Senator Nelson Should Be Defeated in 2012. He Has Lied To The Voters In Florida.

U.S. Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) voted against the Balanced Budget Amendment contained in the “Cut-Cap-Balance” legislation.
This is a 180 degree reversal from his earlier position.
Apparently Senator Nelson only supports the Balanced Budget Amendment until he has to actually vote on it.
Senator Nelson should be defeated in 2012. He has lied to the voters in Florida and he’s working to bankrupt the nation.


Senator Bill Nelson failed his Oath of Office, failing to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States

Senator Bill Nelson failed his Oath of Office, failing to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, failing to cast a vote against S. 2248, the FISA Amendments Act. The FISA Amendments Act makes the misnamed Protect America Act permanent. Even worse, the FISA Amendments Act makes it legal:

– For the federal government to spy on you electronically
– Reading your email
– Listening to your telephone calls
– Watching what web pages you visit
– Following your financial transactions
– Without any explanation of why they’re doing it
– Without anyone outside of the Executive Branch knowing that it’s being done
– Without oversight by Congress
– Letting the government use information it obtains illegally
– Giving telecommunications companies retroactive immunity for helping the government do this, even when it was expressly against the law to do so

When a President of the United States has this kind of power at his disposal, she or he cannot be stopped. The president’s power becomes total and the president becomes a totalitarian. Senator Nelson failed to show up and cast a vote against the FISA Amendments Act. Through inaction, he allowed the country to slouch toward totalitarianism.

The idea that he would be preparing to assume dictatorial powers seems so remote that the mainstream media has not even reported on these initiatives.

Senator Nelson failed to cast a vote against the ironically named Protect America Act. The Protect America Act is a law now passed by both houses of Congress which replaces judicial warrants with executive prerogative and substitutes blank checks for reasons. The Protect America Act gives the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) the power to spy on your emails, your web surfing, your telephone calls and other electronic communications. All this is carried out without a warrant, which is required by the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

There is no supervision of the spy programs put in place by the Attorney General and the DNI, except by these two individuals themselves. No one has the power to stop them any more. They can search your records, sift through your private messages, watch you go from web page to web page, on the pretext of protecting America from terrorists, all without a search warrant. No one has the power to tell them no.

The Attorney General and the DNI, both political appointees of the President, have the power under the Protect America Act to order any American to help them conduct their electronic spying against other Americans. Under the new law, if they order you to take part in their spying operations, and you say no, they can throw you in prison. If you do not keep their spying on other Americans a secret, even from your family, they can throw you in prison.

The Protect America Act institutes Big Brother government in the United States. It betrays American liberty. It is a shame that the Act passed. Shame on Senator Nelson for failing to vote against it.

From the transfer of Total Information Awareness into the National Security Agency under codenames like topsail and basketball, through warrantless wiretape, seizures of massive amounts of cell phone and email records, and even the systematic entry of the DNA of innocent Americans into gigantic government databases, we have seen a dramatic effort by the government to watch over the most personal aspects of our lives. Thanks to these secretive government programs, Americans can no longer assume that their postal mail, email, phone calls, commercial activity, and other kinds of personal activity are at all private.

Biden: If Bill Nelson loses Senate race, Obama won’t win Florida in 2012.  YAY!!! We shake off both of these weasels.


Charles Krauthammer On Social Security Friday, March 11, 2011

Here’s how President Barack Obama answered CBS’s Scott Pelley’s question about whether he could guarantee that Social Security checks would go out on August 3, the day after the government is supposed to reach its debt limit: “I cannot guarantee that those checks he included veterans and the disabled, in addition to Social Security go out on August 3rd if we haven’t resolved this issue. Because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it.”

And Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner echoed the president on CBS’s Face the Nation Sunday implying that if a budget deal isn’t reached by August 2, seniors might not get their Social Security checks.

Well, either Obama and Geithner are lying to us now, or they and all defenders of the Social Security status quo have been lying to us for decades. It must be one or the other.

Here’s why: Social Security has a trust fund, and that trust fund is supposed to have $2.6 trillion in it, according to the Social Security trustees.** If there are real assets in the trust fund, then Social Security can mail the checks, regardless of what Congress does about the debt limit.

President Obama’s budget director, Jack Lew, explained all this last February in USA Today:

He shamelessly said “Social Security benefits are entirely self-financing. They are paid for with payroll taxes collected from workers and their employers throughout their careers. These taxes are placed in a trust fund dedicated to paying benefits owed to current and future beneficiaries. … Even though Social Security began collecting less in taxes than it paid in benefits in 2010, the trust fund will continue to accrue interest and grow until 2025, and will have adequate resources to pay full benefits for the next 26 years.” Notice that Lew said nothing about raising the debt ceiling, which was already looming, and it shouldn’t matter anyway because he told us “Social Security is “entirely self-financing” and off budget.” What could be clearer??????

Unconvinced, syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer wrote a subsequent column questioning Lew’s assertions. “This [Lew’s] claim is a breathtaking fraud. The pretense is that a flush trust fund will pay retirees for the next 26 years. Lovely, except for one thing: The Social Security trust fund is a fiction. … In other words, the Social Security trust fund contains—nothing.”

Social Security status-quo defenders have assured us for the past 25 years that Social Security is fully funded—for the next 25 years, or 2036. So if there are real assets in the Social Security Trust Fund—$2.6 trillion allegedly—then how could failure to reach a debt-ceiling agreement possibly threaten seniors’ Social Security checks?

The answer is that the federal government has borrowed all of that trust fund money and spent it, exactly as Krauthammer asserted.And the only way the trust fund can get some cash to pay Social Security benefits is if the federal government draws it from general revenues or borrows the money—which, of course, it can’t do because of the debt ceiling.

Charles Krauthammer Friday, March 11, 2011

The relative ease of the fix is what makes the Obama administration’s Social Security strategy so shocking. The new line from the White House is: no need to fix it because there is no problem. As Office of Management and Budget Director Jack Lew wrote in USA Today just a few weeks ago, the trust fund is solvent until 2037. Therefore, Social Security is now off the table in debt-reduction talks.???

For decades it had been in the black, taking in more in FICA taxes than it sent out in Social Security benefits. The surplus, scooped up by the Treasury, reduced the federal debt by tens of billions. But demography is destiny. The ratio of workers to retirees is shrinking year by year. Instead of Social Security producing annual surpluses that reduce the federal deficit, it is now producing shortfalls that increase the federal deficit – $37 billion in 2010.

That’s what makes this administration’s claim that Social Security is solvent so cynical.President Obama is preparing the ground to demagogue Social Security right through the 2012 elections. The ad writes itself:Those heartless Republicans don’t just want to throw granny in the snow, they want to throw granny in the snow to solve a problem that doesn’t even exist!??? Vote Obama.

On Tuesday, Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia denounced Obama for lack of leadership on the debt. It’s worse than that. With Lew’s preposterous claim that Social Security is solvent for 26 years, Obama is preparing to lead the charge against entitlement reform as his ticket to reelection.

 Read More washington post content above

unholy alliance between the Democratic Party and public sector unions

Exposed to all voters is the unholy alliance between the Democratic Party and public sector unions, whose members are paid by taxpayers who make far less in compensation and benefits than those whom their taxes support.

Here’s how the cozy relationship between public sector unions and the Democratic Party works. You pay state and local property taxes; those taxes then pay the salaries and benefits of public sector union members, such as teachers. Automatically deducted from their checks are union dues. Those dues end up as campaign donations to Democrat candidates for public office. So even if you’re a Republican or Independent, your tax dollars are going into the campaign coffers of the Democratic Party. This is just plain wrong.

But this partnership between public sector unions and Democrats gets even sleazier: in effect, after winning office the Democrat sits across the table to bargain with the union. This is the same union who funded a large part of that Democrat’s campaign. Does this sound like a conflict of interest to any reasonable citizen? You bet it does. So the Democrat grants very generous pay and benefit packages to the union members in return for the union’s campaign contributions. Who ends up holding the proverbial bag? The taxpayer does.The consequence of this quid pro quo system is out of control spending that is ruining the fiscal health of states that can no longer sustain it. The unions are protesting because they fear the end of the gravy train compensation packages granted by friendly Democrats. The Wisconsin Democrat State Senators went in hiding because they feared the end of the gravy train campaign money supplied by taxpayers via the unions.

Do government workers really need a union? Of course they don’t. Former President Franklin Roosevelt didn’t think government workers should ever unionize when he said, “All government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining cannot be transplanted into the public service.” The reason former President Kennedy lifted the ban on government unions was traditional organized labor, the backbone of the Democrat Party, was beginning to lose membership. The plan worked for the Democratic Party.

In the last election, AFSCME – the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees union – gave $87 million to candidates, with 99.5% going to Democrats. “We’re the big dog,” said Larry Scanlon, the head of AFSCME’s political operations. “But we don’t like to brag.” The three major public sector unions spent over $171 million in the 2010 election plus an estimated $250 million equivalent value of volunteer activity. During that election cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, the National Education Association union donated 96% to Democrat candidates and the American Federation of Teachers 99.7% to Democrats. These are YOUR tax dollars my good friends.

In 2010, public school teachers in Wisconsin earned a combined $75,587 in total average compensation for nine months work – wages and benefits –according to figures from the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. They contribute a fifth of a penny on a dollar of wages to their pensions and one-fourth what private-sector workers pay for health insurance. I believe the time has come for a school voucher system, whereby the free enterprise system creates competition in our education system. Competition makes everyone better – all to the benefit of our children.

This Could Be The Single Largest Election Purchase In Our Lifetimes,And The Largest Redistribution of Wealth In History

When President Obama took office, he instructed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to begin buying up foreclosed homes. According to Stimulus Package Details, Fannie received another $200 billion influx of cash from the Stimulus Package.

According to Reuters, Fannie received an additional $8.5 billion to continue snatching up foreclosures in May of 2010. At the time, Rush predicted that President Obama’s end game was to turn all of the assets owned by Fannie & Freddie into Government Housing.

This past August, Hot chronicled details of the faltering mortgage giant receiving another $5.1 billion cash infusion from the Obama administration. Furthermore, the Associated Press reported that the Obama administration quietly announced that it was planning to turn the estimated 250,000 foreclosed homes that have been purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into Government Rental Housing.

President Obama could effectively nationalize the housing industry, making the Federal Government the largest landlord in the world, and completing the largest redistribution of wealth in history.

Foreclosing a home and allowing the current owner to rent at below-market rates would create another huge class of people receiving government benefits. or lowering mortgage rates for the poor.

With the expansion in food stamps, Obamacare and so forth the goal of the Left is clearly to get as large a percentage of the American people beholden to the government as possible as a preparatory step to his fundamental change.

So, everyone’s property taxes increase. Or services are forced to be cut. The municipality is forced to request State or Federal help.It is diabolical and I mean that word in its literal sense.

There’s another agenda here. Get Holder’s people from the ghetto to the burbs and then sit back and watch the havoc they create. More chaos to take advantage of.

Jaret Seiberg of the Washington Research Group:” a think tank bunch “To us, the most important takeaway from a recess appointment of Cordray is that the President could use this same maneuver to put a housing advocate in charge of FHFA.” Federal Housing Finance Agency.

“And why is that important? The Federal Housing Finance Agency is the regulator and conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. And the FHFA currently has an acting director, Edward DeMarco. If Obama replaces him with a ‘housing advocate’ via the same recess appointment process, here’s what might happen next, according to Seiberg:

Those people that went to the town hall meeting shortly after Obama was elected, inaugurated, saying, “Where’s my car? Where’s my new kitchen?” Obama is gonna say, “Here is your house! I have made it possible for you to stay in and afford your house.”

So it won’t matter who the Republican nominee is. It won’t matter whether our nominee says the government is screwed or not or we’re screwed. None of that stuff will matter. The polling data won’t matter. This will be the single largest election purchase in our lifetimes, and it coincidences with defense department cuts and so forth. So the bottom line is: It’s a political and economic gaining changer in a presidential election year.

It’s an election year and all that’s going to be reported is the intention. The compassionate intention of Obama to help people who have been screwed by predatory lenders to make their mortgages affordable. Whether it ever happens or not will be irrelevant in terms of the impact on the campaign. The way it will be reported is, “Obama cares!”

His intentions. His big-heartedness. “He wants to help.” And, if it doesn’t happen, you go to the old reliable: You blame the Republicans for standing in the way of it.

Obama’s Coup to Overthrow the Constitution * Read His Own Words

Obama creating a societal crisis which opens the door for his socialist revolution.

Obama openly complained that his job would be so much easier if he were President of China, able to issue orders without media scrutiny or challenges from other branches of government.

In July, he once again admitted that he found the idea of bypassing congress and the constitutional separation of powers “tempting”.

Only wannabe dictators find the idea of unilaterally implementing once’s will and whims without accountability “tempting”. Obama never talks about the constitutional limits placed on his power but with disgust, as in, “sorry I haven’t been able to implement the utopian agenda as quickly as I want, but that pesky constitution and the other two branches of government have been getting in my way.”

Obama wasn’t the only one expressing such sentiments. During the debt ceiling debate, several Democrats insisted that Obama should raise the debt limit by Executive fiat, falsely claiming that the 14th Amendemnt gives the Executive branch the power to ignore the debt ceiling imposed by congress.

In September, North Carolina Governor Beverly Perdue floated the idea of suspending the 2012 elections so congress could make whatever decisions they felt necessary without worrying about accountability to the voters.

Obama’s former director of the Office of Management and Budget Peter Orszag echoed the suggestion, saying:

…we need to counter the gridlock of our political institutions by making them a bit less democratic.

Lee DeCovnick warned at American Thinker:

…this was not a mistake, and the mask was purposefully and deliberately allowed to slip. This is classic Alinsky; the forbidden idea enters the public discussion, the liberal experts and analysts seriously debate the horror as if it were a reasonable, the public becomes increasingly insensitive to the outrageous nature of the idea, more experts add their weight to the idea, and suddenly a horror becomes cutting edge, an acceptable option for the elites to foist on the masses.

Though he had abused Executive orders in the past, Obama began seriously setting the stage for going around congress and imposing his agenda by Executive fiat during the “jobs bill” debate in September.

When the bill failed to pass in October, Obama declared that the American people “won’t take ‘no’ for an answer” and began pushing ahead to implement key portions without congressional authorization.

On the 24th, he announced his plan to abuse Executive orders to bypass congress on mortgage refinancing and student loans, calling congress “dysfunctional” and declaring that “we can’t wait.”

One News Now reported that Bill Wilson, president of Americans for Limited Government, was offering serious warnings about Obama’s behavior:

“The president now has decided that he can operate through executive order, without Congress…It’s particularly disturbing when you look at the fact that now, for three weeks, his key supporters and backers — including elected officials — have been urging him to basically ignore Congress and rule by decree.”

Wilson concludes by saying that as the president begins his “rule-by-decree tour” around the western United States, it will be important for watchdogs in Congress to ensure that he does not overstep his constitutional authority in a “wild attempt to gain votes.”

Columnist John Rossomando urged congress to grow a spine and “check our out-of-control president,” to no avail.

On October 25th, Obama announced:

…we can’t wait for an increasingly dysfunctional Congress to do its job. Where they won’t act, I will. I’ve told my administration to keep looking every single day for actions we can take without Congress…and we’re going to be announcing these executive actions on a regular basis.

He immediately issued several more Executive orders designed to bypass congress.

Unfortunately, House Speaker John Boehner seemed to view Obama’s abuses as a joke, telling radio talk show host Laura Ingraham:

“This idea that you’re just going to go around the Congress is just, it’s almost laughable.”

It wasn’t laughable. It’s DANGEROUS. When Obama couldn’t get “Card Check” through congress, he used the NLRB to advance the Big Labor agenda. When the people’s representatives rejected “Cap and Trade,” he turned the EPA into a channel for imposing the environmentalist agenda via regulatory fiat. When the DREAM Act failed, Obama began implementing it anyway by Executive order.

It’s becoming frighteningly clear how Obama treats the constitution he considers “flawed” when it gets in the way of all the things he believes that government should provide (at the expense of the rule of law and our liberties).

In November, Obama ramped up his “We Can’t Wait” campaign in earnest, testing a usurpation of the Legislative branch’s role of imposing taxes by trying to issue a tax from the Executive branch (which he later retracted).

Two weeks later, he issued another Executive order to spend $1 Billion dollars on expanding the healthcare workforce.

In December, Obama signed a spending bill and then unilaterally discarded whatever parts of it he didn’t like.

As 2012 began, the Associated Press reported:

Obama’s re-election year will focus almost exclusively on executive action.

…Obama will come out with at least two or three directives per week, continuing the “We Can’t Wait” campaign the administration began this fall, and try to define Republicans in Congress as gridlocked and dysfunctional.

Whatever Obama and his media parrots like to claim, the truth is that Congress was and is not “dysfunctional.” It’s working exactly as our founders designed it to. What Obama calls “gridlock” is actually what is known as “constitutional checks and balances.” Our founders designed the separation of powers in our federal government precisely for such a time as this, for such a tyrant as this, if only the Legislative and Judicial branches had the spine to assert their constitutional authority and hold the Executive branch in check.

Unfortunately, the impotent response Obama has received thus far has only emboldened him.

Barely a week into the new year, Obama defied the constitution to make ‘Recess Appointments’ while that Senate was still in session, including three appointments to the NLRB who are tasked with shoring up union support for Obama in 2012 by any means necessary, such as forced unionization to increase membership and dues which can be put towards campaign contributions.

Americans for Prosperity VP Phil Kerpen warns at PJ Media that Obama’s reelection strategy is to bypass congress and trample the Constitution:

…the Obama election strategy for election 2012 is to act as if election 2010 never happened, disregard the Republicans in Congress, and put the full force of the federal executive apparatus to work towards his reelection.

Eric Holder’s Justice Department is already blocking state voter ID laws from going into effect and preventing voter fraud.

Obama is bypassing congress to relax immigration laws so that ACORN will have as many illegal voters to recruit as possible.

There are rumors that Obama is preparing to bribe middle class voters with a massive mortgage refinancing program – by Executive order, of course. The agenda echos historical predecessors who enticed citizens into more dependency on a benevolent dictator.

Obama is deliberately implementing the Cloward-Piven strategy he learned as a “community organizer” for ACORN: hasten the fall of capitalism by recruiting so many people into government entitlement programs that the overloaded welfare state collapses under a flood of impossible demands, thus creating a societal crisis which opens the door for a socialist revolution.

There will continue to be more blatant constitutional violations, power grabs, bribes and illegal appointments as long as congress does nothing.

Steve McCann warns at American Thinker that Obama’s actions are eerily reminiscent of the World War II’s European despots he lived through:

I had to survive a war that was precipitated by those who were initially elected by the people in a democratic fashion. Yet once in power, they began to systematically usurp and overthrow the rule of law. Their lust for power led them to shred any written constitution or traditions as they systematically imposed new regulations, laws, and executive orders geared primarily to centralize authority in the government as individual rights and liberties were extinguished. In due course, they and their cronies became the government, as the people were powerless to stop them.

The people of Germany, the most advanced society in continental Europe, or Italy in the first four years of the 1930s, would have found it incredible to imagine what became of those countries by 1945. They would not think it even remotely possible.

The history of the United States and its traditions of liberty and individual freedom should be a bulwark against the successful emergence of people like Obama and his cronies. Yet why are the media, or the opposition party, or the members of Congress or the judiciary not shouting from the highest hilltop and taking action to stop these power-grabs? Has this country enjoyed peace and prosperity so long that everyone is jaded and preoccupied with him- or herself, or in a self-induced stupor either ignoring what’s happening or saying that these unconstitutional steps are minor? Is it because Obama happens to have black skin and everyone is too intimidated by political correctness to speak? Or is it as it was in Germany, Italy, and Russia among many — a belief that the worst could never happen here?

I have seen and experienced the worst that man can offer, I am not intimidated, and I will say without reservation that Barack Obama and his cronies have the same mindset in their tactical approach, philosophy, and lust for power that was extant in Benito Mussolini and the Fascists in the early days of their regime.

The Marxist organizers of Occupy Wall Street are already training activists in Alinskyite intimidation tactics in preparation for an all-out class war this spring, including European-style street riots. They can provide Obama with not only a media distraction and platform for Leftist talking points, but also an excuse for more Executive power grabs.

This is not merely a president running for re-election. This is a wannabe dictator abusing the powers of the Executive branch to seize more power, fill every federal department and agency with radical minions who will use their offices to advance his agenda, and bully his opponents into submission.

The Executive Branch is officially being “community organized” into a re-election apparatus for permanently installing a radical Socialist regime. If the military were involved, we would be correctly recognizing this as a coup.

If Obama succeeds in 2012, we could very well find ourselves “fundamentally transformed” into a Banana Republic which holds sham elections only to legitimize the ruling party’s grip on power. The constitutional republic our founders gave us will be gone.

There are four reasons to hope. First, the military is not on Obama’s side. Second, Americans are well-armed, outspoken, and are used to these two crucial freedoms (arms and speech) which they will not give up without a fight.

Third, Obama can’t control the flow of ideas and information. Social media, blogs and conservative news outlets are now beating the corrupt “mainstream” media channels which the Left has come to dominate. If we were facing the same propaganda campaign and power grabs prior to the internet age, the outlook would be far more bleak. But in today’s information age, alternative media sources abound. Is it any wonder that Obama tried to control the message via his infamous “fishy list,” the “Attack Watch” snitch site, and his own ‘Ministry of Truth’?

Fourth, the majority of Americans are now awake and actively opposed to Obama’s agenda. The Left could never have anticipated the emergence of the Tea Party, in which everyday Americans – many of which had never been politically active in their lives – rose spontaneously to confront their government over bailouts and other abuses and assaults against our liberties.

In order to beat such overwhelming opposition, Obama is forced to resort to using ACORN activists, union takeovers, illegal immigrants and the suppression of voter ID laws to steal the election.

Americans must actively engage and make sure he doesn’t succeed. Nothing less than the future of our republic is at stake.     .(by thoughts from a conservative mom)

Dictator-in-Chief: Obama’s Mask is Off

Obama’s Tyrannical Abuse of Power

How Team Obama Plans to Steal the Election of 2012

Will We Retire Obama – or the Constitution?

Congress Needs To Fight Back Against Obama’s Unconstitutional Recess Appointments

Racket that is going on in every single State that allows collective bargaining.

It seems that the insurance company that provided all the “so-called benefits” to the teachers was an insurance company owned and operated by the teacher’s union

. by Milton F Gregory Jr

Remember the violent and disgusting demonstrations over Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker doing away with the collective bargaining for teachers’ unions?

The results are in.Some school districts went from a $400,000 deficit to a $1,500,000 surplus as a result. Why?

It seems that the insurance company that provided all the “so-called benefits” to the teachers was an insurance company owned and operated by the teacher’s union

. Since they were guaranteed to get the insurance business from the teachers, and the State had to pay for it and not the teachers, they were increasing the annual costs every single year to become the most expensive insurance company in the state.

**Then the insurance company was donating millions and millions of dollars to their favorite (democrat) politicians, who when they got elected, guaranteed to keep funding the unions’ outrageous costs.

**In other words, the insurance company was a “pass through” for Wisconsin taxpayer money directly to the democratic politicians who kept the whole scandal going.

**Nice racket, and this is the racket that is going on in every single State that allows collective bargaining. No wonder the States are taking it away.

**Now that the State of Wisconsin is free to put the insurance contract out for bid, and lo and behold, they have saved so much money it has turned deficits into surplus amounts. As a result, none of the teachers had to be laid off, everyone got a raise, etc., etc., and the taxpayers of Wisconsin don’t have to pay more taxes to fund the union’s political ambitions.


The 10 PLANKS stated in the Communist Manifesto and some of their American counterparts are…

Capture red obama 2

Politicians who believe in the SOCIALISTIC and COMMUNISTIC concepts, especially those who pass more and more laws implementing these slavery ideas, are traitors to their oath of office and to the Constitution of the united States of America… KNOW YOUR ENEMY …Remove the enemy from within and from among us.None are more hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they are free…. Read the 10 Planks of The Communist Manifestoto discover the truth and learn how to know your enemy… Karl Marx describes in his communist manifesto, the ten steps necessary to destroy a free enterprise system and replace it with a system of omnipotent government power.

The 10 PLANKS stated in the Communist Manifesto and some of their American counterparts are… 1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes. Americans do these with actions such as the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management (Zoning laws are the first step to government property ownership)

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. Americans know this as misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State “income” taxes. We call it “paying your fair share”

. 3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. Americans call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.

 4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. Americans call it government seizures, tax liens, Public “law” 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of “terrorists” and those who speak out or write against the “government” (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process. Asset forfeiture laws are used by DEA, IRS, ATF etc…).

 5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. Americans call it the Federal Reserve which is a privately-owned credit/debt system allowed by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) another privately-owned corporation. The Federal Reserve Banks issue Fiat Paper Money and practice economically destructive fractional reserve banking.

 6. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State. Americans call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver’s licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.

 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan. Americans call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture… Thus read “controlled or subsidized” rather than “owned”… This is easily seen in these as well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture. Americans call it Minimum Wage and slave labor like dealing with our Most Favored Nation trade partner; i.e. Communist China. We see it in practice via the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two “income” family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920’s, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of population over the country. Americans call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public “law” 89-136. These provide for forced relocations and forced sterilization programs, like in China.

 10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production. Americans are being taxed to support what we call ‘public’ schools, but are actually “government force-tax-funded schools ” Even private schools are government regulated. The purpose is to train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based “Education” . These are used so that all children can be indoctrinated and inculcated with the government propaganda, like “majority rules”, and “pay your fair share”. WHERE are the words “fair share” in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26)?? NO WHERE is “fair share” even suggested !! The philosophical concept of “fair share” comes from the Communist maxim, “From each according to their ability, to each according to their need! This concept is pure socialism. …

America was made the greatest society by its private initiative WORK ETHIC … Teaching ourselves and others how to “fish” to be self sufficient and produce plenty of EXTRA commodities to if so desired could be shared with others who might be “needy”… Americans have always voluntarily been the MOST generous and charitable society on the planet. Do changing words, change the end result? … By using different words, is it all of a sudden OK to ignore or violate the provisions or intent of the Constitution of the united States of America????? The people (politicians) who believe in the SOCIALISTIC and COMMUNISTIC concepts, especially those who pass more and more laws implementing these slavery ideas, are traitors to their oath of office and to the Constitution of the united States of America… KNOW YOUR ENEMY …Remove the enemy from within and from among us.

In 2009  theDemocratic Socialists of America” released in its newsletter a list of 70 members of the U.S. Congress who are members of the organization. Get their names here


A vision of Hospice,10 beds or more to a room of seniors shipped in to die so Health Care costs are less?

Obama Just Doesn’t like Seniors

I have heard the president just does not like Seniors.( We know Hillary Clinton doesn’t) He thinks they are greedy, racists, and has no respect for them. (I thought we were the greatest generation) The seniors are the ones that worked and built this country thats being torn apart by a bunch of Radicals in the whitehouse. These people took the wealth earned by seniors and spent it.

The cost of living for seniors is way up.

Food – up,



home insurance – up,

phone service-up.

cloths up.


Taxi service – up

Obama is shuffling the paperwork but the bottom line speaks for itself. Seniors are losing wealth at the fastest pace in modern history.

“A lot of Seniors in Southern States like Georgia and Florida and all through the southeast and the southwest are dependent on air conditioning just to live. Politicians will be able to afford the rise in Electricity costs. But will a Grandmother in Florida living on Social Security and sitting in a 110 degree Apartment be able to.
Why if we are so worried about Pollution  government trying to bring in 12 million more low skilled poor workers to add to our problem. We send these Politicians to washington to protect us. AND THEY DON’T GIVE A DARN! Its always for something, or someone other than their own people. But it is just another scam by a tyranical Government. And a President that cares only about his own Ideology not our seniors.

Last week I got a letter from AARP saying that my plan would not change but new suscribers plan would. I remember it saying that aside what was no longer covered, these lucky subscribers would be getting HOSPICE coverage. Well I paid no attention until Yesterday when I went to a Florida Hospital someone I know had had a stroke two days before. He was being prepared to be shipped to a Hospice that evening.(An attendant said he felt he knew what was going on but could not communicate) He was being given Morphine several times a day. Yet he was not in pain. I wondered “why the morphine” There was no waiting to see if he would have any amount of recovery at all. How could there be when he was being given morphine. And now he was off to a Hospice.

And is a Government who can’t afford the Democrats health care bill( everyone of the democratic reps voted for it) going to do similar to us!I had this vision of Hospice 10 beds or more to a room of seniors shipped in to die so Health Care costs are less. Will this be whats coming with health care by Government.

You Bet it Will

When you want to help people, you tell them the truth. When you want to help yourself, you tell them what they want to hear.

Thomas Sowell