some Kentucky activists are already talking about a primary challenge to Representative Harold Rogers, chairman of the Appropriations Committee, who has been in office since 1981,” the New York Times’ Jeremy Peters wrote on Tuesday. “Breitbart News, a conservative website, reported on the possible primary challenger this week. Mr. Rogers’ office has said Congress could not simply defund the president’s directive, because the agency that carries it out, Citizenship and Immigration Services, is not financed by appropriations but by the fees it generates.”

Later in the story, Peters noted that Ryan and even Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) could face primary challenges in 2016.

“Other potential primary targets, Tea Party groups say, are Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, the 2012 Republican vice-presidential nominee, and even Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida, who was elected initially with the help of Tea Party energy,” Peters wrote.

boehner ryan scam gopCondemn all Politicians who only work for Lobbyist’s. Who lost their faith and forgot their own citizens future.


Obama Surrounds Himself with the Most Extreme Appointees in American History


 really you still trust the government

The Western Center for Journalism, a Steve Baldwin Exclusive:

Much has been written about Obama’s controversial appointments, not only to the federal bench, but to key cabinet positions, as well as to the unaccountable (and probably unconstitutional) “Czar” positions. Much of the criticism has dwelled on the Obama administration’s lack of vetting when filling these rolls—but that’s not the issue.

To the contrary, the Obama team did investigate thoroughly and they choose precisely. When an administration repeatedly nominates hard-left individuals, it’s not a vetting error—it’s a pattern. We should not allow the media to portray these appointments as a series of errors; but rather, we need to realize that Team Obama is simply nominating those who share their goal of radically changing America.

Most Americans have a hard time understanding this because they refuse to believe Obama is this extreme. But he is. For a year prior to his election conservatives warned voters that everything we knew about Obama indicated that his views were far from the mainstream. This was obvious when one analyzed his friends, which groups he funded while a “community activist,” his Illinois State Senate record, his United States Senate record and even what he wrote in his own books.

The reality, of course, is that Obama’s views are far from the mainstream and it is embarrassing so many Americans fell for his leftist candy-coated lies. Indeed, it appears that Obama is the most far left President in American history. His appointees only confirm this. They hate America, or more precisely, they hate America’s heritage; American institutions, and the American Constitution.

Many of these extremists nominated by Obama hail from academia,where they were shielded from outside scrutiny while they quietly indoctrinated our youth. But don’t let the cloak of academia fool you; they are out to change America in ways most Americans oppose. More importantly, Americans need to realize their views are Obama’s views.

The American media is partly responsible for bringing such extremists to power. There is little doubt the media engaged in a massive propaganda effort to convince Americans that Obama was some kind of hip moderate; a breath of fresh air, a reformer, and someone who would fight the corrupt ways of Washington. Until Americans wake up and stop relying on the mainstream media for their source of news, they will continue to pay a heavy price for their ignorance. Unfortunately, this report covers just a few of Obama’s policy-makers, but there are many more such extremists within his administration.

Much has been written about Obama’s controversial appointments, not only to the federal bench, but to key cabinet positions, as well as to the unaccountable (and probably unconstitutional) “Czar” positions. Much of the criticism has dwelled on the Obama administration’s lack of vetting when filling these rolls—but that’s not the issue.

To the contrary, the Obama team did investigate thoroughly and they choose precisely. When an administration repeatedly nominates hard-left individuals, it’s not a vetting error—it’s a pattern. We should not allow the media to portray these appointments as a series of errors; but rather, we need to realize that Team Obama is simply nominating those who share their goal of radically changing America.

Most Americans have a hard time understanding this because they refuse to believe Obama is this extreme. But he is. For a year prior to his election conservatives warned voters that everything we knew about Obama indicated that his views were far from the mainstream. This was obvious when one analyzed his friends, which groups he funded while a “community activist,” his Illinois State Senate record, his United States Senate record and even what he wrote in his own books.

The reality, of course, is that Obama’s views are far from the mainstream and it is embarrassing so many Americans fell for his leftist candy-coated lies. Indeed, it appears that Obama is the most far left President in American history. His appointees only confirm this. These appointees hate America, or more precisely, they hate America’s heritage; American institutions, and the American Constitution.

Many of these extremists nominated by Obama hail from academia, where they were shielded from outside scrutiny while they quietly indoctrinated our youth. But don’t let the cloak of academia fool you; they are out to change America in ways most Americans oppose. More importantly, Americans need to realize their views are Obama’s views.

The American media is partly responsible for bringing such extremists to power. There is little doubt the media engaged in a massive propaganda effort to convince Americans that Obama was some kind of hip moderate; a breath of fresh air, a reformer, and someone who would fight the corrupt ways of Washington.

Until Americans wake up and stop relying on the mainstream media for their source of news, they will continue to pay a heavy price for their ignorance.

Unfortunately, this report covers just a few of Obama’s policy-makers, but there are many more such extremists within his administration.Domestic Policy:


CZAR_CassSunsteinImage2The Regulatory Czar – Cass Sunstein

Sunstein was nominated and approved to be Obama’s “Regulatory Czar.” He supports massive gun control and doesn’t believe the 2nd Amendment is an individual right. He has straight out said, “We ought to ban hunting.” While this fruitcake strips Americans of their Constitutional right to own guns, he wants to give rights to animals and has argued that “Animals should be permitted to bring suit…” Naturally, he also supports the “Fairness Doctrine,” the wrongly-named concept which allows the government to regulate the airwaves.


Climate Czar – Todd SternClimate Czar – Todd Stern

Stern, a veteran of the Clinton administration, was the U.S. negotiator at the Kyoto conference in 1997 (which called for dramatic climate change regulations based on bogus assumptions.) the treaty implemented, would plunge the world into economic chaos.

Since then, new evidence has revealed that the major climate models used to justify the Global Warming alarm was, in fact, not accurate. One would think Stern would address this, but chances are he won’t. Climate change seems to be more about giving the government control over our lives, than about phony climate crises. Indeed, Stern has made it clear that he thinks international agencies, such as the United Nations, should take the lead on forcing climate change down the throats of national governments. Stern has even gone as far as to propose that world powers form an “E8” group, who would meet yearly and dictate environmental policy to the rest of the world. What about national sovereignty? Clearly, Stern feels that’s an outdated concept.

Stern is also the nutcase behind the Cap and Trade proposal which, even an analysis by Obama’s own Treasury Department concluded, would cost American taxpayers up to $200 billion dollars—just what we need for today’s economy!


Science Czar – John HoldrenScience Czar – John Holdren

In his book, Holdren advocates some of the most bizarre and horrifying policy stances imaginable. In the event of a “over-population crises,” Holdren supports “laws requiring compulsory abortion,” government confiscation of new born babies, the “development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin,” and, incredibly, “adding a sterilant to drinking water or stable foods….” as long a livestock would not be affected (as experimentally implemented in India). Holdren wants the government to dictate family size and advocate a “planetary regime,” run by the United Nations. This real life Dr. Frankenstein will be deciding science policy for the United States of America


mark-lloyd.jpg Chief Diversity Officer, Federal Communications Commission – Mark LloydChief Diversity Officer, Federal Communications Commission – Mark Lloyd

While Obama is playing coy with his plans to shut down conservative talk radio, we know what his real intentions are, due to his appointment of Mark Lloyd. Lloyd’s view of the 1st Amendment is shocking:

“It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press.

This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. At the very least, blind references

to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination

of other communications policies. “The purpose of free speech is warped to protect

global corporations and block rules that would promote democratic governance.”

Like many of Obama’s appointees, Lloyd worked for George Soros, the foreign billionaire who funds anti-America groups. He seems to be enamored with dictators and has even publicly praised Venezuelan Communist dictator Hugo Chavez’s “incredible…democratic revolution.” He also wants to use the Fairness Doctrine to “balance” talk radio and believes there are too many white people in the media. He has written that unless there are “more people of color, gays and other people…we will not change the problem.” One of his solutions to “balance” the media is to fine conservative radio stations up to $250 million and give the proceeds to National Public Radio. Get ready for censorship like America has never seen before.

Attorney-General-Eric-HolderAttorney General – Eric Holder

Like most of Obama’s appointees, Holder is a member of the American Constitution Society, a ACLU-type group dedicated to destroying much the Constitution in order to make it “relevant” to the modern world. And as with many Obama’s appointees, he is obsessed with race, even to the point of refusing to pursue the prosecution of two Black Panther thugs who intimidated white voters at a polling place. The thugs were screaming things at the voters such as, “You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker.” If whites had harassing blacks at a polling place, they would still be sitting in a jail within days. Nevertheless, Holder apparently doesn’t mind undermining the democratic process.

He is currently challenging the rights of states to enact citizen verification procedures previously approved by two federal courts. In other words, Holder wants to make it easier for illegal aliens to vote, which also happens to be ACORN’s goal. This comes as no surprise; Holder has been undermining the rule of law for most of his career. While serving as the #2 official in Clinton’s Justice Department, Holder was the driving force behind the effort to pardon members of the notorious Puerto Rican terrorist group, FALN, a group that engaged in over 130 attacks in the USA, killing six people. By refusing to carry out justice against the Black Panthers and the Hispanic FALN terrorists, he was clearly pandering to these two racial groups for political reasons. So this is what Obama’s Justice Department will be all about: racial pandering first and justice last. Speaking at an ACS convention last November, Holder announced that America would soon be “run by progressives.” At least he’s honest.

David OgdenDeputy Attorney General – David Ogden

Deputy Attorney General – David OgdenThis appointment must have been a favor for the porn industry; Ogden has probably done more than anyone in America to defend the “rights” of pornographers. Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., said Ogden “is more than just a lawyer who has had a few unsavory clients. He has devoted a substantial part of his career, case after case, for 20 years, in defense of pornography.” For example, he argued in support of the American Library Association when they went to court to challenge mandatory anti-obscenity internet filters in school libraries. Incredibly, the ALA/Ogden position was that libraries should be free-speech zones in which school children should have the right to access anything they want – even pornography – on school computers.

This comes as no surprise, when Ogden was an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, he argued on constitutional grounds to strike down the conviction of a defendant who received and possessed child pornography. Ogden believes there is a constitutional right to possess child pornography. The appointment of Ogden is apparently what Obama means when he talks about promoting “family values.”

Solicitor General – Elena KaganSolicitor General – Elena Kagan

Elena Kagan has also been mentioned by the Obama forces as the next nomination to the Supreme Court. This is ironic considering her complete lack of judicial or appellate experience. She has never even been a judge or argued before the Supreme Court! Kagen has served as the Dean of Harvard Law School, but her job was to fundraise and make the students “comfortable.” As the Boston Globe writes, “Some of her initial acts as dean were small-scale improvements, like offering free coffee in classroom buildings and free tampons in women’s bathrooms.” Isn’t that nice!

However, the few legal views she holds are certainly far from the mainstream. She described the “don’t ask, don’t tell” homosexual military policy adopted by President Clinton as “a profound wrong – a moral injustice of the first order,” and favors homosexuals being allowed to openly serve in the military. She argued that it was unconstitutional for Congress to withhold funds from colleges that banned military recruiters and she even took it upon herself to ban military recruiters from Harvard because of their policy regarding homosexuals. Clearly, her lesbianism has clearly created a bias that affects her shallow legal views.


untitledAssistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel – Dawn Johnson

Johnson is the former legal director for the National Abortion Rights Action League, a group on the extreme left of the abortion debate. They oppose any restrictions on abortion for any reason, at any time of pregnancy—even late term abortions. She has also worked for the ACLU. Johnson has argued that abortion is all about “sexual freedom.” That’s right: have sex with whoever you want and whenever you want and if you get pregnant, get an abortion. This same mentality has led to skyrocketing sexual disease rates, unwanted pregnancies, and untold sorrow. In a brief filed while working with NARAL,Johnson cited a source that said forcing women to bear children was “disturbingly suggestive of involuntary servitude, prohibited by the 13th Amendment, in that forced pregnancy requires a woman to provide continuous physical service to the fetus in order to further the state’s asserted interest.” In other words, being pregnant is comparable to being a slave.


Secretary, Department of Education – Arne DuncanSecretary, Department of Education – Arne Duncan

4thgraders in Chicago reached the proficiency level in reading and for black 8th graders, only 9% reached reading proficiency. In math, only 8% of black students reached proficiency in 4th grade and just 6% reached proficiency in 8th grade. This was the disappointing outcome, despite spending $13-$14,000 per student and is among the highest of any major city.Even worse, a majority of Chicago public school students drop out or fail to graduate with their class. Needless to say, the Duncan era was a disaster. He did, however, pursue an aggressive agenda to promote the homosexual lifestyle in the schools. So Chicago kids can’t read or write, but they all know how to engage in homosexual sex. If anyone tells you Duncan is an “education reformer,” tell them you’re the tooth fairy.



Assistant Deputy Secretary, Department of Education – Kevin JenningsAssistant Deputy Secretary, Department of Education – Kevin Jennings

Jennings is the founder of the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a group dedicated to promoting the homosexual agenda to school children as young as five. They’re sick people and even promote books that feature adult-child sex in a favorable way. Regardless, Obama must have been impressed with Jennings, as he appointed him to carry out his perverted mission nationwide in his new role as head of the Department’s “Office of Safe & Drug Free Schools.”

The reality is that homosexuality is not safe; it takes years off the average lifespan of males. But for Obama, is not really about safety; it’s about keeping the homosexual community happy—after all, they helped elect him. Jennings has been in the press lately due to revelations that he gave encouraging advice to a boy who privately confessed to him he was having sex with an older man. And what was Jennings’s advice? Buy a condom. Parents, start monitoring what your schools are teaching your children. It’s going to get ugly. Foreign Policy



UN+Ambassador+Susan+Rice+Testifies+House+Committee+ujZYem6_I2elUnited States Ambassador to United Nations – Susan Rice

Even though she served on the National Security Council under President Clinton, Rice seems to have slept through the last two decades. She is fanatically pro-UN and wants the United States to work closely with the United Nations in order to carry out all kinds of humanitarian and military actions, seeming unaware that the UN has never been supportive of US interests. They don’t stop wars; they don’t sanction terrorist regimes, and their internal corruption is so pervasive they can’t even carry out humanitarian missions.

But rather than hold the UN responsible for its obvious failings over the years, Rice blamed Bush for being “unilateral” and for “stiff-arming our partners.” She even sits on the board of the UN Fund for UNICEF, an agency which has been repeatedly caught giving aid to terrorists, and during the Cold War, assisting communist insurgents.

More seriously, she is overly cautious in regard to fighting terrorism. The former Ambassador to Sudan implicated Rice as the person who bungled the opportunity to take out Osama bin Laden when Sudanese officials offered him to the USA on a silver platter during the Clinton years.

She and Clinton rejected their offer. There’s a good chance 9/11 could have been avoided if Rice had accepted the Sudanese offer. Apparently, even though she worked for the NSC, she didn’t regard Al-Qaeda as a threat. No wonder we were hit on 9/11. And now she’s our UN Ambassador? I wonder whose interests she will serve…probably the UNs.

Counsel, State Department – Harold KohCounsel, State Department – Harold Koh

The man Obama has named as the State Department’s legal advisor is Harold Koh. Koh believes America should defer to the International Court of Justice to determine legal precedents; a totally unconstitutional endeavor. He is a member of the “trans-nationalism” school of legal thought that believes all distinctions between American Constitutional law and international law should vanish. Incredibly, he even believes Muslim law –Sharia law– should be applied to some disputes in US courts. Clearly, his views are in contradiction to the Constitution he swore to uphold, but no matter, he is now in charge of all legal issues for the U.S. State Department.

National Security Council – Samantha PowerNational Security Council – Samantha Power

Power is an anti-Israel pseudo intellectual, a strange position given that Israel is our top ally in the Middle East. She holds the view that until Israel allows Palestine to set up a separate state, all the other problems in the Middle East will remain. This, of course, ignores the 1,300 year old war of conquest waged by Islam against the West, most of it occurring long before the modern day Israel/Palestine conflict. She also holds to the conspiratorial view that everything America does in the Middle East – like the Iraq war – is due to Israeli influence.Finally, she pooh-poohs the idea that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, a thoroughly discredited view in light of recent events. While she opposed sending troops to Iraq – she called it an “occupation”—she favored sending US troops to Israel to forcibly impose a Palestinian state. Power’s writing grossly exaggerates “war crimes” committed by Israel and never condemns terrorist activity by the Palestinians. The last thing we need in the midst of war between the West and Islamic terrorism is a nut on the NSC giving the President advice favoring our enemies.

Advisor, Under-Secretary of Defense for Policy – Rosa BrooksThisAdvisor, Under-Secretary of Defense for Policy – Rosa Brooks

This genius wrote that Al-Qaeda was just an “obscure group” until America began the war on terrorism, ignoring all the documentation that Al-Qaeda was making plans for rapid growth long before 9/11. Apparently, it’s America’s fault that terrorist groups exist today! She called President Bush “our torturer in chief” and compared Bush’s anti-terrorist policies to Hitler’s policies. Clearly, she ignored the fact that Bush’s policies were responsible for stopping over 17 different terrorist plots against the United States. She also called the successful surge in Iraq a “feckless plan” and seems completely blind to the successes we have had in the war on terrorism. But we shouldn’t be surprised; she used to work for a foundation funded by the foreign America-hater George Soros. It’s hard to believe Brooks is now deciding defense policy.

White House Staff


White House StaffSenior Advisor and Assistant to the President for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs, Valerie JarrettSenior Advisor and Assistant to the President for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs – Valerie Jarrett

Jarrett is involved with vetting all the extremists Obama has appointed and thus, has to be an extremist as well. For example, she was aware that former Green Czar Van Jones (who withdrew) had a long history of involvement in Communist Party causes, but still said she was “delighted to be able to recruit him into the White House.” She had to have known, because she married into a family with a pedigree of Communist Party involvement. Her father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett, worked closely with Obama mentor and Communist Party leader Frank Marshall Davis in a number of Communist Party front groups during the Cold War years. Valerie married Vernon’s son in 1983 and later became chief of staff for Mayor Richard Daley, where she was a key player in perhaps America’s most corrupt big city political machine. Obama does not go forward with anything without her counsel.

Political advisor – David AxelroPolitical advisor – David Axelrod

For those who think Axelrod is just a good campaign consultant, you couldn’t be more wrong., which often promoted the Communist Party line. Indeed, author IF Stone, later revealed to be working for the Axelrod has a long history of working for obscure socialist candidates and Obama was no different, politically, from his other clients. In fact, promoting socialist causes was a family tradition. His mother wrote for a New York City tabloid called PM Magazine KGB, was PM’s DC correspondent. Much of the tabloid’s funding came from Marshall Field, a hard left millionaire who also funded Saul Alinsky’s training school. Axelrod has spent his entire life promoting extremist candidates, but no one bothered to look into his background. Today, he advises Obama on all things political.


BrownerCarol_bioDirector of the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change – Carol Browner

Browner previously served as head of the EPA during the Clinton regime where she advocated incredibly stupid environmental regulations that destroyed entire industries. At a time when America is losing jobs in record numbers, she is precisely the right person for the Obama job-killing machine. Browner is a socialist and was picked by Socialist International to be one of 14 leaders of a group it created called the Commission for a Sustainable World Society. SI believes in massive wealth redistribution from the West to the Third World, choosing to ignore the evidence that Third World countries are poor due to their socialist policies.

Moreover, SI constantly attacks the free market in general and the United States in particular. The fact that Obama has chosen both Browner and Todd Stern (Climate Czar) does not bode well for the American economy. The recent disclosure that the climate models used by Browner and Stern to justify draconian new regulations – such as Cap and Trade – are based on inaccurate data, has not fazed the Obama administration one bit. For Obama, environmentalism is a tool for increasing government control and nothing else.

General Counsel and Senior Policy Advisor, Office of Management & Budget  – Preeta BansalGeneral Counsel and Senior Policy Advisor, Office of Management & Budget – Preeta Bansal Bansal is very close to Obama; she acts behind the scenes advising him regarding the selection of federal judges. She is on the far left side of the judicial spectrum and is a leader of the misnamed American Constitutional Society, a group that believes in a “living Constitution” and works to “debunk” the “original intent” concept. Indeed, ACS’s view that the Constitution should constantly change undermines the very purpose for having a constitution. Needless to say, the ACS is obsessed with criminal rights, illegal alien rights, terrorist rights, and other phony rights. ACS is America’s main networking group for far-left attorneys and is where Bansal is recruiting many of Obama’s judicial nominees.

Bansal is also a member of the “critical race theory (CRT)” school of legal thought that boils all legal concepts down to racist conspiracies and that racism permeates all aspects of American society. Indeed, she even co-authored a paper claiming that republicanism is based upon racist consensus. In other words, she believes the entire concept of representative democracy is based upon racist assumptions. Indeed, CRT advocates even believe the founding of America was primarily due to racial motivations.

Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals called CRT supporters the “lunatic core” of “radical legal egalitarianism.” Bansal is a lunatic and her appointment will ensure that Obama’s judicial appointments will be far more about “diversity” than they will be about competence.

Director of Intergovernmental Affairs, Executive office of the President  — Cecilia MunozDirector of Intergovernmental Affairs, Executive office of the President — Cecilia Munoz

Munoz is a hard-core open borders advocate who served recently as the Vice President for the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), where she supervised all legislative activities. La Raza is the nation’s foremost supporter of “rights” for illegal aliens and the granting of amnesty to the millions of illegals here in America. She does not care that illegal aliens are costing America billions of dollars; she believes they should enjoy the same rights as citizens. Not surprisingly, she served on the U.S. Programs board of the Open Society Institute, a George Soros-funded group. You can expect Munoz to quietly push for a massive transfer of benefits and welfare to illegal aliens and for legislation granting amnesty to all those here illegally

Director, Domestic Policy Council – Melody BarnesDirector, Domestic Policy Council – Melody Barnes

Barnes is a certified wacko. She was previously Vice President of the far-left Center for American Progress (SOROS) and also served as Chief Counsel for Senator Ted Kennedy on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Her view on abortion is so extreme, she served on the boards of both Emily’s List and the Planned Parenthood Action Fund. She favors unrestricted abortions for any reason at any time of pregnancy.

Incredibly, some naïve pro-life leaders supported Obama, believing he was pro-life because he supposedly wanted to find ways to reduce abortions. Barnes has put that myth to rest. In a meeting with key pro-family leaders, Barnes made it clear that “It is not our goal to reduce the number of abortions.” As reported, the room went silent. Barnes glorifies abortion as being a “concept of liberty that includes women as equal.” She has written that “reproductive rights are human rights.” My guess is that the baby being aborted doesn’t quite feel the same way. Needless to say, there will NOT be any pro-life measures supported by this administration. The Nation magazine praised Barnes as a “dyed-in-the-wool progressive,” a nice term for a socialist. She is also a former staff member for the American Constitutional Society, the far-left legal group mentioned elsewhere.


I can make obama sing talk and destroy economies BEST.jpg 4x4SOROS WORKED FOR NAZISMcCain hUGGING sOROS oH THANK YOU FOR SAVING MEMcCain and Soros

imagesThis nonprofit group] shows how disturbing its work really is. Its name is Organizing for Action (OfA), and if its initials seem familiar, that’s because the group is the direct descendant of Obama for America, the president’s campaign organization in 2008 and 2012, noted the left-wing New York Times –– and it’s an organization with many of the same Obama strategists, but without the restraint of limited donations.

“It stinks,” slammed the Washington Post in an op-ed titled, “The temptation of dark money” –– “judging by recent reports, Organizing for Action should be renamed Paying for Access,” because they are raising large sums of money by offering advisory board positions with “the privilege of attending quarterly (and secret) meetings with the president.”

It’s pretty obvious what access and influence buys in Washington DC these days, but now the Obama Team is openly selling access. Is that even legal?

Or maybe it’s just “change we can believe in.”

Hillary more of the same




















Vets still betrayed — nothing’s been fixed at the VA

the forgotten onesreally you still trust the government

By Betsy McCaughey, New York Post

Sharon Helman, the face of the Veterans Administration scandal, finally got sacked on Monday.

Helman was the director of the Phoenix VA, where vets needing medical care languished on secret lists. It took seven months to fire her. So much for the “VA reform” law that Congress passed last August.

Nearly all the managers guilty of manipulating waiting lists, lying to vets and covering up are still getting paid. They have their jobs or they’re collecting paid leave or they retired with full benefits.

As for vets getting their promised Choice Cards to escape waitlists and see a civilian doctor, don’t hold your breath.

The Phoenix revelations prompted Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) to offer a bill last May that would enable the VA secretary to fire senior managers linked to the secret lists. Rubio said the secretary must be able to “fire executives underneath him if they haven’t done their job.” But the Veterans Committee chairman, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I.-Vt.), killed the bill. Sanders, a self-described socialist whose top campaign contributors are unions, insisted on protecting “due process” rules that make it as hard to fire federal workers — even top managers — as it is to ax an incompetent New York City public-school teacher.

Sound Off on Fox Nation

Read the full story in the New York Post→

Hillary more of the same Hillary Grandmother of Obamacare

Obama’s unusual statements and actions consistent with Malignant Narcissism, Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD),

OBAMA MAN CHILD IN OFFICEThis is how Obama sits at a moment when someone challenges him or infuriates him is in the room – portraying this obscene gesture, but with plausible deniability, that he can talk his way out of if ever questioned on it.

Explanation of what you’re seeing

Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is marked here by an uncontrollable need to feed Obama’s view of self-grandiosity – his view of himself as above us all.

Obama does this gesture or position repeatedly at the precise moment that he mentions people who challenge his authority – the most hated thing to a narcissist.

Obama is not simply giving someone the finger as some politicians have done. That would be un-Presidential, but sane.

Rather, he is doing it in front of millions of people, but intending to NOT get caught. He does it covertly, and deniably. Meanwhile, these videos show it must be done knowingly. In Obama’s mind, he is knowingly hiding something from us, yet doing it in front of the cameras, for his own perverse gratification. This is a sign of mental illness.

OBAMA MIDDLE FINGERWhy is he doing this?

a) he cannot stand to have his perceived greatness opposed, and is driven to uncontrollable anger and outbursts at those who oppose him. Obama is saying, “f-u, I am taking the Presidency, it’s mine”, as if a kid arguing over a toy in a sand box. It’s the figurative sticking his tongue out at his opponent. And, “by the way, watch how easily I can manipulate the entire nation.”

b) he also does this because thinks he is more clever than the entire world who doesn’t notice. (Or, clever enough to talk his way out of it if someone did notice.) He is doing it to show his grandiosity above us all, for not noticing, and allowing ourselves to be manipulated by him. In his clever but twisted mind, this perverse behavior is proving to himself his greatness, his supreme cleverness above us all. (and actually genius, if he is able to get away with it.

This is clearly Narcissistic Personality Disorder combined with delusional outbursts that are arguably psychotic in nature, certainly not rational. In fact, it is because they are so irrational that they have not come to popular attention. It sounds ridiculous unless someone carefully looks at it.

Watch the videos. Do not just look at the photos.

(Please also download and save the videos, (maybe save with screen capture or other software), so it cannot be removed as some of these videos have already been.)

Why can’t these be accident?

That chance that Obama, with his masterful body language skills, does this repeatedly by accident or coincidence is impossible. We all learn at a very early age to be conscious of the middle finger’s position because it is offensive.

Once, maybe one could believe it is an accident, but not repeatedly, and at precisely at times he mentions his opponents or is infuriated or challenged. He knows exactly what he is doing. It can only be intentional.

His Modus Operandi is always similar. He always sets it up first with his index finger first to set himself up, pauses, and then switches to the middle finger. If he only has an itch, why pause and switch fingers like that?

He always stops talking and switches to serious demeanor at the moment he does it. Then, he amazingly switches back to joking – true mentally ill behavior of a genius caught on video – it is almost unbelievable to watch.

– In hundreds of hours of video of Obama, he never does this without mentioning an opponent, or having another trigger anger him.

Obama is an expert in body language who could never accidentally do this. Even we all learn as kids that the middle finger is offensive, and to be conscious of it. It is impossible for Obama, an international diplomat, to be unaware that his middle finger is up and fully extended.

– Statistically, the chances of this happening at around the time he mentions someone who opposes him, ~10 seconds out of a ~30-minute speech, are about 1 in 180. Statistically, for this to occur in 2 speeches of similar length, regarding two different opponents accidentally, are 1 in 32,000. In 3 speeches, 1 in 5,000,000 (five million). There are 6 instances caught in the just videos above, the odds of which happening accidentally are, even given every benefit of the doubt, one in billions.

– It is neither practical nor comfortable to scratch with the middle finger, with other fingers bent back.

– He is doing nothing with his hand prior.

– Watch the dramatic pause after mentioning his opponents’ names each time.

– If he were scratching, why not just scratch in one motion without the dramatic pause?

– Who scratches with their middle finger anyway? It’s neither comfortable nor effective.

– Who alternates the finger they scratch with, and would do so unconsciously like this?

– The middle finger is usually even uncomfortable to extend by itself.

Once, a Russian newscaster gave Obama the middle finger: It is unclear if this was in response to Obama giving the middle finger to others, maybe Putin, or just a sign that Russia is watching Obama closely and is aware of his tactics, even if all of America is sleeping.

ob finger 2After some of these gestures received media attention, the White House responded by saying it was unintentional. Obama is believed to have stopped doing the middle finger gesture around the same time, while other aspects of his NPD are worsening, and dramatically worsen in a second term. The videos clearly show otherwise. Most people who view these videos identify them as clearly intentional. The remaining few, must see them in the context of Obama’s dozens, if not hundreds of other acts consistent with NPD, Malignant Narcissism, and Messiah and God complex as analyzed in Part 2 and Part 3.

Obama gives Hillary the finger video

Part 2

Analysis of Obama’s unusual statements and actions consistent with Malignant Narcissism, Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), Messiah Complex and an uncontrollable need for ever-increasing power consistent with his Executive power restructurings analyzed in Part 3

Psychological and factual analysis of dozens of unusual actions and statements evidencing Obama’s delusional view of himself as a Messiah and God like never before seen in an American president, but consistent with historical figures with NPD such as Adolph Hitler, Stalin, and Nero.

Analysis of the likely severity of Obama’s NPD, and how it may affect his decision-making. Will Obama continue to conceal problems he cannot solve to protect his ego at any cost, like continuing to print money and increase debt to hide economic problems. Will he continue to make more people reliant on his “savior” hand in the form of food stamps and other government aid? Is he capable of extreme acts such as intentionally causing an “emergency” to make even more people reliant on him?

obama muslim flagAnalysis of psychologists’ concerns about the dangers of Obama’s NPD, his self-view as a messiah, his psychological need for ever-increasing power.

Analysis of whether Obama’s NPD is severe enough that he may be unable to step down from power and accept limits to his “grandiosity,” regardless the 2016 election, like Saddam, Assad, Hitler, who must die in power at any price.

Analysis of whether Obama’s Messianic delusions can cause him to voluntarily or involuntarily manufacture an emergency to seek increased power regardless the Constitution, democratic, and elections process.

Analysis of whether Obama’s Executive power restructurings are based on anti-democratic intent, or merely ignorant/uncontrolled narcissistic power hungriness and control obsession.

obama arms alQada and the behead priest

Generally, Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is exhibited as follows:

– View of self-grandiosity, as better than others, special
– Self-centered and boastful
– Seeks constant attention and admiration
– Exaggerates their talents and achievements
– Believes that they are entitled to special treatment
– Is easily hurt but may not show it
Lack of empathy – although might fake it perfectly
– All narcissists create a cult, operate through cult, even if only a cult of one, of which the narcissist is the guru
– Narcissist has no personality, but may fake an apparently perfect charismatic personality
Narcissists often suffer from trauma as a child, such as abandonment of a father, and the unnaturally high view of himself is compensation or defense mechanism for the feeling of abandonment
Manipulation of others
Pathological liar, a walking piece of fiction, perhaps brilliantly performed near 100% of the time
Always blames others for everything that goes wrong
– Hyper-vigilant regarding attacking criticism
– Will stop at nothing to feed the narcissistic need*
Some will say, “of course he has these traits, he is the President and a politician.” But it is actually the reverse. He was elected President because he exuded being special. This document focuses on extraordinary actions even for politicians.

The following is a partial list of examples and signs Obama’s Malignant Narcissism and NPD, Obama’s actions consistent with Messiah and God Complex, and Obama caught weaving Biblical and anti-Christ themes into his Executive actions. Further analysis follows.

1) Obama’s middle finger gestures shown above

Viewing the repeated instances of this strange behavior in video quickly take this analysis beyond the realm of wild conspiracy. This is clearly not ordinary behavior, and there is no sane explanation. Also, as the White House has already denied it is intentional, they now own that position, which, from watching the videos, is obviously untrue.

Narcissists often experience psychotic “micro-episodes” associated with NPD such as these, as written by Dr. Sam Vaknin, an expert on narcissism and malignant narcissism. “When Narcissistic Supply is deficient, the narcissist de-compensates and acts out in a variety of ways.” Many of the examples analyzed here are just that, examples of Obama acting out.

2) Dr. Sam Vaknin speaks out with great concern about Obama’s NPD

Psychologists including Israeli psychologist Dr. Sam Vaknin have explained their analysis as to why Obama has severe NPD, a self-view as a Messiah, a false personality “mask” and a hidden true nature we rarely see (except for the outbursts above, for example). Dr. Vaknin also analyzes the possible catastrophic risks when Obama may not be able to let go of his Messiah delusion despite the reality of losing an election, having to step down from power, or some other failure or limitation Immigration amnesty after loosing the senate

Dr. Sam Vaknin’s multi-part analysis starts here with Part 1:

Further, more detailed interview with Dr. Vaknin is here:

Dr. Vaknin describes Obama’s view of himself as “the most important person even on the public stage,” and that Obama will not be able to accept being a a major failure, or if re-elected, having to step down in 2016. He says Obama may feel compelled to do something that will be remembered for 2000 years, like Jesus, suggesting, even if he has to cause an apocalypse.

Dr. Vaknin discusses in detail why people with NPD cannot psychologically let go of their delusions of greatness, or power, at any cost, and how this leads directly to history’s most destructive and genocidal examples of malignant narcissism.

3) Ali Sina’s Article: “Understanding Obama: Making of a Fuhrer”

This highly-recommended article by Ali Sina discusses Obama’s Fuhrer complex in relation to his NPD. An excerpt:

“Therefore, the question whether the President is a Muslim or a Christian, whether he is pro Palestine, as he has been all his life or whether he is pro Israel, whether he is a black supremacist or an agent of racial harmony, are moot. the President is anything you want him to be and situation dictates. He takes the side that is more expedient to his cause. To communists he is a comrade, to Islamists he is their man, to Palestinian fighters he is their hope and to the Jews he is a staunch Zionist. The narcissist’s creed is himself. Everything else is negotiable.

The best description of the President comes from himself. “I serve as a blank screen,” he wrote in The Audacity of Hope, “on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.” This is the key to the President’s personality. He will do and say anything as long as it suits him. He will embrace any cause, will align himself with anyone, and will shift his position wherever the wind blows. Narcissists are chameleons.”

4) Obama’s threat to the Supreme Court of the United States not to overturn “his” healthcare law.

Just days after oral arguments were heard by the Supreme Court regarding possibly overruling the Patient’s Protection and Affordable Care Act, Obama made very unusual statements never before seen in a President towards the Court. It is clinical narcissistic behavior to react as he did, in a childish undisciplined outburst, when it made the news that the Supreme Court may strike it down, just days after oral arguments were heard. Clinical narcissists cannot accept that they have any fault. The President needed to keep up his illusion of the world and needed to blame someone else, the Supreme Court, seeing them as wrong, activist, and without power to challenge him.

As analyzed further in Part 3 below, separation of powers is a key aspect of our democracy that protects us from dictatorship. The President’s unusual statement was taken as a threat by many people, including judges who demanded that the Justice Department explain what the President meant. In dictatorships, the most subtle threats are used by leaders who control the military to also pressure judges. Such statements are entirely unusual and improper for a President towards the Supreme Court.

Notice the complete absurdity with which Obama said the “unelected court” better not overturn “his” law which passed by a “strong majority”, when in reality only a single republican voted for it. This was an uncontrolled outburst based on his delusional reality in which nobody can challenge his authority. It is the very job of the “unelected court” to overturn unconstitutional laws. Interestingly, the narcissistic outburst and this delusional comment come together.

5) Obama repeatedly compares himself to super-heros in ways to that go beyond joking.

Most politicians do not compare themselves to superman, “here to save the planet earth.” But, that is exactly what Obama said, “contrary to the rumors you’ve heard, I was not borne in a manger, I was born on krypton and sent here to save the planet Earth” While once is unusual enough and perhaps joking, such identification with superman has been a recurring theme with Obama, as also shown in the photo below.

evil face 2

6) Obama’s NY Girlfriend Genevieve Cook calls Obama’s desire to play out a superhero a strong archetype of his personality

Note that Superman is not just a superhero, he is the strongest of all super-heros, unlimited strength and abilities, able to change the rotation of the earth to his desire.

Obama’s ex-girlfriend, Cook, “told Maraniss that she thought Obama’s desire to “play out a superhero life” was “a very strong archetype in his personality.”

Needless to say, this by itself is highly unusual. Cook’s language suggests Obama is not just a fan of Superman, but that this fantasy theme is part of Obama’s personality. It is difficult to measure the psychological impact of such a super-human mentality on someone who actually has millions of people to support such a delusion, but it is likely to solidify the delusion for such an individual, and may even make it indistinguishable from reality. Of course, if ever questioned, Obama is far too clever to admit how he really views his “superiority.”

7) Obama has referenced realization of his greatness as a “light from above”, an “epiphany.”

Obama has made statements such as, “a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, ‘I have to vote for Barack.’” And that his election will result in “a nation healed, a world repaired.”

8) Obama has said his election will “slow the rise of the oceans”, and “the planet will begin to heal”

Again, superhuman, and Biblical themes applied to his not even so much his accomplishments, but to people’s realization of his greatness in electing him.

I cant fathom why when Obama said this, the whole nation did not laugh, and immediately lose all serious interest in Obama for either being insane, or harboring a Messiah complex, either way, not fit for the Presidency.

9) Obama’s statement in 2008 statement, “We are the ones the world has been waiting for.”

Link above.

10) Obama has referred to himself as “God.”

Reportedly, in a discussion with actor Morgan Freeman, Obama said to him, “you were God before I was God.” It is a bit of a coincidence that they happened to be on the subject of this particular Freeman movie of all his roles, to begin with.

11) Obama has supported himself being idolized as “the one”, “sent by God”, “God,” and the “Messiah”

Obama has fully supported and never rebuked the mass idolization of him by millions and the media as “God” or “Messiah.” Obama has allowed and fueled this “Messiah” phenomenon supported by millions of his fans. Some examples at:

obama-communism.jpg rothchilds

MSNBC’s Chris Mathews said of Obama, “this is bigger than Kennedy, this is New Testament.”

Nancy Pelosi said Obama is sent by God, calling him “A leader that God has blessed us with at this time.”

Bill Maher said Obama is “Christ-like.”

Even Michelle Obama has said Obama is the Messiah, and “our savior”, that he can heal the earth, part the red sea, and lead us to the promised land. This is consistent with the common pattern of narcissists surrounding themselves with those who support their delusions.

The list is endless. Googling “Obama Messiah” produces 1,800,000 hits.

Why do so many people photograph Obama with a light behind him to create a halo effect and attribute a religious and Biblical overtone to him? If other politicians were photographed this way, the photo would be discarded as ridiculous and unusable. What is different about Obama? Most people are not joking when they express such views. Obama has never spoken out against this strange worship, though any wise person should know its dangers. In the least, this is inappropriate and manipulative. Both this popular phenomenon and Obama’s support of it are consistent with severe NPD and Messiah Complex.

Chris Mathews of MSNBC, Speaker of the house of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, and many other responsible intelligent people have imposed Biblical themes onto Obama in what should be described as the most frightening and primitive regression of man witnessed in modern times. Logic should be kicking in bringing to the forefront in our minds the logical danger of millions of people looking to someone as a real-life Messiah.

12) Obama adds his own accomplishments to the presidential biographies beside those of each American president

No other U.S. president has ever done anything so egomaniacal, nor would any other even feel the need to. It is delusional to think this is appropriate. This is a clear red flag. For Obama, even the U.S. Presidency is insufficient. Some dismiss this as a gaff by someone with merely a huge ego, without an understanding of the dangers of delusional NPD. And of course, Obama will cleverly talk his way out of anything.

13) Promising more “flexibility” after the election to Medvedev

Obama was caught on a hot microphone saying to Russian President Medvedev regarding missile defense, that “I’ll have more flexibility after the election.” This can only be taken as Obama saying, after the people vote for me, I will do things that if they knew about, they may not vote for me. Promising more “flexibility” is also vague, and manipulative – letting the other person imagine what they like, as long as he gets what he wants. Narcissists can be expert manipulators. Some suspect Obama has been making similar promises to many world leaders, and when this went public, it caused a disconnect between him and many other world leaders.

This may be the reason for such little bilateral relations recently with other world leaders, and even his refusal to meet with world leaders before the 2012 U.N. speech.

14) Obama calls for a civilian police force as strong as the military – right out of Hitler’s playbook Dictators often set up new police forces and militaries to circumvent established chains of command and loyalty. Doing so with a force not sworn to uphold the Constitution, and not part of the traditional military, is an attempt to restructure traditional power and enforcement mechanisms to make them loyal directly to Obama. This is discussed further in Part

15) Obama calls for a “contiguous” Palestinian State Such would mean dividing Israel in half. Obama does not misspeak, begging the question: Why did he say this? This was another “more flexibility after the election” type promise. Regardless what we think it means, you can bet Palestinians have their own expectations. Based on Obama’s acts, either Israel or the Palestinians will be very disappointed based on public statements alone, not even considering what he may have promised to both parties in private. Thinking he can promise everyone the world and get away with it is consistent with NPD-type behavior.

16) When a democrat suggests cancelling the 2012 elections, Obama does not object Governor Bev. Perdue of North Carolina made the suggestion. Obama said nothing about a suggestion that, if more widely supported, could threaten our democracy.

17) A pledge of loyalty not to the United States, but to Barack Obama

Also reminiscent of Hitler, Obama now has people making a “pledge of loyalty” not to the USA, but to Barack Obama personally. To even conceptualize such an oath is highly unusual, and consistent with both dictatorial mindset and NPD. It is also entirely inconsistent with promoting the United States and democratic values, and instead is a begging to feed his ego. Has any politician we can think of ever asked for a pledge of loyalty to him personally? Those who sign such a pledge may well confuse loyalty to Obama with loyalty to democratic principles and this nation. If a dictator wanted to override the Constitution, the first thing he would want to know is who and how many are with him.

This is not the only instance of Obama wanting confirmations of loyalty to him to feed an apparent narcissistic need to feel loyalty to him. Ads like the one below are repeated instances of displays of Obama’s NPD, wanting people to confirm loyalty to Obama, not to the Constitution or this county, and not even to promise to merely vote for him.

Notice how multiple of these ads carry the same theme. And maybe coincidence, the “tell Barack you’re in”, is almost essentially the same written as tell Barack “you rein” (although misspelled “you reign”). Some have suggested Obama uses significant hidden subconscious messaging an hypnosis in his mass manipulation.

18) Obama’s excessive use of “I”s and “me”s in speeches

“Consider that in Obama’s four State of the Union addresses, he has said the word “I” 80, 102, 62, and 72 times respectively. In his most recent address, he also used the word “my” 18 times, “I’m” 14 times, “me” 13 times, and “I’ve” 5 times, meaning that in a speech that was supposed to be about the health and wellbeing of our nation, Obama managed to reference himself a whopping 122 times, averaging roughly once every 30 seconds! To put that in perspective, in the first State of the Union Address ever given by an American President, George Washington used the word “I” 11 times. Thomas Jefferson used it 17 times in his first such address. In 1864, during the height of the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln used the word “I” 22 times. Ronald Reagan used it an average of 39 times during his State of the Unions, with a high of 48. George W. Bush averaged 35, with a high of 46.”

When Obama announced the killing of Bin Laden, he referenced himself 15 times, including, “I was briefed … I met repeatedly with my national security team …I determined that we had enough intelligence…and authorized an operation…at my direction…” (Though, he did not mention the seals that actually carried out the mission.)

This excessive use directly evidences NPD, as discussed by Dr. Vaknin and others.

There is a rumor that SEAL Team 6 was deployed without the President’s knowledge.The operation unknown to President Barack Obama or Valerie Jarrett and it remained that way until AFTER it had already been initiated. President Obama was literally pulled from a golf outing and escorted back to the White House to be informed of the mission.  jjadded

19) Obama does not look at Romney during their first debate

Several reporters commented that Obama looked down and not at Romney during their first debate. This may be a possible reaction caused by the furiosity Obama felt being challenged by Romney, which caught him by surprise.

20) Obama is referred to by Axelrod as “black Jesus” because of his “Messiah Complex”

Yes, those were Axelrod’s exact words. In ‘The Amateur’, Mr Klein’s unauthorised account of Mr Obama’s life and first term in office, he writes that Obama was supposedly known as ‘Black Jesus’ by his former senior campaign adviser David Axelrod because of his “messiah complex.”

21) Obama takes credit for jobs created under Clinton

During the first AND SECOND debate with Romney, Obama said, “We added 23 million jobs” – By this, Obama was taking credit for jobs Clinton created. It is likely an NPD delusion for Obama to feel as though he deserves credit for jobs created during the Clinton Administration, which Obama had no role in, enough to say “we created” those jobs.

22) Obama compares himself to Ghandi, Mandela

President’s statement comparing himself to Gandhi, “Around the world, Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, what they did was hard. It takes time. It takes more than a single term…” While Obama does this very subtly, the reference and intended connection is clear. Here again, the grandiosity of him being like Ghandi and Mandela, and the need for more power, a second presidential term, appear together, connected.

23) Sarkozy aid says Obama “insane” and “grossly egotistical”

“According to the European Union Times, “a new report circulating in the Kremlin” claimed that French President Nicolas Sarkozy referred in private remarks to Obama as “dangerous[ly] aliènè,” which the EU Times says “translates into his, Obama, being a ‘mad lunatic,’ or in the American vernacular, ‘insane.’ ”

French president Sarkozy has called the President conceited.

Sources close to Sarkozy say Sarkozy thinks Obama is “incredibly naive and grossly egotistical – so egotistical that no one can dent his naiveté”

24) Obama’s disturbing posture and body language

As Ali Sina discusses in her article above: What was initially disturbing to many about Obama was the way he holds himself, with a type of perfect, but haughty body language. His body language never shows self-consciousness, but the opposite, a perfect grandiosity. One typical Obama pose is chin just a little higher than others, looking upward as if toward the future, which is compelling to many who do not realize these are false tactics. He really isn’t looking up at anything, he is holding his head up for the effect it has on viewers.

obama_contemptlive25) Obama claims his Administration is more accomplished than all but three presidencies

The President’s statement that his presidency’s first 100 days has exceeded those of all but three presidents in history was deemed so narcissistic by CBS, that they themselves deleted it from the interview to protect him. I wonder how many other such instances the media and supporters have filtered out, and if such people would not come forward in the interest of this nation.

26) Obama always blames others for anything that goes wrong

Obama blames Bush, the Republicans, everyone but himself. This is not just political. Narcissists see blame in others, even if clearly unrealistic to the rest of us, because they must preserve their infallible view of themselves regardless the cost, even reality must sway. That’s why it is a delusional disorder.

27) Obama tells his supporters to be “obsessive”

28) Obama claimed in school to be an Indonesian prince, and Kenyan royalty

A former classmate’s account:

29) Charles Krauthammer calls Obama a narcissist

30) Before Obama was President, he stood before a fake Presidential Seal he created

Another example of delusional judgment in connection with viewing his self-greatness and power.

31) Obama wrote two memoirs, the first at age 35, before any real accomplishments

Similarly, Adolph Hitler wrote Mein Kamph before any significant accomplishments.

32) In a healthcare bill discussion, Obama tells McCain that “the election is over” – rudely and boastfully rubbing McCain’s nose in his victory for no reason in a disturbing display of angry NPD caught on video*

obama angerSen. McCain is discussing the proposed healthcare law, and points out that any reform should “remove all the special interests and special deals for a favored few, and treat all Americans the same.” Obama, out of the blue, jumps on McCain to reassert his supremacy in an extreme fashion by saying: “Let me just make this point, John, because we’re not campaigning anymore. The election’s over.” Obama accuses McCain of being political, which McCain doesn’t appear to be. Whether Obama had an overly-sensitive response to criticism, or otherwise just had a compelling urge to stick it to McCain, either is strongly indicative of NPD.

33) Obama remarks that he could fix the debt crisis better “entirely on his own”

This is another example of Obama’s perceived superiority leading directly to his argued justification for his increased powers. Dictators justify their need for more power by saying they could do more good with the power.

34) Obama remarks that U.S. military is fighting “on my behalf”

35) Obama says to Congress, “you’re going to destroy my presidency”

36) Obama says campaigner who died insisted she be buried in Obama t-shirt

This is unusual because it examples a lack of empathy regarding the death of someone, with Obama throwing his ego over it. The crowd bursts out because they cannot comprehend how to react to his statement, but Obama was not joking in speaking about this person’s death.

37) Obama said “I have become a symbol of America returning to its best traditions”  smiley-laughing001

38) Obama gave Queen Elizabeth an ipod loaded with pictures of him and his inauguration  smiley-laughing001

39) Obama had given the order to win re-election “by any means necessary”

White House insider Cass Sustein is reported to have created a plan whereby Obama supporters are told to win his re-election “by any means necessary.”

Remember that while Obama preaches justice, he won his first primary by having all of his opponents disqualified by challenging their qualification signatures at the last minute so there was no time to obtain new signatures. So much for democracy.shocked

40) Obama has told his supporters to be “almost obsessive” about winning his re-election

41) Obama said “the next 100 days will be so successful I will complete them in 72 days, and then I will rest.”

This is another statement consistent with a superhuman theme, and a “God” theme (who according to the Bible created the world in 7 days and then rested.) Also consistent with an anti-Christ theme, Obama has asked all other symbols of God to be removed.

42) Obama obsessively touches his debate opponents last when shaking hands to show his dominance.

Obama is always the last one who ceases touching the other on the arm or shoulder. Obama also makes sure his arm is facing the audience.

43) Obama has expressed a desire to speak all languages, consistent with Biblical anti-Christ themes. Obama’s reason for wanting this superpower is clear – to be able to speak all languages and influence the whole world with his amazing speaking skills – exactly what the anti-Christ was said to be able to do.

44) Obama asks supporters to mark their right hands and pledge loyalty to Barack Obama

“In Revelation 13:16-17, the Beast requires all to receive a mark on their foreheads or their right hands in order to buy and sell.”

45) In an interview, Obama has described his relationship with God as an ongoing conversation, and “sin” as “being out of alignment with my values.”

Falsani: Do you pray often?

Uh, yeah, I guess I do.
It’s not formal —me getting on my knees. I think I have an ongoing conversation with God. I think throughout the day, I’m constantly asking myself questions about what I’m doing, why am I doing it.

Falsani: What’s that power? Is it the holy spirit? God?

Well, I think it’s the power of the recognition of God, or the recognition of a larger truth that is being shared between me and an audience.

Who’s Jesus to you?

(He laughs nervously)

Jesus is an historical figure for me, and he’s also a bridge between God and man, in the Christian faith, and one that I think is powerful precisely because he serves as that means of us reaching something higher.

Falsani: What is sin?

Being out of alignment with my values.

The authors of this article bring up the question of Obama’s God complex based on this statement.

46) Obama has accepted as his Secret Service codename, “renegade”, meaning lawless one, which is also the name for the anti-Christ.

47) Obama is caught saying “I God bless you.”*

See the disturbing video for yourself. (ignore the other content of this video not the subject of this analysis)

The video is entitled “Obama to Create God’s Kingdom on Earth” and is 1:17 (one minute 17 seconds long.) I tried to insert it but for some reason the wrong video is being inserted, but please click on the link above.

Without all of the other evidence of God complex, one could say this was accidental. But with all the evidence, and knowing both Obama’s mentality and the games he plays in front of audiences such as his middle finger gestures, his other behavior suggests this was on purpose. Thus, this is quite disturbing.

48) His use of Greek columns in his speeches

As the psychologists above explain, everything Obama does is in his mind historic, and monumental, symbolic, and earth-changing – same as he views himself. The Greek columns are just one example of this.

49) At a September 11th Memorial, Obama quotes religious text which includes the phrase “I am God”

Perhaps coincidence, perhaps not, that he decided to say religious text in which this language is said repeatedly.

50) Obama makes a 7-year pact with Israel consistent with Biblical anti-Christ themes

The Bible states that the anti-Christ will make a 7-year pact with Israel. In addition to deals and promises with Israel for the past 4 years, now, when Israel insists on attacking Iran, Obama instead convinces Israel to the agreement H.R. 4133: United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012, which is to terminate in 2015, an additional 3 years.

51) Dr. Andre Hodges psychology professor and FBI profiler says Obama is angry and dangerous

While this analysis is not detailed, this profiler raises an interesting point about possible anger and trauma by Obama, including from the possibility that his mother might have had Obama aborted.

52) Obama’s family history consistent with narcissism

Obama’s father’s had relationships with multiple women around the world, drove drunk, and only once bothered to even come see his son. Wanting to overcompensate for the feeling of worthlessness from a father not wanting to see a child is a textbook factor in creating this hyper-grandiosity NPD.

53) The real answer on the Benghazi Rose Garden speech

Obama is a master of making two sides hear different things in his same words, each walking away thinking Obama is with them exclusively. Only Obama can give a speech and have both Israelis and Palestinians walk away believing he is on just their side. Yet, on this issue like many he has taken no action. “The beauty of doing nothing is that you can do it perfectly. Only when you do something is it almost impossible to do it without mistakes.” Thomas Sowell.

The reason there was so much confusion about whether Obama called the 9/11/2012 attack in the Rose Garden on 9/12/2012 a “terrorist attack” is because Obama was being intentionally vague to appeal to all possible sides around the world. In three separate instances, Obama said, “no act of terror will shake the resolve of this great nation” – on 9/12/2012, 9/13/2012, and at the U.N. People who wanted to hear him call that specific attack “terrorism” heard that. People who wanted to hear Obama not call the attack “terrorism” instead only heard him speak generally regarding terror. The proof that Obama was being intentionally vague is that he used the same “no act of terror” language in three separate instances. One cannot be equally vague accidentally three times. Obama was being intentionally vague, because some people will accept that language he used, but would be offended to him specifically identifying a person or act as “terrorism”, such as if he would have said “the 9/11/2012 Benghazi was an act of terrorism.” Obama even refused to call the Ft. Hood attack “terrorism,” so he clearly wasn’t calling Benghazi terrorism. Biden said they were not told it was terrorism by their intelligence sources. Yet, even after Biden’s admission, Obama is so manipulative that he convinced Candy Crowley, and the world, that he did call it terrorism in the Rose Garden, knowing very well that he was being intentionally vague. Obama said, “read the transcript” with absolute smugness, knowing he is clever enough to run circles around everyone who examines his statements or acts closely and tries to catch him on something. The middle finger gesture is the epitome of this – he is saying, “look what I can get away with, I’m so clever.” This is the only explanation, and it shows the clever attention to every word in Obama’s speeches, and the brilliant ability to use his every word to manipulate audiences of one or millions. He always knows exactly what people want to hear, and thereby thinks he can do whatever he wants, because he will have a chance to explain it all away beautifully.

54) New Obama ad likens voting for Obama to losing virginity to a “great guy” Barack “Let your first time be with Barack”

55) Obama redraws American flag with “O” instead of stars

obama FLAG

Enigma of Obama and his prodigious ability to lie so confidently, comfortably and continually:

hitler and obamaobama FLAG

By Tom Retterbush

ABC News personality, Pulitzer prize-winning columnist George Will, said it best in a Washington Post article:

“Barack Obama’s intellectual sociopathy – his often breezy and sometimes loutish indifference to truth – should no longer startle.”

“Sociopathy” is a strong word, but used by many to describe Obama – not necessarily as a clinical psychiatric diagnosis, but just because the symptoms fit so darn well, as per this typical description:

“Sociopaths are often well-liked because of their charm and high charisma, but they do not usually care about other people. They think mainly of themselves and often blame others for the things that they do. They have a complete disregard for rules and lie constantly. They seldom feel guilt or learn from punishments.” Remind you of anyone?

Under normal circumstances, extreme narcissism creates difficulties in personal relationships and at work because of the narcissist’s intense and unrealistic demands for approval and acceptance. When the narcissist works out of the Oval Office, however, the implications become ominous.

One veteran psychiatrist suggested a slightly different diagnosis for Obama, but similar to “sociopathy” in many ways – namely, “malignant narcissistic personality disorder.” The modifier “malignant” signifies the version of “narcissistic personality disorder” that may cross over into criminality, he explained.

Obama tyrannyThe narcissistic personality is defined by characteristics such as an inflated sense of one’s importance, unrealistic fantasies of power and success, the need for constant approval and acceptance, and difficulty handling criticism fro others. Narcissism is different from healthy self-esteem; people who simply have strong self-esteem can realistically evaluate their shortcomings as well as their strengths. Such people are not likely to describe their impact upon the world in messianic terms, as Obama did during the 2008 campaign when he prophesied that his election would be remembered by future generations as “the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal.”

The popular misconceptions about the role of president can be allurig enough even to those with balanced egos. Indeed, Lord Acton’s quote seems fitting:

“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

For a super-ambitious and vainglorious person such as Obama, lying is a vital and creative power. Lies open doors that would otherwise remain shut. Thus in a very real sense, for Obama, lies are “magic words,” the invocation of which represents the exercise of real power – power to impress voters, raise money, demonize critics, win elections, pass legislation and transform a nation.

Ordinary people don’t possess this power, as they are constrained from such brazen lying by their conscience and/or the fear of being caught. But a highly narcissistic person like Obama feels he has the freedom – indeed, the mandate – to reshape America by creatively speaking into existence his preferred version of reality, without regard for any higher standard of truth. In other words, to li

Here’s how psychiatrist M. Scott Peck, M.D., explains it in his classic best-seller, “People of the Lie“.

Malignant narcissism is characterized by an unsubmitted will. All adults who are mentally healthy submit themselves one way or another to something higher than themselves, be it God or truth or love or some other ideal. They do what God wants them to do rather than what they would desire. “Thy will, not mine, be done,” the God-submitted person says. They believe in what is true rather than what they would like to be true.

Appearing as all things to all people has been key to Obama’s meteoric rise, requiring constant deception. As one blogger put it recently:

He is Muslim, he is Christian, he is a capitalist, he is a socialist, he is black, he is white, … he is a constitutional professor, he is an average collegian who smoked dope and did cocaine, he is a foreigner, he is American-born, he is “EVERYMAN.”

Sam Vaknin, one of the world’s leading experts on narcissism and author of several books on is the disorder believes Obama is a narcissist! Watch this video of Vaknin talk about our our Narcissist-in-Chief…

… In summary, to a greater or lesser degree, all mentally healthy individuals submit themselves to the demands of their own conscience. Not so the evil, however. In the conflict between their guilt and their will, it is the guilt that must go and the will that must win.

The reader will be struck by the extraordinary willfulness of evil people. They are men and women of obviously strong will, determined to have their own way. There is a remarkable power in the manner in which they attempt to control others.

In his second autobiography “The Audacity of Hope,” Obama makes an audacious admission: “I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.” While it’s amazing that anyone could openly brag about such a manipulative life-strategy, Obama has long cultivated his appealing yet ambiguous public persona in preparation for a career as political messiah.

With America now in precipitous decline on his watch, many have tried to explain The Enigma of Obama and his prodigious ability to lie so confidently, comfortably and continually:

In “Rules for Radicals,” Alinsky counsels wannabe revolutionaries that they must be willing to ignore the dictates of their own conscience to advance the left’s agenda:

In action, one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent both with one’s individual conscience and the good of mankind. The choice must always be for the latter. Action is for mass salvation and not for the individual’s personal salvation. He who sacrifices the mass good for his personal conscience has a peculiar conception of “personal salvation”; he doesn’t care enough for people to be “corrupted” for them.

That, friends, is one of the most twisted things I’ve ever heard. To believe it and act on it is to abandon your greatest gift, your moment-to-moment connection with the Living God – your conscience. Maybe that’s why Alinsky dedicated “Rules for Radicals” to “the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer.”

French Leader Sarkozy Warns Obama Might Be Insane. amazed at American Presidents unwillingness to listen to”reason” or “logic”


In the final analysis, Obama lies because that’s how he gets his way, and getting his way is all he cares about.

By Tom Retterbush

hitler and obama

Veteran psychiatrist suggested a diagnosis for Obama, namely, “malignant narcissistic personality disorder.” version of “narcissistic personality disorder” that may cross over into criminality



Dr. Ben Carson that President Barack Obama is putting the needs and desires of non-citizens over those who elected him.

9_162014_b1-carson-constitut8201_s877x511-580x337It only took Dr. Ben Carson three sentences to demolish the executive orders granting amnesty to five million illegal immigrants announced by President Barack Obama Thursday night.

And it only took a few hours for those words, shared on the African-American Conservatives Facebook page, to begin going viral.

There are so many of our own people who are having a very difficult time finding jobs, making ends meet,” Carson said, according to the Facebook post. “This is not going to aid those people.

ben-carson-one-nation“Is there ever going to come a time when maybe we think about our own people first?”

This doesn’t seem like an overly complicated concept, but it’s one that the president and his fellow liberals seem to have difficulty grasping.

There may be those who consider the words of the likely 2016 Republican presidential contender racist — but that would be a difficult argument to maintain. Carson was not referring to a race when he said “our people,” but rather a citizenry made up of many races — indeed, a citizenry made up of essentially every race.

Nor was Carson suggesting that Americans, always a big-hearted people, ignore the plight of those from other nations who truly require assistance with basic needs just to survive. He merely said that America’s elected representatives should give first consideration to those who voted for them — not to those without a vote.

It’s hard to see how anyone could reasonably argue against that sort of common sense.

Please share this article on Twitter and Facebook if you agree with Dr. Ben Carson that President Barack Obama is putting the needs and desires of non-citizens over those who elected him.

Pentagon got duped, made ransom payment for Bowe Bergdahl to con man


obama crimes

By Bill Gertz – The Washington Times

The Pentagon is under fire for making a ransom payment to an Afghan earlier this year as part of a failed bid to win the release of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, according to U.S. officials.

Sgt. Bergdahl was released in May after nearly five years in captivity as part of a controversial exchange for five terrorists held at the U.S. military detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The ransom payment was first disclosed by Rep. Duncan Hunter in a Nov. 5 letter to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel. Mr. Hunter stated in the letter that Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) made the payment covertly as part of a release deal. But the money was stolen by the Afghan intermediary claiming to represent the Haqqani terrorist network.

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters Tuesday that Mr. Obama “continues to believe, as previous presidents have concluded, that it’s not in the best interest of American citizens to pay ransoms to any organization, let alone a terrorist organization.”


“And the reason for that is simple: We don’t want to put other American citizens at even greater risk when they’re around the world,” he said.

Video shows moments before journalist Steven Sotloff beheaded by Islamic State militantsSecretary of State John F. Kerry also said in a speech Tuesday that ransom payments will not be paid. Both officials spoke following the latest beheading of an American, Peter Kassig, by Islamic State terrorists.

obama-biden laugh small There is no one with any sense in charge.

Officials said the Bergdahl ransom was an unspecified large amount of money and that the exchange was handled by the Army’s elite Delta Force anti-terrorism squad. The FBI also was involved in the ransom payment attempt and was waiting inside Afghanistan’s border with North Waziristan when the release failed, confirming that it had been a scam.

smiley-laughing001      The Pentagon’s spin on the payment is that the money was not technically a ransom. Instead, defense officials are claiming the cash was intelligence money paid to a source for information that would lead to the release of Sgt. Bergdahl.

Before the prisoner swap for Sgt. Bergdahl, which angered Congress because it violated promises of consultations prior to the freeing of Guantanamo inmates, special operations commandos had been preparing to conduct a rescue raid if Sgt. Bergdahl’s location was uncovered.

However, confusion and multiple lines of effort to win the American soldier’s release surrounded the entire affair. In addition to the JSOC ransom and rescue plans, the State Department held negotiations with the Taliban in Qatar, and Pakistani military and intelligence agencies also were involved. Also, the Bergdahl family was preparing to pay a $10 million ransom, according to BuzzFeed.

Sgt. Bergdahl was captured in Afghanistan in June 2009 along with a group of Afghan soldiers who were intoxicated. According to a person familiar with the capture, he was sold to the Haqqani network and moved to Pakistan, complicating any covert rescue attempt.

A spokesman for Mr. Hunter said the Pentagon has not responded to the congressman’s letter but is said to be working on a response.

Every day in every way it become apparent we are enduring the most corrupt administration in the history of the nation.

Hillary more of the same











Is the Obama administration secretly negotiating treaties with globalist bodies?

Obama, Clinton Selling Out U.S. Sovereignty in Secret

By Victor Thorn

Is the Obama administration secretly negotiating treaties with globalist bodies, in violation of the Unites States Constitution? That’s the question on the minds of a number of political watchdogs, who argue that the White House is doing an end run around Congress and the American people in order to lock the country into agreements on the environment, fishing rights and even gun ownership with the United Nations (UN).

On February 7, former Bill Clinton campaign manager Dick Morris dissected a host of international “sneaky treaties” that, he says, “Once signed and ratified, have the same status as constitutional law and cannot be altered or eclipsed by Congress or state legislatures. And their provisions must be enforced by U.S. courts.”

The most egregious of these would be U.S. membership in the International Criminal Court (ICC). This tribunal that has jurisdiction across the globe could prosecute elected U.S. leaders for entering into a war without UN approval. These “crimes of aggression”—even if approved by Congress under an official declaration of war—could still land the president or cabinet members in prison.

The ICC’s reach supersedes the rulings of any U.S. court, thereby posing a serious threat to constitutionally-guaranteed trials by a jury of our peers. A lesser-known aspect of this treaty involves, ironically, the use of America’s military to wage aggressions against those deemed war criminals by the ICC. Already, Barack Obama has buckled to this ruling body by sending armed forces into Africa to execute an arrest warrant for alleged war criminal Joseph Kony, leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army in Uganda. Yet rather than having Congress authorize sending U.S. men and women into action overseas, Obama bypassed them and opted to exert his “executive power.” He justified this decision as an “international obligation.”

Who is our president obligated to: American citizens or the New World Order? Another treaty, one advocating children’s rights, would—at least superficially—protect youths from kidnapping, prostitution and human trafficking. However, if a 14-member panel determines that certain countries like the U.S. aren’t providing enough funding for food, education or clothing to underdeveloped nations, the UN could levy a tax on American citizens and then redistribute this money to Third World countries. Not surprisingly,

A leading proponent for the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) is Hillary Clinton. In her book It Takes a Village, she wrote: “The village must act in the place of parents. It accepts these responsibilities in all our names through the authority we vest in the government.These 14-member overlords could also weigh in on what religious teachings, educational material and social attitudes are acceptable.

Hillary is the war on women says kathleen wiley

Interestingly, Hillary’s views on child-rearing dovetail with those of the UNCRC. “They [parents] have to be shown how to do it,” wrote Hillary. “They have to be, in a sense, re-parented to be able to be a good parent.” Hillary is so distrustful of traditional families that she further elaborated.: “Decisions about motherhood and abortion, schooling, cosmetic surgery, treatment of venereal diseases or employment and others where the decision—or lack of one—will significantly reflect the child’s future should not be made unilaterally by the parent.”

If these social-engineering thoughts aren’t horrifying enough, Hillary remarked at the University of Texas in 1993, “Let us be willing to remold society by redefining what it means to be a human being in the 20th century, moving into the new millennium.”

A third troublesome treaty is known as the Law of the Sea Treaty, or LOST. Over 162 nations have signed or ratified it. Many other nations, such as Turkey and Israel, have stayed out of it. Obama sidesteps the Constitution yet again via executive order

. LOST is being promoted by another Clinton crony, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who seeks to surrender seas off the coasts of the United States to UN overseers. Although the complexities of this treaty are far too vast to elaborate on here, in a nutshell LOST will acquiesce to a UN council where U.S. companies can drill for oil or fish and which technologies must become global property via a form of intellectual eminent domain. The UN could tax up to 50% of royalties from offshore drilling and redistribute these proceeds to poorer nations.

panneta and UN

In another example, the Outer Space Code of Conduct could seriously interfere with the U.S. implementing any type of anti-missile shield to protect itself. Using the feel-good premise of decreasing space debris, in actuality this treaty would jeopardize the U.S. military’s ability to deploy platform-based weapons in space

When it comes to China and India’s rapid development of their space programs and offensive weaponry, are Americans willing to forfeit their safety to the edicts of UN bureaucrats that already view us with such outright enmity?

Obama and Hillary are also targeting Americans’ firearms ownership.

In early April, Sen. Rand Paul issued a statement on this: “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently announced the Obama administration will be working hand in glove with the United Nations to pass a new ‘UN Small Arms Treaty.’ ” The UN Small Arms Treaty is designed to “register, ban and confiscate firearms owned by private citizens like you,” wrote Paul.

If Washington signs onto this, added Paul, the U.S. would be forced to “enact tougher licensing requirements . . . confiscate and destroy all ‘unauthorized’ civilian firearms . . . ban the trade, sale and private ownership of semiautomatic weapons . . .[and] create an international gun registry.” – See more at:

Hillary more of the same

FCC official warns Obama-backed net neutrality plan would bring ‘immediate’ Internet tax

obama_yourpayingforit.jpg 2222222222Internet users would be forced to pay a new federal tax on their monthly bills if the government approves regulations recently endorsed by President Obama, a member of the Federal Communications Commission predicts.

Commissioner Mike O’Reilly addressed what’s known as “net neutrality” at a Washington seminar on Friday. He spoke after Obama backed stricter rules by calling for preventing service providers from charging more for speedier service and for regulating them like telecommunications companies under a decades-old law.

That law requires telecommunications companies to pay into the FCC’s “Universal Service Fund” — and would likely require the same of Internet companies. But O’Reilly says history clearly shows that the fees would quickly be “passed off” to customers, just like they are now on monthly phone bills.

“Consumers of these services would face an immediate increase in their Internet bills,” O’Reilly said Friday during the seminar held by the non-partisan Free State Foundation. “Let’s accept a truism: Consumers pay [the fund], not companies.”

O’Reilly, a Republican on the five-member commission, also quoted scholar and net neutrality guru Tim Wu in saying, “Ultimately, consumers always pay for everything, no matter what we say otherwise.”

Ohio GOP Rep. Bob Latta, vice chairman of the House Communication and Technology Subcommittee, on Monday supported O’Reilly’s concerns.