Message from Egypt, Yes to The American People, No To Obama

Grow Up Barak Obama  

Netanyahu. In its public posturing, the Obama White House may be playing it rather cool and calm in reaction to news that House Speaker John Boehner — without consulting or notifying 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue — invited Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address Congress. An Obama spokesman says the move is a “departure” from protocol, and neither the president nor vice president will meet with Netanyahu.

But privately, say inside sources, the administration is fuming over the Israeli leader’s plans to go before U.S. lawmakers in March regarding the possibility of stepping up sanctions against Iran. In fact,

One unnamed Obama official has reportedly threatened retaliation, saying Netanyahu will pay “a price” if he dares to appeal directly to the senators and representatives. (MY guess Valerie Jarrett jj )

these two 3.jpg 5 Valerie Jarrett is the most powerful figure in the White House, rivalling President Obama in the scope of her influence over the fate of the Republic. Her personal Secret Service detail attests to the importance of her role in our government – in a position that is unelected and unconfirmed by the Senate.

muslim brotherhood infiltrates obama adm  Reports on accounts in the Israeli media saying that the White House is outraged by the Israeli prime minister’s acceptance of Boehner’s speaking invitation, and that Obama intends to inflict payback.

“We thought we’ve seen everything,” a source identified as a senior American official was quoted as saying. “But Bibi [Netanyahu] managed to surprise even us. There are things you simply don’t do.

(I say: “What’s wrong with our Congress inviting an ally to speak.”)

“He spat in our face publicly and that’s no way to behave. Netanyahu ought to remember that President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.”    “How Presidential our little Dictator is.

obama and vallery In addition,a Fox News report says that President Obama has even gone so far as to directly warn Netanyahu not to get involved with the back-and-forth between the White House and the Congress over sanctions against an Iranian regime thought to be seeking development of its own nuclear weapons.

misssile-e1421867594235-635x357  Iran has built a 27-meter-long missile, capable of delivering a warhead “far beyond Europe,” and placed it on a launch pad at a site close to Tehran, an Israeli television report said Wednesday, showing what it said were the first satellite images of the missile ever seen in the West. It stressed that the missile could be used to launch spacecraft or satellites, but also to carry warheads.

It showed one photograph of a site near Tehran, which it said the West had known about for two years, where Iran was working on engines for its long-range missiles.

It then showed a satellite photograph of a second site, nearby, which featured a launch pad, with the 27-meter missile on it — an Iranian missile “never seen before” by the West. The missile is capable of taking a manned spacecraft or satellite into space, the TV report said.

The new Republican majorities on Capitol Hill have been considering harsher sanctions to put more pressure on Iran to back off its nuclear ambitions.

“Obama has threatened to veto such a bill, saying it could derail delicate talks over Iran’s nuclear program – and Netanyahu’s visit to Washington could give him an opportunity to further encourage sanctions legislation.”

smiley-laughing001

extraordinary criticism of the president’s “crumbling” foreign policy — blunt criticism coming from the editorial board of the left-leaning Washington Post.

The Post’s editorial of January 22nd blasted Obama’s so-called “partnering” strategy with nations where anti-American terrorists have sought safe havens, especially in Middle East countries such as Yemen, which has fallen into chaos.

The Yemen mess reveals the weaknesses of Mr. Obama’s “partners” strategy….

Unfortunately, the president’s cursory and formulaic description of his counterterrorism policies this week, following a year in which jihadist forces and terrorist attacks expanded across the world, suggested that he remains uninterested in correcting his mistakes.

no-obama-egypt-flag 

“Yes to the American People-No Obama “

hillary clinton you are not welcome in Egypt

 

Citizens of Egypt Depose Installed Rothschild NWO Czar Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood. Citizens of Egypt Depose Obama’s, Rothchild NWO Czar Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

McCain and Graham in egypt on thr wrong side

McCain and Graham in Egypt on the wrong side

John McCain, center, stands with Neo-Nazi leader Oleh Tyahnybok

CFA Member John McCain,center stands with Neo-Nazi leader Oleh Tyahnybok in the troubled Ukraine.

isis with McCain.jpg lrg

McCain with Islamic state?  and  Syria Free Army General Salem Idriss             right of McCain.

—Council On Foreign Affair’s McCain ~ Fomenting War In Libya

McCain Formenting war in Libya ?

mcCain Soros5

McCain’s long standing association with George Soros

McCain hUGGING sOROS oH THANK YOU FOR SAVING ME

cartoon your all good people right

 

Israeli TV shows ‘Iranian missile’ that ‘can reach far beyond Europe’

Satellite image shown on Israel’s Channel 2 news, January 21, 2015, said to show a new long-range Iranian missile on a launch pad outside Tehran.

misssile-e1421867594235-635x357 Iran has built a 27-meter-long missile, capable of delivering a warhead “far beyond Europe,” and placed it on a launch pad at a site close to Tehran, an Israeli television report said Wednesday, showing what it said were the first satellite images of the missile ever seen in the West. It stressed that the missile could be used to launch spacecraft or satellites, but also to carry warheads.

It showed one photograph of a site near Tehran, which it said the West had known about for two years, where Iran was working on engines for its long-range missiles.

It then showed a satellite photograph of a second site, nearby, which featured a launch pad, with the 27-meter missile on it — an Iranian missile “never seen before” by the West.

The missile is capable of taking a manned spacecraft or satellite into space, the TV report said.

It is also capable of carrying a conventional or non-conventional warhead “far beyond Europe,” the report added The TV report said the satellite images were taken by the Eros B commercial Earth observation satellite

 

 

As Comrade Obama laid out his “strategy” for dealing with ISIS the “vetted moderate” Free Syrian Army (FSA) — is now admitting that they, too, are working with the Islamic State.

by:   http://thefederalist-gary.blogspot.com/            PJ Media 

As Comrade Obama laid out his “strategy” for dealing with ISIS in Iraq and Syria, and as bipartisan leadership in Congress push to approve as much as $4 billion to arm the Syrian “rebels, it should be noted that the keystone to his anti-Assad policy — the “vetted moderate” Free Syrian Army (FSA) — is now admitting that they, too, are working with the Islamic State.

cartoon your all good people right  This confirms our reporting about the FSA’s alliances with Syrian terrorist groups here at PJ Media last week. The FSA, Nusra Front and ISIS have entered a tenuous allegiance of convenience to fight Assad-aligned forces in the badlands surrounding Arsal. “We are collaborating with the Islamic State and the Nusra Front by attacking the Syrian Army’s gatherings in … Qalamoun,” said Bassel Idriss, the commander of an FSA-aligned rebel brigade.

“We have reached a point where we have to collaborate with anyone against unfairness and injustice,” ??? confirmed Abu Khaled, another FSA commander who lives in Arsal.

Young, battle-hardened men around Arsal are joining the militarily successful, deep-pocketed Islamist militias in increasing numbers. ISIS “wanted to enhance its presence in the Western Qalamoun area. After the fall of Yabroud and the FSA’s retreat into the hills [around Arsal], many units pledged allegiance” to ISIS, Idriss said. “A very large number of FSA members [in Arsal] have joined ISIS and Nusra,” Abu Fidaa said. “In the end, people want to eat, they want to live, and the Islamic State has everything,” he said. (Daily Star of Lebanon)

isis army

isis obama wants to give  500000000 In April, the Obama administration again turned on the CIA weapons spigot to the FSA, and Obama began calling for an additional $500 million for the “vetted moderate” rebels, but by July the weapons provided to the FSA were yet again being raided and captured by ISIS and other terrorist groups. Remarkably, one Syrian dissident leader reportedly told Al-Quds al-Arabi that the FSA had lost $500 million worth of arms to rival “rebel” groups, much of which ended up being sold to unknown parties in Turkey and Iraq.

At the same time U.S.-provided FSA weapons caches were being mysteriously raided by ISIS and Jabhat al-Nusra, one of the senior FSA commanders in Eastern Syria, Saddam al-Jamal, defected to ISIS. In March, Jabhat al-Nusra joined forces with the FSA Liwa al-Ummah brigade to capture a Syrian army outpost in Idlib. Then in early July I reported on FSA brigades that had pledged allegiance to ISIS and surrendered their weapons after their announcement of the reestablishment of the caliphate. More recently, the FSA and Jabhat al-Nusra teamed up last month to capture the UN Golan Heights border crossing in Quneitra on the Syria/Israel border, taking UN peacekeepers hostage.  shocked

But the Free Syrian Army is not the only U.S.-armed and trained “rebel” force in Syria that the Obama administration is having serious trouble keeping in the “vetted moderate” column. . Earlier this week I reported on Harakat al-Hazm, which was the first of the “vetted moderates” to receive U.S. anti-tank weaponry earlier this year. Harakat al-Hazm is reportedly a front for the Muslim Brotherhood as well as Turkey and Qatar, its Islamist state sponsors. An LA Times article published this past Sunday from the battle lines in Syria where their reporter recounted a discussion with two Harakat al-Hazm fighters who admitted, “But Nusra doesn’t fight us, we actually fight alongside them. We like Nusra.” Read More . . . . .http://thefederalist-gary.blogspot.com/2014/09/moderate-free-syrian-army-in-alliance.html     Must See Video!

Embedded with Al-Qaeda in Syria: ISIS and al-Nusra https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFZhQ4u2Cbg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFZhQ4u2Cbg

cartoon al qada

scent of a traitorAmerica held hostage and afraid ?????

Hillary more of the same

 

Charges of crimes against humanity have been filed in the International Criminal Court against Obama for his activities with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt

obama muslim flag

Charges of crimes against humanity have been filed in the International Criminal Court against Obama for his activities with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt

This lie being peddled about the toppling of Middle Eastern leaders as being a good thing and in the name of democracy is an outright lie. This tradgedy is a direct consequence of Obama’s interference by sending bombs in America’s name to topple Egypt and Libya.for his beloved Muslim Brotherhood

It seems the only promise Obama has kept is to Radicle Muslims when he wrote “I will stand with them (Muslims) should the political winds shift in an ugly direction”. Wake up America!! Now it seems and we are reading Obama and Hillary had been arming Al-Qaeda.Obama seems to be Replacing pro-Western governments in the Middle East with Islamic extremist governments.Instead of bringing victory over the fascist forces of the Muslim Brotherhood, we now recognize that their infiltration is right up to the American White House, but we can’t say that.”

muslim brotherhood infiltrates obama admAmerica’s government-controlled media fail to report the truth, which is why many Americans research, self-educate and become citizen journalists in order to bring you the truth

According to Egyptian newspaper El Watan, a group of Egyptian lawyers has submitted a complaint charging U.S. president Barrack Hussein Obama with crimes against humanity at the International Criminal Court.

The complaint charges Obama of being an accessory to the Muslim Brotherhood, which incited widespread violence in Egypt both before and after the June 30 Revolution.

Along with Obama, the complaint reproduced by El Watan mentions several Brotherhood members by name, beginning with the leader of the organization Muhammad Badie, and other top ranking leaders such as Mohamed al-Beltagy, Essam al-Erian, and Safwat Hegazi, adding that “Obama cooperated, incited, and assisted the armed elements of the Muslim Brotherhood in the commission of crimes against humanity in the period from 3/7/2013-8/18/2013, in the Arab Republic of Egypt.”

According to the published text, the complaint begins by quoting Article 7/1 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court, titled “Crimes against humanity,” which is reproduced below:

Article 7

Crimes against humanity

  1. For the purpose of this Statute, “crime against humanity” means any of the following

acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against

any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:

(a) Murder;

(b) Extermination;

(c) Enslavement;

(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;

(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;

(f) Torture;

(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced

sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;

(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial,

national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other

grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international

law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime

within the jurisdiction of the Court;

(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;

(j) The crime of apartheid;

(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great

suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.

Next, the complaint shows how Muslim Brotherhood leadership violated some of the above definitions, for example, by torturing, mutilating, raping, and killing Egyptians in their “sit in” camps (first reported here), with a highlight on the role the Brotherhood played in inciting violence and the killing of peaceful protesters around Itthadiya Palace back in December.

Now that the Egyptian military has finally begun to neutralize Muslim Brotherhood terrorist bases, the so-called mainstream media are doing what they do best—twist reality to the Islamists’ benefit by casting them as innocent victims merely “holding vigil” only to be slaughtered, while calling for the prosecution of the military for “human rights abuses.” They essentially follow the pro-Brotherhood Al Jazeera’s lead of portraying these bases in Rab‘a al-Adawiya and elsewhere as peaceful “sit ins.”

What the mainstream media have failed to report is that for over two months in these “sit ins”—or more appropriately, mini-emirates in Egypt—many Egyptians have been tortured, mutilated, raped, and mass murdered in the name of Islam and/or Brotherhood rule. (Of course, this is unsurprising considering how the media also failed to report on the nonstop and heinous attacks on the nation’s Christian minority and its churches, all validated by Brotherhood leadership.)

Women are also easy prey in the Brotherhood camp. According to a recent report, they are being abused for refusing to have sex with Brotherhood supporters. One woman was reportedly tortured to death and another critically injured and hospitalized. An Egyptian organization concerned with female rights said it “will expose in the coming days the extent of the violations and crimes against humanity which our sisters have been exposed to by the orders of the General Guide [of the Brotherhood, Muhammad Badie] to coerce women to engage in sex-jihad, with torture to death for those who refuse.”

Here is another live interview with an Egyptian reporter who was kidnapped in Rab‘a, beaten, and told she must stay “because we need women for sex.” The logic behind the sex-jihad (or in Arabic jihad al-nikah) is that women are permitted to copulate with single, male Brotherhood protesters to help alleviate their sexual frustrations so they can focus on empowering Islam—which among the Brotherhood is synonymous with empowering the Brotherhood—without becoming too restless and possibly abandoning the jihad.

Then there are the corpses that are being found. According to journalist Ahmed Musa on Tahrir TV channel, one of the arrested terrorists confessed that Brotherhood leadership murdered more than 80 people who were either suspected of being police informants or were trying to escape the Brotherhood camps. The Brotherhood then buried the bodies in a mass grave inside Rab‘a. According to the arrested terrorist, the Brotherhood fears that, “if their camps are broken up, their crimes against humanity will be exposed and that the Ministry of Interior will take pictures of this mass grave and broadcast them to the world.”

Aside from these atrocities and accusations of atrocities, reports of general beatings were surfacing every day. The majority revolved around people working or living in Rab‘a, who were pressured to join the pro-Morsi protests, only to be beaten savagely for refusing.

Despite the many serious human rights abuses that took place under Brotherhood auspices, the only Western media ever to allude to any of this was an AP report that, after explaining how bound, dead bodies were found near Rab‘a and how many in Egypt insist it’s the work of the Brotherhood, immediately went into default mode by suggesting these could all be false allegations and, if dead bodies are being found, perhaps it’s the work of the military trying to frame the Brotherhood—exactly what the Brotherhood has been caught doing, killing their own supporters to frame the military.

Brotherhood exploitation of the media to garner sympathy is an old phenomenon. Years back, former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, discussing how Islamists often turn to violence when “dialogue” doesn’t go their way, said:

But when I see that you are firing at me, trying to kill me—well, I have to defend myself. Then the international news agencies go to these [Islamist] groups for information, and they tell them, “They are killing us, they are killing us!” Well, don’t you [news agencies] see them killing the police?! I swear to you, not one of the police wants to kill them—not one of us.

And now, as the Egyptian military disperses the Brotherhood’s terrorist camps, right on cue, the Western press is doing what it does best—skewing reality to the benefit of the Brotherhood.

Still, there is one positive side to all this. Because so many Muslim Brotherhood members and their Islamist allies had congregated in Rab‘a and elsewhere, turning them into mini Islamist states where Brotherhood rule was enforced—torturing, chopping fingers off, sexually abusing women, and murdering dissenters—we have gotten a glimpse of exactly what sort of state the Brotherhood sought to transform Egypt.

But just as it took several months before even Fox News told of the Muslim Brotherhood torture chambers—despite the fact that any number of Egyptian media had for months been disseminating pictures and videos of those tortured—no doubt it will take a while before news of the Brotherhood torture camps is ever disseminated in the West.

Update: Now that Egypt’s military has cleared out and is investigating Rab’a, buried bodies are indeed being found. So far, 28 bodies, most bearing marks of severe torture, including charring from electrocution, have been discovered — the handiwork of the Muslim Brotherhood.

When will Our U.S Leaders stop Barak Obama

Barack Obama gushed on national television after Morsi was elected President of Egypt. With the help of Obama. And oddly—or not so oddly—Obama continued to gush over Morsi while reports surfaced that the Muslim Brotherhood were setting up torture chambers for their political enemies, not to mention openly crucifying Christians!

America will burn, and all its inhabitants. Be assured, the day Dr. Morsi is touched by any hand whichever, and connected to whomever, by Allah it will be the last day for us. We will neither leave them, nor show them any mercyIn two separate criminal complaints, Egyptian lawmakers have charged Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton with conspiring with the Muslim Brotherhood.

According to one of the criminal charges, Hillary Clinton was found to be working with Obama’s ousted Muslim Brotherhood president Mohammed Morsi’s wife, Naglaa Mahmood, in attempting to overthrow the current leader of Egypt, General Abde. The complaint has reportedly been filed with Egypt’s Attorney General, Hisham Barakat. According to multiple Arabic sources (Al Wafd and Vetogate among them), this one is said to allege that the wife of Obama’s ousted President Mohammed Mursi not only admitted in an interview with Turkey’s Anatolia news agency that she sought to excite domestic insurrections to overthrow Abdel Fatah Al-Sisi but that she collaborated with Hillary Clinton.

Mursis Wife Friends with the Clintons since the 1980sAccording to Anatolia Press, Mahmoud said, “I have between my fingers, a treasure trove of secrets from the White House and Mrs. Clinton fears my wrath.” She said, “I will not speak about Huma Abedin”.

Multiple Arabic sources reported that Saad Al-Shater, the son of jailed Muslim Brotherhood deputy Khairat Al-Shater, told Anatolia that his father had the goods on Barack Obama and his administration’s collaboration with Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood.

One has to wonder why this madness is permitted to continue, with all of the crimes that both Obama and Hillary have committed, why in the world are they not arrested and tried for some of their many crimes?

obama arms alQada and the behead priest

blood on their hands benghazi http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-clinton-charged-muslim-brotherhood-conspiracy/#kZ5tpvefjOM0Gsl6.97

But this is just the tip of the iceberg.

 

 

20 Quotes By Barack Obama About Islam

obama muslim flag20 Quotes By Barack Obama About Islam

#1 “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam”

#2 “The sweetest sound I know is the Muslim call to prayer”

#3We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world including in my own country.”

#4 “As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam.”

5e00beb6-75ab-4374-b8c9-5f8fc817d8df@news_ap_org

#5 “Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance

#6 “Islam has always been part of America”

#7 “we will encourage more Americans to study in Muslim communities”

#8These rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings.”

islim will dominate front white house 2

#9America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles of justice and progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.”

#10 “I made clear that America is not and never will be at war with Islam.”

#11 “Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism it is an important part of promoting peace.”

#12 “So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed”

#13 “In ancient times and in our times, Muslim communities have been at the forefront of innovation and education.”

#14throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.”

#15 “Ramadan is a celebration of a faith known for great diversity and racial equality”

#16The Holy Koran tells us, ‘O mankind! We have created you male and a female; and we have made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another.’”

#17I look forward to hosting an Iftar dinner celebrating Ramadan here at the White House later this week, and wish you a blessed month.”

#18We’ve seen those results in generations of Muslim immigrants farmers and factory workers, helping to lay the railroads and build our cities, the Muslim innovators who helped build some of our highest skyscrapers and who helped unlock the secrets of our universe.”

#19That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”
#20 “I also know that Islam has always been a part of America’s story.”

https://seniorcitizenspublicsquare.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/shocked.gif

If the Internet becomes a public utility, you’ll pay more. Here’s why.

 

when your country is telling you no

Obama –  instead of banning are freedom, rights and taking our money,why don’t you just try leaving us the hell alone & see how that works out?

Obama’s Federal Communications Commission is in the middle of a high-stakes decision that could raise taxes for close to 90 percent of Americans. The commission is considering whether to reclassify broadband as a telecommunications service and, in doing so, Washington would trigger new taxes and fees at the state and local level.

The agency would like to make Internet service a public utility, placing broadband under Title II regulation of the Communications Act of 1934. This move would make broadband subject to New Deal-era regulation, and have significant consequences for U.S. taxpayers.

Under this decision to reclassify broadband, Americans would face a host of new state and local taxes and fees that apply to public utilities. These new levies, according to the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI), would total $15 billion annually. On average, consumers would pay an additional $67 for landline broadband, and $72 for mobile broadband each year, according to PPI’s calculations, with charges varying from state to state.

Proponents of broadband reclassification, including the left-of-center organization Free Press, claim that it would not result in higher taxes or fees. The recently extended Internet Tax Freedom Act, they assert, prohibits state and local taxation of Internet service. This is incorrect, however. The act does not apply to telecom-related fees.

Free Press and other broadband reclassification proponents also say the new taxes and fees can be prevented if the FCC designates broadband as an interstate service. A Progressive Policy Institute report explains why this also is incorrect:

“When the Commission previously considered the jurisdiction of Internet traffic, it determined that such traffic was ‘largely interstate,’ but ‘jurisdictionally mixed.’ States routinely tax jurisdictionally mixed services that are classified as ‘interstate’ for purposes of regulation. For example, wireless services may not be regulated by state public utility commissions, but they are subject to a host of state and local taxes and fees. In several states, interstate wireless revenues are subject to taxation.”

Late last year, President Barack Obama waded into this contentious debate. He called for the Internet to be treated like a public utility. Critics of Obama’s position point out this would reduce investment in infrastructure and lead to inferior service for consumers. Reclassifying broadband as a telecommunications service would also stifle innovation and restrict the openness of the Internet.

obama silly Change???

The telecommunications industry has invested more than $1.2 trillion on broadband infrastructure since 1996. As a result, roughly 87 percent of Americans have access to broadband. It would be foolish for government to discourage the significant investment required to maintain, expand and improve this infrastructure by subjecting broadband to circa 1930s regulation. Subjecting Internet service providers to such onerous rules would depress innovation and penalize Web users.

Not only would higher taxes and fees leave individuals, families, and employers with less disposable income, a wealth of research indicates it would be bad for the economy.

John Hood, former president of the John Locke Foundation, found that keeping state and local tax and regulatory burdens as low as possible fosters economic growth, when he analyzed 681 peer-reviewed academic journal articles going back to 1990.

“Most studies find,” Hood stated, “that lower levels of taxes and spending, less-intrusive regulation…correlate with stronger economic performance.”

Tax Foundation economist William McBride reviewed academic literature going back three decades and found, “While there are a variety of methods and data sources, the results consistently point to significant negative effects of taxes on economic growth even after controlling for various other factors such as government spending, business cycle conditions and monetary policy.”

In McBride’s survey of 26 studies, dating to 1983, he found “all but three of those studies, and every study in the last 15 years, find a negative effect of taxes on growth.”

The Federal Communications Commission is expected to make its decision early this year. After the more than 20 tax increases signed into law during Obama’s six years in office, the last thing American taxpayers need is a gusher of new taxes and fees triggered by bureaucrats in Washington.

really you still trust the government

 

When they say Path-to-Citizenship. They mean- Blanket Amnesty

https://www.numbersusa.com/resource-article/position-and-vocabulary

The Government has long since run out of other peoples money including yours.and yet, it’s still giving it away.,

these two 3.jpg 5 immigrant children

Controlled Immigration: Vocabulary 

  https://www.numbersusa.com/resource-article/position-and-vocabulary

When they say Path-to-Citizenship. They mean- Blanket Amnesty

When they say Immigration Reform  They mean – Uncontrolled Immigration

When they say. Border Security First They mean – Amnesty and More Illegal Immigration

Uncontrolled immigration does not fix America’s immigration system. We need instead a policy of controlled immigration to preserve the value of American citizenship, consisting of three key components:

Serious immigration security & enforcement measures.

A system of controlled legal immigration.

No amnesty.

Amnesty – No Amnesty, No Work Permits ,No Path-to-Citizenship, No Blanket Amnesty, No Illegal Immigration, Yes ,Security & Enforcement Yes, Border Security

12006104-dejected-entrepreneur American Jobs First

Amnesty

Any right to live and work in the U.S. granted by the federal government to an illegal alien or illegal immigrant: Every so-called “pathway to citizenship,”; without exception, is an amnesty.

An amnesty occurs when an illegal alien or illegal immigrant receives a work permit.

There are two types of amnesty: restricted amnesty and blanket amnesty.

Amnesty Overload

The catastrophic immigration-processing dysfunction that will be caused by uncontrolled-immigration schemes resulting in millions of fraudulent amnesties, as well as fraudulent legal immigration requests, being granted:

The Senate-passed uncontrolled-immigration bill would quadruple applications immediately.

The United States Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) is the agency that processes immigration applications, including amnesties. USCIS is widely acknowledged to be at or over capacity now. Like all government bureaucracies, USCIS can only expand capacity at a slow rate.

The Senate-passed, uncontrolled-immigration bill shifts the burden-of-proof from the applicant to USCIS. As a practical matter, this makes it highly likely USCIS will simply issue amnesties upon the flimsiest of evidence, such as a relative’s unsupported attestation that the applicant has been in the U.S. for the requisite period of time.

Pools of fraudulent applications include the illegal immigration since the cut-off date, the 9 million Border Crossing Cards that allow Mexicans who hold them to cross at will, and tens of millions of other visitor visas issued each year.

Blanket Amnesty

An amnesty without significant amnesty qualification restrictions or amnesty process restrictions (see restricted amnesty for definitions):

Almost all pathway-to-citizenship proposals are blanket amnesties.

Proposals that grant amnesty to a majority of illegal immigrants are blanket amnesties.

The Senate-passed uncontrolled-immigration bill contains a blanket amnesty, as did the 1986 immigration law.

Controlled Immigration

Immigration to the U.S. (both legal and illegal) that serves the national interest. The three key components are:

Controlled legal immigration

Immigration security & enforcement

No amnesty

Controlled Legal Immigration

Legal immigration to the U.S. by foreign citizens only in numbers and categories justified by the national interest:

Includes visas for spouses and kids, some asylee visas, some number of employment-visas for the most skilled, potentially even at higher levels than today’s.

Reduces the overall numbers of legal immigrants from today’s levels: increases in any immigration category must be offset by decreases of at least as much immigration in others, principally through eliminating categories (such as that for adult siblings).

Illegal Alien

A foreign citizen unlawfully present in the U.S., whether by unlawful entry or overstaying a visa.

Illegal Immigrant

An illegal alien permanently settled in the U.S.

About half of illegal immigrants first arrived by illegal border crossings

About half of illegal immigrants arrived lawfully, but overstayed their visas. (Note that these visa overstays are not “undocumented.”)

Illegal Immigration

Foreign citizens entering the country unlawfully or overstaying their visas with the intent of long-term residency.

Immigration Security & Enforcement (ISE)

The full suite of measures to stop and reverse illegal immigration (i.e., the result being more illegal immigrants going out than coming in)

The most important immigration-security-&-enforcement measures are

An enforced employment-eligibility check system, more and better border fence, (also increased border manpower) check-in/check-out system for 100% of foreign citizens entering & exiting the U.S.A, and credible threat of deportation.

Immigration security & enforcement first, before any amnesties can occur:

To insure the political system actually implements immigration security & enforcement as part of any compromise, ISE must be implemented prior to any amnesty (such as work permits) being granted to illegal immigrants.

National Interest

Protecting the value of American citizenship; the long-term well-being of American citizens:

Not the interests of foreign citizens who want to immigrate to the U.S., or of businesses that seek low-wage labor, or of national-origin lobbies or of other special interests.

No Amnesty

The ideal position on amnesty: granting no illegal immigrants the right to live and work in the U.S.

Obamacare- like Immigration Policy

The uncontrolled-immigration bill passed by the U.S. Senate in the summer of 2013 is a prime example.

It made promises that won’t be kept.

It was such an enormous bill that no one knew what was in it.

It imposed tasks on the bureaucracy that are beyond its abilities.

It proposed a comprehensive approach to what are discrete problems.

It created an artificial crisis where there was none.

Specifically, the bill entailed:

Uncontrolled increases in legal immigration to double present levels.

Blanket amnesty for nearly all 11,000,000 illegal immigrants already settled in the U.S., as well as an amnesty opportunity for millions more fraudulent applicants who would take advantage of bureaucratic meltdown in the immigration system.

A lack of guaranteed immigration security & enforcement measures, to stop and reverse illegal immigration.

No real triggers.

The Obamacare-like uncontrolled-immigration bill would not fix America’s immigration system. It would break it.

immigrants crossing border

Restricted Amnesty

The granting of amnesty to some fraction of illegal immigrants (well under half) based on some number of restrictions, both qualification restrictions and process restrictions.

Qualification Restrictions: are mostly common-sense restrictions on the number of illegal immigrants granted amnesty. Two significant qualification restrictions would be:

Being able to pass an 8th-grade English test by a near-term date and

Having first arrived in the U.S. after a certain date significantly in the past (more than just the two years provided for in the Senate-passed uncontrolled-immigration bill)

Other restrictions might be things like never having previously been deported.

Process Restrictions: are restrictions on how fast, and by what processes, an amnesty can take place. These include a careful series of steps, so that a restricted amnesty in theory does not become a blanket amnesty in practice. But they also include triggers related to immigration security & enforcement (ISE) implementation to make sure the political system actually implements ISE.

Triggers

Process restrictions that lay out milestones of immigration security & enforcement before a given step toward a restricted amnesty occurs.

Uncontrolled Immigration

Any combination of blanket amnesty, uncontrolled legal immigration, and high levels of illegal immigration.

Uncontrolled Legal Immigration

Legal immigration at levels, and by type, far above historical norms and contrary to the national interest:

Includes adult-relative (other-than-spouse) visas, the visa lottery, unjustified refugee and asylee visas, and non-critical employment visas.

The Senate-passed uncontrolled-immigration bill would double legal immigration to over 2 million per year the first decade.

Hillary more of the same

https://seniorcitizenspublicsquare.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post-new.php

 

Obama Administration erases known oil and gas reserves from the US inventory,

 

me lie.bmp I just changed the promise.bmp smaller Millions of acres of public lands will be closed to the public.

As the Obama Administration speeds up the land grab in the American West, and erases known oil and gas reserves from the US inventory,

Oil industry drive up the price of crude oil without too many repercussions from lawmakers. Oil is one of the most plentiful resources on Earth. Left to the free market, oil would be $20 per barrel—or less. That’s what happens under the law of supply and demand.

Executive Order creating the national monument bypassed public comment and peer review

The oil industry needed a little help  to remove the excess availability of oil from the “global inventory.” How best to accomplish that? In the United States? Convert oil lands into national parks or national monuments.

In fact, in Salazar‘s guidelines for converting “Wild Lands” into “managed lands,” mandates that any mineral wealth under the lands seized must be withdrawn from mineral entry. The lands must be closed to leasing, or allowing leasing under special circumstances with a special waiver. Mineral material sales are excluded. Exclude commercial permits for commercial or personal-use wood cutting. In other words,

The designation of “Wild Lands” will inhibit the ability of independent oil explorers to search, for or sink test wells in this growing number of designated areas, at a time when common sense dictates that we remove all barriers to domestic oil exploration, domestic oil drilling and increased oil refining. And on top of that, we need to repeal every nonsensical law on the books that requires—or encourages with a monetary award—converting food sources to energy when we need to keep food affordable (corn) and plentiful.

Placing more and more public land off limits to oil development specifically to prevent independent drillers from harvesting the oil this nation desperately needs is not only ludicrous, those in Congress who have allowed it to happen need to be removed from office by impeachment or recall and place in trial in federal court for malfeasance of office.

Presidential Executive Orders, Presidential Proclamations, Presidential Decision Directives are not binding as law on anyone—not even the employees of the Executive Branch. They are “advisories” from the boss of the Executive Branch to his employees. Nothing more.

The President of the United States has no legislative or judicial authority under the Constitution. He can’t write law. He can’t adjudicate punishment for violating laws. And, more important, Executive Branch bureaucrats who are elected by no one have no authority whatsoever by the stretch of anyone’s imagination, to “write law.” Congress writes the laws. All of them. No other body in the US government—not even the federal court system—has the constitutional prerogative to write law.

The judiciary weighs the application of law, and has the authority to vacate a law, but they lack the legal prerogative to rewrite them to make them “fit” the evolving needs of society—even though they do it all the time. Executive Orders and Secretarial Orders, in other words, are just so much “who shot John” unless Congress enacts the presidential or secretarial wish list into law. That generally doesn’t happen because the wish list is usually something members of Congress would get fired for if they enacted it.

The question is, why is Congress—on both sides of the aisle—not screaming in a voice loud enough to be heard on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue for the latest Obama land grab? It is, after all, their power Obama has usurped. And this at a time when Congress should be reducing its dependence on foreign oil. With no one in Congress publicly complaining, no one is sounding the alarm. Nor is the media in the United States talking about a new peer-reviewed paper published by Swedish geophysicist Nils-Axel Morner that warns the world that between 2040-2050 we will be in a new major “solar minimum”—a new Little Ice Age like the one the world experienced between 1350 AD and 1850 AD.

If you recall, the world is theoretically moving away from oil, gas and coal because, according to Al Gore’s Inconvenient Truth, “fossil fuels” cause global warming. So, as we continue to “board-up” America’s oil, coal and natural gas industries, the social progressive watermelons (green on the outside, red on the inside) who control policy in the United States, have succeeded in perpetuating the global warming myth to such a degree that the truth about global cooling never makes it to your morning newspaper or TV’s evening news.

Even though, since the embarrassing UN Summit On Global Warning during a series of blizzards in 2009 that took place in Copenhagen, Denmark that kept scores of global warming attendees from reaching the conference, the ecowackos now refer to global warming as climate change as they pretend their computer models that show the world is heating up when it is actually cooling are still correct by blaming the newest findings that the world is now cooling on—you guessed it—global warming.

That not only justifies Cap & Trade regulations which penalize the industrial world for global warming—which specifically is caused by solar flares on the Sun—but it justifies using taxpayer dollars to fund private companies (donors to the campaigns of Congressmen, Senators and Presidents) to find alternatives to “fossil fuel” energy sources as the government engages in the most massive land grab in the history of mankind. As the Obama Administration speeds up the land grab in the American West, and erases known oil and gas reserves from the US inventory, it replaces natural resources with costly environmentally neutral pseudo-resources that will never live up to the promises of the same ecoalarmists who, in 1933 stole America’s gold and silver-backed money and replaced it with worthless scrip.

You would think, by this time, the American people would have realized that whenever government pulls out the walnut shells, the politicians are about to steal real wealth and replace it with something very costly, and very artificial. It will always cost the consumer more and deliver less.

For example, the latest environmental energy scheme that is supposed to replace fossil fuel energy (now safely tucked away under the mantle of environmental correctness) is a US government’s partially subsidized project through an Australian company, EnviroMission, which has a contract to supply alternate energy to the Southern California Public Power Authority.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar just performed the first phase of the Obama Administration’s smoke and mirrors sleight-of-hand, issuing a Secretarial Order—3310—assuming mythical authority he does not constitutionally or legally possess, and through the issuance, establishing a new “land designation” of “Wild Lands” as a distinctly different classification than “Wilderness Areas” (designated by Congress). In point of fact, only Congress has that authority. Obama does not possess it, thus, he cannot transfer authority he does not constitutionally possess to a subordinate.

Secretarial Order 3310 will require the Bureau of Land Management to inventory all lands within their jurisdiction in order to ascertain which have “wild lands” characteristics. According to the Order, the Bureau must conduct such an inventory before it can authorize any project that might impair the “wild lands” characteristics of any land considered for mineral exploration or other forms of development. It is then that the definitions of what constitutions “wild lands” characteristics gets fuzzy.

And even though the Congressional designation of a national monument mandates that it cannot consume more than 5,000 acres, Secretarial Order 3310 says that “wild lands” areas “…must contain at least 5,000 acres of contiguous roadless Bureau of Land Management land, except that it may be smaller if it is adjacent to other federal lands which have been formally determined to have wilderness or potential wilderness value or…such lands included designated wilderness, BLM wilderness study areas, US Fish & Wildlife service areas proposed for wilderness designation, US Forest Service wilderness study areas, or areas of recommended wilderness, and National Park Service areas recommended or proposed for designation.” blaaa blaaa blaaa

Second, the land must contain “naturalness,” meaning it must appear to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, and any work of human beings must be substantially unnoticeable.” And finally, according to Secretarial Order 3310, the wild lands to be confiscated by fiat must present “opportunities for solitude.” Say, what? Just in case the land about to be stolen by the government does not meet the first two criteria, I guess if you feel “solitude” when you see it, it qualifies as “wild lands” even though it doesn’t qualify based on its physical attributes.

Because the reality of these national “monuments” is not the wealth of their majesty in the eyes of the beholders, but the wealth under the feet of the beholders. When vast tracts are found to contain enough mineral wealth to impact the global cost of that commodity—like oil and natural gas—the princes of industry need to find a way to eliminate the total sum of that newly found wealth from the “recorded” global inventory of available oil reserves. When it cannot be harvested, according to the rules established by the global elite, it technically isn’t available.

That is why the bureaucratic oil and gas bean counters insist that Venezuela has the world’s largest oil reserves with 2,980 billion barrels, Saudi Arabia with 2,670 billion barrels, Canada with 1,790 billion barrels and the United States with 210 billion barrels. According to the oil bean counters, 56% of all known oil reserves are in the Muslim Mideast, with 16% in North America—with most of that found in Canada (with Alaska construed in those estimates as “Canada”).

The three most recent oil and natural gas finds are in the United States, Alaska and along the Marianas Trench. The single largest oil find in the history of man is at the bottom of the Marianas Trench. That oil has been claimstaked by Exxon-Mobil in a joint IPO with China Oil. But the largest oil and natural gas deposits found thus far are in the United States.

The known oil reserves along the North Slope of Alaska and throughout the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge [ANWR]—and in areas about to be seized by the Dept. of the Interior— would supply 100% of the industrial and consumer needs of the United States for over 300 years without the United States buying one barrel of oil or one cubic foot of natural gas from any other nation on Earth.

The princes of industry and the barons of banking want the American people to believe we are dependent on foreign oil because we don’t have enough domestic oil to survive without a little oil from our friends. That, of course is a blatant, bald-face lie that only a politician could spew with a straight face to justify buying oil from our enemies. Taking the oil under the continent’s “national parks” and “national monuments” into consideration, the oil reserves in North America exceed the oil reserves in the Mideast.

 

ob finger 2 Stop Me If You Can.

 

 

 

 

 

 

When will the future not belong to those who kill in the name of Islam?

 

muslims-carrying-banners-declaring-islam-will-dominate-the-world-protest-at-the-visit-of-mr-wilders-to-the-uk

A backdrop to the massacre in Paris on Wednesday by self-professed al Qaeda terrorists is that city officials have increasingly ceded control of heavily Muslim neighborhoods to Islamists, block by block.

France has Europe’s largest population of Muslims, some of whom talk openly of ruling the country one day and casting aside Western legal systems for harsh, Islam-based Shariah law.

The situation is out of control, and it is not reversible,” said Soeren Kern, an analyst at the Gatestone Institute and author of annual reports on the Islamization of France.”

5e00beb6-75ab-4374-b8c9-5f8fc817d8df@news_ap_org “Islam is a permanent part of France now. It is not going away,” Mr. Kern said. “I think the future looks very bleak. The problem is a lot of these younger-generation Muslims are not integrating into French society. Although they are French citizens, they don’t really have a future in French society. They feel very alienated from France. This is why radical Islam is so attractive because it gives them a sense of meaning in their life.”

While not a complete safe-haven for al Qaeda-type operatives, Paris and other French cities have become more fertile places for Muslim extremists in the past decade. City leaders have allowed virtual Islamic mini-states to thrive as Muslims gain power to govern in their own way.

“There are no-go areas not just in Paris, but all over France, where they are effectively in control,” said Robert Spencer, who directs JihadWatch.org, a nonprofit that monitors Muslim extremists.
The situation is out of control, and it is not reversible,” said Soeren Kern, an analyst at the Gatestone Institute and author of annual reports on the “Islamization of France.”

islim will dominate front white house 2“Islam is a permanent part of France now. It is not going away,” Mr. Kern said. “I think the future looks very bleak. The problem is a lot of these younger-generation Muslims are not integrating into French society. Although they are French citizens, they don’t really have a future in French society. They feel very alienated from France. This is why radical Islam is so attractive because it gives them a sense of meaning in their life.”

While not a complete safe-haven for al Qaeda-type operatives, Paris and other French cities have become more fertile places for Muslim extremists in the past decade. City leaders have allowed virtual Islamic mini-states to thrive as Muslims gain power to govern in their own way.

“There are no-go areas not just in Paris, but all over France, where they are effectively in control,” said Robert Spencer, who directs JihadWatch.org, a nonprofit that monitors Muslim extremists.

They’re operating with impunity, apparently secure in the knowledge that authorities cannot or will not act decisively to stop them,” he said. “And with the universal denial and obfuscation of the clear motive for the Charlie Hebdo attack, they have good reason to think that.”

evil-angry-obama Obama at The UN “The Future Must Not Belong to Those Who Slander The Prophet of Islam”

 

obama silly  When will the future not belong to those who kill in the name of Islam? And when will the President make a statement about that at the UN?

The attackers who killed 12 people at the offices of the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo claimed to be members of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula in Yemen. Witnesses said they spoke perfect French, a strong indication that they are homegrown terrorists who received help from AQAP or another group.

Mr. Kern said the connection between the attack and the Islamization movement is that French jihadis are becoming bolder in trying to stamp out any criticism of Islam.

“What they are trying to do is shut down any sort of criticism of Islam, any sort of speech, cartoons, discussion, anything,” he said. “Essentially, the French government and the other European governments have lost control over the situation. It’s a snowball that is growing bigger and bigger, in particular over the past 10 years.”

Last year, AQAP put Charlie Hebdo editor and cartoonist Stephane Charbonnier on a “Most Wanted” poster for lampooning the Prophet Muhammad. He was among the 12 killed by hooded assailants firing assault rifles Wednesday morning at a weekly staff gathering.

The Middle East Media Research Institute reported that French jihadis on Twitter were openly chattering about how to retaliate against Charlie Hebdo for its comic book biography of Muhammad. One idea was to immediately start killing French nationals.

While French jihadis were plotting a wave of violence, Mr. Kern and the Gatestone Institute issued a report on the Islamization of France in 2013, and a follow-up in December.

The think tank, led by John R. Bolton, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said the country’s Muslim population last year reached 6.5 million, or 10 percent of its 66 million people. That makes France the European country with the largest Muslim minority.

Some Muslim activists gleefully predict that France will be a Muslim-majority country in the not-too-distant future.

obama-bows-to-saudi-king.jpg the same way that a dog will lay down before it's master The Bow seen round the world.

Created by Executive Fiat – a new “Obama Fund” Dump all you “savings” into government debt

First ObamaCare and now Obama Fund

large group we wont take it any more Seniors Hit Hard by Financial Crisis

Treasury rolls out a new savings plan without a Congressional vote

Hey, kids. Uncle Sam has a new investment offer for you. Even if you have several decades of productive work ahead—and thus a long investing time horizon—the White House wants you to consider a retirement plan that will invest in nothing but U.S. government debt.

Any financial professional who advised a young investor to avoid stocks and corporate bonds—and everything else except Treasury bonds—would be sued for malpractice. But asset allocation is merely one of the problems with the new “myRA” fund rolling out from the Treasury this month.

Seniors got screwed by the housing bubble Crash. then by the phony Fed Reserve 0% fund and now the Treasury rolls out a new savings plan called ‘Obama Fund’…

Collapsing home prices, tight credit, dwindling investment income a lethal brew.

12006104-dejected-entrepreneurCollapsing real estate values and an imploding Wall Street are making life uncertain for everyone, but seniors are being hit especially hard. The economic upheaval has shattered many seniors’ retirement plans and, even worse, has cut into the income of many of those who have already retired and has sharply reduced the value of most seniors’ primary asset — their home. Lenders are cutting seniors no slack, as a growing list of complaints to ConsumerAffairs.com illustrates.

U.S. households lost billions in interest income during the Fed’s near-zero interest rate experiment. Because they are often reliant on income from savings, seniors were hit the hardest. Households headed by seniors 65-74 years old lost on average $1,900 in annual income over the past six years, according to a November 2013 McKinsey Global Institute report. For households headed by seniors 75 and older, the loss was $2,700 annually.

With a median income for senior households in the U.S. of roughly $25,000, these are significant losses. In total, according to my company’s calculations, approximately $58 billion in annual income has been lost by America’s seniors since 2008.

Retirees depend on income from their savings for basic living expenses. Without that income, many seniors have taken on greater risk to increase the yield on their savings, or simply spent down their nest eggs. After decades of playing by the rules, putting off spending and socking away money, seniors have taken it on the chin. This strikes a blow at the core American principles of self-reliance, individual responsibility and fairness.

male-crying-100100961

Lost everything when my business failed and now, at 63, working two part time jobs and getting $563 a month in early retirement pay,” said Elwood of Sinking Spring, Pa., who also supports two family members.

Elwood’s situation became desperate when he was unable to complete a “short sale” of his home. In a short sale, the buyer pays less than the remaining amount on the seller’s mortgage. In some cases, lenders will forgive some or all of the difference but lately, banks have been squeezing consumers for every last cent.

Elwood said he found a buyer for his home but Chase Mortgage rejected the deal and began foreclosure proceedings.

The Forgotten Ones

The Forgotten Ones

With the Fed’s near-zero policy, households headed by someone 75 or older have lost $2,700 annually in interest income.

What happen’s to the investment when the Government defaults on the debt, With the most to loose I guess Seniors would loose all ???

First ObamaCare and now Obama Fund

obama silly Stop Me If You Can. I Will Do What I Want.

Remember what we have already learned over a century ago. Modern liberalism is the worst disease of all… it doesn’t merely get people killed, it takes down countries!

REMEMBER, the DEMOCRATS took over COMPLETE CONTROL OF FEDERAL SPENDING, at the end of 2006, and had control of BOTH HOUSES through October 2010. The ECONOMIC CRASH, that OBAMA cites, happened in late 2008, under a Democratic Congress’s watch. (Obama says DEMOCRAT POLICIES have only been effect for 4 years. Actually, that’s EIGHT YEARS.)

 

obama and vallery