Category Archives: Seniors

Well!!Gang of 8 voted on what they call a Bi Partisan immigration bill that will destroy America if Congress passes it.

Posted on by
Don't Forget To Pay Your Taxes America

Don’t Forget To Pay Your Taxes America

After five days of debate over dozen of amendments, the Judiciary Committee voted 13-5 in support of the bill, with three Republicans joining the committee’s 10 Democrats. The legislation emerged with its core provisions largely intact, including new visa program.Senate immigration negotiators are targeting as many as two dozen Republicans for a show-of-force majority — which they believe may be the only way a reform bill will have the momentum to force the House to act.

Reform proponents are looking for votes far beyond the usual moderate suspects to senators in conservative bastions such as Utah, Georgia and Wyoming. The senators landed on the list because they’re retiring, representing agricultural states, anxious to get the issue behind the party, important to persuading skittish House Republicans or all of the above.

Senators and their immigration reform allies insist the goal of 70-plus votes laid out last month by   corrupt, immoral,  unconvincing,   dishonest  Gang of Eight leaders Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) is more than just attainable under the right circumstances — it’s imperative. The legislative strategy for passing a bill is based largely on the theory that an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote in the Senate is essential to getting it through the Republican-controlled House.

Vote this Gang of  dissipated, decadent, debauched,  phoney’s out of Office.
“Gang of Eight”–Lie that will end up being a multi-trillion dollar entitlement spending increase, with the burden falling on American taxpayers.Can Americans, by our own apathy, encourage their own destruction? The bill would create an end-run around federal law: individuals in the country illegally could receive legal status without having to demonstrate financial self-sufficiency.”??   And The long-term unfunded liability for Obamacare would grow another $2 trillion.”
The majority of illegals are from Mexico. look at the numbers – they make an average of $22,000 (no tax’s) and have an average of 2-3 kids. Citizenship means an automatic eligibility for food stamps, WIC, free school lunches, subsidized housing, Medicaid, free cell phones, SSDI if their back hurts, TANF cash, SSI cash, etc….
*At tax time in April, when 53% of Americans are paying taxes, the new citizens would be getting huge bonus checks that include all the money that they paid in during the year plus EITC and Child Tax Credits. ($22,000 no federal income tax) The 53% cannot afford more burdens to pay for. We already have 40,000,000 home grown welfare cases that we have to support.
Lawmakers are about to give the OK to millions more.We see that the systems we allow to shape our lives are camouflaged as serving us when in fact, we the people are the servants. It seems even the institutions and activist groups with altruistic beginnings are infiltrated by instruments of chaos or control.
“The impact of immigration on our public health is often overlooked”
The rapidly swelling population of illegal aliens in our country has also set off a resurgence of contagious diseases that had been totally or nearly eradicated by our public health system.

Don’t Forget To Pay Your Taxes America

Obama and the Democrats Howling for War With Syria. The Obama Puppet Pretends to oppose arming the Muslim rebel terrorists.

Posted on by

I WILL STAND BY MUSLIMS

By Robert J. AvrechI suppose we should not be surprised that Barack Hussein Obama is secretly running with the Syrian Islamists.

Afterall, it was Obama who insisted that the Muslim Brotherhood get front row seats to his first speech in Cairo. And, of course, it was Obama who threw Mubarak under the bus in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood. And it is Obama who continues to support the Jew-American-Christian hating Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian tyranny.

My friend Barry Rubin, one of the most astute observers and analysts of the Middle East, has written an important post about Obama’s secret support of Syrian rebels. Have no doubt, these rebels are just as bad, if not worse, than Assad, the human monster they are attempting to overthrow. This coalition of sharia-yearning rebels are fanatic Islamists whose ultimate goal is the genocide of the Jewish people, and the founding of a caliphate that is ethnically cleansed of all non-Muslims.

The United States is training and helping arm radical Islamist guerrillas who want a Sharia state in Syria, who believe Israel should be wiped off the map, and who may soon be murdering and oppressing Christians and other groups in Syria itself.

In a new development, as indicated by statements from Secretary of State John Kerry and other sources, the Obama Administration is not only arming but now training Syrian rebels. We know that the weapons are going to radical Islamists—both Muslim Brotherhood and smaller groups.

We don’t know from which groups these people now being trained militarily by the CIA in Jordan but the odds are that they are from radical Islamist groups including the Brotherhood. Finding out who is receiving this military training—which they are sure to use for other purposes in future—should be a priority in the national debate and in questions from Congress.

Since the U.S. criterion for weapons’ supply is only that the groups are not al-Qaida—the Muslim Brotherhood and other Salafists are acceptable—isn’t the training criterion the same?

In the 1980s the United States was convulsed by a scandal because the Reagan Administration was providing arms—through Saudi Arabia—and training to the pro-American Contra group in Nicaragua that were fighting against the Marxist regime there. It was alleged that the Contras participated in some torture and killing of civilians. Well, today the Obama Administration is doing the same strategy—with Saudi and Qatari help—in Syria, with much more likelihood of atrocities by those it is helping. On top of that, those being helped are largely anti-American and radical Islamist. Yet there is no serious concern being raised.

————————–

by jj

Today I heard senetor Graham from south carolina in his usual self-important way begging for help for the poor rebels whom Assad would be using chemical weapons against!!   What rubbish. He was joined by Democratic Senators from Oregan and Michigan all swaggering andPontificating the need for arming these terrorists.

This lie being peddled about the toppling of Middle Eastern leaders as being a good thing and in the name of democracy is an outright lie. These countries are falling into a system of total Islamic law and that is evil in itself. You cannot mix democracy and Islam as they are polar opposites, so using the guise of promoting democracy in the region is an outright lie.
This tradgedy is a direct consequence of Obama’s interference by sending bombs in America’s name to topple Egypt and Libya.for his beloved Muslim Brotherhood. It seems the only promise Obama has kept is to Radicle Muslims when he wrote “I will stand with them (Muslims) should the political winds shift in an ugly direction”. Wake up America!!

Immigration bill would grant 33 million new green cards in the first 10 years after enactment

Posted on by

NumbersUSA

BREAKING: Our Capitol Hill team has finished crunching the numbers of the new amnesty bill and found that the bill would grant 33 million new green cards in the first 10 years after enactment. Look for more details to come…

The 844-page bill filed by the Senate’s Gang of Eight is filled with so many waivers, exemptions, loopholes, and broken promises that it’s almost too much to keep up with. The most recent item that can be filed in the “broken promises” category has to do with back taxes.Some more digging through the bill has found that illegal aliens will not have to pay back taxes before applying for and receiving amnesty. Sec. 2101 of the bill describes the process by which most of the nation’s 11-18 million illegal aliens can apply for Registered Provisional Immigrant Status (including work permits).Under a subsection entitled “Payment of Taxes”, the bill states that illegal aliens will have to satisfy “any applicable Federal tax liability.” The next paragraph defines “applicable Federal tax liability” as any income taxes that have been assessed by the IRS. So, for those illegal aliens that haven’t filed a tax return, they won’t have to pay any taxes on any work they may have been paid for in the past.

Why is this important? For starters, when the Gang of Eight released their “framework” for immigration reform back in January, they said that illegal aliens would have to “pay back taxes” in order to receive an amnesty. The next day, Sen. Marco Rubio spoke on the Senate floor and said that illegal aliens would have to “pay back taxes.” Now that there’s a bill – there’s no requirement to pay back taxes unless the illegal alien has already been flagged by the IRS for owing back taxes.

We’re seeing this become a trend with the Gang of Eight. We were told there would be triggers. Now we know the triggers are meaningless. We were told there would be enforcement before legalization. Now we know it’s legalization before enforcement. We were told there would be an entry/exit system. Now we know the exit system excludes all land ports. What else will we learn in the upcoming weeks?

In light of this development, we’ve posted new faxes on your Action Board to send to your Three Members of Congress.

HOUSE TAKES DIFFERENT APPROACHHouse Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte indicated this week that he would take a much different approach on immigration than what’s going on in the Senate. He said there would be three pieces of legislation: 1) mandatory E-Verify, 2) a new guest worker program for agriculture, and 3) changes to the high-skilled visa program.The first bill was introduced today, and it’s a good one! Rep. Lamar Smith has reintroduced the Legal Workforce Act, H.R.1772, which would require all employers to use the E-Verify system. The bill is similar to the version introduced and passed by the Judiciary Committee during the last Congress but with a few modest changes.Rep. Smith’s bill would require most employers to use E-Verify within the first 6 months of enactment. It would phase it in for smaller employers over a two-year period. (The Gang of Eight’s bill takes 5 years to phase in E-Verify.) The bill also contains provisions that would close up a few of the known issues within the E-Verify system and allow employers to run current employees through the system.

We’ve posted new faxes on your Action Board to send to your House Rep. asking them to cosponsor the bill.

CHRIS CHMIELENSKI
Fri, Apr 26th

Obama tyranny

Mass immigration has decimated the poor and working class in america already — forcing them to compete dog eat dog style for jobs scraps against tidal waves of even poorer, low skilled and cheaper immigrants. wages have gone through the floor because of this insane policy.

Granting these people citizenship will overnight put 11 million more people on full welfare entitlement — america simply cannot afford this and the poor and working class are going to take a second hit because of it. Not sure how democrats have made this a ‘racist’ issue because its african americans who are going to take the brunt of these reforms and this mass immigration policy.

The American Public Stand Like A Deer In The Headlights

Posted on by

Obama tyranny

When will Americans say stop No more. I hear only silence while executive orders, signed in seclusion, override our constitution. Our lawmakers provide more restrictions than FREEDOM, with little thought to our pursuit of happiness. We are ruled by BUREAUCRATS and threatened by AGENCIES. Citizens are encumbered by restrictions, codes, regulations, fees, taxes, penalties, and prison. The private Federal Reserve and the global bankster Billionaires are handed trillions of tax payer dollars while in collusion with factors on Wall Street to destroy the foundations of our economy, and they face no penalty.And Our media fails to inform us.
We see that the systems we allow to shape our lives are camouflaged as serving us when in fact, we the people are the servants. It seems even the institutions and activist groups with altruistic beginnings are infiltrated by instruments of chaos or control.
What none of these so called surveys ask is what people think of allowing another 40-60 million third world immigrants in, in the next 10-15 years, because under existing laws (for “family reunions”) that is exactly what will happen if you legalize the 15-20 million illigals currently residing in the country.

On Fox business today we hear Obama is going to tax our 401k’s” of course like everything else it starts with  “ I am only asking the rich” and then we find out its the middleclass as well.Last year we heard about this scheme and most said “that cant happen”  Well now it has.

Can Americans, by our own apathy, encourage their own destruction?
By Frosty Wooldridge
When Do We Say “Uncle,” and Get A Life?
Are we hypnotized, or mesmerized? Can an entire civilization possess a death wish? Can Americans, by our own apathy, encourage their own destruction? Can American citizens be that stupid? Are our leaders that corrupt? Can Americans be that disinterested as the core of their values rots ?
Look around fellow Americans. You’ve got Muslims swearing-in on the Koran in the United States Congress. That book stands diametrically opposed to the U.S. Constitution. Those who follow the Koran expect to kill Jewish and Christian nations. The Koran states it emphatically.
Islamists expect to wipe Christians off the face of the earth! It’s the prime directive of those who follow the Koran to “convert or kill all non-believers.” And, yet the people of Minnesota elected a man who follows a religion bent on destroying Western humanity.
Are You Ready – Sharia Law Governing the U.S.A.?
If all 535 candidates for Congress were Muslims, and became U.S. senators and House members– they would dismantle our Constitution in a heartbeat and install Sharia Law. How stupid are we as a nation? How naïve? How bankrupt in our apathy toward Islam and its prime directive?
Additionally, how stupid our apathy toward massive legal and illegal immigration! How far will we allow our nation into this nightmare?

“To Serve Man”
Forty years ago, a movie narrated by Rod Serling, “To Serve Man” starred Lloyd Bochner and Susan Cummings. It depicted an alien space craft landing on earth. The head alien gave the people of earth a book. With a special beam, all diseases vanished. Crops grew in abundance. Humans grew fat and happy. Soon, the aliens gave humans free trips back to their home planet. The aliens gave humans a choice to stay on the new planet. Flights left daily. Amazingly, no one returned to earth — except more space ships for transport.
Where did they go, and what did they do?
Near the end of the movie, Susan Cummings ran up to Bochner with a horrifying look on her face. “What’s the problem?” Bochner asked. “This book,” she said, “To Serve Man, well, our best experts have deciphered it.” “What did they learn?” Bochner asked. Susan Cummings burst into tears, “It’s a cookbook!”
There are other provocative movies. Have you seen the current movie, “Children of Men?” Brace yourself and do that – then sit somewhere in silence, and think about the consequences.
Believe It, or Not – We Are Responsible For the Nightmare!

We Can Choose To Stop It – If not now, When?How far do Americans want to continue into this horror movie with a cast of millions of consequences including illegal aliens, violent Muslims landing in our country daily and an annual $700 billion trade deficit? Do you like watching diseases like TB, hepatitis and leprosy imported? Do you find it exciting to watch MS-13 gangs expanding all over our country? What about hospitals bankrupting, prisons exploding and education degraded to the Tower of Babel? Is it fun to watch your neighbors lose their jobs to outsourcing, offshoring and insourcing?
On top of that, our own Congress may insanely legalize up to 30 million illegals and jump legal immigration one hundred percent annually – to two million per year. This legislation increases by tens of thousands work visas that take jobs from Americans — and continues chain migration and anchor babies without pause.And still, the American public stands like a bunch of sheep in a pasture waiting to be slaughtered.
Americans remain as stupid and naïve as the humans in “To Serve Man.” Our nation adds 100 million people in 33 years with 70 million of them poorly-educated immigrants from Third World countries. Yet, the American public stands like a deer in the headlights.

Funding Pakistan, but Military Suspends U.S. Tuition Assistance

Posted on by

The disconnect in Washington continues. While warning us of increased security lines at airports, the TSA pushed through a $50 million deal to buy new uniforms. The USDA warned they will not be able to monitor the food you eat, but will forge ahead with its partnership with the Mexican government on food stamps. There’s also the release of thousands of illegal immigrants from jail by the Homeland Security department, which has posted more than 100 job openings this month alone.There’s the closing the White House to public tours, but they’re giving 139 staffers six-figure salaries! The list of hypocrisy in this government goes on and on, but this latest example of sequester hype may take the cake.

The Pentagon is cutting assistance for American troops! According to members of Congress, the Marines spent $47 million to help graduate 50,000 military members last year.That money represents just a tenth of a percent of the Pentagon’s budget.The Army offered similar assistance by giving $4,500 annually for courses and more than 200,000 soldiers participated in the program.

Here’s the hypocrisy of it all

We’re cutting these programs, but are still spending nearly $13 million on education aid in Pakistan! Where hatred against the U.S. is at record levels! That $13 million is just a fraction of the $370 million we’ve spent on all forms of nondefense aid to Pakistan in 2012, and another $1.5 Billion to Egypt. This administration is really missing a golden opportunity here with this sequester. Instead of acting like a two-year old and throwing a temper tantrum, laying people off, closing the White House, and making other big spectacle cuts, why not really look at where the money is going.Look at smart ways to meet the new budget requirements.

No one’s telling you to never spend another dime. We just ask that for once you spend that money wisely!

Obama has left us with an awesome feeling of depression when we look at the national debt and realize that he’s planning on “solving” that problem by taking whatever else he let us keep during his first four years

Read more: http://www.foxbusiness.com/on-air/willis-report/blog/2013/03/19/funding-pakistan-military-suspends-us-tuition-assistance#ixzz2OQZrwQq9

Now they want to kill the elderly when they come to collect the money due them in their old age.

Posted on by

Agendized bureaucrats and their minions in the medical community do not possess an inherent right to hasten that journey because they view us as a drain on the financial coffers of the State, or because stupid men believe the populations of the nations are responsible for cyclic weather change and floods and droughts. And, by reducing the population of the United States we will somehow make the world a better place. The sole purpose for euthanizing the elderly is to reduce the drain on a bankrupt Social Security and Medicare system. The government of the United States not only stole the Social Security Trust Fund to finance the Progressive Democrats Welfare State, now they want to kill the elderly when they come to collect the money due them in their old age.

hillary-in-blue-hijab-300x205

Bill Clinton was so concerned about AIDS that on Nov. 12, 1993 as Hillary’s Health Security Act was in its death throes, he suggested that a provision be added to the bill mandating a one-time screening for AIDS be done on all US citizens. Clinton also proposed having the CDC require every citizen with full-blown AIDS to be confined to AIDS sanatoriums until they were no longer contagious, or until they died. The sanatoriums were to be situated in sparsely-populated areas of the country. Upon admission, patients would be required to sign living wills with euthanasia previsions that could be triggered by proxy when their healthcare providers deemed them to be “terminal.” The AIDS provision Clinton wanted to add to Hillarycare does not appear to be in Obamacare. However, the same federal Health Board that will be charged with the responsibility of doing the cost analysis on the merits of keeping the elderly alive versus denying them lifesaving procedures will also be responsible for preparing a cost analysis on the value of keeping terminally-ill AIDS victims alive on the public dime.It’s interesting to note that the gay and lesbian population actively campaigned for Clinton in 1992 and 1996.  Just as- the elderly—the primary target of the Obamacare Health Board—actively campaigned, and voted, for Barack Obama in 2008.               , And try to convince the gay and lesbian community that, if Hillarycare hadn’t failed, most of them would be spending their final days in an isolated AIDS sanatorium somewhere in the Badlands. And the blue-haired seniors in Florida and Arizona may find that their next flare-up of irritable bowel syndrome, or their next broken hip, might land them in a terminal care unit of their local hospital where those who linger while dying go to die, instead of sitting around bragging about their latest hospital adventure at the assisted living center.

Obama_1_nose_in_the_air_cropped  Obamacare, which supersede all current health options (including those offered by private carriers) enacted into law, your signing a living will that requires all extraneous means be used to prolong your life will not save, or prolong, your life for one minute if the Health Board rules that you have exhausted your “healthcare options.” The Health Board will hold the power of life and death over healthcare recipients who are construed to have either terminal or catastrophic illnesses, or, if they are victims of expensive chronic illnesses that historically drain financial resources without healing the patient, the Board will have the right to deny procedures or surgery even though they may enhance the quality of life of the patient

The 15-member Obama Health Board was created under HR 1, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The board will gain its authority from HR 3200, The America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009. The board, which the legislation purports to be an advisory panel created to perform cost analysis of all phases of the stimulus plan is, in reality, a panel of physicians and healthcare providers whose role it will be to determine at what point it is no longer cost productive to sanction the use of taxpayer dollars to save the life of a patient who requires a surgical procedure, medical procedure or lifesaving medications to correct a medical malady that threatens the life of an elderly patient or someone with a catastrophic illness.

The American people—thanks to Hillary Clinton—now have a more complex understanding of how, by design, universal healthcare puts into place the foundation of regulations that will allow government to control not only the lives of the people, but their mobility as well. Universal healthcare provides government with the platform that will surreptitiously allow them to, ever so slowly, steal the liberty of the People under the guise of taking care of them.

Like Obamacare, Hillarycare also contained provisions to ration healthcare to the elderly and also to catastrophically-ill people whom statistics said would drain the finite resources of the public healthcare system and bankrupt it if caps were not placed on catastrophic care.The specific language that deals with the rationing of healthcare to the elderly found in The America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 (which was drafted in part by Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, brother of former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.

 

Massive fraud on the part of our nation’s leaders, who have plundered every cent of the Social Security Trust Fund

Posted on by

Massive fraud on the part of our nation’s leaders, who have plundered every cent of the Social Security Trust Fund and the surplus that was specifically earmarked 1983 by President Regan for the retirement of the baby boomers.”future Presidents knew and took the money regardless.
Public-issue, marketable U.S. Treasury bonds are default-proof, and that is the kind of bonds that the Social Security surplus revenue was supposed to be invested in. If this had been done, Social Security would be in fine shape today. But, instead of using the surplus Social Security revenue to buy such bonds in the open market,** the government chose to spend the money and issue IOUs to replace the spent money.*** These IOUs are non-marketable and could not be sold to anyone, even for a penny on the dollar. The government has the legal authority to declare these IOUs null and void.
Hasn’t Social Security been receiving surplus revenue ever since the 1983 payroll tax hike? Isn’t there supposed to be approximately $2.5 trillion in the Social Security trust fund? The answer to both questions is yes. But there is a problem. Every dollar of that surplus Social Security revenue has already been spent by the government.In a 1960 ruling by the United States Supreme Court, the court ruled that nobody has a “contractual earned right“ to Social Security benefits.
some did not take the language seriously because they thought it was probably unconstitutional. However, in 1960, in the case of Fleming v. Nestor, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of benefits to Nestor, even though he had contributed to the program for 19 years and was already receiving benefits In its ruling, the Supreme Court established the principle that entitlement to Social Security benefits “is not a contractual right.”
Obama has proved he has no use for the elderly and Hillary has been heard to say some deeply offensive comments on America’s elderly. Obama Care was never about us,it is about power for the progressive Democrats.as they speed to their Global Government.
The ruling class Progressive Democrat elites a have promised everything and delivered nothing but failure and economic slavery to our bloated leviathan called the U.S. Government

USA traitors have created the Social Security Totalization schemes

Posted on by

by Mark W Lowry

Carter ,Bush1, Bush2, and Obama have all worked to create a One World Government.

Did anyone ask Americans if they wanted a Global Government??? Carter was first President to sign totalization agreement in 1978 and future Globalist Presidents have secretly turned our country over to it. Our corrupt traitor elected officials are blaming hardworking Mainstream American Citizens for the Social Security Insurance trust going bust. The tragic destruction of the USA is the result of global government funding by our government and is not the responsibility of its citizens. The traitors need to take credit for their hard work to create the global government under control of the international moneyed families and their closely held global corporations.

That is what has bankrupted USA Social Security. The lie about a decrease in USA workers is a lie. Older workers are working much longer now because Social Security Benefits are not enough to live on. The elderly are taking jobs the teens used to take.

The illegals sit on their —  and draw the money. Many of them in the nation they came from. They only have to be here for a year and half to get benefits sent to Mexico (  totalization agreement with Mexico)   or any other country with a totalization agreement and pick up their dependent families as beneficiaries too. Chain migration, and the preposterous anchor babies of foreign citizens along with tourist-birth babies that provide citizenship status and Social Security benefits to people around the world under Totalization agreements has destroyed the USA financially, socially and legally.

The goose that laid the golden egg for multinationals is dying an agonizing death. There is no blood left in the USA turnip. Totalization agreements designed to provide multinationals with more profit are failures for the USA

Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:43 AM Subject: $2 trillion paid to foreigners in USA not discussed in pseudo debt debate. Additional global governance $trillions costs not discussed.To: The massive expense of welfare payments to illegal foreign mercenaries on our soil is the key to our indebtedness. USA traitors have created the Social Security Totalization schemes where we pay for Social Security Benefits now for workers from 21 nations.

We also pay for most of Mexico’s Social Security benefits. The annual expense was only $2.6 billion in 2002 to a reported 418,000 foreign beneficiaries outside the USA. Ten years later that amount sent to foreign nations must be well over $3 trillion a year.

The annual Federal debt is $14 trillion. There is a minimum federal expenditure of $2 trillion for all federal expenses related to housing, feeding, and protecting illegals and “legal” foreign citizens in the USA. Some comes from pseudo refugee programs and other open door programs that permit over 4 million people to enter the country each year legally. Another 4 million or so enter illegally.

The USA is permitting an invasion of over 8 million people each year to assure our nation is demographically destroyed. This enormous growth in illegal and legal residents as well as foreign citizens who are now provided USA welfare and Social Security benefits can not be sustained under any situation. The growth in beneficiaries is documented here: http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/chartbooks/disability_trends/sect01.html Note these numbers only reflect the primary beneficiaries and not all the dependent beneficiaries. For instance, one eligible illegal may have 10 children getting benefits. The 56 million number of beneficiaries now is a low estimate but reflects a 100 percent increase since 1970 when Carter started the Totalization Agreements. Cost increases after the 1983 Reagan Amnesty were dramatic.

By Marti Dinerstein September 2004

 

Examining a Lopsided Agreement with Mexico

By Marti Dinerstein

September 2004

 Since the late 1970s, the United States has entered into a series of bilateral “totalization” agreements that coordinate the U.S. Social Security program with the comparable programs of other countries. To date, 20 such agreements are in force. They have been financially beneficial to U.S. workers and their employers and the associated social security payments to foreign nationals have been reasonable. As such, totalization agreements have been non-controversial. Congress has never voted to disapprove one.

But the proposed totalization agreement with Mexico is profoundly different from prior agreements in four important ways:

1. One-sided.

Unlike the 20 existing agreements, a totalization agreement with Mexico would be one-sided. Its beneficial effects to U.S. workers would be miniscule compared to those received by potentially millions of Mexicans. It is expected that the totalization agreement with Mexico would:

Provide only modest tax savings for American workers and their employers compared to other totalization agreements.

Entice Mexicans to remain in the United States for the 10 years it takes to vest for U.S. Social Security (versus 24 in Mexico) in order to maximize their retirement income. The United States pays out far more to low-wage workers than they contribute to the system. In contrast, Mexico only pays out what was contributed, plus accrued interest.

Permit Mexicans to return home and have their spouses and dependents receive U.S. Social Security benefits they would not have been entitled to without a totalization agreement.

Permit partial Social Security benefits to be paid to those who worked in the United States as little as 18 months (six quarters).

Eventually compel the United States to pay out billions in retirement benefits to Mexicans for credits they acquired while using fraudulent Social Security numbers prior to obtaining legal status.

Lure even more Mexicans into the United States illegally in the hopes they would obtain amnesty, thereby making themselves and their families eligible to receive U.S. Social Security benefits once the worker returned to Mexico and reached retirement age.

2. Perversion of original concept.

The anticipated totalization agreement with Mexico is a perversion of prior agreements, calling into question the appropriateness of such a pact. The norm in existing bilateral totalization agreements assumes employees of corporations are asked by their employers to transfer to the other country for a specified period of time. Employees and employers in both countries have been contributing to their respective social security systems. The dual objectives of existing totalization agreements were to secure tax savings for the employees and employers of both nations by eliminating double taxation and to guarantee an old age pension to those who contributed to both social security systems by “totalizing” the years worked in both countries. Employees legally enter the partner nation with documents verifying they are authorized to work. Virtually all of the existing 20 totalization agreements are with developed nations whose social security retirement benefits are at parity with those in the United States, providing no incentive to stay and vest for U.S. social security.

In contrast, most Mexican workers entered the United States illegally, were not affiliated with a corporation, previously lived in poverty, and paid no social security taxes in Mexico. There is no benefit parity for American workers in Mexico as it takes more than twice as long to vest for Mexican social security (24 years vs. 10 years in United States) and the benefits are far less generous than those in the United States.

3. Most Mexicans here illegally. None of the existing totalization countries accounts for even 1 percent of the U.S. illegal population and jointly comprise only 4 percent of the total number of illegals. In contrast, over half of the Mexicans living in the United States are illegal aliens. The size of the illegal population from Mexico more than doubled in the last decade and now accounts for 69 percent of the U.S. illegal population. (1974)To adopt a totalization agreement with Mexico would put the United States in the ludicrous position of offering Social Security benefits to potentially millions of Mexican workers who showed contempt for our laws by illegally crossing our border and by fraudulently obtaining the Social Security numbers (SSNs) needed to qualify for old age and disability benefits.

4. Huge costs.

It is extremely difficult to estimate the potential long-term drain of a Mexican totalization agreement on the U.S. Social Security trust fund, but it has the potential to dwarf all the other agreements combined. Serious questions have been raised about the assumptions made by the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the rigor of its analysis. Inexplicably, SSA projected its estimates based on the totalization experience with Canada. The estimated number of Canadians living in the United States is 820,000 (vs. 9.2 million Mexicans).(1974) Given the fact that a totalization agreement would cover not just Mexican workers but also their spouses and dependents, it is highly likely that over time, potentially millions of people would receive U.S. Social Security benefits and the cost would be in the billions of dollars.

The Health Board will hold the power of life and death over elderly healthcare recipients

Posted on by

We dont have to take it anymore. The Obama election says “yes you do”.
Paul Joseph Watson
Thursday, June 28, 2012
The blue-haired seniors in Florida and Arizona may find that their next flare-up of irritable bowel syndrome, or their next broken hip, might land them in a terminal care unit of their local hospital where those who linger while dying go to die, instead of sitting around bragging about their latest hospital adventure at the assisted living center.

If Britain’s socialist healthcare system is a benchmark for what we can expect from Obamacare, hundreds of thousands of elderly patients face being euthanized through “assisted death” techniques designed to cut costs.
The idea that “death panels” would be introduced through Obamacare as a means of rationing healthcare was discussed during an Aspen Institute conference in 2010 when Bill Gates argued that money should not be spent on treating the elderly.
During a question and answer session, Gates implied that elderly patients undergoing expensive health care treatments should be killed and the money spent elsewhere.

Gates said there was a “lack of willingness” to consider the question of choosing between “spending a million dollars on that last three months of life for that patient” or laying off ten teachers.
“But that’s called the death panel and you’re not supposed to have that discussion,” added Gates.

However, Britain’s socialist healthcare system under the NHS has gone light years beyond death panels and actually introduced a method of “care” that actually has the intended effect of euthanizing patients.

In a recent exposé, Patrick Pullicino, a consultant neurologist for East Kent Hospitals and professor of clinical neurosciences at the University of Kent, revealed that of the 450,000 patients who die annually under the care of the NHS, 130,000 of them were on the Liverpool Care Pathway.
Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) is a process whereby a doctor identifies a patient who is likely to die and that patient is then heavily sedated while treatment is withdrawn, “including the provision of water and nourishment by tube.”
“If we accept the Liverpool Care Pathway we accept that euthanasia is part of the standard way of dying as it is now associated with 29 per cent of NHS deaths,” Pullicino
Thank You Hillary and Obama for pretending to care for what was called our finest generation.And advising aspirin instead of care and all the morphine they want!!! I believe You Progressives are monsters.
I wonder how this will work when Georgr Soros goes in Hospital (no care and all the Morphine he wants) I doubt it.Sadly, Hillary Clinton’s failed Health Security Act of 1993 offered a bureaucratic solution: rationed healthcare. Obamacare, which will supersede all current health options (including those offered by private carriers) is enacted into law, your signing a living will that requires all extraneous means be used to prolong your life will not save, or prolong, your life for one minute if the Health Board rules that you have exhausted your “healthcare options.

” The Health Board will hold the power of life and death over healthcare recipients who are construed to have either terminal or catastrophic illnesses, or, if they are victims of expensive chronic illnesses that historically drain financial resources without healing the patient, the Board will have the right to deny procedures or surgery even though they may enhance the quality of life of the patient.

Agendized bureaucrats and their minions in the medical community do not possess an inherent right to hasten that journey because they view us as a drain on the financial coffers of the State, or because stupid men believe the populations of the nations are responsible for cyclic weather change and floods and droughts. And, by reducing the population of the United States we will somehow make the world a better place.
The sole purpose for euthanizing the elderly is to reduce the drain on a bankrupt Social Security and Medicare system. The government of the United States not only stole the Social Security Trust Fund to finance the Welfare State, now they want to kill the elderly when they come to collect the money due them in their old age.

Obama’s 15-member Health Board, officially branded as the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Research,  ???? The verbiage in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. makes it appear that the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Research was legislated as an advisory panel to do cost analysis on all facets of the stimulus package.

Make no mistake about it. The Obama Health Board, or as it is legislatively known, the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Research, headed by death merchants the likes of Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel based on the vision of Dr. Robert Pearlman, the Chief of Ethics Evaluation for the Veteran’s Administration National Center for Ethics in Health Care, who was the visionary behind the notion that disabled veterans who do not want to be a burden to their families or to society, have the right to death with dignity through assisted suicide.

Pearlman authored his death protocol in 1997. For the remaining three years of the Clinton Administration, Pearlman’s 52-page end-of-life planning document, “Your Life, Your Choices,” not only became the basis for the living wills used by disabled military people but, it also became the framework for the federal regulation that now requires hospitals and other medical care facilities to pressure patients—particularly elderly patients—to sign Living Wills (i.e., euthanasia provisions   (This happened to me just a few months ago I was pressured to sighn and refused.)

 Today, in violation of the Hippocratic Oath, doctors regularly euthannize patients deemed to be terminally-ill. Among the list of terminal illnesses that can trigger the Living Will death-with-dignity provision is old-age.!!!

No right-minded person should ever sign a living will unless they have a penchant to prematurely expedite their exodus from this world. When you sign a living will, you are actually signing your own death warrant—and you are giving someone you don’t know the right to end your life when they see fit to do so. The argument of the pro-euthanasia crowd (whose primary goal is population reduction at both ends of the age corridor) is that people have a right to death with dignity.

There is no such thing. There is no dignity in death. Even in a roomful of people, death is a journey we travel alone. God, not a bureaucrat, appointed when that journey will begin for each of us.

additional on this topic shortly:

(This happened to me just a few months ago I was pressured to sighn and refused.)This line was added by me.