Obama’s Handlers Have Sent Community Organizers To Florida And Texas

large group we wont take it any more Obama’s Handlers have sent organizers to Florida and Texas. Jeremy Bird Obama’s field director,  revolutionized the effectiveness of field registering, 361,000 left-leaning voters in Florida, 156,000 left-leaning voters in Colorado and 96,000 left-leaning voters in Nevada. And  for his 2012 successes, the former director is able to name his job. Bird chose Texas, and if he spends any significant time there, it is because he really thinks he can win with his divide and conquer strategy.

It’s the Elderly in Florida who are being used and abused by the Democrats. The Party of their youth no longer exists. It has been taken over by thugs and Radicals who, threaten those in government who would vote against them. Obama operatives are signing up Florida seniors for food stamps by the thousands on, one hand and destroying their health care on the other hand.

Most have no idea yet that their healthcare is being rationed. Seniors are told there are no “death panels”  then, why did the House of Representatives vote 223-181 to repeal the Independent Payment Advisory Board, the ObamaCare “death panel” of 15 unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats who would ration health care for seniors,

Sadly, an even grimmer death panel awaits, The Democrats still control the Senate, and they love the idea of bureaucratic panels imposing price controls. They’re certainly not going to force President Obama to veto a bill that would repeal a key component of his bloated and dying health-care monstrosity. Instead, they’ll keep pushing one of the most persistent and dangerous delusions of the modern era, which is that price controls can be imposed without reducing quality and/or supply. That’s never actually happened, but statist politicians will never stop insisting they can impose “affordable prices” with a swish and flick of their magic wands.

By now, most people know about the bureaucracy created by ObamaCare, but less widely known is the fate of anyone who dares to challenge its edicts. As the National Right to Life Committee explains in a heavily documented fact sheet:

The Commission’s recommendations are to be ones “that the Secretary of Health and Human Services] or other Federal agencies can implement administratively.” In turn, the Secretary of Health and Human Services is empowered to impose “quality and efficiency” measures on hospitals, requiring them to report on their compliance with them. Doctors will have to comply with such quality measures in order to be able to contract with any qualified insurance plan. Basically, doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers will be told by Washington just what diagnostic tests and medical care are considered to meet “quality and efficiency” standards – not only for federally funded programs like Medicare, but also for health care paid for by private citizens and their nongovernmental health insurance.

That’s what we’re talking about here: price controls and quality standards imposed through coercion, under the pain of being driven out of business, impervious to anything less than a congressional super-majority vote – a very rare event. The objective of these limits is to keep health care costs below the rate of medical inflation.

Given the penalties they face, don’t expect a lot of doctors to fool around with administering care in excess of what the IPAB decrees. Anything else you hear from Senate Democrats or the Obama Administration is pure spin. Part of that spin has been a remarkable degree of sorcery surrounding the “cost” of repealing the IPAB. Democrats simultaneously claim that the death panel would hardly have to do any rationing at all for the next ten years… and that repealing it will cost $3.1 billion. These talking points are based on a range of Congressional Budget Office projections, evaluating possible scenarios through 2022.

If you tell a Democrat that the IPAB will impose brutal rationing on seniors, they’ll say no, Do  they think it’s just going to sit there minding its own business for the next decade, because the growth of health care costs is projected to slow down?. If you then propose repealing the IPAB because it’s unnecessary, the very same Democrats will spin on a dime and shriek that repeal will slap another $3 billion on the deficit, which they otherwise could not care less about. There’s more in the PATH Act than just repeal of the death panels, as House Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) explained in a statement: “Health care decisions should be made between doctors and patients—that relationship does not work when bureaucrats and trial lawyers come between them.”

According to a recent Rasmussen poll, Americans overwhelmingly favor the complete repeal of Obama Care, 56-39 percent. It joins construction of the Keystone XL pipeline (57-29 percent according to a Gallup poll released Thursday) as something America desperately wants, but cannot have, as long as the Democrat Party controls the White House and Senate. http://www.humanevents.com/2012/03/22/house-votes-to-repeal-the-death-panel/

The death panels still exist. They just keep changing its name by a stroke of the many  Obama pens.


It sort of puts a new slant on how you view your friendly bank, doesn’t it?

kennedy was to expose plot

by John P. Curran

“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it”.
Louis T. McFadden Chairman of the House Banking Committee in the 1930s

With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. Two weeks later he was killed.

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree. Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superseded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.

in 1910 Senator Nelson Aldrich, then Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, in collusion with representatives of the European central banks, devised a plan to pressure and deceive Congress into enacting legislation that would covertly establish a private central bank.

This bank would assume control over the American economy by controlling the issuance of its money. After a huge public relations campaign, engineered by the foreign central banks, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was slipped through Congress during the Christmas recess, with many members of the Congress absent. President Woodrow Wilson, pressured by his political and financial backers, signed it on December 23, 1913.

The act created the Federal Reserve System, a name carefully selected and designed to deceive. “Federal” would lead one to believe that this is a government organization. “Reserve” would lead one to believe that the currency is being backed by gold and silver. “System” was used in lieu of the word “bank” so that one would not conclude that a new central bank had been created.

In reality, the act created a private, for profit, central banking corporation owned by a cartel of private banks. Who owns the FED? The Rothchilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg of Germany; and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman, Sachs and the Rockefeller families of New York

.Did you know that the FED is the only for-profit corporation in America that is exempt from both federal and state taxes? The FED takes in about one trillion dollars per year tax free! The banking families listed above get all that money.

Almost everyone thinks that the money they pay in taxes goes to the US Treasury to pay for the expenses of the government. Do you want to know where your tax dollars really go? If you look at the back of any check made payable to the IRS you will see that it has been endorsed as “Pay Any F.R.B. Branch or Gen. Depository for Credit U.S. Treas. This is in Payment of U.S. Oblig.” Yes, that’s right, every dime you pay in income taxes is given to those private banking families, commonly known as the FED, tax free.

**Like many of you, I had some difficulty with the concept of creating money from nothing

. You may have heard the term “monetizing the debt,” which is kind of the same thing. As an example, if the US Government wants to borrow $1 million $ the government does borrow every dollar it spends  they go to the FED to borrow the money. The FED calls the Treasury and says print 10,000 Federal Reserve Notes (FRN) in units of one hundred dollars.

The Treasury charges the FED 2.3 cents for each note, for a total of $230 for the 10,000 FRNs. The FED then lends the $1 million to the government at face value plus interest. To add insult to injury, the government has to create a bond for $1 million as security for the loan. And the rich get richer. The above was just an example, because in reality the FED does not even print the money; it’s just a computer entry in their accounting system. To put this on a more personal level, let’s use another example.

Today’s banks are members of the Federal Reserve Banking System. This membership makes it legal for them to create money from nothing and lend it to you. Today’s banks, like the goldsmiths of old, realize that only a small fraction of the money deposited in their banks is ever actually withdrawn in the form of cash. Only about 4 percent of all the money that exists is in the form of currency. The rest of it is simply a computer entry.

Let’s say you’re approved to borrow $10,000 to do some home improvements. You know that the bank didn’t actually take $10,000 from its pile of cash and put it into your pile? They simply went to their computer and input an entry of $10,000 into your account. They created, from thin air, a debt which you have to secure with an asset and repay with interest. The bank is allowed to create and lend as much debt as they want as long as they do not exceed the 10:1 ratio imposed by the FED.

 **It sort of puts a new slant on how you view your friendly bank, doesn’t it?

How about those loan committees that scrutinize you with a microscope before approving the loan they created from thin air. What a hoot! They make it complex for a reason. They don’t want you to understand what they are doing. People fear what they do not understand. You are easier to delude and control when you are ignorant and afraid.

Now to put the frosting on this cake. When was the income tax created? If you guessed 1913, the same year that the FED was created, you get a gold star. Coincidence? What are the odds? If you are going to use the FED to create debt, who is going to repay that debt? The income tax was created to complete the illusion that real money had been lent and therefore real money had to be repaid.

So, what can be done? My father taught me that you should always stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand up alone.

If “We the People” don’t take some action now, there may come a time when “We the People” are no more. You should write a letter or send an email to each of your elected representatives. Many of our elected representatives do not understand the FED. Once informed they will not be able to plead ignorance and remain silent.

Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can “coin money and regulate the value thereof.” The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency.

Ask your representative, in light of that information, how it is possible for the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the Federal Reserve Bank that it created, to be constitutional. Ask them why this private banking cartel is allowed to reap trillions of dollars in profits without paying taxes. Insist on an answer.

Thomas Jefferson said, “If the America people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currencies, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their prosperity until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt.”

John P. Curran  Source:http://www.roc-grp.org/jfk.html

Does anyone really believe that someone, a ‘man of the people’, would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American history? He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very people that Obama says he wants to ‘set free’.

You only have to look at the cabal behind Obama, and those he has already appointed to his administration team, to see what his ‘change’ is truly planned to be. 

a question : Does anyone really believe that someone, a ‘man of the people’, would simply appear from apparently nowhere to run the slickest and best-funded presidential campaign in American history? He was chosen long ago by those who wish to enslave the very people that Obama says he wants to ‘set free’.

The sources of Obama funding read like a Wall Street Who’s Who – Goldman Sachs, UBS, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and so on. No wonder he went back on his pledge to accept the limitations of public funding for his campaign and instead took the no-limit option of ‘private’ funding.
And those people are going to support a candidate who does not represent their best interests?? “David Icke”