The goal Democrat amnesty supporters is not to bring 11 million illegal immigrants humanely “out of the shadows,” but to turn them into voters.

rubio gang og 8

breitbart.com

A Politico cover story perfectly encapsulates the bizarre, insular world of the D.C. political establishment. The article purports to take readers behind the scenes of the strategic machinations of the Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) campaign

It is a fairly basic rule of thumb that campaign staffs should always make political stories about the candidate, not themselves. Barely 100 words into the story, however, the reader introduced to no fewer than three top aides to Rubio. Worse, the story is devoted to chronicling an allegedly brilliant trap the three had set for one of Rubio’s rivals.

Obviously, staff have a large role in developing and executing a campaign, but publicly this should always be subordinate to the candidate. Did the staff who leaked this story want to profile Marco Rubio or themselves?

Read the article, you’ll learn that was a rhetorical question.

Most political campaigns are surrounded by people who seek the limelight for themselves. On its own, this Politico story is part of a sad legacy of campaign advisors who try to use an election to raise their own personal profile.

This article, though, creates an entirely new chapter of the genre because it chooses to highlight a strategy that can only be described as inane. The “trap” supposedly hatched by the Rubio staff was to pick an arcane fight over technicalities of a bill that itself represents an existential threat to Rubio’s candidacy.

One of the biggest obstacles to Marco Rubio winning the Republican nomination was his decision to co-sponsor the infamous “Gang of 8” immigration reform bill. Written primarily by Sens. Dick Durbin and Chuck Schumer, the legislation provided a quick path to amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants with the barest fig-leaf of border protections far into the future.

Rubio took the lead on the effort just months after President Obama won reelection, at a time that the D.C. Republican party establishment was desperate to enact some kind of immigration reform. It represented a complete misreading of the public and, especially, the Republican base.

Just over a year later, Republicans would thunder into a Senate Majority, largely by campaigning against the very amnesty provisions contained in Rubio’s bill.

Recognizing that the amnesty legislation currently represents a challenge to Rubio’s ambitions, the Rubio campaign staff, according to Politico, has chosen to actually use this legislation against one of his chief rivals, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)

. Their “smoking gun” was an amendment to the Gang of 8 bill proposed by Cruz that would have allowed legalizing illegal immigrants but permanently blocked them from becoming citizens.

Politico sets the scene in Rubio’s headquarters when Cruz said during the most recent debate that he didn’t support legalization:

In that moment, Rubio campaign manager Terry Sullivan, top adviser Todd Harris and communications director Alex Conant recognized what they’d accomplished because they’d been planning this exchange all along. Not only had Cruz just contradicted his own statements from 2013, he’d used words that gave them the opening they had been wanting to turn their rival’s anti-establishment narrative on its head.

So, Rubio’s “trap” for Cruz was to compare his stated position to a hostile legislative amendment filed to a proposal he was opposing.

“This was an attempt by Cruz to kill the  Amnesty bill,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, co-author of the Gang of Eight bill said of Cruz’s amendment. “And there was no doubt at the time that Senator Cruz knew it would do exactly that.”

What Cruz understands is that the goal of Sens. Schumer, Durbin and other Democrat amnesty supporters is not to bring 11 million illegal immigrants humanely “out of the shadows,” but to turn them into voters.

Cruz’s amendment exposed that truth.

The particularly inane part of the Rubio staff’s strategy is that they are choosing to focus on complicated, inside-baseball legislative machinations around legislation that was sponsored by Rubio and hated by an overwhelming majority of Republicans.

Rubio’s campaign ought to focus on foreign policy and try to forget the Senator ever embraced amnesty in the first place. When the chief opponent of Rubio’s amnesty legislation, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) 80% publicly lists Cruz as an ally against amnesty, no one, other than a Politico reporter, is going to take seriously Rubios campaign’s spin.

If anything, the entire episode simply reminds Republican voters that Marco

Rubio did team up with Sens. Schumer and Durbin to push amnesty legislation.

In the 1980 primary, Ronald Reagan’s primary challenges tried to argue that he had supported tax hikes in the past or had been pro-choice on abortion. These weren’t really true, but rather based on creative reading of past legislative debates. Voters didn’t buy it, no matter how clever the challengers, or their staffs, tried.

Rubio’s weird attempt to blunt his own record on amnesty by claiming that Cruz at one time supported something like it seems equally doomed to fail.

Pollster Frank Luntz reported that Ted Cruz scored the highest positive ratings during the Las Vegas debate. Cruz didn’t really have any of the memorable zingers or one-liners that political pundits dissect. What he did have was composure and confidence, at a time that much of the public is filled with anxiety.

ted cruz bst flag

That anxiety is fueled in no small part by a feeling that the political class in Washington is out of touch and almost inhabits an alternate universe. A universe where a campaign to be the leader of the free world leaks its internal strategy deliberations to Politico.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/18/marco-rubio-staff-leak-inane-strategy-politico/

 

 

 

Admiral Fired For Leaking Obama Bought Mansion in Non-Extradition Country

scent of a traitor 2.jpg sm

Admiral Fired For Leaking Obama Bought Mansion in Non-Extradition Country

stunning new Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that one of the United States Navy’s top commanders was relieved of his command a few hours ago after he sent out an “email/posting” revealing that President Barack Obama was in the process of purchasing a multi-million dollar seaside luxury villa in the United Arab Emirates city (UAE) of Dubai.

According to this report, the Commander of the US Navy’s Carrier Strike Group 15, Rear Admiral Rick Williams, posted a “pointed” query on 8 January [since deleted] to the US Naval Institute’s “Readiness Kill Chain” “recipients/responders” list as to why Navy security and intelligence personal hadbeen dispatched from Naval Support Facility Thurmont (aka Camp David) to Dubai on what he termed an “Obama house hunting mission”.

Within 18 hours of Admiral Williams posting this query, this report continues, the US Navy’s Third Fleet Commander, Vice Admiral Nora Tyson, acting on direct orders from her Commander-In-Chief, President Barack Obama, fired Admiral Williams stating her action was “due to a loss of confidence in his ability to command” because of “allegations of his misuse of government computer equipment”.

Today journalists via email to provide more details about Admiral Williams firing, this report notes, the Pentagon failed to reply—but then began releasing “anonymous” stories to the US press that Admiral Williams had been viewing pornography on his computer.

To such an absurd claim that Admiral Williams (or any US Navy officer or seaman in fact) could view pornography on their computers, SVR analysts in this report note, is an impossibility due to the US Navy/Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI), which not only blocks such sites, but also requires each single user to log in with their own unique password and username and whose records are meticulously kept and reviewed on a daily basis (thanks to Edward Snowden)—and which one would logically think one of the highest ranking officers in the US Navy would surely be aware of.

As to the “Obama house hunting mission” Admiral Williams was making his query about before being fired, this report continues, SVR intelligence “assests” in the UAE identified it as being a luxury seaside villa located in the Palm Jumeirah development of Dubai being offered for sale at the price of $4.9 million (18 million United Arab Emirates Dirham), and which a deposit on it was made this past week by the Washington D.C. based global public affairs company Podesta Group.

Important to note about the Podesta Group, this report notes, is that its leader is Tony Podesta, who aside from being one of the most powerful oligarchs in the US, is a close personal friend of President Obama too.

Equally important to note about the Podesta Group’s purchasing of this Dubai luxury seaside mansion for President Obama, this report says, is that is being legally represented in this purchase by the equally powerful Washington D.C. based global law firm DLA Piper—both of whom have long been identified as being the nexus power brokers behind Saudi Arabia’s massive multi-million dollar “PR machine” operating behind the scenes corrupting the entire United States political establishment.

To if Saudi Arabia itself is behind the purchase of this luxury seaside villa in Dubai for President Obama this report doesn’t state—but to the cost of it being to high after it cost the job of one of America’s top Naval Commanders is beyond dispute.

Newspapers simply won’t publish letters to the editor which they either deem politically incorrect

america the beautiful

ORANGE COUNTY,FLORIDA

 For some reason, people have difficulty structuring their arguments when arguing against supporting the currently proposed immigration revisions.
This lady made the argument pretty simple. NOT printed in the Orange County
 Paper …..

Newspapers simply won’t publish letters to the editor which they either deem politically incorrect (read below) or which do not agree with the philosophy they’re pushing on the public. This woman wrote a great letter to the editor that should have been published; but, with your help, it will get published via cyberspace!
From: “David LaBonte”
My wife, Rosemary, wrote a wonderful letter to the editor of the OC Register which, of course, was not printed. So, I decided to “print” it myself by sending it out on the Internet. Pass it along if you feel so inclined. Written in response to a series of letters to the editor in the Orange County Register:
mulla
 Dear Editor:

So many letter writers have based their arguments on how this land is made up of immigrants. Ernie Lujan for one, suggests we should tear down the Statue of Liberty   because the people now in question aren’t being treated the same as those who passed through Ellis Island and other ports of entry.
Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out to people like Mr. Lujan why today’s American is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer. Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the United States, people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in New York and be documented. Some would even get   down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. 
They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad times. They made learning English a primary rule in their new American households and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home.
They had waved good-bye to their birth place to give their children a new life and did everything in their power to help their children assimilate into one culture. 
Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws to protect them. All they had were the skills and craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity.
Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out. My father fought alongside men whose parents had come straight over from Germany , Italy , France and Japan . None of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought about what country their parents had come from.
They were Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan . They were defending the United States of America as one people.
When we liberated France , no one in those villages were looking for the French-American or the German-American or the Irish-American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we carried one flag that represented one country. 
Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country’s flag and waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had sacrificed so much to be here. 
These immigrants truly knew what it 
meant to be an American. They stirred the melting pot into one Red, White and Blue bowl.
And here we are with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights 
and privileges. Only they want to 
achieve it by playing with a different 
set of rules, one that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their mother country. 
immigrants crossing border
I’m sorry, that’s not what being an American is all about. I believe that the immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early 1900’s deserve better than that for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising future generations to create a land that has become a beacon for those legally searching for a better life. 
I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those waving foreign country flags.
And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of Liberty , it happens to mean a lot to the citizens who are voting on the immigration bill. I wouldn’t start talking about dismantling the United States just yet.
(signed)
Rosemary LaBonte
KEEP THIS LETTER MOVING. FOR THE WRONG THINGS TO PREVAIL THE RIGHTFUL MAJORITY NEEDS TO REMAIN COMPLACENT AND QUIET!! LET THIS NEVER HAPPEN!! 
I sincerely hope this letter gets read by millions of people all across the nation!
really you still trust the government

Terrorists are Here And We Are Told More Are Coming

obama arms alQada and the behead priest

I am 73 and owned a Home in the New Orleans French Quarter at the time of Katrina. Crime was occurring unchecked for weeks.   I was able to sleep at night with a 38 snub nosed police special (perfect Gun for women and Seniors)under my pillow, and a small dog who barked when my home was approached by anyone day or night.

Thankfully I have never had to use that firearm. I can remember the fear, the thoughts of the door being kicked in, and being trapped with no means of protection. (A woman alone)

This small but effective firearm allowed me to have the confidence that I would not be a victim. I could at the least try and fight for my life.

Remember New Orleans was on fire people were being robbed or killed and my neighbors were on their own. Police and troops not only went to the flooded areas of the town and confiscated guns, but they also went to the high and dry wealthy parts of town and confiscated all of their weapons as well.  It left many of them without any means of self-protection at a time when rioting and looting was taking place.

27421988-sad-children-hugging-his-mother There was no justifiable reason to confiscate the guns from the homes that were not affected by the hurricane.  If anything, these people needed their guns to help insure their own safety and that of their families.  They used the guise of a state of emergency to carry out their disarming of the people.  I believe the liberal Democrats violated the Second Amendment rights of the citizens of New Orleans when they did. By disarming the residents, the police and National Guard left them at the mercy of thugs, looters and rapists. We know from the news that the police then left their posts and abandoned the city. So the only ones left with guns were mostly the criminals. 

San Bernardino shooting: OK-  So today I hear a TV News Person say “Can you imagine what it felt like to be trapped in that room with no way out “Yes I Can”

Terrorist’s are here and more are coming. I don’t care what Barak Obama tells us. The threat is growing and any thinking person can see our homes will be invaded next. Perhaps not today or next month but Black suited gangs of Muslim Terror and even more Crime will come to our neighborhoods.

gun-control.jpg obama

The theory that becoming a victim is morally superior to defending your family

 When They Come For Your Guns, You Will Turn Them Over

By Jim Karger 

Jim Karger is a lawyer who has represented American businesses against incursions by government and labor unions for 30 years

“When they come for my gun, they will have to pry it out of my cold, dead hands,” is a common refrain I often hear when there is a threat, credible or otherwise, that the US government is going to take their firearms.

And, when I hear this crazy talk, I agree with them openly. “You are right. They will pry your gun from your cold dead hands,” which I often follow with the question, “And where will that leave you except face down in a pool of your own blood [in] the middle of the street, just another dead fool resisting the State?”

This is not a question they are comfortable with, if only because the intent of their saber-rattling was to imply they would fight to keep their weapons, and win.

Nice fantasy. It’s not happening.

…they will take your guns, and no, all your Second Amendment bluster aside, you are not going to do anything about it.

If the federal government decides to disarm the public, and when the increasingly-militarized police force rolls down your street after a not-so-subtle request that you kindly turn over your firearms and ammunition “for the common good,” it will be nothing less than suicide by cop to do anything other than what you are told.

The militarization of US police forces is ongoing and escalating. Many cities and towns now own tanks, armed personnel carriers, even attack helicopters, and almost all are outfitted with military weapons not available to the general public.

note jj: (So slick when this administration threatens now to take away police heavy military weapons that they gave them.  Don’t believe it the progressives are crafty, sly and Machiavellian.)

And, it is not just your hometown cops who are getting new boy-toys. The military itself is buying up weaponry not just for use in the current or next scheduled war, but to deal with the likes of you, citizens who don’t seem to understand that the Bill of Rights has been overruled, and that specifically includes, but is not limited to, the right to protest and engage in civil disobedience.

Also ignored (as if it didn’t even exist) is the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 which generally bars the military from law enforcement activities within the United States.

Did you know that when Hurricane Katrina took aim at the city of New Orleans in 2005, the Democrats in power at the time used the opportunity to disarm the people of the area?
gun-confiscation-during-hurricane-katrina-gives-us-picture-of-road-ahead

Article 15 of the UN Arms Trade Treaty, if ratified, provides for foreign “assistance to implement the Treaty,” and mandates that nations who can provide requested support must do so if requested by member nations.

United Nations Vehicles in the U.S

And, they are not just arming cops and weekend warriors for domestic purposes. Active duty Marines are now being trained for law enforcement operations all over the world (of which the US remains a part) specifically to deal with civil uprisings, and the US government knows that civil uprisings are coming to a town near you just as soon as the fantasy of a healing economy is shattered, the US dollar fails, and unemployment goes to 30%+ in real numbers.

And, to you tough-talk with your AR-15 rifles and a few thousand rounds of ammo, here is the reality: they will take your guns, and no, all your Second Amendment bluster aside, you are not going to do anything about it. You are not going to take on a platoon of Marines with state-of-the-art automatic weapons and the best body armor you cannot buy protected by armed personnel carriers and attack helicopters unless you choose to die that day — You will either be in the country or out, and if you are in, you will stay in and you will comply.

That is your choice… for the moment.

————————————————————-

Stewart Rhodes
Oath Keepers
May 17, 2010We know that wholesale gun confiscation happened during Hurricane Katrina. We watched the Chief of Police of New Orleans declare on national television that “no one [no private citizen] will be able to be armed, we’re going to take all the weapons.” We watched an old lady being tackled in her own kitchen and disarmed.
There WERE Troops Who Refused to Confiscate Guns in Katrina

“rumor of martial law”
“our group”…”Constitution loving”
“it’s wrong, we shouldn’t be doing this”
“don’t worry, we’ll never ask you to do that”
“whoa, why are they using active duty soldiers here”
“big army” “82nd Airbourne”

Note that bill clintoon called OathKeepers “hatriots”..those adhering to the Constitution, not beating and/or murdering civilians to confiscate their firearms..

Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b45_1274215853#6pusrBDuib7VQVco.99

Ted Cruz Bio

ted cruz bst flag “There are some who believe that the path to Republican victory is to run to the mushy middle, is to blur distinctions,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said in January in response to a question about Romney. “I think that recent history has shown us that’s not a path to success. It doesn’t work. It’s failed electoral strategy.”

BIO

After graduating from Princeton, Cruz attended Harvard Law School, graduating magna cum laude in 1995 Referring to Cruz’s time as a student at Harvard Law, Professor Alan Dershowitz said, “Cruz was off-the-charts brilliant”

Cruz served as a law clerk to J. Michael Luttig of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and William Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United States in 1996.Cruz was the first Hispanic ever to clerk for a Chief Justice of the United States.1999 and 2003,

Cruz served as the director of the Office of Policy Planning at the Federal Trade Commission, an Associate Deputy Attorney General at the United States Department of Justice, , Cruz was an Adjunct Professor of Law at the University of Texas School of Law in Austin, where he taught U.S. Supreme Court litigation, from 2004 to 2009. Cruz has tried cases before the Supreme Court

cruz constitution We can trust Ted Cruz to follow our constitution. He is the most qualified to be President Left or Right. Cruz is someone that the left is going to try and dig up garbage on, because he doesn’t claim a strong alliance with any side, he plots the course he believes in.

James Carville:  Ted Cruz “the most talented and fearless Republican.He has no fear,Ted Cruz will eat their lunch”

Ted Cruz Vowed to Put strong Conservatives on the Supreme Court.       As examples, he cited Chief Justice John Roberts, an appointee of President George W. Bush, who rejected a challenge to President Barack Obama’s health care law in 2012, and Justice Anthony Kennedy, a Ronald Reagan appointee, who voted in 2015 to make same-sex marriage a constitutional right. Both cases were decided 5 to 4.

His goal? To match Democrats’ “nearly perfect record” of picking justices who vote reliably with their movement. “The Republicans have an abysmal record. We bat about .500,” he said  “About half of the nominees Republicans have put on the court have not just occasionally disappointed but have turned into absolute disasters.” His ideal contender would be someone who has refused to bow to pressure, rather than a “stealth candidate” without a demonstrable conservative record.

cruz a great service

The land-related provisions in the defense authorization. In his statement, Cruz criticized “self-serving politicians” for trying to “exploit” the annual defense authorization and called on colleagues to reject the current draft:  At a time where jobs are scarce and the federal government has removed billions of acres of land from productive use, Congress should not be restricting more than a half-million new acres. Four federal agencies — the Bureau of Land Management, the Forest Service, the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Park Service — oversee the acres owned by the government. The land-related provisions in the defense authorization angered national security experts and conservative groups alike.

Sen. Ted Cruz Blasts Obama’s Plan to Arm Syrian Rebels:  speaking on the Senate Floor where he blasted President Obama’s plan to arm Syrian rebels, many of whom are aligned with Al-Qaeda. Cruz said plainly: (2013)

“Number one, don’t arm al Qaida. Don’t arm those who hate us. Don’t arm those who want to kill us.”

Sen. Cruz indicated as many as “seven of nine” primary rebel groups in Syria are tied to Al-Qaeda, and he quoted from reports that the Al-Qaeda leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri had said one of the main rebel groups in Syria acts on his orders.

future must not belong to

 

     
     

 

 

 

Five Globalist Presidents have brought us to their hateful New World Order. All refused to close our southern border.

america the beautiful

Kit Daniels | Infowars.com

It’s time YOU take a step back, re-examine history, and STOP listening to the Mainstream Media it is Obama who has been accused of Treason by the highest levels in government, not you.

“America has switched sides in the war on terror under President Obama. Clare Lopez was willing to say what a few members of Congress have said in private, but declined to say on-the-record.”

It’s time people decide if they want their country back, or not. If they do, it’s time to stop headline reading and sound bite seeking. The time has come to get INFORMED, spread this to everyone you know, and tell everyone you see. If we wait, this country is lost. Congress are the only ones who can stop Obama, because even though Obama seems to think he has power over who gets in the country, Congress and ONLY Congress has plenary power over immigration.

NWO Presidents

Five Globalist Presidents have brought us to their hateful New World Order. Spreading the middle class wealth our forefathers fought and died for to nations that hate us. All refused to close our southern border.

Several of the same are running for the office of POTUS right now. In my opinion 3 are Bush, Rubio, and Graham

NO MORE TALK, TIME FOR ACTION!

The time to make a stand against Barack Obama has finally come. For seven years we’ve repeatedly heard, “Oh, Obama will never be able to do that, the people will stop him,” and no one has even lifted a finger much less stop him, but here and now, unless we want what happened in Paris happening on our doorsteps, killing our children, then the rubber has finally met the road, and the time to act has come.

morsi-gets-tanks1

Much of what I am about to write, you can see and hear you will find in the video at the end of this post. It is one of the most powerful I’ve ever seen. It is your DUTY as an American to enlighten yourselves on the FACTS.

If you, or anyone else around you suggests the words I speak in this post, or those that you hear in the video at the end sound treasonous, then perhaps it’s time YOU take a step back, re-examine history, and STOP listening to the Mainstream Media. Chief Justice William Douglass, the LONGEST sitting Supreme Court justice in this nation’s history said, “The RIGHT to revolt has sources DEEP within out nations history.” Besides, it is Obama who has been accused of Treason by the highest levels in government, not you.

damn-you-obama

The former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, General Michael Flynn, accused Obama of “knowingly and willingly arming ISIS.” Keep in mind that is an appointed position by the President, so that was one of his own turning on him. Then there’s 4 Star Admiral Lyons, Lieutenant General Thomas McInnerney, The former CIA Director, Former Assistant Director of the FBI, Former CIA agent Clare M. Lopez, who is now the Vice President for Research and Analysis at the Center for Security Policy and a Senior Fellow at The Clarion Project, the London Center for Policy Research, and the Canadian Meighen Institute, and if I’m not mistake General Valley has also, but don’t quote me on the last one. The point is, the list of people accusing President Obama of outright treason is long, and distinguished. Clare M. Lopez bluntly told the newspaper, World Net Daily, that:

America has switched sides in the war on terror under President Obama

cartoon your all good people rightClare Lopez was willing to say what a few members of Congress have said in private, but declined to say on-the-record.”

It’s time people decide if they want their country back, or not. If they do, it’s time to stop headline reading and sound bite seeking.

The time has come to get INFORMED, spread this to everyone you know and tell everyone you see. If we wait, this country is lost. Congress are the only ones who can stop Obama, because even though Obama seems to think he has power over who gets in the country, Congress and ONLY Congress has plenary power over immigration.

Again 5 POTUS Democrat and GOP all Globalist’s puppets. none closed the border none stopped illegal immigration or slowed legal uneducated of over a million a year. Nor did they do anything productive to stop the job run to oversea”. (jc)

NWO presidents.jpg 2

smiley-sign0085

James Madison, the Father of the Constitution, said:

“The ultimate authority resides within the people, and if the federal government ever got too powerful and overstepped its authority, then the people were to develop plans of resistance and resort to arms.”

Thomas Jefferson wrote:

“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was, and what never will be.”

jeb-bush-immigration New World Order Progressive ?

Rubio puppetRubio Globalist NWO  Puppet ?

 

Honor killing in America: DOJ report says growing problem is hidden in stats

America Under the heel of Liberalism

dawn of the muslim brotherhood

Given US immigration trends in the last decade — an influx from Middle Eastern and South Asian countries where honor violence is part of the culture — the problem will continue to worsen if authorities don’t identify and address it.

honorpic1.jpg

The estimated 27 victims of so-called “honor killings” each year in the U.S. don’t fit neatly into the FBI’s exhaustive Uniform Crime Reporting Statistics.

Hidden among thousands of nondescript murders and cases labeled as domestic violence are a mounting number of killings motivated by a radical and dark interpretation of Islam. Honor killings and violence, which typically see men victimize wives and daughters because of behavior that has somehow insulted their faith, are among the most secretive crimes in society, say experts.

“Cases of honor killings and/or violence in the U.S. are often unreported because of the shame it can cause to the victim and the victim’s family,” Farhana Qazi…

View original post 2,261 more words

Teaching children indoctrination to first graders or any students to be mindless change agents in their community

21173867-finger-pointing-to-angry-and-tired-little-girl-studyingTURNING 6 YEAR OLDS INTO PROPAGANDA MACHINES: COMMON CORE – See more at: http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/the-way-we-see-itour-blog/turning-6-year-olds-into-propaganda-machines-common-core#sthash.XjbJbENj.dpuf

If you were going to take over a country without using the military you’d probably do it through the media and the educational system. And that’s exactly what we’re experiencing. If it isn’t a take-over what is it? Total manipulation of children’s minds in classrooms; every magazine, movie, TV program, newspaper, and textbook is working on the rest of us with sustainable development dictates; land use plans, emergency management plans, law enforcement plans, food regulation, energy restrictions, legislative and legal decisions–all direct us and formulate public opinion to unquestioningly accept the agenda for the 21st century.

As I travel the nation speaking I am sometimes challenged by people who are paid to advocate for Smart Growth and Common Core, or the Wildlands Project or regionalization/globalization. These are the people who pretend that we’re crazy and they are the reasonable, sensible saviors of the planet. They’re often employees of non-profits, government agencies, and foundations. Even when they’re shown the facts they’ll still deny them.

A tactic I see often is that they’ll make personal attacks on me rather than address what I’m saying. These are people who are motivated by money, or by acceptance in their social group, or job security, or by a sincere belief that they must not look deeply into Sustainable Development because the end justifies the means. And the ‘end’ is the salvation of the planet, in their minds.

Many of these people are under 50. They have been indoctrinated.
Please take a look now at a Common Core textbook for 6 year old children. One thing you want to notice when you’re watching this short video is that the text directs children to play on people’s emotions when they are writing. The other thing to notice is that the examples used include fighting a land owner who wants to build houses on land that people have been using as a park (no explanation here, just emotion: anger), and the need to manipulate parents and others. Take a look.

This is Common Core. Common Core is Agenda 21. See video at: http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/the-way-we-see-itour-blog/turning-6-year-olds-into-propaganda-machines-common-core#sthash.5QKnrwF5.dpuf

Highlander Research and Educational Center in Tennessee offers this fun summer activity for kids:
“A Highlander tradition since 1985, Children’s Justice Camp returns this year with another chance for children ages 7-12 to develop a passion for social justice….”

http://highlandercenter.org/events/21/childrens-justice-camp/
– See more at: http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/the-way-we-see-itour-blog/turning-6-year-olds-into-propaganda-machines-common-core#sthash.5QKnrwF5.dpuf

A few vids against common core, all well worth watching: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGph7QHzmo8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYj-HDDrL4w http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0iYgcRRk5w – See more at: http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/the-way-we-see-itour-blog/turning-6-year-olds-into-propaganda-machines-common-core#sthash.5QKnrwF5.dpuf

Teaching children indoctrination to first graders or any students in other grades to be mindless change agents in their community is exactly how it is done in Communist China. It is all emotionally charged group think for the benefit of STATE CONTROL. –

27421988-sad-children-hugging-his-motherSee more at: http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/the-way-we-see-itour-blog/turning-6-year-olds-into-propaganda-machines-common-core#sthash.5QKnrwF5.dpuf

Has Domrose set himself the task of accomplishing what his father could not accomplish in the Second World War and Cold War—the military subordination of Russia?

obama in jail 2

http://www.stopwar.org.uk/news/what-has-putin-to-say-about-nato-putting-its-missiles-

We have the right to ask, says Putin, against whom is the NATO expansion intended? And what happened to the assurances made after the dissolution of the Soviet Union

No sane person could seriously assert that NATO’s missile shield circling Russia is intended to protect the West from Iran. Yet, that is exactly what NATO – the imperial American occupation army in Europe – tells the world.

the chemical weapons attack by western-backed anti-Assad forces which committed the crime, using chemical weapons to serve as a causus belli against President Assad. (admitted even by the UN ) Only the swift action of President Putin avoided a bloodbath in Syria in which NATO would have become willingly involved.

1_official_photo_domroese Comments by the German four-star general, Domrose who is supreme commander of the Allied Joint Force Command, one of Europe’s three NATO units in the operations leadership, amounted to an open threat of war against Russia.

25 years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, NATO mass’s tens of thousands of troops near Russia’s borders.

Washington and Berlin orchestrated a fascist-led coup in Kiev last February to install a pro-Western  regime. Now the NATO powers are pursuing the military encirclement of Russia, a policy that carries with it the very real danger of military conflict with a nuclear-armed power. Even sections of the German press that have been propagandizing against Russia for months describe the plan as a “provocative move against Moscow” ( Spiegel Online ).

We will establish a NATO rapid response force of between 5,000 and 7,000 men that can be deployed in two-to-five days to a region,” General Domröse said. “According to our plans, the rapid response force will participate in the major maneuver ‘Trident Juncture’ in September 2015 in Italy, Spain and Portugal. If everything goes according to plan, the rapid response force could be ready for deployment at the end of 2015.”

Only NATO states with the necessary high-tech military equipment and trained soldiers can participate in the NATO spearhead force, according to Domröse. Germany will assume a leading role.

Domröse’s family history makes his statements all the more sinister. His father, Lothar Domröse, fought in the Second World War as commander of a Wehrmacht company on the Eastern Front. As part of the rearming of the German military, he was accepted back into the army in 1956 and pursued a successful military career.In 1973, he became major general and commander of the Northern Army Group. In 1975, he took over the post of head officer of the commanding officers of the armed forces.

surrender If at first you don’t succeed try try again.

“We are planning,” he said, “that each of the six-to-ten nations will form the spearhead for a year and then be changed. According to the current plans, each cycle will have a lead nation, which will certainly include Germany at some point. But this highly mobile force must have access to a large-scale air force in order to reach operational zones quickly.”

obama muslim flagMaking available the required means of transportation was the greatest challenge for the NATO states, the general noted..

what has he done Guess who??

So now Has Domrose set himself the task of accomplishing what his father could not accomplish in the Second World War and Cold War—the military subordination of Russia?

Domröse and the NATO leadership are planning a new form of Blitzkrieg. The NATO conference in Wales earlier this year approved a plan to increase readiness to deploy military forces.

One immediate flaw in NATO’s latest assertion is that, given its total dependence on creating military conflict, reliance on their version of anything should be subject to intense scrutiny. With an estimated 50,000 plus troops in action (not counting CIA and US mercenaries), the question is whether sending 1,000 Russian troops into Ukraine is worth the risk to Putin who has consistently followed a diplomatic path while US diplomacy has been dominated by threats and bullying.

Putin Redefines Russia’s National Interests

After the  Gorbachev – Yeltsin years overseeing the dissolution of the USSR.  Putin addressed the Munich Conference on Security Policy in 2007.

During that speech, he redefined contemporary Russia’s national interests and its geopolitical concerns as he established himself as an independent, critical thinker with an international perspective – and, therefore, a threat to US dominion.   The speech is worth reading in its entirety and here are several excerpts:

Decrying a “greater and greater disdain for the basic principles of international law.   One state, first and foremost, the United States has overstepped its national borders in every way.”

In referring to “Russia’s peaceful transition to democracy.   Why should we start bombing and shooting now at every available opportunity?”

In referring to an earlier speaker,  “I understood that the use of force can only be legitimate when the decision is taken by NATO, the EU, or the UN. If he really does think so, then we have different points of view. The use of force can only be considered legitimate if the decision is sanctioned by the UN. And we do not need to substitute NATO or the EU for the UN.”

With regard to expanding NATO with missiles on Russia’s borders:  “It turns out that NATO has put its frontline forces on our borders  I think it is obvious that NATO expansion does not have any relation with the modernisation of the Alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe.  It represents a serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have the right to ask: against whom is this expansion intended? And what happened to the assurances our western partners made after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact?”

And lastly, Putin quoted the “speech of NATO General Secretary Manfred Woerner in Brussels on 17 May 1990. He said at the time that: “the fact that we are ready not to place a NATO army outside of German territory gives the Soviet Union a firm security guarantee“.

Hillary more of the same

ii added pics (just can’t resist)

President Obama actually threatened to shoot down Israeli war planes if they attacked Iran to stop its nuclear program

America Under the heel of Liberalism

obama muslim flag

In a report that’s likely sending shockwaves through the region, Middle Eastern news agencies are picking up a Kuwaiti newspaper’s report that President Obama actually threatened to shoot down Israeli war planes if they attacked Iran to stop its nuclear program.

Al-Jarida, an independent newspaper owned by a former president of the Kuwaiti parliament, reported that the Israeli government had made plans to attack Iran because it suspected the Obama administration had reached an agreement with the ayatollahs, according to the Israeli news site Arutz Shiva. Citing “well-placed sources,” Al-Jarida reported that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his top advisors had decided take military action, if necessary, to stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. The Israelis had not only developed a plan, but even engaged in experimental flights to make sure they could elude Iranian radar defenses, the report said.

However, the report said, an Israeli minister…

View original post 143 more words